Cu–S system

23 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 12, model 11); 3 calculated phase diagram(s). 12 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (14) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental12
model11
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction19
phase transition4

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
CuS-07Lee.tdbB.-J. Lee, B. Sundman, S.I. Kim, K.-G. Chin, ISIJ Int., 47, 163-71(2007). doi:10.2355/isijinternational.47.163d5d1065a84e9aabe84f1a0d2ad1ffe56d89e9dbc799ad90b44c16f840b0275a0viewer · TDB · JSON
CuS-92Sun-LB.tdbB. Sundman, unpublished, 1992.b8d5ff92c7cc3e8388cd43eed138d371e60c79cb9b044dfda0d7c3328bcb0726viewer · TDB · JSON
CuS-92Sun-newS.tdbB. Sundman, unpublished, 1992.137242d5bf305aadb1a044623c566cbe19778f1612775076add29b4808d1b3ffviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
CuS-07Lee.tdb1409.44LIQUID#2 (x(S) 0.022) + LIQUID (x(S) 0.33136) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.33301)
CuS-07Lee.tdb1342.28FCC_A1 (x(S) 2.300e-4) + LIQUID (x(S) 0.0141) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.33314)
CuS-07Lee.tdb1236.55CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.34888) + LIQUID (x(S) 0.37241) + GAS (x(S) 1)
CuS-07Lee.tdb766.66CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.36861) + CUS_B18 (x(S) 0.5) + GAS (x(S) 1)
CuS-07Lee.tdb723.86CUS_B18 (x(S) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(S) 0.99996) + GAS (x(S) 1)
CuS-07Lee.tdb707.74FCC_A1 (x(S) 0) + CU2S_BETA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.33342)
CuS-07Lee.tdb384.34CUS_B18 (x(S) 0.5) + ORTHORHOMBIC_A16 (x(S) 1) + LIQUID (x(S) 1)
CuS-07Lee.tdb379.45FCC_A1 (x(S) 0) + CU2S_ALPHA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU2S_BETA (x(S) 0.33333)
CuS-07Lee.tdb379.45CU2S_BETA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU2S_ALPHA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.35194)
CuS-07Lee.tdb367.17CU2S_ALPHA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU31S16 (x(S) 0.3413) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.35287)
CuS-07Lee.tdb350.02CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.35915) + CU7S4 (x(S) 0.36364) + CUS_B18 (x(S) 0.5)
CuS-07Lee.tdb343.58CU31S16 (x(S) 0.3413) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.35609) + CU7S4 (x(S) 0.36364)
CuS-92Sun-LB.tdb1377.51ION#2 (x(S) 0.02066) + ION (x(S) 0.32881) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.33312)
CuS-92Sun-LB.tdb1338.66FCC_A1 (x(S) 1.900e-4) + ION (x(S) 0.01729) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.33317)
CuS-92Sun-LB.tdb779.75CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.36474) + CUS_B18 (x(S) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(S) 0.99983)
CuS-92Sun-LB.tdb710.34FCC_A1 (x(S) 0) + CU2S_BETA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.33341)
CuS-92Sun-LB.tdb388.35CUS_B18 (x(S) 0.5) + MONOCLINIC_S (x(S) 1) + LIQUID (x(S) 1)
CuS-92Sun-LB.tdb375.97FCC_A1 (x(S) 0) + CU2S_ALPHA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU2S_BETA (x(S) 0.33333)
CuS-92Sun-LB.tdb375.97CU2S_BETA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU2S_ALPHA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.34555)
CuS-92Sun-LB.tdb371.96CU2S_ALPHA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU31S16 (x(S) 0.3413) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.34634)
CuS-92Sun-LB.tdb368.33CUS_B18 (x(S) 0.5) + ORTHORHOMBIC_A16 (x(S) 1) + MONOCLINIC_S (x(S) 1)
CuS-92Sun-LB.tdb325.41CU31S16 (x(S) 0.3413) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.35752) + CUS_B18 (x(S) 0.5)
CuS-92Sun-LB.tdb311.97CU31S16 (x(S) 0.3413) + CU7S4 (x(S) 0.36364) + CUS_B18 (x(S) 0.5)
CuS-92Sun-newS.tdb1338.03FCC_A1 (x(S) 1.900e-4) + ION#2 (x(S) 0.01791) + ION (x(S) 0.32938)
CuS-92Sun-newS.tdb1314FCC_A1 (x(S) 1.600e-4) + ION (x(S) 0.32982) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.33323)
CuS-92Sun-newS.tdb771.29CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.3646) + CUS_B18 (x(S) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(S) 0.99984)
CuS-92Sun-newS.tdb710.93FCC_A1 (x(S) 0) + CU2S_BETA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.33341)
CuS-92Sun-newS.tdb384.34CUS_B18 (x(S) 0.5) + ORTHORHOMBIC_A16 (x(S) 1) + LIQUID (x(S) 1)
CuS-92Sun-newS.tdb375.97FCC_A1 (x(S) 0) + CU2S_ALPHA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU2S_BETA (x(S) 0.33333)
CuS-92Sun-newS.tdb375.97CU2S_BETA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU2S_ALPHA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.34555)
CuS-92Sun-newS.tdb371.95CU2S_ALPHA (x(S) 0.33333) + CU31S16 (x(S) 0.3413) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.34634)
CuS-92Sun-newS.tdb325.41CU31S16 (x(S) 0.3413) + CU2S_GAMMA (x(S) 0.35752) + CUS_B18 (x(S) 0.5)
CuS-92Sun-newS.tdb311.97CU31S16 (x(S) 0.3413) + CU7S4 (x(S) 0.36364) + CUS_B18 (x(S) 0.5)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull CuS-92Sun-LB · CALPHAD hull CuS-92Sun-newS

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Cu–S system (19)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1409.15L2 = L1 + DgL2: S 0.3314; L1: S 0.022; Dg: S 0.333model[1] Lee 2007Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
1378.15L2 = L1 + Dgexperimental[1] Lee 2007
cites Chakrabarti 1994
Table 2, p. 4, row 24
report
1342.15L1 = (Cu) + DgL1: S 0.0141; (Cu): S 2.000e-4; Dg: S 0.3331model[1] Lee 2007Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
1340.15L1 = (Cu) + Dgexperimental[1] Lee 2007
cites Chakrabarti 1994
Table 2, p. 4, row 25
report
1087.15L2 = Dg + L3L2: S 0.4012; Dg: S 0.3642; L3: S 0.9986model[1] Lee 2007Table 2, p. 4, row 17
report
1086.15L2 = Dg + L3experimental[1] Lee 2007
cites Chakrabarti 1994
Table 2, p. 4, row 32
report
781.15Dg + L3 = CvDg: S 0.3689; L3: S 0.9999model[1] Lee 2007Table 2, p. 4, row 19
report
780.15Dg + L3 = Cvexperimental[1] Lee 2007
cites Chakrabarti 1994
Table 2, p. 4, row 33
report
388.15L + Cv = (S)experimental[1] Lee 2007
cites Chakrabarti 1994
Table 2, p. 4, row 34
report
388.15L + Cv = (S)model[1] Lee 2007Table 2, p. 4, row 20
report
379.15(Cu) + βCh = αChmodel[1] Lee 2007Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
377.15(Cu) + βCh = αChexperimental[1] Lee 2007
cites Chakrabarti 1994
Table 2, p. 4, row 27
report
367.15βCh – Dg DjαCh: S 0.3333; Dg: S 0.3529; Dj: S 0.3413model[1] Lee 2007Table 2, p. 4, row 10
report
366.15βCh + Dg = Djexperimental[1] Lee 2007
cites Chakrabarti 1994
Table 2, p. 4, row 28
report
363.15βCh = αCh + Djexperimental[1] Lee 2007
cites Chakrabarti 1994
Table 2, p. 4, row 29
report
350.15Dg + Cv = AnDg: S 0.3591model[1] Lee 2007Table 2, p. 4, row 23
report
348.15Dg + Cv = Anexperimental[1] Lee 2007
cites Chakrabarti 1994
Table 2, p. 4, row 35
report
345.15Dg + Dj = Anexperimental[1] Lee 2007
cites Chakrabarti 1994
Table 2, p. 4, row 30
report
343.15Dg + Dj = AnDg: S 0.3561; Dj: S 0.3413model[1] Lee 2007Table 2, p. 4, row 13
report

Other properties

Phase transition (4)

Phase transition, Cu–S system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition708.15 K708.15(Cu) + Dg = βChexperimental[1] Lee 2007
cites Chakrabarti 1994
Table 2, p. 4, row 26
report
Phase transition708.15 K708.15(Cu) + Dg = βCh
Dg: S 0.3334
model[1] Lee 2007Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
Phase transition1403.15 K1403.15L = Dgexperimental[1] Lee 2007
cites Chakrabarti 1994
Table 2, p. 4, row 31
report
Phase transition1413.15 K1413.15L = Dg
L: S 0.3355
model[1] Lee 2007Table 2, p. 4, row 15
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Byeong-Joo Lee, Bo Sundman, Sung Il Kim, Kwang-Geun Chin, Thermodynamic Calculations on the Stability of Cu2S in Low Carbon Steels, ISIJ Int. 47, 163-171 (2007). doi:10.2355/isijinternational.47.163