Cu–Yb system

14 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 7, model 7); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 6 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (9) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental7
model7
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction14

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
CuYb-07Zha.tdbL.G. Zhang, L.B. Liu, H.S. Liu, Z.P. Jin, Calphad, 31, 264-68(2007). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2006.11.003d08c0b2a0da7e0acd5479a42dcaf3542ca5b877f3b6a53822f1c2e20c9918870viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
CuYb-07Zha.tdb1151.01LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.11192) + CU5YB_D2D (x(Yb) 0.16667) + CU9YB2 (x(Yb) 0.18182)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb1151.01LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.11224) + CU5YB_D2D (x(Yb) 0.16667) + CU9YB2 (x(Yb) 0.18182)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb1151.01LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.11184) + CU5YB_D2D (x(Yb) 0.16667) + CU9YB2 (x(Yb) 0.18182)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb1143.75FCC_A1 (x(Yb) 3.100e-4) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.10423) + CU5YB_D2D (x(Yb) 0.16667)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb1143.75FCC_A1 (x(Yb) 3.100e-4) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.10422) + CU5YB_D2D (x(Yb) 0.16667)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb1096.99CU9YB2 (x(Yb) 0.18182) + BCC_A2 (x(Yb) 1) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 1)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb1095.2CU9YB2 (x(Yb) 0.18182) + CU7YB2 (x(Yb) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.30749)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb1095.2CU9YB2 (x(Yb) 0.18182) + CU7YB2 (x(Yb) 0.22222) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.3073)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb1031.31LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.95197) + BCC_A2 (x(Yb) 0.99962) + FCC_A1 (x(Yb) 0.99995)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb1025.43CU7YB2 (x(Yb) 0.22222) + CU2YB (x(Yb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.36715)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb1025.42CU7YB2 (x(Yb) 0.22222) + CU2YB (x(Yb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.36749)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb1025.42CU7YB2 (x(Yb) 0.22222) + CU2YB (x(Yb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.36761)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb905.19CU2YB (x(Yb) 0.33333) + CUYB_B27 (x(Yb) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.51138)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb905.19CU2YB (x(Yb) 0.33333) + CUYB_B27 (x(Yb) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.51101)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb905.19CU2YB (x(Yb) 0.33333) + CUYB_B27 (x(Yb) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.51153)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb747.97CUYB_B27 (x(Yb) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.74745) + FCC_A1 (x(Yb) 0.99976)
CuYb-07Zha.tdb747.97CUYB_B27 (x(Yb) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.74741) + FCC_A1 (x(Yb) 0.99976)

Convex hulls: OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Cu–Yb system (14)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1210congruent melting: L -> Cu9Yb2L: Cu 0.8182; Cu9Yb2: Cu 0.818182, Yb 0.181818experimental[1] Zhang 2007
cites Iandelli 1971 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 12
report
1195congruent melting: L -> Cu9Yb2L: Cu 0.8182; Cu9Yb2: Cu 0.818182, Yb 0.181818model[1] Zhang 2007Table 4, p. 5, row 11
report
1151peritectic: L + Cu9Yb2 -> Cu5YbL: Cu 0.8874; Cu9Yb2: Cu 0.818182, Yb 0.181818; Cu5Yb: Cu 0.833333, Yb 0.166667model[1] Zhang 2007Table 4, p. 5, row 13
report
1150peritectic: L + Cu9Yb2 -> Cu5YbL: Cu 0.88; Cu9Yb2: Cu 0.818182, Yb 0.181818; Cu5Yb: Cu 0.833333, Yb 0.166667experimental[1] Zhang 2007
cites Iandelli 1971 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 14
report
1139eutectic: L -> FCC(Cu) + Cu5YbL: Cu 0.8981; Cu5Yb: Cu 0.833333, Yb 0.166667model[1] Zhang 2007Table 4, p. 5, row 15
report
1132eutectic: L -> FCC(Cu) + Cu5YbL: Cu 0.9; Cu5Yb: Cu 0.833333, Yb 0.166667experimental[1] Zhang 2007
cites Iandelli 1971 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 16
report
1098peritectic: L + Cu9Yb2 -> Cu7Yb2L: Cu 0.6839; Cu9Yb2: Cu 0.818182, Yb 0.181818; Cu7Yb2: Cu 0.777778, Yb 0.222222model[1] Zhang 2007Table 4, p. 5, row 9
report
1098peritectic: L + Cu9Yb2 -> Cu7Yb2L: Cu 0.7; Cu9Yb2: Cu 0.818182, Yb 0.181818; Cu7Yb2: Cu 0.777778, Yb 0.222222experimental[1] Zhang 2007
cites Iandelli 1971 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 10
report
1030peritectic: L + Cu7Yb2 -> Cu2YbL: Cu 0.64; Cu7Yb2: Cu 0.777778, Yb 0.222222; Cu2Yb: Cu 0.666667, Yb 0.333333experimental[1] Zhang 2007
cites Iandelli 1971 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 8
report
1028peritectic: L + Cu7Yb2 -> Cu2YbL: Cu 0.6208; Cu7Yb2: Cu 0.777778, Yb 0.222222; Cu2Yb: Cu 0.666667, Yb 0.333333model[1] Zhang 2007Table 4, p. 5, row 7
report
901peritectic: L + Cu2Yb -> CuYbL: Cu 0.49; Cu2Yb: Cu 0.666667, Yb 0.333333; CuYb: Cu 0.5, Yb 0.5experimental[1] Zhang 2007
cites Iandelli 1971 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 6
report
901peritectic: L + Cu2Yb -> CuYbL: Cu 0.4739; Cu2Yb: Cu 0.666667, Yb 0.333333; CuYb: Cu 0.5, Yb 0.5model[1] Zhang 2007Table 4, p. 5, row 5
report
750eutectic: L -> FCC(Yb) + CuYbL: Cu 0.255; CuYb: Cu 0.5, Yb 0.5model[1] Zhang 2007Table 4, p. 5, row 3
report
745eutectic: L -> FCC(Yb) + CuYbL: Cu 0.265; CuYb: Cu 0.5, Yb 0.5experimental[1] Zhang 2007
cites Iandelli 1971 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 4
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. L.G. Zhang, L.B. Liu, H.S. Liu, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of Cu–Eu and Cu–Yb system, Calphad 31, 264-268 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2006.11.003