Cu–Ni system
31 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 31); 4 calculated phase diagram(s). 7 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (4) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 31 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| mixing / partial | 3 |
| activity / EMF / Gibbs energy | 28 |
Calculated phase diagrams
Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.
| TDB file | Assessment | SHA-256 | Links |
|---|---|---|---|
| CuNi-07Tur.tdb | M.A. Turchanin, P.G. Agraval, A.R. Abdulov, Powder Metall. Met. Ceram., 46, 467-77(2007). doi:10.1007/s11106-007-0013-9 | 10031ba89321cab1e44115d6fa90ffa375b8daa4c4ee8d4c0bf0b9f027b1c488 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| CuNi-87Jan.tdb | A. Jansson, TRITA-MAC 340, KTH, Stockholm 1987. | c378a4dea0f2dadf130df3dbfd46ff643d92c32242bb19a0a743b2d29d1f2d59 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| CuNi-89Sri.tdb | S. Srikanth, K.T. Jacob, Mater. Sci. Technol., 5, 427-34(1989). doi:10.1179/mst.1989.5.5.427 | 39b018ea8c7d3c13c313c0275c736b6516c8bfc5c0d2efaf0cf5b4a3963fc3f7 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| CuNi-92Mey-LB.tdb | S. an Mey, Calphad 16, 255-60(1992). | 7e52adda858e302168ae26b5abfe17f4726ccbfaaff0880abcad5b38e3f559e1 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull CuNi-87Jan · CALPHAD hull CuNi-89Sri · CALPHAD hull CuNi-92Mey-LB
Other properties
Mixing / partial (3)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enthalpy of mixing printed: enthalpy of mixing | 1.59 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1113 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 cites ref. 10 | p. 2 report | Oriani and Murphy10 used a differential solution calorimeter using liquid tin as the solvent to measure enthalpy of mixing in solid Cu-Ni alloys at 1113 K. Their study gives a maximum value of 1590 J mol-1 at XNi '" 0·7. | |
| Enthalpy of mixing printed: ~Hmax | 8 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1773 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 cites EL'KHASAN 1966 | p. 7 report | El'Khasan et ai.39 report high exothermic values for the enthalpy of mixing (~Hmax= 8 kJ mol-1) at 1773 K and their results are not compatible with other calorimetric studies. | |
| Partial enthalpy printed: ∞ ΔH Co | 42 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 2.4 | 1385 | experimental | [2] Turchanin 2007 cites ref. 19 | p. 2 report | The above results are in agreement with [19], which established the first enthalpy of cobalt mixing ∞ ΔH Co = 42.0 ± 2.4 kJ/mole at 1385 K using a high-temperature Tian-Calvet calorimeter. |
Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy (28)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activity Cu printed: aCu | 0.5141 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.2, Ni 0.8 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 8 report | |
| Activity Cu printed: aCu | 0.7926 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.7, Ni 0.3 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 3 report | |
| Activity Cu printed: aCu | 0.8463 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.8, Ni 0.2 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 2 report | |
| Activity Cu printed: aCu | 0.9128 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.9, Ni 0.1 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 1 report | |
| Activity Cu printed: aCu | 0.5873 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.3, Ni 0.7 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 7 report | |
| Activity Cu printed: aCu | 0.6391 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.4, Ni 0.6 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 6 report | |
| Activity Cu printed: aCu | 0.3649 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Ni 0.9 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| Activity Cu printed: aCu | 0.6856 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.5, Ni 0.5 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| Activity Cu printed: aCu | 0.7376 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.6, Ni 0.4 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| Activity Ni printed: aNi | 0.8686 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.2, Ni 0.8 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 8 report | |
| Activity Ni printed: aNi | 0.5985 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.7, Ni 0.3 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 3 report | |
| Activity Ni printed: aNi | 0.4894 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.8, Ni 0.2 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 2 report | |
| Activity Ni printed: aNi | 0.3103 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.9, Ni 0.1 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 1 report | |
| Activity Ni printed: aNi | 0.8322 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.3, Ni 0.7 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 7 report | |
| Activity Ni printed: aNi | 0.7953 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.4, Ni 0.6 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 6 report | |
| Activity Ni printed: aNi | 0.9185 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Ni 0.9 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| Activity Ni printed: aNi | 0.7506 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.5, Ni 0.5 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| Activity Ni printed: aNi | 0.6856 1 | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.6, Ni 0.4 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| EMF printed: E | 6.1 mV | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.2, Ni 0.8 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 8 report | |
| EMF printed: E | 22.1 mV | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.7, Ni 0.3 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 3 report | |
| EMF printed: E | 30.8 mV | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.8, Ni 0.2 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 2 report | |
| EMF printed: E | 50.5 mV | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.9, Ni 0.1 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 1 report | |
| EMF printed: E | 7.9 mV | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.3, Ni 0.7 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 7 report | |
| EMF printed: E | 9.9 mV | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.4, Ni 0.6 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 6 report | |
| EMF printed: E | 3.7 mV | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Ni 0.9 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| EMF printed: E | 12.4 mV | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.5, Ni 0.5 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| EMF printed: E | 16.3 mV | 1000 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.6, Ni 0.4 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 | Table 1, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| Gibbs energy printed: ΔfG°(CuI) - ΔfG°(0.5NiI2) | 39 kJ mol-1 | 1000 | experimental | [1] Srikanth 1989 cites KUBASCHEWSKI 1979 | p. 6 report | Since the standard Gibbs' energies of formation of CuI and 0'5NiI2 differ by only 39 kJ mol-1 (Ref. 30) at 1000 K, it is possible that their measurements may be affected by the displacement reaction Ni(alloy) + 2Cu + ~ Nj2+ + 2Cu(alloy) |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- S. Srikanth, K. T. Jacob, Thermodynamic properties of Cu–Ni alloys: measurements and assessment, Materials Science and Technology 5, 427-434 (1989). doi:10.1179/mst.1989.5.5.427
- M. A. Turchanin, P. G. Agraval, Phase equilibria and thermodynamics of binary copper systems with 3d-metals. V. Copper-cobalt system, Powder Metall Met Ceram 46, 77-89 (2007). doi:10.1007/s11106-007-0013-9