Dy–Gd–Ho–Te system

33 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 19, model 14); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental19
model14
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction33

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Dy–Gd–Ho–Te system (33)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1820Liquid -> DyTe + Dy2Te3Liquid: Te 0.56; DyTe: Te 0.5; Dy2Te3: Te 0.6model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 24
report
1813Liquid -> DyTe + Dy2Te3Liquid: Te 0.56; DyTe: Te 0.5; Dy2Te3: Te 0.6experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Eichler 1990 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 23
report
1658Liquid -> bcc(Dy) + DyTeLiquid: Te 0.03; bcc(Dy): Te 0; DyTe: Te 0.5experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Eichler 1990 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 17
report
1657Liquid -> bcc(Dy) + DyTeLiquid: Te 0.007; bcc(Dy): Te 0; DyTe: Te 0.5model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 18
report
1563Liquid -> bcc(Gd) + GdTeLiquid: Te 0.02; bcc(Gd): Te 0; GdTe: Te 0.5experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Abrikosov 1967
Table 3, p. 7, row 1
report
1548Liquid -> bcc(Gd) + GdTeLiquid: Te 0.01; bcc(Gd): Te 0; GdTe: Te 0.5model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 2
report
1528Liquid + GdTe -> Gd2Te3Liquid: Te 0.704; GdTe: Te 0.5; Gd2Te3: Te 0.581model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 6
report
1528Liquid + GdTe -> Gd2Te3Liquid: Te 0.7; GdTe: Te 0.5; Gd2Te3: Te 0.57experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Abrikosov 1967
Table 3, p. 7, row 5
report
1503Liquid + Dy2Te3 -> Dy4Te7Liquid: Te 0.65; Dy2Te3: Te 0.6; Dy4Te7: Te 0.636experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Eichler 1990 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 27
report
1496Liquid + Dy2Te3 -> Dy4Te7Liquid: Te 0.665; Dy2Te3: Te 0.592; Dy4Te7: Te 0.636model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 28
report
1463Liquid + Gd2Te3 -> Gd4Te7Liquid: Te 0.73; Gd2Te3: Te 0.6; Gd4Te7: Te 0.64experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Abrikosov 1967
Table 3, p. 7, row 7
report
1462Liquid + Gd2Te3 -> Gd4Te7Liquid: Te 0.782; Gd2Te3: Te 0.59; Gd4Te7: Te 0.64model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 8
report
1387Liquid -> hcp(Ho) + HoTeLiquid: Te 0.204; HoTe: Te 0.5model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 37
report
1383Liquid -> hcp(Ho) + HoTeLiquid: Te 0.23; HoTe: Te 0.5experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Ghamri 2013 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 36
report
1383Liquid -> hcp(Ho) + HoTeLiquid: Te 0.23; HoTe: Te 0.485experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Yarembash 1974
Table 3, p. 7, row 35
report
1273Liquid + Gd4Te7 -> GdTe2Liquid: Te 0.9; Gd4Te7: Te 0.636; GdTe2: Te 0.667experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Abrikosov 1967
Table 3, p. 7, row 9
report
1272Liquid + Gd4Te7 -> GdTe2Liquid: Te 0.897; Gd4Te7: Te 0.636; GdTe2: Te 0.667model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 10
report
1193Liquid + GdTe2 -> Gd2Te5Liquid: Te 0.91; GdTe2: Te 0.667; Gd2Te5: Te 0.714experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Abrikosov 1967
Table 3, p. 7, row 11
report
1193Liquid + Dy4Te7 -> Dy4Te9Liquid: Te 0.87; Dy4Te7: Te 0.636; Dy4Te9: Te 0.692experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Eichler 1990 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 29
report
1192Liquid + Dy4Te7 -> Dy4Te9Liquid: Te 0.867; Dy4Te7: Te 0.636; Dy4Te9: Te 0.692model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 30
report
1190Liquid + GdTe2 -> Gd2Te5Liquid: Te 0.917; GdTe2: Te 0.667; Gd2Te5: Te 0.714model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 12
report
1128Liquid + Dy4Te9 -> Dy4Te11Liquid: Te 0.9; Dy4Te9: Te 0.692; Dy4Te11: Te 0.733experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Eichler 1990 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 31
report
1128Liquid + Dy4Te9 -> Dy4Te11Liquid: Te 0.907; Dy4Te9: Te 0.692; Dy4Te11: Te 0.733model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 32
report
1108Liquid + Gd2Te5 -> GdTe3Liquid: Te 0.92; Gd2Te5: Te 0.714; GdTe3: Te 0.75experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Abrikosov 1967
Table 3, p. 7, row 13
report
1104Liquid + Gd2Te5 -> GdTe3Liquid: Te 0.94; Gd2Te5: Te 0.714; GdTe3: Te 0.75model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 14
report
1073Liquid + HoTe -> Dy2Te5Liquid: Te 0.918; HoTe: Te 0.536; Dy2Te5: Te 0.714model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 43
report
1073Liquid + HoTe -> Dy2Te5HoTe: Te 0.547; Dy2Te5: Te 0.714experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Yarembash 1974
Table 3, p. 7, row 41
report
1073Liquid + HoTe -> Dy2Te5Liquid: Te 0.93; HoTe: Te 0.547; Dy2Te5: Te 0.714experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Ghamri 2013 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 42
report
1053Liquid + Ho2Te5 -> HoTe3Liquid: Te 0.941; Ho2Te5: Te 0.714; HoTe3: Te 0.75experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Ghamri 2013 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 45
report
1053Liquid + Ho2Te5 -> HoTe3Ho2Te5: Te 0.714; HoTe3: Te 0.75experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Yarembash 1974
Table 3, p. 7, row 44
report
728Liquid -> Dy4Te11 + hex(Te)Dy4Te11: Te 0.733; hex(Te): Te 1experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Eichler 1990 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 33
report
723Liquid -> GdTe3 + hex(Te)GdTe3: Te 0.75; hex(Te): Te 1experimental[1] Cui 2023
cites Abrikosov 1967
Table 3, p. 7, row 15
report
719Liquid -> GdTe3 + hex(Te)Liquid: Te 0.99; GdTe3: Te 0.75; hex(Te): Te 1model[1] Cui 2023Table 3, p. 7, row 16
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Dongyu Cui, Jiong Wang, Jiaqiang Zhou, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Te-X (X = Gd, Dy, Ho) Binary Systems Combined with the First-Principles Method, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 44, 456-467 (2023). doi:10.1007/s11669-023-01051-1