Cu–Ho system

23 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 12, model 11); 2 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (10) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental12
model11
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction23

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdbC.P. Wang, S.H. Guo, X.J. Liu, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, J. Alloys Compd., 487, 173-78(2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.08.042b376cb3e339bac727cf9884b0cf22007c55c84a7b4c9b28597b69f83cc6f052cviewer · TDB · JSON
CuHo-09Wan.tdbC.P. Wang, S.H. Guo, X.J. Liu, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, J. Alloys Compd., 487, 173-78(2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.08.0427fa1a2bcc060b66d5232fee581c46fcdd026a10c0698bdf84816d5cf7b471edaviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1259.36LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.16491) + CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1259.36LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.16498) + CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1259.36LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.16473) + CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1242.86CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1242.86LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.13277) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1242.86LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.13243) + CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1242.86LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.13242) + CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1206.65CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182) + CU7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.25222)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1206.64CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182) + CU7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.25233)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1158.09CU2HO (x(Ho) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.35559) + CUHO_B2 (x(Ho) 0.5)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1158.09CU2HO (x(Ho) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.35553) + CUHO_B2 (x(Ho) 0.5)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1158.09CU2HO (x(Ho) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.35568) + CUHO_B2 (x(Ho) 0.5)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1150.07FCC_A1 (x(Ho) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.08328) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1150.07FCC_A1 (x(Ho) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.08324) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1150.07FCC_A1 (x(Ho) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.08321) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1150.07FCC_A1 (x(Ho) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.08319) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1144.94CU7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.28703) + CU2HO (x(Ho) 0.33333)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1144.94CU7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.28708) + CU2HO (x(Ho) 0.33333)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1143.81CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182) + CU7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222) + CU2HO (x(Ho) 0.33333)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1108.79CUHO_B2 (x(Ho) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.70817) + HCP_A3 (x(Ho) 0.99963)
CuHo-09Wan-newHo.tdb1108.79CUHO_B2 (x(Ho) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.70824) + HCP_A3 (x(Ho) 0.99963)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1700.91LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.97896) + BCC_A2 (x(Ho) 0.99955) + HCP_A3 (x(Ho) 0.99992)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1257.8LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.16516) + CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1257.8LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.16536) + CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1257.8LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.1651) + CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1242.86CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1242.86LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.13435) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1242.86LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.13397) + CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1242.86LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.13397) + CU5HO_D2D (x(Ho) 0.16667) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1192.27CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182) + CU7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.26027)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1192.26CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182) + CU7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.26036)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1155.46CU2HO (x(Ho) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.35605) + CUHO_B2 (x(Ho) 0.5)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1155.46CU2HO (x(Ho) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.356) + CUHO_B2 (x(Ho) 0.5)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1155.46CU2HO (x(Ho) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.35613) + CUHO_B2 (x(Ho) 0.5)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1154.01CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182) + CU7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.2813)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1154.01CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182) + CU7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.28135)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1154CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182) + CU7HO2 (x(Ho) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.28147)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1149.2FCC_A1 (x(Ho) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.08351) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1149.2FCC_A1 (x(Ho) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.08348) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1149.2FCC_A1 (x(Ho) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.08345) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1149.2FCC_A1 (x(Ho) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.08343) + CU5HO_C15B (x(Ho) 0.16667)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1142.47CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.28704) + CU2HO (x(Ho) 0.33333)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1142.47CU9HO2 (x(Ho) 0.18182) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.2871) + CU2HO (x(Ho) 0.33333)
CuHo-09Wan.tdb1103.13CUHO_B2 (x(Ho) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ho) 0.70971) + HCP_A3 (x(Ho) 0.99964)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull CuHo-09Wan-newHo

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Cu–Ho system (23)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1283.15congruent melting: L ↔ CuHoL: Ho 0.5; CuHo: Ho 0.5model[1] Wang 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 21
report
1283.15congruent melting: L ↔ CuHoL: Ho 0.5; CuHo: Ho 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Subramanian 1994
Table 3, p. 4, row 20
report
1263.15congruent melting: L ↔ Cu9Ho2L: Ho 0.182; Cu9Ho2: Ho 0.182experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Subramanian 1994
Table 3, p. 4, row 8
report
1263.15congruent melting: L ↔ Cu9Ho2L: Ho 0.182; Cu9Ho2: Ho 0.182model[1] Wang 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 9
report
1258.15peritectic: L + Cu9Ho2 ↔ βCu5HoL: Ho 0.157; Cu9Ho2: Ho 0.182; βCu5Ho: Ho 0.167experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Subramanian 1994
Table 3, p. 4, row 4
report
1258.15peritectic: L + Cu9Ho2 ↔ βCu5HoL: Ho 0.164; Cu9Ho2: Ho 0.182; βCu5Ho: Ho 0.167model[1] Wang 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 5
report
1243.15polymorphic: αCu5Ho ↔ βCu5HoαCu5Ho: Cu 0.833333, Ho 0.166667; βCu5Ho: Ho 0.167experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Subramanian 1994
Table 3, p. 4, row 6
report
1243.15polymorphic: αCu5Ho ↔ βCu5HoαCu5Ho: Cu 0.833333, Ho 0.166667; βCu5Ho: Ho 0.167model[1] Wang 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 7
report
1193.15peritectic: L + Cu9Ho2 ↔ Cu7Ho2L: Ho 0.26; Cu9Ho2: Ho 0.182; Cu7Ho2: Ho 0.222model[1] Wang 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 11
report
1193.15peritectic: L + Cu9Ho2 ↔ Cu7Ho2Cu9Ho2: Ho 0.182; Cu7Ho2: Ho 0.222experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Subramanian 1994
Table 3, p. 4, row 10
report
1188.15congruent melting: L ↔ Cu2HoL: Ho 0.333; Cu2Ho: Ho 0.333experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Subramanian 1994
Table 3, p. 4, row 16
report
1163.15congruent melting: L ↔ Cu2HoL: Ho 0.333; Cu2Ho: Ho 0.333model[1] Wang 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 17
report
1155.15eutectic: L ↔ Cu2Ho + CuHoL: Ho 0.356; Cu2Ho: Ho 0.333; CuHo: Ho 0.5model[1] Wang 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 19
report
1153.15metatectic/catatectic: Cu7Ho2 ↔ L + Cu9Ho2Cu7Ho2: Ho 0.222; L: Ho 0.282; Cu9Ho2: Ho 0.182model[1] Wang 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 13
report
1153.15metatectic/catatectic: Cu7Ho2 ↔ L + Cu9Ho2Cu7Ho2: Ho 0.222; Cu9Ho2: Ho 0.182experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Subramanian 1994
Table 3, p. 4, row 12
report
1149.15eutectic: L ↔ (Cu) + Cu5HoL: Ho 0.083; (Cu): Ho 0; Cu5Ho: Ho 0.167model[1] Wang 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 3
report
1148.15eutectic: L ↔ Cu2Ho + CuHoL: Ho 0.352; Cu2Ho: Ho 0.333; CuHo: Ho 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Subramanian 1994
Table 3, p. 4, row 18
report
1148.15eutectic: L ↔ (Cu) + Cu5HoL: Ho 0.095; (Cu): Ho 2.000e-4; Cu5Ho: Ho 0.167experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Subramanian 1994
Table 3, p. 4, row 2
report
1143.15eutectic: L ↔ Cu9Ho2 + Cu2HoL: Ho 0.314; Cu9Ho2: Ho 0.182; Cu2Ho: Ho 0.333experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Subramanian 1994
Table 3, p. 4, row 14
report
1143.15eutectic: L ↔ Cu9Ho2 + Cu2HoL: Ho 0.287; Cu9Ho2: Ho 0.182; Cu2Ho: Ho 0.333model[1] Wang 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 15
report
1137.15eutectic: L ↔ (Cu) + Cu5Ho(Cu): Ho 2.000e-4; Cu5Ho: Cu 0.833333, Ho 0.166667experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Wunderlin 1963
Table 3, p. 4, row 1
report
1103.15eutectic: L ↔ CuHo + (Ho)L: Ho 0.709; CuHo: Ho 0.5; (Ho): Ho 1model[1] Wang 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 23
report
1103.15eutectic: L ↔ CuHo + (Ho)L: Ho 0.7; CuHo: Ho 0.5; (Ho): Ho 1experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Subramanian 1994
Table 3, p. 4, row 22
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. C.P. Wang, S.H. Guo, X.J. Liu, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, Thermodynamic assessments of the Ho–X (X: Cu, Mo, V) systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 487, 173-178 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.08.042