Cu–Ir system
33 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 8, model 15, unspecified 10); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 3 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (4) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 8 |
| model | 15 |
| unspecified | 10 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| phase equilibrium | 24 |
| activity / EMF / Gibbs energy | 1 |
| crystal structure | 8 |
Calculated phase diagrams
Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.
| TDB file | Assessment | SHA-256 | Links |
|---|---|---|---|
| CuIr-04Kor-LB.tdb | J. Korb, unpublished work, GTT, 2004. | bc7d8e92a01c7ed06d721d920a89d9758432138326a7b50dbffdc4a44fe9349b | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| CuIr-87Cha.tdb | D.J. Chakrabarti, D.E. Laughlin, Bull. Alloy Phase Diag., 8, 132-36(1987). doi:10.1007/BF02873198 | f9fe888f4dc6f8ff7058c3ba7c9f7aaa7ee7b95ed9ffe8a038f8636604b1769b | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| TDB file | T (K) | Phases at the invariant |
|---|---|---|
| CuIr-04Kor-LB.tdb | 1418.24 | LIQUID (x(Ir) 0.04212) + FCC_A1#2 (x(Ir) 0.10024) + FCC_A1 (x(Ir) 0.96687) |
| CuIr-87Cha.tdb | 1403.89 | LIQUID (x(Ir) 0.03221) + FCC_A1#2 (x(Ir) 0.0786) + FCC_A1 (x(Ir) 0.97024) |
Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull CuIr-87Cha
Other properties
Phase equilibrium (24)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase composition | 773.15 | (Cu) + (Ir) (Cu): Cu 0.994, Ir 0.006; (Ir): Cu 0.001, Ir 0.999 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 24 report | ||
| Phase composition | 973.15 | (Cu) (Cu): Cu 0.969, Ir 0.031 | experimental | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report | ||
| Phase composition | 973.15 | (Cu) + (Ir) (Cu): Cu 0.981, Ir 0.019; (Ir): Cu 0.005, Ir 0.995 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 23 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1073.15 | (Cu) + (Ir) (Cu): Cu 0.972, Ir 0.028; (Ir): Cu 0.008, Ir 0.992 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 22 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1073.15 | (Ir) (Ir): Cu 0.014, Ir 0.986 | experimental | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 1, p. 2, row 9 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1133.15 | (Cu) (Cu): Cu 0.945, Ir 0.055 | experimental | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 1, p. 2, row 8 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1173.15 | (Cu) + (Ir) (Cu): Cu 0.959, Ir 0.041; (Ir): Cu 0.013, Ir 0.987 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 21 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1293.15 | (Cu) (Cu): Cu 0.935, Ir 0.065 | experimental | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 1, p. 2, row 7 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1358.02 | Liquidus + Solidus + L + (Cu) Liquidus: Cu 1, Ir 0; Solidus: Cu 1, Ir 0; L: Cu 1, Ir 0; (Cu): Cu 1, Ir 0 | unspecified | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 2 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1363.15 | (Ir) (Ir): Cu 0.03, Ir 0.97 | experimental | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 1, p. 2, row 6 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1373.15 | (Cu) + (Ir) (Cu): Cu 0.927, Ir 0.073; (Ir): Cu 0.027, Ir 0.973 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 20 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1411.15 | (Cu) + (Ir) (Cu): Cu 0.92, Ir 0.08; (Ir): Cu 0.03, Ir 0.97 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 19 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1411.15 | Liquidus + Solidus + L + (Ir) Liquidus: Cu 0.96, Ir 0.04; Solidus: Cu 0.03, Ir 0.97; L: Cu 0.96, Ir 0.04; (Ir): Cu 0.03, Ir 0.97 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 18 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1473.15 | Liquidus + Solidus + L + (Ir) Liquidus: Cu 0.95, Ir 0.05; Solidus: Cu 0.034, Ir 0.966; L: Cu 0.95, Ir 0.05; (Ir): Cu 0.034, Ir 0.966 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1473.15 | Solidus + (Ir) Solidus: Cu 0.032, Ir 0.968; (Ir): Cu 0.032, Ir 0.968 | experimental | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 1, p. 2, row 5 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1673.15 | Liquidus + Solidus + L + (Ir) Liquidus: Cu 0.905, Ir 0.095; Solidus: Cu 0.046, Ir 0.954; L: Cu 0.905, Ir 0.095; (Ir): Cu 0.046, Ir 0.954 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 16 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1673.15 | Solidus + (Ir) Solidus: Cu 0.051, Ir 0.949; (Ir): Cu 0.051, Ir 0.949 | experimental | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 1, p. 2, row 4 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1873.15 | Liquidus + Solidus + L + (Ir) Liquidus: Cu 0.827, Ir 0.173; Solidus: Cu 0.057, Ir 0.943; L: Cu 0.827, Ir 0.173; (Ir): Cu 0.057, Ir 0.943 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 15 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1873.15 | Solidus + (Ir) Solidus: Cu 0.073, Ir 0.927; (Ir): Cu 0.073, Ir 0.927 | experimental | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report | ||
| Phase composition | 2073.15 | Liquidus + Solidus + L + (Ir) Liquidus: Cu 0.678, Ir 0.322; Solidus: Cu 0.063, Ir 0.937; L: Cu 0.678, Ir 0.322; (Ir): Cu 0.063, Ir 0.937 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 14 report | ||
| Phase composition | 2273.15 | Liquidus + Solidus + L + (Ir) Liquidus: Cu 0.39, Ir 0.61; Solidus: Cu 0.057, Ir 0.943; L: Cu 0.39, Ir 0.61; (Ir): Cu 0.057, Ir 0.943 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 13 report | ||
| Phase composition | 2473.15 | Liquidus + Solidus + L + (Ir) Liquidus: Cu 0.171, Ir 0.829; Solidus: Cu 0.037, Ir 0.963; L: Cu 0.171, Ir 0.829; (Ir): Cu 0.037, Ir 0.963 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 12 report | ||
| Phase composition | 2673.15 | Liquidus + Solidus + L + (Ir) Liquidus: Cu 0.028, Ir 0.972; Solidus: Cu 0.007, Ir 0.993; L: Cu 0.028, Ir 0.972; (Ir): Cu 0.007, Ir 0.993 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report | ||
| Phase composition | 2720.15 | Liquidus + Solidus + L + (Ir) Liquidus: Cu 0, Ir 1; Solidus: Cu 0, Ir 1; L: Cu 0, Ir 1; (Ir): Cu 0, Ir 1 | unspecified | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | Table 1, p. 2, row 1 report |
Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy (1)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibbs energy printed: G (L) | -0.59 kJ/mol | 1273.15 | model | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 | p. 4 report | The corresponding integral molar Gibbs energy G (L) (based on pure liquid Cu and pure liquid Ir as standard states), estimated at 1000 ~ is -0.59 kJ/mol. |
Crystal structure (8)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice a | 3.836 Å | 1073.15 | (Ir) alloy: Cu 0.6, Ir 0.4 | unspecified | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 3, p. 3, row 7 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.623 Å | 1133.15 | (Cu) alloy: Cu 0.97, Ir 0.03 | unspecified | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 3, p. 3, row 3 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.625 Å | 1133.15 | (Cu) alloy: Cu 0.96, Ir 0.04 | unspecified | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 3, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.629 Å | 1133.15 | (Cu) alloy: Cu 0.95, Ir 0.05 | unspecified | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 3, p. 3, row 5 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.621 Å | 1133.15 | (Cu) alloy: Cu 0.98, Ir 0.02 | unspecified | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 3, p. 3, row 2 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.832 Å | 1473.15 | (Ir) alloy: Cu 0.4, Ir 0.6 | unspecified | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 3, p. 3, row 8 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.828 Å | 1673.15 | (Ir) alloy: Cu 0.4, Ir 0.6 | unspecified | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 3, p. 3, row 9 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.823 Å | 1873.15 | (Ir) alloy: Cu 0.4, Ir 0.6 | unspecified | [1] Chakrabarti 1987 cites ref. 69Rau | Table 3, p. 3, row 10 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- D. J. Chakrabarti, D. E. Laughlin, The Cu−Ir (Copper-Iridium) system, JPE 8, 132-136 (1987). doi:10.1007/bf02873198