Cu–Tm system

21 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 11, model 10); 1 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (9) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	11
model	10

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	21

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	C.P. Wang, S.H. Guo, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, X.J. Liu, K. Ishida, J. Alloys Compd., 482, 67-72(2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.03.101	`b25db1e4f57b8e8f0adcee02ffa3ca47362cd07f3534febbe6f69d49aa3383a8`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1273.03	LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.14593) + CU5TM_C15B (x(Tm) 0.16667) + CU9TM2 (x(Tm) 0.18182)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1273.03	LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.14602) + CU5TM_C15B (x(Tm) 0.16667) + CU9TM2 (x(Tm) 0.18182)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1273.03	LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.14574) + CU5TM_C15B (x(Tm) 0.16667) + CU9TM2 (x(Tm) 0.18182)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1232.63	CU9TM2 (x(Tm) 0.18182) + CU7TM2 (x(Tm) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.2489)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1232.63	CU9TM2 (x(Tm) 0.18182) + CU7TM2 (x(Tm) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.24882)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1209.17	CU2TM (x(Tm) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.3723) + CUTM_B2 (x(Tm) 0.5)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1209.17	CU2TM (x(Tm) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.37229) + CUTM_B2 (x(Tm) 0.5)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1209.17	CU2TM (x(Tm) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.37248) + CUTM_B2 (x(Tm) 0.5)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1195.64	CUTM_B2 (x(Tm) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.66325) + HCP_A3 (x(Tm) 0.99858)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1195.64	CUTM_B2 (x(Tm) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.66328) + HCP_A3 (x(Tm) 0.99858)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1193.12	CU9TM2 (x(Tm) 0.18182) + CU7TM2 (x(Tm) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.26985)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1193.11	CU9TM2 (x(Tm) 0.18182) + CU7TM2 (x(Tm) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.26993)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1179.52	FCC_A1 (x(Tm) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.08389) + CU5TM_C15B (x(Tm) 0.16667)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1179.52	FCC_A1 (x(Tm) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.08387) + CU5TM_C15B (x(Tm) 0.16667)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1179.52	FCC_A1 (x(Tm) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.08382) + CU5TM_C15B (x(Tm) 0.16667)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1179.52	FCC_A1 (x(Tm) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.08381) + CU5TM_C15B (x(Tm) 0.16667)
CuTm-09Wan.tdb	1178.12	CU9TM2 (x(Tm) 0.18182) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.2769) + CU2TM (x(Tm) 0.33333)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Cu–Tm system (21)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1373.15	congruent melting: L -> CuTm	L: Tm 0.5; CuTm: Tm 0.5	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 4, p. 5, row 19 report
1373.15	congruent melting: L -> CuTm	L: Tm 0.5; CuTm: Tm 0.5	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Subramanian 1994	Table 4, p. 5, row 18 report
1293.15	congruent melting: L -> Cu9Tm2	L: Tm 0.182; Cu9Tm2: Tm 0.182	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 4, p. 5, row 7 report
1293.15	congruent melting: L -> Cu9Tm2	L: Tm 0.182; Cu9Tm2: Tm 0.182	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Subramanian 1994	Table 4, p. 5, row 6 report
1273.15	peritectic: L + Cu9Tm2 -> Cu5Tm	L: Tm 0.139; Cu9Tm2: Tm 0.182; Cu5Tm: Tm 0.167	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Subramanian 1994	Table 4, p. 5, row 4 report
1273.15	peritectic: L + Cu9Tm2 -> Cu5Tm	L: Tm 0.145; Cu9Tm2: Tm 0.182; Cu5Tm: Tm 0.167	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 4, p. 5, row 5 report
1233.15	congruent melting: L -> Cu2Tm	L: Tm 0.333; Cu2Tm: Tm 0.333	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Subramanian 1994	Table 4, p. 5, row 14 report
1233.15	congruent melting: L -> Cu2Tm	L: Tm 0.333; Cu2Tm: Tm 0.333	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 4, p. 5, row 15 report
1233.15	peritectic: L + Cu9Tm2 -> Cu7Tm2	Cu9Tm2: Tm 0.182; Cu7Tm2: Tm 0.222	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Subramanian 1994	Table 4, p. 5, row 8 report
1233.15	peritectic: L + Cu9Tm2 -> Cu7Tm2	L: Tm 0.249; Cu9Tm2: Tm 0.182; Cu7Tm2: Tm 0.222	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 4, p. 5, row 9 report
1209.15	eutectic: L -> Cu2Tm + CuTm	L: Tm 0.372; Cu2Tm: Tm 0.333; CuTm: Tm 0.5	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 4, p. 5, row 17 report
1203.15	eutectic: L -> Cu2Tm + CuTm	L: Tm 0.365; Cu2Tm: Tm 0.333; CuTm: Tm 0.5	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Subramanian 1994	Table 4, p. 5, row 16 report
1198.15	eutectic: L -> CuTm + (Tm)	L: Tm 0.67; CuTm: Tm 0.5; (Tm): Tm 1	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Subramanian 1994	Table 4, p. 5, row 20 report
1196.15	eutectic: L -> CuTm + (Tm)	L: Tm 0.663; CuTm: Tm 0.5; (Tm): Tm 1	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 4, p. 5, row 21 report
1193.15	metatectic/catatectic: Cu7Tm2 -> L + Cu9Tm2	Cu7Tm2: Tm 0.222; L: Tm 0.27; Cu9Tm2: Tm 0.182	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 4, p. 5, row 11 report
1193.15	metatectic/catatectic: Cu7Tm2 -> L + Cu9Tm2	Cu7Tm2: Tm 0.222; Cu9Tm2: Tm 0.182	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Subramanian 1994	Table 4, p. 5, row 10 report
1183.15	eutectic: L -> Cu9Tm2 + Cu2Tm	L: Tm 0.294; Cu9Tm2: Tm 0.182; Cu2Tm: Tm 0.333	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Subramanian 1994	Table 4, p. 5, row 12 report
1179.15	eutectic: L -> (Cu) + Cu5Tm	L: Tm 0.084; (Cu): Tm 0; Cu5Tm: Tm 0.167	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 4, p. 5, row 3 report
1178.15	eutectic: L -> Cu9Tm2 + Cu2Tm	L: Tm 0.277; Cu9Tm2: Tm 0.182; Cu2Tm: Tm 0.333	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 4, p. 5, row 13 report
1173.15	eutectic: L -> (Cu) + Cu5Tm	L: Tm 0.07; (Cu): Tm 0; Cu5Tm: Tm 0.167	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Subramanian 1994	Table 4, p. 5, row 2 report
1123.15	eutectic: L -> (Cu) + Cu5Tm	Cu5Tm: Cu 0.833333, Tm 0.166667	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Bochvar 1975	Table 4, p. 5, row 1 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

C.P. Wang, S.H. Guo, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, X.J. Liu, K. Ishida, Thermodynamic assessments of the Cu–B and Cu–Tm systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 482, 67-72 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.03.101

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}