Co–Cu–Zr system

37 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 18, model 19); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	18
model	19

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	19
phase equilibrium	18

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Co–Cu–Zr system (19)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1683	other: L + Co2Zr <-> Co23Zr6	L: Co 0.653, Cu 0.161, Zr 0.186	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 1 report
1633	other: L + Co2Zr <-> Cu51Zr14	L: Co 0.334, Cu 0.457, Zr 0.209	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 2 report
1628	quasi-peritectic: L + Co2Zr <-> Co23Zr6 + Cu51Zr14	L: Co 0.365, Cu 0.449, Zr 0.186	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 10 report
1600	other: L + Co2Zr <-> (Co,Cu)Zr	L: Co 0.499, Cu 0.036, Zr 0.465	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 3 report
1567	eutectic: L <-> L + Co23Zr6 + Cu51Zr14	L: Co 0.204, Cu 0.686, Zr 0.11	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 12 report
1567	quasi-peritectic: L + L <-> Cu51Zr14 + Co23Zr6	L: Co 0.057, Cu 0.904, Zr 0.039	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 11 report
1491	quasi-peritectic: L + Co11Zr2 <-> Co23Zr6 + A1(Co)	L: Co 0.865, Cu 0.046, Zr 0.089	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 13 report
1457	quasi-peritectic: L + L <-> Co23Zr6 + A1(Cu)	L: Co 0.084, Cu 0.914, Zr 0.002	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 14 report
1457	eutectic: L <-> L + Co23Zr6 + A1(Co)	L: Co 0.59, Cu 0.345, Zr 0.065	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 15 report
1423	quasi-peritectic: L + Co2Zr <-> (Co,Cu)Zr + Cu51Zr14	L: Co 0.197, Cu 0.452, Zr 0.351	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 16 report
1403	peritectic: L + (Co,Cu)Zr + Cu51Zr14 <-> Cu8Zr3	L: Co 0.168, Cu 0.479, Zr 0.353	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 17 report
1400	other: L + (Co,Cu)Zr <-> CoZr2	L: Co 0.269, Cu 0.073, Zr 0.658	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 7 report
1378	quasi-peritectic: L + A1(Co) <-> Co23Zr6 + A1(Cu)	L: Co 0.054, Cu 0.945, Zr 0.001	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 18 report
1342	quasi-peritectic: L + Co23Zr6 <-> Cu51Zr14 + A1(Cu)	L: Co 0.008, Cu 0.977, Zr 0.015	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 19 report
1332	other: L <-> A2(Zr) + CoZr2	L: Co 0.181, Cu 0.062, Zr 0.757	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 8 report
1318	other: L + CoZr2 <-> CuZr2	L: Co 0.076, Cu 0.257, Zr 0.667	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 9 report
1313	quasi-peritectic: L + CoZr2 <-> CuZr2 + (Co,Cu)Zr	L: Co 0.08, Cu 0.285, Zr 0.635	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 20 report
1288	quasi-peritectic: L + CoZr2 <-> A2(Zr) + CuZr2	L: Co 0.067, Cu 0.193, Zr 0.74	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 21 report
1266	quasi-peritectic: L + Cu51Zr14 <-> Cu5Zr + A1(Cu)	L: Co 0.002, Cu 0.932, Zr 0.066	model	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 4, p. 8, row 22 report

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (18)

Phase equilibrium, Co–Cu–Zr system
Property	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase composition	1023	(Co,Cu)Zr (Co,Cu)Zr: Co 0.0424, Cu 0.4523, Zr 0.5053	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 7 report
Phase composition	1023	(Co,Cu)Zr + Co2Zr + Cu51Zr14 (Co,Cu)Zr: Co 0.3835, Cu 0.1127, Zr 0.5038; Co2Zr: Co 0.5496, Cu 0.1185, Zr 0.3319; Cu51Zr14: Co 0.2089, Cu 0.5735, Zr 0.2176	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 8 report
Phase composition	1023	(Co,Cu)Zr + Cu10Zr7 + Cu8Zr3 (Co,Cu)Zr: Co 0.132, Cu 0.3637, Zr 0.5043; Cu10Zr7: Co 0.0445, Cu 0.5418, Zr 0.4137; Cu8Zr3: Co 0.0585, Cu 0.663, Zr 0.2785	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 10 report
Phase composition	1023	(Co,Cu)Zr + Cu8Zr3 (Co,Cu)Zr: Co 0.311, Cu 0.1842, Zr 0.5048; Cu8Zr3: Co 0.1079, Cu 0.6049, Zr 0.2872	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 9 report
Phase composition	1023	(Co,Cu)Zr + Cu8Zr3 + Cu51Zr14 (Co,Cu)Zr: Co 0.3365, Cu 0.1664, Zr 0.4971; Cu8Zr3: Co 0.1449, Cu 0.5711, Zr 0.284; Cu51Zr14: Co 0.1463, Cu 0.6279, Zr 0.2258	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 12 report
Phase composition	1023	A3(Zr) + CoZr3 + CuZr2 A3(Zr): Co 2.000e-4, Cu 0.003, Zr 0.9968; CoZr3: Co 0.1942, Cu 0.0495, Zr 0.7563; CuZr2: Co 0.0675, Cu 0.2628, Zr 0.6697	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 1 report
Phase composition	1023	Co23Zr6 + A1(Co) Co23Zr6: Co 0.7254, Cu 0.0781, Zr 0.1965; A1(Co): Co 0.9437, Cu 0.0374, Zr 0.0189	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 14 report
Phase composition	1023	Co23Zr6 + A1(Cu) Co23Zr6: Co 0.6209, Cu 0.1656, Zr 0.2135; A1(Cu): Co 0.0476, Cu 0.95, Zr 0.0024	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 15 report
Phase composition	1023	Co23Zr6 + Cu51Zr14 + A1(Cu) Co23Zr6: Co 0.4058, Cu 0.378, Zr 0.2162; Cu51Zr14: Co 0.2391, Cu 0.5411, Zr 0.2198; A1(Cu): Co 0.0069, Cu 0.9928, Zr 3.000e-4	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 16 report
Phase composition	1023	Co2Zr + Co23Zr6 Co2Zr: Co 0.5783, Cu 0.1097, Zr 0.312; Co23Zr6: Co 0.4454, Cu 0.341, Zr 0.2136	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 13 report
Phase composition	1023	CoZr2 + (Co,Cu)Zr CoZr2: Co 0.2652, Cu 0.0605, Zr 0.6743; (Co,Cu)Zr: Co 0.3119, Cu 0.1752, Zr 0.5129	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 3 report
Phase composition	1023	CoZr2 + CuZr2 + (Co,Cu)Zr CoZr2: Co 0.2294, Cu 0.0983, Zr 0.6723; CuZr2: Co 0.0806, Cu 0.2435, Zr 0.6759; (Co,Cu)Zr: Co 0.2228, Cu 0.2569, Zr 0.5203	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 4 report
Phase composition	1023	CoZr3 + CoZr2 + CuZr2 CoZr3: Co 0.1921, Cu 0.0424, Zr 0.7655; CoZr2: Co 0.2403, Cu 0.0884, Zr 0.6713; CuZr2: Co 0.0727, Cu 0.2533, Zr 0.674	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 2 report
Phase composition	1023	Cu10Zr7 + Cu8Zr3 Cu10Zr7: Co 0.041, Cu 0.5457, Zr 0.4133; Cu8Zr3: Co 0.0193, Cu 0.6963, Zr 0.2844	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 11 report
Phase composition	1023	Cu51Zr14 + A1(Cu) Cu51Zr14: Co 0.2303, Cu 0.5565, Zr 0.2132; A1(Cu): Co 0.0218, Cu 0.9763, Zr 0.0019	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 17 report
Phase composition	1023	Cu51Zr14 + Cu5Zr + A1(Cu) Cu51Zr14: Co 0.0754, Cu 0.7129, Zr 0.2117; Cu5Zr: Co 0.0413, Cu 0.7935, Zr 0.1652; A1(Cu): Co 0.0119, Cu 0.9853, Zr 0.0028	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 18 report
Phase composition	1023	CuZr2 + (Co,Cu)Zr CuZr2: Co 0.0435, Cu 0.2793, Zr 0.6772; (Co,Cu)Zr: Co 0.1722, Cu 0.3179, Zr 0.5099	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 6 report
Phase composition	1023	CuZr2 + (Co,Cu)Zr CuZr2: Co 0.0648, Cu 0.2614, Zr 0.6738; (Co,Cu)Zr: Co 0.2403, Cu 0.2508, Zr 0.5089	experimental	[1] Zhou 2022	Table 2, p. 4, row 5 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Chenyang Zhou, Haipeng Jin, Huakou Yang, Jinming Liu, Hang Wang, Bin Yang, Phase diagram, thermodynamic modeling and predictions of glass-forming range and ability in the Co–Cu–Zr system, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 588, 121615 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121615

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}