Cu–Te system

215 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 134, model 74, unspecified 7); 3 calculated phase diagram(s). 14 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (22) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental134
model74
unspecified7
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction78
phase transition73
phase equilibrium25
activity / EMF / Gibbs energy4
crystal structure35

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
CuTe-21Hua.tdbD. Huang, R. Han, Y. Wang, T. Ye, J. Alloys Compd., 855, 157373(2021). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.1573737d81feae126f40f42d7eca362aec9c1c5a6cdfb84e45fa9fe7cb8dbff1c1088eviewer · TDB · JSON
CuTe-22Yu.tdbS. Yu, J. Wang, D. Cui, S. Chen, Q. Wu, Y. Du, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 43, 193-213(2022). doi:10.1007/s11669-022-00950-z1478a3ddfca00a47d3ebfd82ca434e131a8018f272646ee7900c52c5386d40f6viewer · TDB · JSON
CuTe-23Hut.tdbY. Hutabalian, S.-W. Chen, W. Gierlotka, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 44, 181-99(2023). doi:10.1007/s11669-023-01032-4849aa90ae59ba1b709ba4cee6d11513b1db42327a15a34284d6163347c68b6eeviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
CuTe-21Hua.tdb1379.3LIQUID#2 (x(Te) 0.05687) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.3185) + CU2TE_ZETA (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb1320.23FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.03577) + CU2TE_ZETA (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb1185.37FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + CU2TE_ZETA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_EPSILON (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb1185.37CU2TE_EPSILON (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_ZETA (x(Te) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.42398)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb922.95CU2TE_EPSILON (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42857) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.48432)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb874.55FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + CU2TE_DELTA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_EPSILON (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb874.55CU2TE_EPSILON (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_DELTA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42857)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb697CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42857) + CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.64293)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb650.02CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857) + CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42857) + CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb650.02CU2TE_DELTA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42857) + CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb625.95CU2TE_DELTA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_GAMMA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb625.95FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + CU2TE_GAMMA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_DELTA (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb623.38CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.71679) + HEXAGONAL_A8 (x(Te) 1)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb619.84CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857) + CUTE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.5) + CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb619.84CUTE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.5) + CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5) + HEXAGONAL_A8 (x(Te) 1)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb581.65CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_GAMMA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb581.65FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + CU2TE_GAMMA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb459.85CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857)
CuTe-21Hua.tdb459.85FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + CU2TE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb1359.4LIQUID#2 (x(Te) 0.05227) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.30321) + CU2TE_ZETA (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb1320.33FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.03681) + CU2TE_ZETA (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb1148.37FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + CU2TE_ZETA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_EPSILON (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb1148.37CU2TE_EPSILON (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_ZETA (x(Te) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.40938)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb1075.98CU2TE_EPSILON (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU3TE2 (x(Te) 0.37) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.42442)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb919.44CU3TE2 (x(Te) 0.37) + CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42857) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.46134)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb917.99CU2TE_EPSILON (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU3TE2 (x(Te) 0.37) + CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42857)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb874.73FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + CU2TE_DELTA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_EPSILON (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb874.73CU2TE_DELTA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_EPSILON (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42857)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb693.7CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42857) + CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.63201)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb650.03CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857) + CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42857) + CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb650.03CU2TE_DELTA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857) + CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42857)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb624.76FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + CU2TE_GAMMA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_DELTA (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb624.76CU2TE_GAMMA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_DELTA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb621.79CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.71811) + HEXAGONAL_A8 (x(Te) 1)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb619.19CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857) + CUTE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.5) + CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb619.19CUTE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.5) + CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5) + HEXAGONAL_A8 (x(Te) 1)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb617.98CU2TE_GAMMA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_IOTA (x(Te) 0.357) + CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb593.05CU2TE_GAMMA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_ETA (x(Te) 0.345) + CU2TE_IOTA (x(Te) 0.357)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb582.19FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + CU2TE_GAMMA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb582.19CU2TE_GAMMA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_ETA (x(Te) 0.345)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb542.88CU2TE_IOTA (x(Te) 0.357) + CU7TE4 (x(Te) 0.36) + CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb520CU2TE_KAPPA (x(Te) 0.357) + CU2TE_IOTA (x(Te) 0.357) + CU7TE4 (x(Te) 0.36)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb520CU2TE_ETA (x(Te) 0.345) + CU2TE_KAPPA (x(Te) 0.357) + CU2TE_IOTA (x(Te) 0.357)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb517.99CU2TE_ETA (x(Te) 0.345) + CU2TE_LAMBDA (x(Te) 0.354) + CU2TE_KAPPA (x(Te) 0.357)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb492.8CU2TE_LAMBDA (x(Te) 0.354) + CU2TE_KAPPA (x(Te) 0.357) + CU7TE4 (x(Te) 0.36)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb459.12FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + CU2TE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.33333)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb459.12CU2TE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_ETA (x(Te) 0.345)
CuTe-22Yu.tdb450CU2TE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_THETA (x(Te) 0.345) + CU2TE_ETA (x(Te) 0.345)
CuTe-23Hut.tdb1368.88LIQUID#2 (x(Te) 0.05436) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.32005) + CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.33382)
CuTe-23Hut.tdb1319.51FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.03654) + CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.33368)
CuTe-23Hut.tdb1058.31CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.35259) + CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.3893) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.46388)
CuTe-23Hut.tdb692.55CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42358) + CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.64803)
CuTe-23Hut.tdb684.29FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + CU2TE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.33334)
CuTe-23Hut.tdb684.29FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + CU2TE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.33333) + CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.33334)
CuTe-23Hut.tdb645.4CU2TE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.34366) + CU2TE_BETA (x(Te) 0.3551) + CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.4092)
CuTe-23Hut.tdb623.38CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.71679) + HEXAGONAL_A8 (x(Te) 1)
CuTe-23Hut.tdb619.84CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42404) + CUTE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.5) + CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5)
CuTe-23Hut.tdb619.84CUTE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.5) + CUTE_BETA (x(Te) 0.5) + HEXAGONAL_A8 (x(Te) 1)
CuTe-23Hut.tdb597.45CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.42349) + CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857) + CUTE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.5)
CuTe-23Hut.tdb588.49CU2TE_ALPHA (x(Te) 0.36072) + CU4TE3_BETA (x(Te) 0.41637) + CU4TE3_C38 (x(Te) 0.42857)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull CuTe-21Hua · CALPHAD hull CuTe-22Yu

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Cu–Te system (78)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1423.05L1 ↔ L2 + ζ-Cu2TeL1: Te 0.316; L2: Te 0.058; ζ-Cu2Te: Te 0.333unspecified[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 2
report
1388congruent melting: L1 -> ζCu2TeL1: Te 0.333; ζCu2Te: Te 0.333experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 3
report
1387.2congruent melting: L1 -> ζCu2TeL1: Te 0.333; ζCu2Te: Te 0.333model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 1
report
1384.5congruent melting: L1 -> ζCu2TeL1: Te 0.333; ζCu2Te: Te 0.333model[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 2
report
1379.3monotectic: L1 -> ζCu2Te + L2L1: Te 0.316; ζCu2Te: Te 0.333; L2: Te 0.058model[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 5
report
1365.15L1 ↔ L2 + ζ-Cu2TeL1: Te 0.29; L2: Te 0.05; ζ-Cu2Te: Te 0.333model[1] Huang 2021
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 11, row 4
report
1365monotectic: L1 -> ζCu2Te + L2L1: Te 0.29; ζCu2Te: Te 0.33; L2: Te 0.05experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 7
report
1359.3monotectic: L1 -> ζCu2Te + L2L1: Te 0.303; ζCu2Te: Te 0.333; L2: Te 0.052model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 4
report
1325.15L2 ↔ (Cu) + ζ-Cu2TeL2: Te 0.046; (Cu): Te 7.000e-4; ζ-Cu2Te: Te 0.333model[1] Huang 2021
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 11, row 8
report
1325eutectic: L2 -> FCC + ζCu2TeL2: Te 0.046; FCC: Te 0; ζCu2Te: Te 0.333experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 11
report
1324.35L1 ↔ L2 + ζ-Cu2Teζ-Cu2Te: Cu 0.666667, Te 0.333333experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 1
report
1324.2monotectic: L1 -> ζCu2Te + L2ζCu2Te: Cu 0.666667, Te 0.333333experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 6
report
1320.45L2 ↔ (Cu) + ζ-Cu2TeL2: Te 0.035; (Cu): Te 0; ζ-Cu2Te: Te 0.333unspecified[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 6
report
1320.3eutectic: L2 -> FCC + ζCu2TeL2: Te 0.037; FCC: Te 0; ζCu2Te: Te 0.333model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 8
report
1320.3eutectic: L2 -> FCC + ζCu2TeL2: Te 0.035; FCC: Te 0; ζCu2Te: Te 0.333model[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 9
report
1307.15L1 ↔ L2 + ζ-Cu2Teζ-Cu2Te: Cu 0.666667, Te 0.333333experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Chikashige 1907 doi
Table 4, p. 11, row 3
report
1306.15L2 ↔ (Cu) + ζ-Cu2Teζ-Cu2Te: Cu 0.666667, Te 0.333333experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Chikashige 1907 doi
Table 4, p. 11, row 7
report
1291.95L2 ↔ (Cu) + ζ-Cu2Teζ-Cu2Te: Cu 0.666667, Te 0.333333experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 5
report
1291.8eutectic: L2 -> FCC + ζCu2TeζCu2Te: Cu 0.666667, Te 0.333333experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 10
report
1076.7εCu2Te + L1 -> Cu0.63Te0.37εCu2Te: Te 0.333; L1: Te 0.424; Cu0.63Te0.37: Te 0.37model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 45
report
1076εCu2Te + L1 -> Cu0.63Te0.37εCu2Te: Te 0.333; L1: Te 0.43; Cu0.63Te0.37: Te 0.37experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 46
report
922.95L + ε-Cu2Te ↔ H-Cu4Te3L: Te 0.491; ε-Cu2Te: Te 0.333; H-Cu4Te3: Te 0.429unspecified[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 10
report
922.8L1 + εCu2Te -> βCu4Te3L1: Te 0.491; εCu2Te: Te 0.333; βCu4Te3: Te 0.429model[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 13
report
920.25L + ε-Cu2Te ↔ H-Cu4Te3ε-Cu2Te: Cu 0.666667, Te 0.333333; H-Cu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 9
report
920.15L + ε-Cu2Te ↔ H-Cu4Te3L: Te 0.47; ε-Cu2Te: Te 0.41; H-Cu4Te3: Te 0.41model[1] Huang 2021
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 11, row 13
report
920.1L1 + εCu2Te -> βCu4Te3εCu2Te: Cu 0.666667, Te 0.333333; βCu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 14
report
920Cu0.63Te0.37 + L1 -> βCu4Te3Cu0.63Te0.37: Te 0.37; L1: Te 0.47; βCu4Te3: Te 0.429experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 48
report
920L1 + εCu2Te -> βCu4Te3L1: Te 0.47; εCu2Te: Te 0.41; βCu4Te3: Te 0.41experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 15
report
919.5L1 + εCu2Te -> βCu4Te3L1: Te 0.461; εCu2Te: Te 0.337; βCu4Te3: Te 0.429model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 12
report
917.7Cu0.63Te0.37 + L1 -> βCu4Te3Cu0.63Te0.37: Te 0.37; L1: Te 0.461; βCu4Te3: Te 0.429model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 47
report
903.15L + ε-Cu2Te ↔ H-Cu4Te3ε-Cu2Te: Cu 0.666667, Te 0.333333; H-Cu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Koneshova 2001
Table 4, p. 11, row 12
report
896.15L + ε-Cu2Te ↔ H-Cu4Te3ε-Cu2Te: Cu 0.666667, Te 0.333333; H-Cu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Chikashige 1907 doi
Table 4, p. 11, row 11
report
698.15L + H-Cu4Te3 ↔ H-CuTeL: Te 0.67; H-Cu4Te3: Te 0.42; H-CuTe: Te 0.5model[1] Huang 2021
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 11, row 22
report
698L1 + βCu4Te3 -> βCuTeL1: Te 0.67; βCu4Te3: Te 0.42; βCuTe: Te 0.5experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 22
report
693.95L + H-Cu4Te3 ↔ H-CuTeH-Cu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571; H-CuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 19
report
693.9L1 + βCu4Te3 -> βCuTeβCu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571; βCuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 21
report
693.7L1 + βCu4Te3 -> βCuTeL1: Te 0.632; βCu4Te3: Te 0.429; βCuTe: Te 0.5model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 19
report
690.65L + H-Cu4Te3 ↔ H-CuTeL: Te 0.642; H-Cu4Te3: Te 0.429; H-CuTe: Te 0.5unspecified[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 20
report
690.5L1 + βCu4Te3 -> βCuTeL1: Te 0.642; βCu4Te3: Te 0.429; βCuTe: Te 0.5model[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 20
report
688.15L + H-Cu4Te3 ↔ H-CuTeH-Cu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571; H-CuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Koneshova 2001
Table 4, p. 11, row 21
report
652.65polymorphic: H-Cu4Te3 ↔ L-Cu4Te3H-Cu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571; L-Cu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 14
report
652.5polymorphic: αCu4Te3 -> βCu4Te3αCu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571; βCu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 18
report
650.05polymorphic: H-Cu4Te3 ↔ L-Cu4Te3H-Cu4Te3: Te 0.429; L-Cu4Te3: Te 0.429unspecified[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 15
report
650polymorphic: αCu4Te3 -> βCu4Te3αCu4Te3: Te 0.429; βCu4Te3: Te 0.429model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 16
report
649.9polymorphic: αCu4Te3 -> βCu4Te3αCu4Te3: Te 0.429; βCu4Te3: Te 0.429model[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 17
report
648.15polymorphic: H-Cu4Te3 ↔ L-Cu4Te3H-Cu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571; L-Cu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Koneshova 2001
Table 4, p. 11, row 17
report
638.15polymorphic: H-Cu4Te3 ↔ L-Cu4Te3H-Cu4Te3: Te 0.415; L-Cu4Te3: Te 0.415model[1] Huang 2021
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 11, row 18
report
638.15polymorphic: H-Cu4Te3 ↔ L-Cu4Te3H-Cu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571; L-Cu4Te3: Cu 0.571429, Te 0.428571experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Chikashige 1907 doi
Table 4, p. 11, row 16
report
623.15L ↔ H-CuTe + (Te)H-CuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Koneshova 2001
Table 4, p. 11, row 26
report
622.85L ↔ H-CuTe + (Te)L: Te 0.71; H-CuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 23
report
622.7eutectic: L1 -> HEX + βCuTeβCuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 25
report
622.25L ↔ H-CuTe + (Te)L: Te 0.711; H-CuTe: Te 0.5; (Te): Te 1unspecified[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 24
report
622.1eutectic: L1 -> HEX + βCuTeL1: Te 0.711; HEX: Te 1; βCuTe: Te 0.5model[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 24
report
621.8eutectic: L1 -> HEX + βCuTeL1: Te 0.718; HEX: Te 1; βCuTe: Te 0.5model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 23
report
619.85polymorphic: H-CuTe ↔ L-CuTeH-CuTe: Te 0.5; L-CuTe: Te 0.5unspecified[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 29
report
619.7polymorphic: αCuTe -> βCuTeαCuTe: Te 0.711; βCuTe: Te 1model[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 28
report
619.05polymorphic: H-CuTe ↔ L-CuTeH-CuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5; L-CuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 4, p. 11, row 28
report
619polymorphic: αCuTe -> βCuTeαCuTe: Te 0.5; βCuTe: Te 0.5model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 27
report
618.9polymorphic: αCuTe -> βCuTeαCuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5; βCuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Huang 2020 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 29
report
618ιCu2Te -> γCu2Te + αCu4Te3ιCu2Te: Te 0.357; γCu2Te: Te 0.333; αCu4Te3: Te 0.429model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 43
report
618ιCu2Te -> γCu2Te + αCu4Te3ιCu2Te: Te 0.357; γCu2Te: Te 0.333; αCu4Te3: Te 0.429experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 44
report
617.15L ↔ H-CuTe + (Te)L: Cu 0.291421, Te 0.708579; H-CuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Chikashige 1907 doi
Table 4, p. 11, row 25
report
613.15polymorphic: H-CuTe ↔ L-CuTeH-CuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5; L-CuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Koneshova 2001
Table 4, p. 11, row 30
report
613.15L ↔ H-CuTe + (Te)L: Te 0.71; H-CuTe: Te 0.5; (Te): Te 1model[1] Huang 2021
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 11, row 27
report
613eutectic: L1 -> HEX + βCuTeL1: Te 0.71; HEX: Te 1; βCuTe: Te 0.5experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 26
report
613polymorphic: αCuTe -> βCuTeαCuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5; βCuTe: Cu 0.5, Te 0.5experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Koneshova 2001
Table 4, p. 9, row 30
report
593ηCu2Te -> γCu2Te +ιCu2TeηCu2Te: Te 0.345; γCu2Te: Te 0.333; ιCu2Te: Te 0.357model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 41
report
593ηCu2Te -> γCu2Te +ιCu2TeηCu2Te: Te 0.345; γCu2Te: Te 0.333; ιCu2Te: Te 0.357experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 42
report
543μCu2Te -> ιCu2Te + αCu4Te3μCu2Te: Te 0.36; ιCu2Te: Te 0.357; αCu4Te3: Te 0.429experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 36
report
543μCu2Te -> ιCu2Te + αCu4Te3μCu2Te: Te 0.36; ιCu2Te: Te 0.357; αCu4Te3: Te 0.429model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 35
report
520polymorphic: κCu2Te -> ιCu2TeκCu2Te: Te 0.357; ιCu2Te: Te 0.357experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 40
report
520polymorphic: κCu2Te -> ιCu2TeκCu2Te: Te 0.357; ιCu2Te: Te 0.357model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 39
report
518λCu2Te -> ηCu2Te + κCu2TeλCu2Te: Te 0.354; ηCu2Te: Te 0.345; κCu2Te: Te 0.357model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 33
report
518λCu2Te -> ηCu2Te + κCu2TeλCu2Te: Te 0.354; ηCu2Te: Te 0.345; κCu2Te: Te 0.357experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 34
report
493κCu2Te -> λCu2Te + μCu2TeκCu2Te: Te 0.357; λCu2Te: Te 0.354; μCu2Te: Te 0.36experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 38
report
492.8κCu2Te -> λCu2Te + μCu2TeκCu2Te: Te 0.357; λCu2Te: Te 0.354; μCu2Te: Te 0.36model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 37
report
450polymorphic: ηCu2Te -> θCu2TeηCu2Te: Te 0.345; θCu2Te: Te 0.345model[2] Yu 2022Table 4, p. 9, row 31
report
450polymorphic: ηCu2Te -> θCu2TeηCu2Te: Te 0.345; θCu2Te: Te 0.345experimental[2] Yu 2022
cites Pashinkin 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 9, row 32
report

Other properties

Phase transition (73)

Phase transition, Cu–Te system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition148.15 K148.153
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Bougnot 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 9
report
Phase transition248.15 K248.153
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Bougnot 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 10
report
Phase transition433.15 K433.1514
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[1] Huang 2021
cites Ssub6 2017
Table 1, p. 2, row 62
report
Phase transition433.15 K433.155
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Kubaschewski 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 20
report
Phase transition440.15 K440.156
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Mills 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 25
report
Phase transition445.15 K445.153
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Bougnot 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 11
report
Phase transition445.15 K445.154
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Guastavino 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 16
report
Phase transition448.15 K448.159
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Vouroutzis 1989 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 38
report
Phase transition452.15 K452.1510
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Ghoumari-Bouanani 1993 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 43
report
Phase transition453.15 K453.1511
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Koneshova 2001
Table 1, p. 2, row 48
report
Phase transition454.15 K454.1512
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Qiu 2017 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 53
report
Phase transition457.15 K457.1513
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Mukherjee 2019 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 57
report
Phase transition459.85 K459.8515
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 1, p. 2, row 67
report
Phase transition463.15 K463.157
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Tsypin 1974
Table 1, p. 2, row 30
report
Phase transition468.15 K468.152
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Stevels 1969
Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
Phase transition497.15 K497.1510
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Ghoumari-Bouanani 1993 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 44
report
Phase transition517.15 K517.1513
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Mukherjee 2019 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 58
report
Phase transition526.15 K526.156
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Mills 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 26
report
Phase transition531.15 K531.1514
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[1] Huang 2021
cites Ssub6 2017
Table 1, p. 2, row 63
report
Phase transition531.15 K531.155
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Kubaschewski 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 21
report
Phase transition533.15 K533.151
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Gravemann 1956
Table 1, p. 2, row 1
report
Phase transition537.15 K537.153
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Bougnot 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 12
report
Phase transition538.15 K538.152
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Stevels 1969
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Phase transition543.15 K543.1511
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Koneshova 2001
Table 1, p. 2, row 49
report
Phase transition548.15 K548.158
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Blachnik 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 34
report
Phase transition548.15 K548.159
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Vouroutzis 1989 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 39
report
Phase transition578.15 K578.153
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Bougnot 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 13
report
Phase transition581.65 K581.6515
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 1, p. 2, row 68
report
Phase transition583.15 K583.1511
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Koneshova 2001
Table 1, p. 2, row 50
report
Phase transition583.15 K583.157
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Tsypin 1974
Table 1, p. 2, row 31
report
Phase transition585.65 K585.654
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Guastavino 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 17
report
Phase transition586.15 K586.158
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Blachnik 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 35
report
Phase transition589.15 K589.151
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Gravemann 1956
Table 1, p. 2, row 2
report
Phase transition590.15 K590.1514
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[1] Huang 2021
cites Ssub6 2017
Table 1, p. 2, row 64
report
Phase transition590.15 K590.155
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Kubaschewski 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 22
report
Phase transition591.15 K591.1510
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Ghoumari-Bouanani 1993 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 45
report
Phase transition593.15 K593.152
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Stevels 1969
Table 1, p. 2, row 7
report
Phase transition593.15 K593.159
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Vouroutzis 1989 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 40
report
Phase transition596.15 K596.1513
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Mukherjee 2019 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 59
report
Phase transition597.15 K597.1512
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Qiu 2017 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 54
report
Phase transition600.15 K600.156
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Mills 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 27
report
Phase transition613.15 K613.15otherexperimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Koneshova 2001
p. 2
report
CuTe exhibits an orthorhombic structure from room temperature up to the decomposition temperature in Ref. [14], whilst ref. [15] Shows that it undergoes a crystallographic transformation at 340 C.
Phase transition620.45 K620.45CuTeexperimental[1] Huang 2021p. 6
report
The first and second exothermic peaks at 347.3 and 350.7  C in the 1  C∙min1 curve are probably corresponding to the highe and lowetemperature modifications of CuTe and the eutectic reaction of L 4 HeCuTe þ (Te) respectively.
Phase transition625.15 K625.156
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Mills 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 28
report
Phase transition625.95 K625.9515
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 1, p. 2, row 69
report
Phase transition627.15 K627.1512
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Qiu 2017 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 55
report
Phase transition628.15 K628.1510
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Ghoumari-Bouanani 1993 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 46
report
Phase transition629.15 K629.1513
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Mukherjee 2019 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 60
report
Phase transition633.15 K633.1511
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Koneshova 2001
Table 1, p. 2, row 51
report
Phase transition633.15 K633.1514
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[1] Huang 2021
cites Ssub6 2017
Table 1, p. 2, row 65
report
Phase transition633.15 K633.153
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Bougnot 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 14
report
Phase transition633.15 K633.154
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Guastavino 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 18
report
Phase transition633.15 K633.155
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Kubaschewski 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 23
report
Phase transition633.15 K633.157
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Tsypin 1974
Table 1, p. 2, row 32
report
Phase transition633.15 K633.158
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Blachnik 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 36
report
Phase transition635.15 K635.151
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Gravemann 1956
Table 1, p. 2, row 3
report
Phase transition638.15 K638.159
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Vouroutzis 1989 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 41
report
Phase transition713.15 K713.152
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Stevels 1969
Table 1, p. 2, row 8
report
Phase transition725.15 K725.1510
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Ghoumari-Bouanani 1993 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 47
report
Phase transition748.15 K748.1513
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Mukherjee 2019 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 61
report
Phase transition750.15 K750.156
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Mills 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 29
report
Phase transition750.65 K750.653
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Bougnot 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 15
report
Phase transition756.15 K756.1512
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Qiu 2017 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 56
report
Phase transition765.65 K765.654
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Guastavino 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 19
report
Phase transition813.15 K813.1511
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Koneshova 2001
Table 1, p. 2, row 52
report
Phase transition823.15 K823.157
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Tsypin 1974
Table 1, p. 2, row 33
report
Phase transition833.15 K833.151
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Gravemann 1956
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
Phase transition835.15 K835.155
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Kubaschewski 1973 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 24
report
Phase transition841.15 K841.1514
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[1] Huang 2021
cites Ssub6 2017
Table 1, p. 2, row 66
report
Phase transition848.15 K848.159
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Vouroutzis 1989 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 42
report
Phase transition864.15 K864.158
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Blachnik 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 37
report
Phase transition874.55 K874.5515
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 1, p. 2, row 70
report
Phase transition1150.85 K1150.8515
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 1, p. 2, row 71
report

Phase equilibrium (25)

Phase equilibrium, Cu–Te system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase assemblage593.15(Cu) + Cu2Te
alloy: Te 0
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 22
report
Phase assemblage593.15Cu2Te + Cu4Te3
alloy: Te 0.333333
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 32
report
Phase composition(Cu) + Cu2Te
(Cu): Cu 0.998, Te 0.002; Cu2Te: Cu 0.659, Te 0.341
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 19
report
Phase composition(Cu) + Cu2Te
(Cu): Cu 0.999, Te 0.001; Cu2Te: Cu 0.665, Te 0.335
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 23
report
Phase compositionCu2Te
Cu2Te: Cu 0.631, Te 0.369
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 29
report
Phase compositionCu2Te
Cu2Te: Cu 0.634, Te 0.366
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 27
report
Phase compositionCuTe + (Te) + (Te) + CuTe
CuTe: Cu 0.459, Te 0.541; (Te): Cu 0.059, Te 0.941; (Te) + CuTe: Cu 0.295, Te 0.705
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 9
report
Phase compositionCuTe + (Te) + (Te) + CuTe
CuTe: Cu 0.499, Te 0.501; (Te): Cu 0.025, Te 0.975; (Te) + CuTe: Cu 0.273, Te 0.727
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
Phase compositionCuTe + (Te) + (Te) + CuTe
CuTe: Cu 0.463, Te 0.537; (Te): Cu 0.007, Te 0.993; (Te) + CuTe: Cu 0.284, Te 0.716
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 11
report
Phase compositionCuTe + (Te) + (Te) + CuTe
CuTe: Cu 0.469, Te 0.531; (Te): Cu 0.007, Te 0.993; (Te) + CuTe: Cu 0.299, Te 0.701
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 13
report
Phase compositionCuTe + (Te) + Cu4Te3 + (Te) + CuTe
CuTe: Cu 0.481, Te 0.519; (Te): Cu 0.032, Te 0.968; Cu4Te3: Cu 0.565, Te 0.435; (Te) + CuTe: Cu 0.282, Te 0.718
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 5
report
Phase compositionCuTe + Cu4Te3 + (Te) + CuTe
CuTe: Cu 0.485, Te 0.515; Cu4Te3: Cu 0.567, Te 0.433; (Te) + CuTe: Cu 0.286, Te 0.714
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 1
report
Phase compositionCuTe + Cu4Te3 + (Te) + CuTe
CuTe: Cu 0.481, Te 0.519; Cu4Te3: Cu 0.566, Te 0.434; (Te) + CuTe: Cu 0.282, Te 0.718
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
Phase composition593.15(Cu) + Cu2Te
(Cu): Cu 0.001, Te 0.999; Cu2Te: Cu 0.666, Te 0.334
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 20
report
Phase composition593.15(Cu) + Cu2Te
(Cu): Cu 0.001, Te 0.999; Cu2Te: Cu 0.664, Te 0.336
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 24
report
Phase composition593.15Cu2Te + Cu4Te3
Cu2Te: Cu 0.627, Te 0.373; Cu4Te3: Cu 0.588, Te 0.412
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 30
report
Phase composition593.15Cu4Te3 + CuTe
Cu4Te3: Cu 0.579, Te 0.421; CuTe: Cu 0.527, Te 0.473
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 16
report
Phase composition593.15Cu4Te3 + CuTe
Cu4Te3: Cu 0.578, Te 0.422; CuTe: Cu 0.524, Te 0.476
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 18
report
Phase composition593.15CuTe + (Te)
CuTe: Cu 0.479, Te 0.521; (Te): Cu 0.009, Te 0.991
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 14
report
Phase composition593.15CuTe + (Te)
CuTe: Cu 0.496, Te 0.504; (Te): Cu 0.008, Te 0.992
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report
Phase composition593.15CuTe + (Te)
CuTe: Cu 0.481, Te 0.519; (Te): Cu 0.018, Te 0.982
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 12
report
Phase composition593.15CuTe + (Te)
CuTe: Cu 0.494, Te 0.506; (Te): Cu 0.033, Te 0.967
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 4
report
Phase composition593.15CuTe + (Te)
CuTe: Cu 0.481, Te 0.519; (Te): Cu 0.008, Te 0.992
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 10
report
Phase composition593.15CuTe + (Te)
CuTe: Cu 0.481, Te 0.519; (Te): Cu 0.012, Te 0.988
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
Phase composition593.15CuTe + (Te)
CuTe: Cu 0.488, Te 0.512; (Te): Cu 0.024, Te 0.976
experimental[1] Huang 2021Table 2, p. 3, row 8
report

Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy (4)

Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy, Cu–Te system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Activity
printed: a(Te)
0.0226 unspecified1473.15model[1] Huang 2021p. 11
report
It should be noticed that a relatively small activity, around 0.0012, at 1200 C and in the composition variation of the miscibility gap of liquid was reported in the work of Azakami and Yazawa [36], whereas a result of 0.0226 is finally obtained in this work.
Activity
printed: a(Te)
0.0012 unspecified1473.15experimental[1] Huang 2021
cites Azakami 1976 doi
p. 11
report
It should be noticed that a relatively small activity, around 0.0012, at 1200 C and in the composition variation of the miscibility gap of liquid was reported in the work of Azakami and Yazawa [36], whereas a result of 0.0226 is finally obtained in this work.
EMF268.76 mV673.15model[1] Huang 2021p. 11
report
For example, the computed EMF at 400 C and at the composition Cu4Te3 is 189.41 mV using the present parameters while that by fitting Azakami and Yazawas's dataset [36] rises to 268.76 mV, which is much higher than the experimental results of 166e214 mV at 360e435 C.
EMF189.41 mV673.15model[1] Huang 2021p. 11
report
For example, the computed EMF at 400 C and at the composition Cu4Te3 is 189.41 mV using the present parameters while that by fitting Azakami and Yazawas's dataset [36] rises to 268.76 mV, which is much higher than the experimental results of 166e214 mV at 360e435 C.

Crystal structure (35)

Crystal structure, Cu–Te system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a4.003 Å298.15Cu0.63Te0.37
alloy: Te 0.37
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 17
report
Lattice a7.319 Å298.15αCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 5
report
Lattice a3.98 Å298.15αCu4Te3
alloy: Te 0.428571
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 18
report
Lattice a3.16 Å298.15αCuTe
alloy: Te 0.5
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 20
report
Lattice a4.227 Å298.15βCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 6
report
Lattice a6.032 Å298.15βCu4Te3
alloy: Te 0.428571
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 19
report
Lattice a8.37 Å298.15γCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 7
report
Lattice a4.246 Å298.15δCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 8
report
Lattice a6.03 Å298.15εCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 9
report
Lattice a7.189 Å298.15ηCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 11
report
Lattice a10.136 Å298.15θCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 12
report
Lattice a8.453 Å298.15ιCu2Temodel[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 13
report
Lattice a8.73 Å298.15κCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 14
report
Lattice a8.373 Å298.15λCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 15
report
Lattice a8.328 Å298.15μCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 16
report
Lattice b3.979 Å298.15Cu0.63Te0.37
alloy: Te 0.37
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 17
report
Lattice b22.236 Å298.15αCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 5
report
Lattice b4.08 Å298.15αCuTe
alloy: Te 0.5
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 20
report
Lattice b7.403 Å298.15βCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 6
report
Lattice b4.187 Å298.15ηCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 11
report
Lattice b10.306 Å298.15θCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 12
report
Lattice b14.6 Å298.15κCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 14
report
Lattice c6.11 Å298.15Cu0.63Te0.37
alloy: Te 0.37
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 17
report
Lattice c36.458 Å298.15αCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 5
report
Lattice c6.12 Å298.15αCu4Te3
alloy: Te 0.428571
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 18
report
Lattice c6.93 Å298.15αCuTe
alloy: Te 0.5
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 20
report
Lattice c7.29 Å298.15βCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 6
report
Lattice c21.6 Å298.15γCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 7
report
Lattice c7.289 Å298.15δCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 8
report
Lattice c7.207 Å298.15ηCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 11
report
Lattice c4.234 Å298.15θCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 12
report
Lattice c21.793 Å298.15ιCu2Temodel[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 13
report
Lattice c7.199 Å298.15κCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 14
report
Lattice c10.877 Å298.15λCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 15
report
Lattice c7.219 Å298.15μCu2Te
alloy: Te 0.333333
model[2] Yu 2022
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 16
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Dandan Huang, Rumo Han, Yao Wang, Tianfan Ye, The Cu–Te system: Phase relations determination and thermodynamic assessment, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 855, 157373 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157373
  2. Shangzhao Yu, Jiong Wang, Dongyu Cui, Shanxiong Chen, Qing Wu, Yong Du, Thermodynamic Modelling of the Te-X (X = Cu, Ga, Li, Sr) Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 43, 193-213 (2022). doi:10.1007/s11669-022-00950-z