Ce–Gd–La–Mg–Nd–Pr–Sm system

9 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 9); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental9
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
formation9

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Ce–Gd–La–Mg–Nd–Pr–Sm system (9)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
R5Mg41-18.1 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental[1] Hampl 2013
cites ref. 1972Pah
Table 6, p. 10, row 7
report
RMg-27.2 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental[1] Hampl 2013
cites ref. 1924Bil
Table 6, p. 10, row 5
report
RMg-13.1 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental[1] Hampl 2013
cites ref. 1972Pah
Table 6, p. 10, row 7
report
RMg-8 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental[1] Hampl 2013
cites ref. 1967Ogr
Table 6, p. 10, row 6
report
RMg12-14.1 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental[1] Hampl 2013
cites ref. 1972Pah
Table 6, p. 10, row 7
report
RMg2-11.4 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental[1] Hampl 2013
cites ref. 1972Pah
Table 6, p. 10, row 7
report
RMg3-18.9 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental[1] Hampl 2013
cites ref. 1972Pah
Table 6, p. 10, row 7
report
RMg3-17.8 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental[1] Hampl 2013
cites ref. 1924Bil
Table 6, p. 10, row 5
report
RMg3-14.9 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental[1] Hampl 2013
cites ref. 1988Nag
Table 6, p. 10, row 8
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. M. Hampl, C. Blawert, M.R. Silva Campos, N. Hort, Q. Peng, K.U. Kainer et al., Thermodynamic assessment and experimental study of Mg–Gd alloys, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 581, 166-177 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.07.042