Cu–Li–Mg system

50 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 50); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	50

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
phase equilibrium	50

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (50)

Phase equilibrium, Cu–Li–Mg system
Property	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase assemblage	298.15	Cu2Mg + CuMg2 alloy: Cu 0.589, Li 0, Mg 0.411	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 51 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.477, Li 0.03, Mg 0.493	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.477, Li 0.03, Mg 0.493	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	Cu2Mg + X + CuMg2 alloy: Cu 0.363, Li 0.06, Mg 0.577	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 47 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	Cu2Mg + X + CuMg2 alloy: Cu 0.347, Li 0.034, Mg 0.619	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 48 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 (or hcp-A3) + CuMg2 alloy: Cu 0.088, Li 0.195, Mg 0.717	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 31 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 (or hcp-A3) + CuMg2 alloy: Cu 0.091, Li 0.118, Mg 0.791	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 33 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 (or hcp-A3) + CuMg2 alloy: Cu 0.031, Li 0.152, Mg 0.817	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 37 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 (or hcp-A3) + CuMg2 alloy: Cu 0.036, Li 0.239, Mg 0.725	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 39 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg alloy: Cu 0.578, Li 0.061, Mg 0.361	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg alloy: Cu 0.649, Li 0.042, Mg 0.309	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 1 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg alloy: Cu 0.044, Li 0.495, Mg 0.461	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 45 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg alloy: Cu 0.035, Li 0.439, Mg 0.526	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 23 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg alloy: Cu 0.578, Li 0.061, Mg 0.361	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg alloy: Cu 0.09, Li 0.422, Mg 0.488	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 27 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg alloy: Cu 0.11, Li 0.531, Mg 0.359	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 26 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg alloy: Cu 0.087, Li 0.655, Mg 0.258	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 25 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg alloy: Cu 0.035, Li 0.439, Mg 0.526	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 24 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg alloy: Cu 0.048, Li 0.44, Mg 0.512	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 43 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.255, Li 0.219, Mg 0.526	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 16 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.36, Li 0.134, Mg 0.506	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 11 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.164, Li 0.32, Mg 0.516	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 20 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.206, Li 0.29, Mg 0.504	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 18 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.424, Li 0.07, Mg 0.506	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.424, Li 0.07, Mg 0.506	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.321, Li 0.162, Mg 0.517	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 13 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.089, Li 0.383, Mg 0.528	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 21 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.089, Li 0.383, Mg 0.528	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 22 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.164, Li 0.32, Mg 0.516	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 19 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.435, Li 0.093, Mg 0.472	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.36, Li 0.134, Mg 0.506	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 12 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.435, Li 0.093, Mg 0.472	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.321, Li 0.162, Mg 0.517	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 14 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.206, Li 0.29, Mg 0.504	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 17 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X alloy: Cu 0.255, Li 0.219, Mg 0.526	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 15 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X? alloy: Cu 0.048, Li 0.44, Mg 0.512	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 44 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X? alloy: Cu 0.09, Li 0.422, Mg 0.488	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 28 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + Cu2Mg + X? alloy: Cu 0.044, Li 0.495, Mg 0.461	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 46 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + X alloy: Cu 0.126, Li 0.292, Mg 0.582	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 29 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + X alloy: Cu 0.027, Li 0.344, Mg 0.629	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 41 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + X alloy: Cu 0.126, Li 0.292, Mg 0.582	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 30 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + X? alloy: Cu 0.027, Li 0.344, Mg 0.629	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 42 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + hcp-A3 alloy: Cu 0, Li 0.202, Mg 0.798	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 49 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2 + hcp-A3? + CuMg2 alloy: Cu 0.036, Li 0.239, Mg 0.725	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 40 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2? + hcp-A3 + CuMg2 alloy: Cu 0.031, Li 0.152, Mg 0.817	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 38 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	bcc-A2? + hcp-A3 + CuMg2 alloy: Cu 0.091, Li 0.118, Mg 0.791	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 34 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	fcc-A1? + Cu2Mg alloy: Cu 0.649, Li 0.042, Mg 0.309	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 2 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	hcp-A3 + CuMg2 alloy: Cu 0.088, Li 0.195, Mg 0.717	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 32 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	hcp-A3 + CuMg2 alloy: Cu 0.05, Li 0.055, Mg 0.895	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 36 report
Phase assemblage	298.15	hcp-A3 + CuMg2 alloy: Cu 0.05, Li 0.055, Mg 0.895	experimental	[1] Braga 2000	Table 1, p. 3, row 35 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

M.H. Braga, L.F. Malheiros, M. Hämäläinen, The Cu–Li–Mg system at room temperature, Thermochimica Acta 344, 47-54 (2000). doi:10.1016/s0040-6031(99)00325-1

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}