Cu–Sn–Ti system

9 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 9); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	9

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
phase equilibrium	9

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (9)

Phase equilibrium, Cu–Sn–Ti system
Property	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location	Quote
Phase assemblage	1073.15	fcc(Cu) + Sn3Ti5 alloy: Sn 0.158, Ti 0.211	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	p. 2 report	Fig. 1 shows a representative backscattered electron (BSE) image of an alloy sample (alloy #1, Cu-15.8 at.% Sn-21.1 at.% Ti) annealed at 800 °C for 760 h. As can be seen, alloy #1 is composed of two different phases. The compositions of the dark phase and the white phase as measured by EPMA are Cu-5.5 at.% Sn-0.8 at.% Ti and Cu-34.3 at.% Sn-52.7 at.% Ti, respectively, corresponding to the fcc(Cu)…
Phase composition	1073.15	Sn3Ti5 + Cu4Ti + Cu3Ti2 Sn3Ti5: Cu 0.134, Sn 0.328, Ti 0.538; Cu4Ti: Cu 0.774, Sn 0.006, Ti 0.22; Cu3Ti2: Cu 0.606, Sn 0.005, Ti 0.389	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 2, p. 4, row 4 report
Phase composition	1073.15	Sn3Ti5 + Cu4Ti + fcc(Cu) Sn3Ti5: Cu 0.116, Sn 0.343, Ti 0.541; Cu4Ti: Cu 0.794, Sn 0.001, Ti 0.205; fcc(Cu): Cu 0.942, Sn 0.004, Ti 0.054	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 2, p. 4, row 3 report
Phase composition	1073.15	Sn3Ti5 + SnTi3 Sn3Ti5: Cu 0.06, Sn 0.355, Ti 0.585; SnTi3: Cu 0.025, Sn 0.234, Ti 0.741	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 2, p. 4, row 7 report
Phase composition	1073.15	Sn3Ti5 + SnTi3 Sn3Ti5: Cu 0.073, Sn 0.349, Ti 0.578; SnTi3: Cu 0.004, Sn 0.263, Ti 0.733	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 2, p. 4, row 6 report
Phase composition	1073.15	Sn3Ti5 + SnTi3 + Cu4Ti3 Sn3Ti5: Cu 0.115, Sn 0.337, Ti 0.548; SnTi3: Cu 0.033, Sn 0.261, Ti 0.706; Cu4Ti3: Cu 0.561, Sn 0.006, Ti 0.433	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 2, p. 4, row 5 report
Phase composition	1073.15	Sn3Ti5 + fcc(Cu) Sn3Ti5: Cu 0.13, Sn 0.343, Ti 0.527; fcc(Cu): Cu 0.937, Sn 0.055, Ti 0.008	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 2, p. 4, row 1 report
Phase composition	1073.15	Sn3Ti5 + fcc(Cu) Sn3Ti5: Cu 0.115, Sn 0.345, Ti 0.54; fcc(Cu): Cu 0.966, Sn 0.022, Ti 0.012	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 2, p. 4, row 2 report
Phase composition	1073.15	SnTi3 + CuTi2 + CuTi SnTi3: Cu 0.025, Sn 0.234, Ti 0.741; CuTi2: Cu 0.324, Sn 0.01, Ti 0.666; CuTi: Cu 0.49, Sn 0.003, Ti 0.507	experimental	[1] Wang 2011	Table 2, p. 4, row 8 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Jiang Wang, Chunlei Liu, Christian Leinenbach, Ulrich E. Klotz, Peter J. Uggowitzer, Jörg F. Löffler, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic assessment of the Cu–Sn–Ti ternary system, Calphad 35, 82-94 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.12.006

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}