Cu–Sb system
55 accepted literature values from 3 paper(s) (experimental 33, model 22); 3 calculated phase diagram(s). 2 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (11) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 33 |
| model | 22 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 22 |
| phase transition | 2 |
| formation | 19 |
| crystal structure | 12 |
Calculated phase diagrams
Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.
| TDB file | Assessment | SHA-256 | Links |
|---|---|---|---|
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | X.J. Liu, C.P. Wang, I. Ohnuma, R. Kainuma, K. Ishida, J. Phase Equilib., 21, 432-42(2000). doi:10.1361/105497100770339608 | 13e84e190226e22dc5930e637d1040222d29881dc5bfd446249534249936f846 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | W. Gierlotka, D. Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, J. Alloys Compd., 484, 172-76(2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.05.056 | 49927e30622bd5246d42dfd023f12df44307e65f94dbfa63ae3d5af2801bed1d | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | R. Liu, J. Wang, D. Cui, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus, 44, 687-703(2023). doi:10.1007/s11669-023-01074-8 | 8157c1beeaa730d4347fbf592edc9124f69cbfee8a8526044f798873f6461f62 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| TDB file | T (K) | Phases at the invariant |
|---|---|---|
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 920.25 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.059) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.18326) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.20425) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 858.09 | BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.31329) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.44394) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 799 | CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.6341) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 799 | CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.63424) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 761.35 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.04546) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.21743) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 761.35 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.04548) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.21742) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 737.85 | CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.22439) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 737.85 | CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.2244) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 737.85 | CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.22418) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 707.55 | BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.24852) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 707.55 | BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.24856) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 707.36 | CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.24679) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 673.52 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.02375) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 673.52 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.0237) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 673.52 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.02374) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 662.16 | CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + CU10SB3 (x(Sb) 0.23) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 632.38 | CU10SB3 (x(Sb) 0.23) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) |
| CuSb-00Liu-LB.tdb | 533.3 | CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + CU10SB3 (x(Sb) 0.23) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 946.29 | CU3SB_D03#2 (x(Sb) 0.24226) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.24981) + CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.25782) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 925.66 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.05689) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.19396) + CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.2066) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 855.69 | CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.3332) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.41788) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 798.72 | CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.62682) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 798.72 | CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.62739) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 752.02 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.06047) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.22387) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 752.02 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.06047) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.22387) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 751.13 | CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.24546) + CU3SB_D03#2 (x(Sb) 0.25457) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33333) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 724.98 | CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.20003) + CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.23205) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 724.97 | CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.20003) + CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.23222) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 724.97 | CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.20003) + CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.23222) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 716.54 | CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.24257) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33333) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 716.54 | CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.24257) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33333) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 716.54 | CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.24266) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33333) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 715.39 | CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.20005) + CU10SB3 (x(Sb) 0.23077) + CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.23892) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 714.9 | CU10SB3 (x(Sb) 0.23077) + CU3SB_D03 (x(Sb) 0.23994) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 653.17 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.03048) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 653.17 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.03046) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 653.17 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.03046) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 534.06 | CU10SB3 (x(Sb) 0.23077) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33333) |
| CuSb-09Gie.tdb | 415.18 | CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + CU10SB3 (x(Sb) 0.23077) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33333) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 920.25 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.059) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.18326) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.20425) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 858.09 | BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.31329) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.44394) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 799 | CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.6341) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 799 | CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.63424) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 753.64 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.04475) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.21788) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 753.64 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.04478) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.21787) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 739.72 | CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.2217) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 739.71 | CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.22184) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 739.71 | CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.22185) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 709.65 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.03325) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 709.65 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.0332) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 709.65 | FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.0332) + CU17SB3_A3 (x(Sb) 0.15) + CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 707.55 | BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.24852) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 707.55 | BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.24856) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 707.36 | CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.24679) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 707.36 | CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + BCC_A2 (x(Sb) 0.24683) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 662.16 | CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + CU10SB3 (x(Sb) 0.23) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 632.38 | CU10SB3 (x(Sb) 0.23) + CU3SB_D0A (x(Sb) 0.25) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) |
| CuSb-23Liu.tdb | 533.3 | CU4SB (x(Sb) 0.2) + CU10SB3 (x(Sb) 0.23) + CU2SB_C38 (x(Sb) 0.33) |
Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull CuSb-00Liu-LB · CALPHAD hull CuSb-09Gie
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 918 | L=FCC_A1+β | L: Sb 0.19 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Subramanian | Table 3, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| 914 | L=FCC_A1+β | L: Sb 0.22 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 3 report | |
| 859 | β+L=η | η: Sb 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Subramanian | Table 3, p. 3, row 6 report | |
| 858 | β+L=η | β: Sb 0.33; η: Sb 0.333333 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 5 report | |
| 799 | L=η+Rhombo | L: Sb 0.63; η: Sb 0.333333; Rhombo: Sb 1 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Subramanian | Table 3, p. 3, row 8 report | |
| 798 | L=η+Rhombo | L: Sb 0.61; η: Sb 0.333333; Rhombo: Sb 1 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 7 report | |
| 761 | FCC_A1+β=γ | γ: Sb 0.15 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Subramanian | Table 3, p. 3, row 10 report | |
| 756 | FCC_A1+β=γ | FCC_A1: Sb 0.15; γ: Sb 0.15 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 9 report | |
| 735 | γ+β=δ | γ: Sb 0.2; δ: Sb 0.2 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 11 report | |
| 735 | γ+β=δ | γ: Sb 0.15; δ: Sb 0.2 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Subramanian | Table 3, p. 3, row 12 report | |
| 718 | δ+β=ε | δ: Sb 0.2; ε: Sb 0.25 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Subramanian | Table 3, p. 3, row 14 report | |
| 717 | δ+β=ε | δ: Sb 0.25; ε: Sb 0.25 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 13 report | |
| 716 | β=ε+η | β: Sb 0.24; ε: Sb 0.25; η: Sb 0.333333 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 15 report | |
| 713 | β=ε+η | ε: Sb 0.25; η: Sb 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Subramanian | Table 3, p. 3, row 16 report | |
| 673 | γ=FCC_A1+δ | γ: Sb 0.15; δ: Sb 0.2 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Subramanian | Table 3, p. 3, row 18 report | |
| 672 | γ=FCC_A1+δ | γ: Sb 0.15; δ: Sb 0.2 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 17 report | |
| 663 | δ+ε=ζ | δ: Sb 0.23; ε: Sb 0.25; ζ: Sb 0.230769 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 19 report | |
| 663 | δ+ε=ζ | δ: Sb 0.2; ε: Sb 0.25; ζ: Sb 0.230769 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Subramanian | Table 3, p. 3, row 20 report | |
| 633 | ε=ζ+η | ε: Sb 0.25; ζ: Sb 0.230769; η: Sb 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Subramanian | Table 3, p. 3, row 22 report | |
| 633 | ε=ζ+η | ε: Sb 0.25; ζ: Sb 0.230769; η: Sb 0.333333 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 21 report | |
| 533 | ζ=δ+η | ζ: Sb 0.230769; δ: Sb 0.2; η: Sb 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Subramanian | Table 3, p. 3, row 24 report | |
| 529 | ζ=δ+η | ζ: Sb 0.23; δ: Sb 0.2; η: Sb 0.333333 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 23 report |
Formation enthalpies
Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.
| Phase | Compound | Value | T (K) | Class | MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| γ | -2.845 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 775 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 5, p. 5, row 3 report | ||||
| γ | -2.68 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 775 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Murakami 1936 | Table 5, p. 5, row 4 report | ||||
| γ(Cu17Sb3) | -2.68 kJ/mol-atom | model | [2] Liu 2000 | Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report | |||||
| γ(Cu17Sb3) | -0.27 kJ/mol-atom | 775.15 | experimental | [2] Liu 2000 cites Hultgren 1973 | Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report | ||||
| δ | -5.486 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 775 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 5, p. 5, row 1 report | ||||
| δ | -5.142 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 775 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Murakami 1936 | Table 5, p. 5, row 2 report | ||||
| δ(Cu4Sb) | -5.142 kJ/mol-atom | model | [2] Liu 2000 | Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report | |||||
| ε | -5.282 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 775 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 5, p. 5, row 5 report | ||||
| ε | -4.718 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 775 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Murakami 1936 | Table 5, p. 5, row 6 report | ||||
| ε(Cu3Sb) | Cu3Sb | -4.718 kJ/mol-atom | model | 3.13 (mp-aaaabexw) | 6.48 (oqmd-320322) | [2] Liu 2000 | Table 2, p. 3, row 4 report | ||
| ζ | -5.513 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 775 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 5, p. 5, row 9 report | ||||
| ζ | -4.936 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 775 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Murakami 1936 | Table 5, p. 5, row 10 report | ||||
| ζ(Cu10Sb3) | Cu10Sb3 | -4.936 kJ/mol-atom | model | 2.094 (mp-aaaaaczc) | 5.616 (oqmd-8425) | [2] Liu 2000 | Table 2, p. 3, row 5 report | ||
| η | -4.753 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 773 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 5, p. 5, row 7 report | ||||
| η | -4.23 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 773 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Vecher 1958 | Table 5, p. 5, row 8 report | ||||
| η(Cu2Sb) | Cu2Sb | -4.351 kJ/mol-atom | model | -3.932 (mp-aaaaacsf) | 1.093 (oqmd-3607) | [2] Liu 2000 | Table 2, p. 3, row 6 report | ||
| η(Cu2Sb) | Cu2Sb | -4.23 kJ/mol-atom | 723.15 | experimental | -3.932 (mp-aaaaacsf) | 1.093 (oqmd-3607) | [2] Liu 2000 cites Kleppa 1956 doi | Table 2, p. 3, row 7 report | |
| η(Cu2Sb) | Cu2Sb | -4.205 kJ/mol-atom | 775.15 | experimental | -3.932 (mp-aaaaacsf) | 1.093 (oqmd-3607) | [2] Liu 2000 cites Hultgren 1973 | Table 2, p. 3, row 8 report | |
| η(Cu2Sb) | Cu2Sb | -1.35 kJ/mol-atom | 773.15 | experimental | -3.932 (mp-aaaaacsf) | 1.093 (oqmd-3607) | [2] Liu 2000 cites Brodowski 1982 | Table 2, p. 3, row 9 report |
Other properties
Phase transition (2)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase transition | 956 K | 956 | L=β | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2009 cites Subramanian | Table 3, p. 3, row 2 report | |
| Phase transition | 958 K | 958 | L=β L: Sb 0.25; β: Sb 0.25 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 1 report |
Crystal structure (12)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice a | 6 Å | β (Cu3Sb) alloy: Sb 0.25 | experimental | [3] Liu 2023 cites Hofmann 1941 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report | ||
| Lattice a | 2.752 Å | 298.15 | γ (Cu17Sb3) alloy: Sb 0.15 | experimental | [3] Liu 2023 cites Schubert 1957 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report | |
| Lattice a | 19.124 Å | 298.15 | δ (Cu78Sb20) alloy: Sb 0.204082 | experimental | [3] Liu 2023 cites Yamaguchi 1972 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.504 Å | 298.15 | ε (Cu3Sb) alloy: Sb 0.25 | experimental | [3] Liu 2023 cites Karlsson 1972 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.0014 Å | 298.15 | η (Cu2Sb) alloy: Sb 0.333333 | experimental | [3] Liu 2023 cites Pearson 1964 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| Lattice a | 9.92 Å | 298.15 | ξ(Cu10Sb3) alloy: Sb 0.230769 | experimental | [3] Liu 2023 cites Gunzel 1958 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report | |
| Lattice b | 4.353 Å | 298.15 | ε (Cu3Sb) alloy: Sb 0.25 | experimental | [3] Liu 2023 cites Karlsson 1972 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.32 Å | 298.15 | γ (Cu17Sb3) alloy: Sb 0.15 | experimental | [3] Liu 2023 cites Schubert 1957 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.32476 Å | 298.15 | δ (Cu78Sb20) alloy: Sb 0.204082 | experimental | [3] Liu 2023 cites Yamaguchi 1972 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.768 Å | 298.15 | ε (Cu3Sb) alloy: Sb 0.25 | experimental | [3] Liu 2023 cites Karlsson 1972 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report | |
| Lattice c | 6.1044 Å | 298.15 | η (Cu2Sb) alloy: Sb 0.333333 | experimental | [3] Liu 2023 cites Pearson 1964 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.32 Å | 298.15 | ξ(Cu10Sb3) alloy: Sb 0.230769 | experimental | [3] Liu 2023 cites Gunzel 1958 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- Wojciech Gierlotka, Dominika Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, Thermodynamic description of the Cu–Sb binary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 484, 172-176 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.05.056
- X. J. Liu, C. P. Wang, I. Ohnuma, R. Kainuma, K. Ishida, Thermodynamic assessment of the phase diagrams of the Cu-Sb and Sb-Zn systems, JPE 21, 432-442 (2000). doi:10.1361/105497100770339608
- Runlin Liu, Jiong Wang, Dongyu Cui, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Cu-Sb-Se System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 44, 687-703 (2023). doi:10.1007/s11669-023-01074-8