Cu–Y–Zr system

23 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 23); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental23
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
phase equilibrium23

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (23)

Phase equilibrium, Cu–Y–Zr system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase assemblageCu10Zr7 + Cu2Y + Cu8Zr3
alloy: Cu 0.65, Y 0.15, Zr 0.2
experimental[1] He 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report
Phase assemblageCu2Y + CuZr + CuZr2
alloy: Cu 0.53, Y 0.17, Zr 0.3
experimental[1] He 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 1
report
Phase assemblageCu6–7Y + Cu4Y + Cu51Zr14
alloy: Cu 0.83, Y 0.12, Zr 0.05
experimental[1] He 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 5
report
Phase assemblageCu6–7Y + Cu9Zr2 + Cu51Zr14
alloy: Cu 0.83, Y 0.07, Zr 0.1
experimental[1] He 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
Phase assemblageCu7Y2 + Cu2Y + Cu8Zr3
alloy: Cu 0.7, Y 0.25, Zr 0.05
experimental[1] He 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
Phase assemblageCu7Y2 + Cu4Y + Cu51Zr14
alloy: Cu 0.8, Y 0.1, Zr 0.1
experimental[1] He 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
Phase assemblageCu7Y2 + Cu4Y + Cu8Zr3
alloy: Cu 0.77, Y 0.18, Zr 0.05
experimental[1] He 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 4
report
Phase composition978Cu10Zr7 + Cu8Zr3
Cu10Zr7: Cu 0.587, Y 0, Zr 0.413; Cu8Zr3: Cu 0.727, Y 0, Zr 0.273
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 14
report
Phase composition978Cu2Y + Cu10Zr7
Cu2Y: Cu 0.646, Y 0.327, Zr 0.027; Cu10Zr7: Cu 0.577, Y 0.034, Zr 0.389
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 7
report
Phase composition978Cu2Y + Cu8Zr3
Cu2Y: Cu 0.671, Y 0.327, Zr 0.002; Cu8Zr3: Cu 0.672, Y 0.059, Zr 0.269
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 13
report
Phase composition978Cu2Y + CuZr2
Cu2Y: Cu 0.646, Y 0.327, Zr 0.027; CuZr2: Cu 0.344, Y 0.007, Zr 0.649
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 8
report
Phase composition978Cu51Zr14 + Cu6–7Y + Cu6-7Y
Cu51Zr14: Cu 0.786, Y 0, Zr 0.214; Cu6–7Y: Cu 0.831, Y 0.121, Zr 0.048; Cu6-7Y: Cu 0.831, Y 0.121, Zr 0.048
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 11
report
Phase composition978Cu51Zr14 + Cu8Zr3
Cu51Zr14: Cu 0.778, Y 0, Zr 0.222; Cu8Zr3: Cu 0.741, Y 0, Zr 0.259
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 10
report
Phase composition978Cu6–7Y + Cu + Cu6-7Y
Cu6–7Y: Cu 0.863, Y 0.118, Zr 0.019; Cu: Cu 0.964, Y 0.031, Zr 0.005; Cu6-7Y: Cu 0.863, Y 0.118, Zr 0.019
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 1
report
Phase composition978Cu9Zr2 + Cu
Cu9Zr2: Cu 0.824, Y 0, Zr 0.176; Cu: Cu 1, Y 0, Zr 0
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 5
report
Phase composition978Cu9Zr2 + Cu51Zr14
Cu9Zr2: Cu 0.752, Y 0.061, Zr 0.187; Cu51Zr14: Cu 0.774, Y 0.009, Zr 0.217
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 4
report
Phase composition978CuY + Cu2Y
CuY: Cu 0.524, Y 0.473, Zr 0.003; Cu2Y: Cu 0.662, Y 0.336, Zr 0.002
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 9
report
Phase composition978CuY + CuZr2
CuY: Cu 0.505, Y 0.493, Zr 0.002; CuZr2: Cu 0.347, Y 0, Zr 0.653
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 16
report
Phase composition978CuY + Zr
CuY: Cu 0.493, Y 0.491, Zr 0.016; Zr: Cu 0.012, Y 0, Zr 0.988
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 15
report
Phase composition978CuZr + Cu10Zr7
CuZr: Cu 0.513, Y 0, Zr 0.487; Cu10Zr7: Cu 0.587, Y 0, Zr 0.413
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 6
report
Phase composition978CuZr + CuZr2
CuZr: Cu 0.499, Y 0, Zr 0.501; CuZr2: Cu 0.341, Y 0, Zr 0.659
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 12
report
Phase composition978CuZr2 + Zr
CuZr2: Cu 0.339, Y 0, Zr 0.661; Zr: Cu 0.027, Y 0, Zr 0.973
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 2
report
Phase composition978Y + CuY
Y: Cu 0.024, Y 0.976, Zr 0; CuY: Cu 0.492, Y 0.508, Zr 0
experimental[1] He 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 3
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. X.C. He, H.S. Liu, Determination of the isothermal section of the Cu–Zr–Y ternary system at 978K, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 475, 245-251 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.07.144