Cu–Si–Zn system

24 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 19, model 5); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	19
model	5

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	9
phase equilibrium	15

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Cu–Si–Zn system (9)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1033.15	L + β = γ + η	L: Cu 0.7034, Si 0.2301, Zn 0.0665; β: Cu 0.7519, Si 0.1595, Zn 0.0886; γ: Cu 0.6845, Si 0.2101, Zn 0.1054; η: Cu 0.7593, Si 0.24, Zn 7.000e-4	model	[1] Wang 2011	Table 6, p. 12, row 1 report
1018.15	L = γ + η + (Si)	L: Cu 0.6771, Si 0.2659, Zn 0.057; γ: Cu 0.6857, Si 0.2203, Zn 0.094; η: Cu 0.7593, Si 0.24, Zn 7.000e-4	model	[1] Wang 2011	Table 6, p. 12, row 3 report
956.15	L = γ + η + (Si)	L: Cu 0.6097, Si 0.1839, Zn 0.2063; γ: Cu 0.6045, Si 0.1485, Zn 0.247; η: Cu 0.7282, Si 0.2206, Zn 0.0512	experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Mima 1956	Table 6, p. 12, row 2 report
940.15	L + γ = δ + (Si)	L: Cu 0.1957, Si 0.0069, Zn 0.7974; γ: Cu 0.3119, Si 0.0069, Zn 0.6812; δ: Cu 0.2756, Si 0, Zn 0.7244	experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Mima 1956	Table 6, p. 12, row 4 report
938.15	L + γ = δ + (Si)	L: Cu 0.1738, Si 0.0134, Zn 0.8128; γ: Cu 0.3255, Si 0.0039, Zn 0.6706; δ: Cu 0.2658, Si 0, Zn 0.7342	model	[1] Wang 2011	Table 6, p. 12, row 5 report
871.15	L + δ = ϵ + (Si)	L: Cu 0.1247, Si 0.0074, Zn 0.8679; δ: Cu 0.2309, Si 0, Zn 0.7691; ϵ: Cu 0.211, Si 0, Zn 0.789	model	[1] Wang 2011	Table 6, p. 12, row 7 report
870.15	L + δ = ϵ + (Si)	L: Cu 0.1189, Si 0, Zn 0.8811; δ: Cu 0.2396, Si 0, Zn 0.7604; ϵ: Cu 0.2198, Si 0, Zn 0.7802	experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Mima 1956	Table 6, p. 12, row 6 report
697.15	L + ϵ = (Zn) + (Si)	L: Cu 0.0187, Si 9.000e-4, Zn 0.9804; ϵ: Cu 0.1258, Si 0, Zn 0.8742; (Zn): Cu 0.0188, Si 0, Zn 0.9812	model	[1] Wang 2011	Table 6, p. 12, row 9 report
697.15	L + ϵ = (Zn) + (Si)	L: Cu 0.0185, Si 0, Zn 0.9815; ϵ: Cu 0.1281, Si 0, Zn 0.8719; (Zn): Cu 0.0278, Si 0, Zn 0.9722	experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Mima 1956	Table 6, p. 12, row 8 report

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (15)

Phase equilibrium, Cu–Si–Zn system
Property	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase composition	873.15	γ γ: Cu 0.606, Si 0.102, Zn 0.292	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 9 report
Phase composition	873.15	γ + (Si) γ: Cu 0.524, Si 0.092, Zn 0.384; (Si): Cu 0, Si 1, Zn 0	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 12 report
Phase composition	873.15	γ + (Si) γ: Cu 0.447, Si 0.041, Zn 0.512; (Si): Cu 0, Si 1, Zn 0	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 14 report
Phase composition	873.15	γ + (Si) γ: Cu 0.502, Si 0.084, Zn 0.414; (Si): Cu 0, Si 1, Zn 0	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 13 report
Phase composition	873.15	γ + (Si) γ: Cu 0.569, Si 0.126, Zn 0.305; (Si): Cu 0, Si 1, Zn 0	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 11 report
Phase composition	873.15	γ + β γ: Cu 0.703, Si 0.142, Zn 0.155; β: Cu 0.714, Si 0.083, Zn 0.203	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 7 report
Phase composition	873.15	γ + δ + (Si) γ: Cu 0.342, Si 0.005, Zn 0.653; δ: Cu 0.258, Si 0.005, Zn 0.737; (Si): Cu 0, Si 1, Zn 0	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 15 report
Phase composition	873.15	γ + ε1 γ: Cu 0.698, Si 0.163, Zn 0.139; ε1: Cu 0.765, Si 0.212, Zn 0.023	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 5 report
Phase composition	873.15	ε1 + γ1 + κ ε1: Cu 0.779, Si 0.21, Zn 0.011; γ1: Cu 0.809, Si 0.162, Zn 0.029; κ: Cu 0.817, Si 0.111, Zn 0.072	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 1 report
Phase composition	873.15	ε1 + κ + γ ε1: Cu 0.772, Si 0.211, Zn 0.017; κ: Cu 0.765, Si 0.107, Zn 0.128; γ: Cu 0.733, Si 0.159, Zn 0.108	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 4 report
Phase composition	873.15	η + γ + (Si) η: Cu 0.709, Si 0.245, Zn 0.046; γ: Cu 0.622, Si 0.148, Zn 0.23; (Si): Cu 0, Si 1, Zn 0	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 10 report
Phase composition	873.15	κ κ: Cu 0.748, Si 0.102, Zn 0.15	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 3 report
Phase composition	873.15	κ κ: Cu 0.797, Si 0.102, Zn 0.101	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 2 report
Phase composition	873.15	κ + (Cu) κ: Cu 0.734, Si 0.093, Zn 0.173; (Cu): Cu 0.735, Si 0.063, Zn 0.202	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 8 report
Phase composition	873.15	κ + γ + β κ: Cu 0.732, Si 0.101, Zn 0.167; γ: Cu 0.705, Si 0.145, Zn 0.15; β: Cu 0.71, Si 0.089, Zn 0.201	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 4, p. 6, row 6 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Jiong Wang, Honghui Xu, Shunli Shang, Lijun Zhang, Yong Du, Wenqing Zhang et al., Experimental investigation and thermodynamic modeling of the Cu–Si–Zn system with the refined description for the Cu–Zn system, Calphad 35, 191-203 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.02.001

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}