Eu–Pd system

42 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 10, model 32); 1 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (11) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental10
model32
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction16
phase transition5
formation20
mixing / partial1

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdbZ. Du, Y. He, J. Alloys Compd., 327, 127-31(2001). doi:10.1016/S0925-8388(01)01411-6108635fcb4bb16a26e242ab2423d09ffa5186de2e8e7e6bbf2e7d7bc7505acbfviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb1602.12EUPD2_C15 (x(Pd) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.68267) + EUPD3_L12 (x(Pd) 0.75)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb1602.12EUPD2_C15 (x(Pd) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.68289) + EUPD3_L12 (x(Pd) 0.75)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb1602.12EUPD2_C15 (x(Pd) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.68267) + EUPD3_L12 (x(Pd) 0.75)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb1377.41EUPD3_L12 (x(Pd) 0.75) + EUPD5 (x(Pd) 0.83333) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.86292)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb1377.41EUPD3_L12 (x(Pd) 0.75) + EUPD5 (x(Pd) 0.83333) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.86291)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb1353.09EUPD5 (x(Pd) 0.83333) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.87135) + FCC_A1 (x(Pd) 0.91066)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb1125.23LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.49916) + EUPD_B33 (x(Pd) 0.5) + EUPD2_C15 (x(Pd) 0.66667)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb1125.23LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.49938) + EUPD_B33 (x(Pd) 0.5) + EUPD2_C15 (x(Pd) 0.66667)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb1052.37EU3PD2 (x(Pd) 0.4) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.43884) + EUPD_B33 (x(Pd) 0.5)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb1052.37EU3PD2 (x(Pd) 0.4) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.43875) + EUPD_B33 (x(Pd) 0.5)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb1052.37EU3PD2 (x(Pd) 0.4) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.43895) + EUPD_B33 (x(Pd) 0.5)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb882.9LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.27847) + EU5PD2 (x(Pd) 0.28571) + EU3PD2 (x(Pd) 0.4)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb882.9LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.27873) + EU5PD2 (x(Pd) 0.28571) + EU3PD2 (x(Pd) 0.4)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb850.13EUPD5 (x(Pd) 0.83333) + EUPD7 (x(Pd) 0.875) + FCC_A1 (x(Pd) 0.91845)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb850.13EUPD5 (x(Pd) 0.83333) + EUPD7 (x(Pd) 0.875) + FCC_A1 (x(Pd) 0.91845)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb850.13EUPD5 (x(Pd) 0.83333) + EUPD7 (x(Pd) 0.875) + FCC_A1 (x(Pd) 0.91845)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb817.43BCC_A2 (x(Pd) 0) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.18068) + EU5PD2 (x(Pd) 0.28571)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb817.43BCC_A2 (x(Pd) 0) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.18053) + EU5PD2 (x(Pd) 0.28571)
EuPd-01Du-LB.tdb817.43BCC_A2 (x(Pd) 0) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.1802) + EU5PD2 (x(Pd) 0.28571)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Eu–Pd system (16)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1603eutectic: liq.->EuPd2+EuPd3liq.: Pd 0.665; EuPd2: Pd 0.666667; EuPd3: Pd 0.75experimental[1] Du 2001
cites Iandelli 1974 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 13
report
1602eutectic: liq.->EuPd2+EuPd3liq.: Pd 0.6827; EuPd2: Pd 0.666667; EuPd3: Pd 0.75model[1] Du 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 12
report
1378liq.+EuPd3->EuPd5liq.: Pd 0.8629; EuPd3: Pd 0.75; EuPd5: Pd 0.833333model[1] Du 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 16
report
1378liq.+EuPd3->EuPd5liq.: Pd 0.865; EuPd3: Pd 0.75; EuPd5: Pd 0.833333experimental[1] Du 2001
cites Iandelli 1974 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 17
report
1353eutectic: liq.->EuPd5+fcc(Pd)liq.: Pd 0.875; EuPd5: Pd 0.833333; fcc(Pd): Pd 0.905experimental[1] Du 2001
cites Iandelli 1974 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 19
report
1353eutectic: liq.->EuPd5+fcc(Pd)liq.: Pd 0.8713; EuPd5: Pd 0.833333; fcc(Pd): Pd 0.8907model[1] Du 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 18
report
1128liq.+EuPd2->EuPdliq.: Pd 0.495; EuPd2: Pd 0.666667; EuPd: Pd 0.5experimental[1] Du 2001
cites Iandelli 1974 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 10
report
1125liq.+EuPd2->EuPdliq.: Pd 0.4992; EuPd2: Pd 0.666667; EuPd: Pd 0.5model[1] Du 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 9
report
1052eutectic: liq.->Eu3Pd2+EuPdliq.: Pd 0.4388; Eu3Pd2: Pd 0.4; EuPd: Pd 0.5model[1] Du 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
1048eutectic: liq.->Eu3Pd2+EuPdliq.: Pd 0.42; Eu3Pd2: Pd 0.4; EuPd: Pd 0.5experimental[1] Du 2001
cites Iandelli 1974 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 8
report
883liq.+Eu3Pd2->Eu5Pd2liq.: Pd 0.263; Eu3Pd2: Pd 0.4; Eu5Pd2: Pd 0.285714experimental[1] Du 2001
cites Iandelli 1974 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 4
report
883liq.+Eu3Pd2->Eu5Pd2liq.: Pd 0.2785; Eu3Pd2: Pd 0.4; Eu5Pd2: Pd 0.285714model[1] Du 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
850EuPd5+fcc(Pd)->EuPd7EuPd5: Pd 0.833333; fcc(Pd): Pd 0.9185; EuPd7: Pd 0.875model[1] Du 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 20
report
850EuPd5+fcc(Pd)->EuPd7EuPd5: Pd 0.833333; fcc(Pd): Pd 0.9; EuPd7: Pd 0.875experimental[1] Du 2001
cites Takao 1990 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 21
report
818eutectic: liq.->bcc(Eu)+Eu5Pd2liq.: Pd 0.175; bcc(Eu): Pd 0; Eu5Pd2: Pd 0.285714experimental[1] Du 2001
cites Iandelli 1974 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report
817eutectic: liq.->bcc(Eu)+Eu5Pd2liq.: Pd 0.1805; bcc(Eu): Pd 0; Eu5Pd2: Pd 0.285714model[1] Du 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 1
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Eu–Pd system (7)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Pd2EuEuPd2-104.63 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-69.372 (mp-aaaaacti)-85.545 (oqmd-30126)[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 61
report
Pd2Eu5Eu5Pd2-44.766 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-47.438 (mp-aaackwba)-59.161 (oqmd-30128)[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 13
report
Pd3EuEuPd3-95.334 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-51.853 (mp-aaabkfgh)-64.877 (oqmd-30129)[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 3
report
Pd3EuEuPd3-51.176 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-51.853 (mp-aaabkfgh)-64.877 (oqmd-30129)[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 73
report
Pd7Eu-51.176 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 73
report
Pd7RE-51.176 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 7
report
PdEuEuPd-78.545 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-67.611 (mp-aaacfydn)-83.46 (oqmd-30127)[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 23
report

Other properties

Phase transition (5)

Phase transition, Eu–Pd system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1082 K1082liq.->Eu3Pd2
liq.: Pd 0.4; Eu3Pd2: Pd 0.4
model[1] Du 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 5
report
Phase transition1083 K1083liq.->Eu3Pd2
liq.: Pd 0.4; Eu3Pd2: Pd 0.4
experimental[1] Du 2001
cites Iandelli 1974 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
Phase transition1607 K1607liq.->EuPd2
liq.: Pd 0.6667; EuPd2: Pd 0.666667
model[1] Du 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 11
report
Phase transition1698 K1698liq.->EuPd3
liq.: Pd 0.75; EuPd3: Pd 0.75
model[1] Du 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 14
report
Phase transition1698 K1698liq.->EuPd3
liq.: Pd 0.75; EuPd3: Pd 0.75
experimental[1] Du 2001
cites Iandelli 1974 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 15
report

Formation (13)

Formation, Eu–Pd system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Entropy of formation
printed: ΔfS
9.236 J/mol-atom/K298.15Pd2Eu
alloy: Eu 0.333333, Pd 0.666667
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 61
report
Entropy of formation
printed: ΔfS
-13.95 J/mol-atom/K298.15Pd2Eu5
alloy: Eu 0.714286, Pd 0.285714
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 13
report
Entropy of formation10.83 J/mol-atom/K298.15Pd3Eu
alloy: Eu 0.25, Pd 0.75
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 3
report
Entropy of formation
printed: ΔfS
6.2 J/mol-atom/K298.15Pd3Eu
alloy: Eu 0.25, Pd 0.75
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 73
report
Entropy of formation6.2 J/mol-atom/K298.15Pd7Eu
alloy: Eu 0.125, Pd 0.875
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 73
report
Entropy of formation
printed: Entropies of formation
6.2 J/mol-atom/K298.15Pd7RE
alloy: Eu 0.125, Pd 0.875
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 7
report
Entropy of formation
printed: ΔfS
8.461 J/mol-atom/K298.15PdEu
alloy: Eu 0.5, Pd 0.5
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 23
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: ΔfG
-107.384 kJ/mol-atom298.15Pd2Eu
alloy: Eu 0.333333, Pd 0.666667
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 61
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-40.6068 kJ/mol-atom298.15Pd2Eu5
alloy: Eu 0.714286, Pd 0.285714
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 13
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-98.563 kJ/mol-atom298.15Pd3Eu
alloy: Eu 0.25, Pd 0.75
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 3
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: ΔfG
-53.0245 kJ/mol-atom298.15Pd3Eu
alloy: Eu 0.25, Pd 0.75
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 73
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-53.0245 kJ/mol-atom298.15Pd7Eu
alloy: Eu 0.125, Pd 0.875
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 73
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: ΔfG
-81.0676 kJ/mol-atom298.15PdEu
alloy: Eu 0.5, Pd 0.5
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 23
report

Mixing / partial (1)

Mixing / partial, Eu–Pd system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Gibbs energy of mixing
printed: Gibbs free Energies
-53.0245 kJ/mol-atom298.15Pd7RE
alloy: Eu 0.125, Pd 0.875
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 7
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Zhenmin Du, Yuntao He, Thermodynamic assessment of the Eu–Pd system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 327, 127-131 (2001). doi:10.1016/s0925-8388(01)01411-6
  2. Said Kardellass, Colette Servant, Isabelle Drouelle, Fatima Zahra Chrifi-Alaoui, Mohamed Idbenali, Alyen Abahazem et al., Calphad-type assessment of the Pd-Yb binary system supported by first-principles calculations – Part II: Results, Materials Today: Proceedings 24, 140-150 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.196