Cu–Er system

29 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 13, model 8, DFT 3, unspecified 5); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 6 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (9) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental13
model8
DFT3
unspecified5
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction12
phase transition4
formation8
crystal structure5

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
CuEr-08Zha.tdbL.G. Zhang, L.B. Liu, G.X. Huang, H.Y. Qi, B.R. Jia, Z.P. Jin, Calphad, 32, 527-34(2008). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2008.05.0022583547fba3f60fe38630f8bc63084e62f900c102043ba35a0bd5585451a2021viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1273.15LIQUID (x(Er) 0.16315) + CU5ER_C15B (x(Er) 0.16667) + CU9ER2 (x(Er) 0.18182)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1273.14LIQUID (x(Er) 0.16342) + CU5ER_C15B (x(Er) 0.16667) + CU9ER2 (x(Er) 0.18182)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1273.14LIQUID (x(Er) 0.16357) + CU5ER_C15B (x(Er) 0.16667) + CU9ER2 (x(Er) 0.18182)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1209.96CU9ER2 (x(Er) 0.18182) + CU7ER2 (x(Er) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Er) 0.25866)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1209.95CU9ER2 (x(Er) 0.18182) + CU7ER2 (x(Er) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Er) 0.25887)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1173.25CU2ER (x(Er) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Er) 0.34406) + CUER_B2 (x(Er) 0.5)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1173.25CU2ER (x(Er) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Er) 0.34403) + CUER_B2 (x(Er) 0.5)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1173.25CU2ER (x(Er) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Er) 0.34431) + CUER_B2 (x(Er) 0.5)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1161.17FCC_A1 (x(Er) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Er) 0.08126) + CU5ER_C15B (x(Er) 0.16667)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1161.17FCC_A1 (x(Er) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Er) 0.08122) + CU5ER_C15B (x(Er) 0.16667)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1161.17FCC_A1 (x(Er) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Er) 0.08118) + CU5ER_C15B (x(Er) 0.16667)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1161.17FCC_A1 (x(Er) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Er) 0.08118) + CU5ER_C15B (x(Er) 0.16667)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1160.65CU7ER2 (x(Er) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Er) 0.29349) + CU2ER (x(Er) 0.33333)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1160.65CU7ER2 (x(Er) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Er) 0.29359) + CU2ER (x(Er) 0.33333)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1151.99CUER_B2 (x(Er) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Er) 0.69873) + HCP_A3 (x(Er) 0.99866)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1151.99CUER_B2 (x(Er) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Er) 0.69878) + HCP_A3 (x(Er) 0.99866)
CuEr-08Zha.tdb1110.1CU9ER2 (x(Er) 0.18182) + CU7ER2 (x(Er) 0.22222) + CU2ER (x(Er) 0.33333)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Cu–Er system (12)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1278peritectic: L + Cu9Er2 -> Cu5ErL: Er 0.162; Cu9Er2: Er 0.181818; Cu5Er: Er 0.166667experimental[1] Zhang 2008
cites Buschow 1970
Table 3, p. 6, row 3
report
1273peritectic: L + Cu9Er2 -> Cu5ErL: Er 0.164; Cu9Er2: Er 0.181818; Cu5Er: Er 0.166667model[1] Zhang 2008Table 3, p. 6, row 4
report
1213peritectic: L + Cu9Er2 -> Cu7Er2Cu9Er2: Er 0.181818; Cu7Er2: Er 0.222222experimental[1] Zhang 2008
cites Buschow 1970
Table 3, p. 6, row 7
report
1210peritectic: L + Cu9Er2 -> Cu7Er2L: Er 0.259; Cu9Er2: Er 0.181818; Cu7Er2: Er 0.222222model[1] Zhang 2008Table 3, p. 6, row 8
report
1178eutectic: L -> Cu2Er + CuErL: Er 0.385; Cu2Er: Er 0.333333; CuEr: Er 0.5experimental[1] Zhang 2008
cites Buschow 1970
Table 3, p. 6, row 11
report
1173eutectic: L -> Cu2Er + CuErL: Er 0.344; Cu2Er: Er 0.333333; CuEr: Er 0.5model[1] Zhang 2008Table 3, p. 6, row 12
report
1168eutectic: L -> Fcc_Cu + Cu5ErL: Er 0.095; Cu5Er: Er 0.166667experimental[1] Zhang 2008
cites Buschow 1970
Table 3, p. 6, row 1
report
1162eutectic: L -> Fcc_Cu + Cu5ErL: Er 0.0815; Cu5Er: Er 0.166667model[1] Zhang 2008Table 3, p. 6, row 2
report
1160eutectic: L -> Cu7Er2 + Cu2ErL: Er 0.293; Cu7Er2: Er 0.222222; Cu2Er: Er 0.333333model[1] Zhang 2008Table 3, p. 6, row 10
report
1158eutectic: L -> Cu7Er2 + Cu2ErL: Er 0.3; Cu7Er2: Er 0.222222; Cu2Er: Er 0.333333experimental[1] Zhang 2008
cites Buschow 1970
Table 3, p. 6, row 9
report
1153eutectic: L -> CuEr + Hcp_ErL: Er 0.695; CuEr: Er 0.5experimental[1] Zhang 2008
cites Buschow 1970
Table 3, p. 6, row 15
report
1152eutectic: L -> CuEr + Hcp_ErL: Er 0.699; CuEr: Er 0.5model[1] Zhang 2008Table 3, p. 6, row 16
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Cu–Er system (8)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Cu2Er-29.1 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Palumbo 2009Table 2, p. 4, row 15
report
Cu2ErCu2Er-27 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-27.328 (mp-aaacgigt)-27.311 (oqmd-2026377)[2] Palumbo 2009
cites Meschel 2005 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 17
report
Cu2ErCu2Er-17.2 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-27.328 (mp-aaacgigt)-27.311 (oqmd-2026377)[2] Palumbo 2009
cites Sommer 2009
Table 2, p. 4, row 16
report
Cu5Er-20.1 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Palumbo 2009Table 2, p. 4, row 12
report
Cu5ErCu5Er-18.4 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-18.819 (mp-aaaabtgd)-18.957 (oqmd-1366368)[2] Palumbo 2009
cites Meschel 2005 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 14
report
Cu5ErCu5Er-10.7 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-18.819 (mp-aaaabtgd)-18.957 (oqmd-1366368)[2] Palumbo 2009
cites Sommer 2009
Table 2, p. 4, row 13
report
CuEr-28.5 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Palumbo 2009Table 2, p. 4, row 18
report
CuErCuEr-14.6 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-26.362 (mp-aaaaacxf)-26.996 (oqmd-1376938)[2] Palumbo 2009
cites Sommer 2009
Table 2, p. 4, row 19
report

Other properties

Phase transition (4)

Phase transition, Cu–Er system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1278 K1278congruent melting: L -> Cu9Er2
L: Er 0.181818; Cu9Er2: Er 0.181818
model[1] Zhang 2008Table 3, p. 6, row 6
report
Phase transition1283 K1283congruent melting: L -> Cu9Er2
L: Er 0.181818; Cu9Er2: Er 0.181818
experimental[1] Zhang 2008
cites Buschow 1970
Table 3, p. 6, row 5
report
Phase transition1319 K1319congruent melting: L -> Cu9Er2
L: Er 0.181818; Cu9Er2: Er 0.181818
model[1] Zhang 2008Table 3, p. 6, row 14
report
Phase transition1328 K1328congruent melting: L -> Cu9Er2
L: Er 0.181818; Cu9Er2: Er 0.181818
experimental[1] Zhang 2008
cites Buschow 1970
Table 3, p. 6, row 13
report

Crystal structure (5)

Crystal structure, Cu–Er system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a4.275 Å298.15Cu2Er
alloy: Cu 0.666667, Er 0.333333
unspecified[1] Zhang 2008Table 1, p. 3, row 16
report
Lattice a7.003 Å298.15Cu5Er
alloy: Cu 0.833333, Er 0.166667
unspecified[1] Zhang 2008Table 1, p. 3, row 13
report
Lattice a3.425 Å298.15CuEr
alloy: Cu 0.5, Er 0.5
unspecified[1] Zhang 2008Table 1, p. 3, row 17
report
Lattice b6.726 Å298.15Cu2Er
alloy: Cu 0.666667, Er 0.333333
unspecified[1] Zhang 2008Table 1, p. 3, row 16
report
Lattice c7.265 Å298.15Cu2Er
alloy: Cu 0.666667, Er 0.333333
unspecified[1] Zhang 2008Table 1, p. 3, row 16
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. L.G. Zhang, L.B. Liu, G.X. Huang, H.Y. Qi, B.R. Jia, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of the Al–Cu–Er system, Calphad 32, 527-534 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2008.05.002
  2. M. Palumbo, L. Battezzati, A. Pasturel, S. Gottlieb-Schönmeyer, W. Assmus, Thermodynamic and ab initio investigation of the Cu–Dy system, Calphad 33, 511-516 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2009.04.001