Cr–Ni–V system

25 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (DFT 25); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
DFT	25

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
formation	25

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Cr–Ni–V system (25)
Phase	Value	Class	Source	Location
sigma	-16.217 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 18 report
sigma	-10.582 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 15 report
sigma	-9.811 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 12 report
sigma	-7.469 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 26 report
sigma	-5.147 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 23 report
sigma	-3.164 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 17 report
sigma	-1.635 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 20 report
sigma	-0.347 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 16 report
sigma	0.89 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 9 report
sigma	4.072 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 10 report
sigma	4.503 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 8 report
sigma	5.085 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 3 report
sigma	6.437 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 2 report
sigma	6.775 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 21 report
sigma	7.876 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 7 report
sigma	8.54 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 24 report
sigma	9.299 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 25 report
sigma	9.394 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 6 report
sigma	10.175 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 11 report
sigma	10.516 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 5 report
sigma	11.912 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 13 report
sigma	13.67 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 1 report
sigma	13.863 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 19 report
sigma	19.448 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 4 report
sigma	19.817 kJ/mol-atom	DFT	[1] Tonyali 2024	Table 4, p. 5, row 22 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Beril Tonyali, Hui Sun, Brandon Bocklund, John Paul Borgonia, Richard A. Otis, Shun-Li Shang et al., Additively manufactured Ni-20Cr to V functionally graded material: Computational predictions and experimental verification of phase formations, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 985, 174011 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174011

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}