Cr–Fe–Zr system

36 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 17, model 19); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental17
model19
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction32
phase equilibrium4

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Cr–Fe–Zr system (32)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1878.15other: L + (Fe,Cr)2Zr_C ↔ (Fe,Cr)2Zr_HL: Cr 0.15, Zr 0.313model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 40
report
1861.15eutectic: L ↔ β(Cr,Zr) + Cr2Zr_HL: Zr 0.187; β(Cr,Zr): Zr 0.03; Cr2Zr_H: Zr 0.311model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
1859.15eutectic: L ↔ β(Cr,Zr) + Cr2Zr_HL: Zr 0.193; Cr2Zr_H: Zr 0.33experimental[1] Yang 2013
cites Pavlu 2009 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 4
report
1835.15Cr2Zr_H ↔ Cr2Zr_C + LCr2Zr_H: Zr 0.36; Cr2Zr_C: Zr 0.36; L: Zr 0.55experimental[1] Yang 2013
cites Pavlu 2009 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
1835.15Cr2Zr_H ↔ Cr2Zr_C + LCr2Zr_H: Zr 0.368; Cr2Zr_C: Zr 0.365; L: Zr 0.595model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 5
report
1805.15Cr2Zr_H ↔ β(Cr,Zr) + Cr2Zr_CCr2Zr_H: Zr 0.314; β(Cr,Zr): Zr 0.027; Cr2Zr_C: Zr 0.321; β (Cr,Zr): Zr 0.027model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
1805.15Cr2Zr_H ↔ β(Cr,Zr) + Cr2Zr_CCr2Zr_H: Zr 0.32; Cr2Zr_C: Zr 0.32experimental[1] Yang 2013
cites Pavlu 2009 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 8
report
1647.15δ(Fe) ↔ L + γ(Fe)experimental[1] Yang 2013
cites Stain 2002
Table 2, p. 3, row 16
report
1646.15δ(Fe) ↔ L + γ(Fe)δ(Fe): Zr 0.01; L: Zr 0.072; γ(Fe): Zr 0.01model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 15
report
1628.15peritectic: L + Fe2Zr_C ↔ Fe2Zr_HL: Zr 0.113; Fe2Zr_C: Zr 0.282; Fe2Zr_H: Zr 0.268model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 17
report
1618.15peritectic: L + Fe2Zr_C ↔ Fe2Zr_Hexperimental[1] Yang 2013
cites Stain 2002
Table 2, p. 3, row 18
report
1606.15eutectic: L ↔ Cr2Zr_C + β(Cr,Zr)L: Zr 0.78; Cr2Zr_C: Zr 0.36experimental[1] Yang 2013
cites Pavlu 2009 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 10
report
1604.15eutectic: L ↔ Cr2Zr_C + β(Cr,Zr)L: Zr 0.738; Cr2Zr_C: Zr 0.38; β(Cr,Zr): Zr 0.919; β (Cr,Zr): Zr 0.919model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 9
report
1578.15eutectic: L ↔ γ(Fe) + Fe2Zr_HL: Zr 0.098; Fe2Zr_H: Zr 0.265experimental[1] Yang 2013
cites Stain 2002
Table 2, p. 3, row 20
report
1572.15eutectic: L ↔ γ(Fe) + Fe2Zr_HL: Zr 0.098; γ(Fe): Zr 0.013; Fe2Zr_H: Zr 0.261model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 19
report
1560.15peritectic: L + γ(Fe) ↔ β(Fe,Cr,Zr) + (Fe,Cr)2Zr_HL: Cr 0.025, Zr 0.095model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 35
report
1554.15peritectic: L + (Fe,Cr)2Zr_C ↔ (Fe,Cr)2Zr_H + β(Fe,Cr,Zr)L: Cr 0.234, Zr 0.724model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 36
report
1480.15other: L ↔ β(Fe,Cr,Zr) + (Fe,Cr)2Zr_CL: Cr 0.28, Zr 0.08model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 39
report
1227.15peritectic: L + (Fe,Cr)2Zr_H ↔ (Fe,Cr)2Zr_C + β(Fe,Cr,Zr)L: Cr 0.008, Zr 0.706model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 37
report
1224.15peritectic: L + Fe2Zr_C ↔ FeZr2Fe2Zr_C: Zr 0.344; FeZr2: Zr 0.667experimental[1] Yang 2013
cites Stain 2002
Table 2, p. 3, row 30
report
1212.15peritectic: L + Fe2Zr_C ↔ FeZr2L: Zr 0.7; Fe2Zr_C: Zr 0.359; FeZr2: Zr 0.692model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 29
report
1211.15eutectic: L ↔ FeZr2 + β(Fe,Zr)L: Zr 0.71; FeZr2: Zr 0.695; β(Fe,Zr): Zr 0.93model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 27
report
1209.15eutectic: L ↔ (Fe,Cr)2Zr_C + β(Fe,Cr,Zr) + FeZr2L: Cr 0.003, Zr 0.703model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 38
report
1208.15Fe2Zr_C + γ(Fe) ↔ β(Fe,Zr)Fe2Zr_C: Zr 0.286experimental[1] Yang 2013
cites Stain 2002
Table 2, p. 3, row 24
report
1201.15eutectic: L ↔ FeZr2 + β(Fe,Zr)L: Zr 0.76; FeZr2: Zr 0.67; β(Fe,Zr): Zr 0.958experimental[1] Yang 2013
cites Stain 2002
Table 2, p. 3, row 28
report
1196.15Fe2Zr_C + γ(Fe) ↔ β(Fe,Zr)Fe2Zr_C: Zr 0.271; γ(Fe): Zr 0.002; β(Fe,Zr): Zr 0.003; γ (Fe): Zr 0.002model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 23
report
1129.15peritectoid: FeZr2 + β(Fe,Zr) ↔ FeZr3FeZr2: Zr 0.695; β(Fe,Zr): Zr 0.946; FeZr3: Zr 0.765model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 31
report
1124.15peritectoid: FeZr2 + β(Fe,Zr) ↔ FeZr3FeZr2: Zr 0.67; β(Fe,Zr): Zr 0.959; FeZr3: Zr 0.75experimental[1] Yang 2013
cites Stain 2002
Table 2, p. 3, row 32
report
1105.15β(Cr,Zr) ↔ Cr2Zr_C + α(Zr)β(Cr,Zr): Zr 0.984; Cr2Zr_C: Zr 0.34; α(Zr): Zr 0.986experimental[1] Yang 2013
cites Pavlu 2009 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 12
report
1103.15β(Cr,Zr) ↔ Cr2Zr_C + α(Zr)β(Cr,Zr): Zr 0.976; Cr2Zr_C: Zr 0.348; α(Zr): Zr 0.991model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 11
report
1055.15β(Fe,Zr) ↔ FeZr3 + α(Zr)β(Fe,Zr): Zr 0.965; FeZr3: Zr 0.765; α(Zr): Zr 1model[1] Yang 2013Table 2, p. 3, row 25
report
1048.15β(Fe,Zr) ↔ FeZr3 + α(Zr)β(Fe,Zr): Zr 0.96; FeZr3: Zr 0.755experimental[1] Yang 2013
cites Stain 2002
Table 2, p. 3, row 26
report

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (4)

Phase equilibrium, Cr–Fe–Zr system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase composition1473.15Fe2Zr_C/Fe2Zr_H + β(Fe,Zr) + Fe23Zr6 + Eutectic
Eutectic: Zr 0.0961; Fe2Zr_C/Fe2Zr_H: Zr 0.275; Fe23Zr6: Zr 0.2112; β(Fe,Zr): Zr 0.001
experimental[1] Yang 2013Table 4, p. 5, row 1
report
Phase composition1473.15Fe2Zr_H + β(Fe,Cr,Zr) + Eutectic
Fe2Zr_H: Cr 0.033, Fe 0.685, Zr 0.282; Eutectic: Cr 0.13, Fe 0.78, Zr 0.09; β(Fe,Cr,Zr): Cr 0.175, Fe 0.824, Zr 0.001
experimental[1] Yang 2013Table 4, p. 5, row 4
report
Phase composition1473.15Fe2Zr_H + β(Fe,Cr,Zr) + Fe23Zr6 + Fe2Zr_C/Fe2Zr_H + Eutectic
Eutectic: Cr 0.0954, Fe 0.8146, Zr 0.09; Fe2Zr_H: Cr 0.033, Fe 0.698, Zr 0.269; Fe23Zr6: Cr 0.0375, Fe 0.741, Zr 0.2215; β(Fe,Cr,Zr): Cr 0.128, Fe 0.871, Zr 0.001; Fe2Zr_C/Fe2Zr_H: Cr 0.02, Fe 0.698, Zr 0.282
experimental[1] Yang 2013Table 4, p. 5, row 3
report
Phase composition1473.15Fe2Zr_H + β(Fe,Cr,Zr) + Fe23Zr6 + Fe2Zr_C/Fe2Zr_H + β(Fe,Zr) + Eutectic
Eutectic: Cr 0.0496, Fe 0.8545, Zr 0.0959; Fe2Zr_H: Cr 0.021, Fe 0.712, Zr 0.267; Fe23Zr6: Cr 0.0329, Fe 0.7509, Zr 0.2162; β(Fe,Cr,Zr): Cr 0.064, Fe 0.926, Zr 0.01; Fe2Zr_C/Fe2Zr_H: Cr 0.011, Fe 0.71, Zr 0.279; β(Fe,Zr): Cr 0.067, Fe 0.932, Zr 0.001
experimental[1] Yang 2013Table 4, p. 5, row 2
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Ying Yang, Lizhen Tan, Hongbin Bei, Jeremy T. Busby, Thermodynamic modeling and experimental study of the Fe–Cr–Zr system, Journal of Nuclear Materials 441, 190-202 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.05.061