Co–Ho system

35 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 17, model 18); 1 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (12) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental17
model18
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction21
phase transition11
formation1
activity / EMF / Gibbs energy2

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
CoHo-09Jin.tdbS. Jin, J. Wang, L.G. Zhang, H.S. Liu, L.B. Liu, F. Zheng, Z.P. Jin, J. Alloys Compd., 477, 233-38(2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.0622530e3403cc340aadbf277f417c2618a37c3cb85d5af012ef13cfea1d0f18424viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1638.4LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.20011) + CO7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222) + CO3HO (x(Ho) 0.25)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1638.4LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.20011) + CO7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222) + CO3HO (x(Ho) 0.25)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1638.4LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.20021) + CO7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222) + CO3HO (x(Ho) 0.25)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1623.67FCC_A1 (x(Ho) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.06173) + CO17HO2 (x(Ho) 0.10526)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1623.59CO17HO2 (x(Ho) 0.10526) + CO5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.15385) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.15486)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1623.59CO17HO2 (x(Ho) 0.10526) + CO5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.15385) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.15476)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1623.59CO17HO2 (x(Ho) 0.10526) + CO5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.15385) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.15437)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1623.59CO17HO2 (x(Ho) 0.10526) + CO5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.15385) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.15437)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1619.63CO5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.15385) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.17375) + CO7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1619.63CO5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.15385) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.17374) + CO7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1619.62CO5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.15385) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.17318) + CO7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1619.62CO5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.15385) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.17338) + CO7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1604.05CO3HO (x(Ho) 0.25) + CO2HO_C15 (x(Ho) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.33357)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1604.05CO3HO (x(Ho) 0.25) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.33329) + CO2HO_C15 (x(Ho) 0.33333)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1427.13CO17HO2 (x(Ho) 0.10526) + CO5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.15385) + CO7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1170.63LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.74765) + COHO3_D011 (x(Ho) 0.75) + HCP_A3 (x(Ho) 1)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1170.63LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.7476) + COHO3_D011 (x(Ho) 0.75) + HCP_A3 (x(Ho) 1)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1170.63LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.74761) + COHO3_D011 (x(Ho) 0.75) + HCP_A3 (x(Ho) 1)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1170.63LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.74768) + COHO3_D011 (x(Ho) 0.75) + HCP_A3 (x(Ho) 1)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1170.63LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.74771) + COHO3_D011 (x(Ho) 0.75) + HCP_A3 (x(Ho) 1)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1062.27LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.63117) + CO7HO12 (x(Ho) 0.63158) + COHO3_D011 (x(Ho) 0.75)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1062.27LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.63114) + CO7HO12 (x(Ho) 0.63158) + COHO3_D011 (x(Ho) 0.75)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1062.27LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.63136) + CO7HO12 (x(Ho) 0.63158) + COHO3_D011 (x(Ho) 0.75)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1059.98CO2HO_C15 (x(Ho) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.61407) + CO7HO12 (x(Ho) 0.63158)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1059.98CO2HO_C15 (x(Ho) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.61414) + CO7HO12 (x(Ho) 0.63158)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1059.98CO2HO_C15 (x(Ho) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.61388) + CO7HO12 (x(Ho) 0.63158)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb1032.1CO2HO_C15 (x(Ho) 0.33333) + CO3HO4 (x(Ho) 0.57143) + CO7HO12 (x(Ho) 0.63158)
CoHo-09Jin.tdb694.99FCC_A1 (x(Ho) 0) + HCP_A3 (x(Ho) 0) + CO17HO2 (x(Ho) 0.10526)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Co–Ho system (21)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1703peritectic: L + BCC_A1 -> HCP_A3L: Ho 0.98model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 1
report
1638peritectic: L + Co3Ho -> Co2Ho7Co3Ho: Ho 0.25; Co2Ho7: Ho 0.777778experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Buschow 1969 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 16
report
1637peritectic: L + Co3Ho -> Co2Ho7L: Ho 0.2008; Co3Ho: Ho 0.25; Co2Ho7: Ho 0.777778model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 17
report
1628peritectic: L + Co17Ho2 -> Co5.5HoCo17Ho2: Ho 0.105263; Co5.5Ho: Ho 0.153846experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Buschow 1969 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 20
report
1623peritectic: L + Co17Ho2 -> Co5.5HoL: Ho 0.1548; Co17Ho2: Ho 0.105263; Co5.5Ho: Ho 0.153846model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 21
report
1623eutectic: L -> Co17Ho2 + FCC_A1L: Ho 0.062; Co17Ho2: Ho 0.105263model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 27
report
1618eutectic: L -> Co7Ho2 + Co5.5HoL: Ho 0.1738; Co7Ho2: Ho 0.222222; Co5.5Ho: Ho 0.153846model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 19
report
1618eutectic: L -> Co17Ho2 + FCC_A1L: Ho 0.07; Co17Ho2: Ho 0.105263experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Buschow 1969 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 26
report
1613eutectic: L -> Co7Ho2 + Co5.5HoL: Ho 0.19; Co7Ho2: Ho 0.222222; Co5.5Ho: Ho 0.153846experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Buschow 1969 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 18
report
1603peritectic: L + Co3Ho -> Co2HoCo3Ho: Ho 0.25; Co2Ho: Ho 0.333333experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Buschow 1969 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 12
report
1601peritectic: L + Co3Ho -> Co2HoL: Ho 0.3343; Co3Ho: Ho 0.25; Co2Ho: Ho 0.333333model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 13
report
1423eutectoid: Co5.5Ho -> Co7Ho2 + Co17Ho2Co5.5Ho: Ho 0.153846; Co7Ho2: Ho 0.222222; Co17Ho2: Ho 0.105263experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Buschow 1969 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 22
report
1423eutectoid: Co5.5Ho -> Co7Ho2 + Co17Ho2Co5.5Ho: Ho 0.153846; Co7Ho2: Ho 0.222222; Co17Ho2: Ho 0.105263model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 23
report
1168peritectic: L + HCP_A3 -> CoHo3CoHo3: Ho 0.75experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Buschow 1969 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 2
report
1162peritectic: L + HCP_A3 -> CoHo3L: Ho 0.7487; CoHo3: Ho 0.75model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 3
report
1055eutectic: L -> CoHo3 + Co7Ho12L: Ho 0.6322; CoHo3: Ho 0.75; Co7Ho12: Ho 0.631579model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 5
report
1053eutectic: L -> Co7Ho12 + Co2HoL: Ho 0.615; Co7Ho12: Ho 0.631579; Co2Ho: Ho 0.333333model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 9
report
1048eutectic: L -> Co7Ho12 + Co2HoL: Ho 0.6; Co7Ho12: Ho 0.631579; Co2Ho: Ho 0.333333experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Buschow 1969 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 8
report
1043eutectic: L -> CoHo3 + Co7Ho12L: Ho 0.67; CoHo3: Ho 0.75; Co7Ho12: Ho 0.631579experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Buschow 1969 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 4
report
1028peritectoid: Co7Ho12 + Co2Ho -> Co3Ho4Co7Ho12: Ho 0.631579; Co2Ho: Ho 0.333333; Co3Ho4: Ho 0.571429model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 11
report
1028peritectoid: Co7Ho12 + Co2Ho -> Co3Ho4Co7Ho12: Ho 0.631579; Co2Ho: Ho 0.333333; Co3Ho4: Ho 0.571429experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Buschow 1969 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 10
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Co–Ho system (1)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
CoHo3-10.539 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[1] Jin 2009p. 5
report
Considering the similar chemical property between Ho and these RE, it can be concluded that the enthalpies of formation of CoHo3 at 298 K should be around -10,000 J mol-1 , which is compatible with the presently assessed value, -10,539 J mol-1 .

Other properties

Phase transition (11)

Phase transition, Co–Ho system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1043 K1043L ↔ CoHo3 + Co7 Ho12experimental[1] Jin 2009p. 3
report
Note here the temperatures of two reactions, L ↔ CoHo3 + Co7 Ho12 at 1055 K and L ↔ Co7 Ho12 at 1056 K, deviate about 12 K from the corresponding measured values, 1043 K and 1068 K respectively.
Phase transition1055 K1055L ↔ CoHo3 + Co7 Ho12model[1] Jin 2009p. 3
report
Note here the temperatures of two reactions, L ↔ CoHo3 + Co7 Ho12 at 1055 K and L ↔ Co7 Ho12 at 1056 K, deviate about 12 K from the corresponding measured values, 1043 K and 1068 K respectively.
Phase transition1056 K1056L ↔ Co7 Ho12model[1] Jin 2009p. 3
report
Note here the temperatures of two reactions, L ↔ CoHo3 + Co7 Ho12 at 1055 K and L ↔ Co7 Ho12 at 1056 K, deviate about 12 K from the corresponding measured values, 1043 K and 1068 K respectively.
Phase transition1056 K1056congruent melting: L -> Co7Ho12
L: Ho 0.6316; Co7Ho12: Ho 0.631579
model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 7
report
Phase transition1068 K1068L ↔ Co7 Ho12experimental[1] Jin 2009p. 3
report
Note here the temperatures of two reactions, L ↔ CoHo3 + Co7 Ho12 at 1055 K and L ↔ Co7 Ho12 at 1056 K, deviate about 12 K from the corresponding measured values, 1043 K and 1068 K respectively.
Phase transition1068 K1068congruent melting: L -> Co7Ho12
L: Ho 0.631579; Co7Ho12: Ho 0.631579
experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Buschow 1969 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 6
report
Phase transition1423.15 K1423.15other: Co5.5 Ho -> Co7 Ho2 + Co17 Ho2experimental[1] Jin 2009p. 1
report
Co5.5 Ho is unstable at low temperature and decomposes into Co7 Ho2 and Co17 Ho2 at about 1150 ◦ C.
Phase transition1643 K1643congruent melting: L -> Co17Ho2
L: Ho 0.105263; Co17Ho2: Ho 0.105263
experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Buschow 1969 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 24
report
Phase transition1648 K1648congruent melting: L -> Co17Ho2
L: Ho 0.1053; Co17Ho2: Ho 0.105263
model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 25
report
Phase transition1661 K1661congruent melting: L -> Co3Ho
L: Ho 0.25; Co3Ho: Ho 0.25
model[1] Jin 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 15
report
Phase transition1663 K1663congruent melting: L -> Co3Ho
L: Ho 0.25; Co3Ho: Ho 0.25
experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Buschow 1969 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 14
report

Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy (2)

Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy, Co–Ho system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Gibbs energy
printed: Gibbs energy of formation
-11953 J mol-11081model[1] Jin 2009p. 4
report
However, Gibbs energy of formation of CoHo3 at 1081 K obtained through EMF measurements is -31,275 J mol-1 , while the assessed value is -11,953 J mol-1 , the difference is noticeable.
Gibbs energy
printed: Gibbs energy of formation
-31275 J mol-11081experimental[1] Jin 2009
cites Su 2003
p. 4
report
However, Gibbs energy of formation of CoHo3 at 1081 K obtained through EMF measurements is -31,275 J mol-1 , while the assessed value is -11,953 J mol-1 , the difference is noticeable.

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. S. Jin, J. Wang, L.G. Zhang, H.S. Liu, L.B. Liu, F. Zheng et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Co–Ho binary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 477, 233-238 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.062