Fe–Mn–Nb system
205 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 30, model 27, DFT 148); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 30 |
| model | 27 |
| DFT | 148 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 53 |
| crystal structure | 152 |
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1797.15 | L + ε ↔ μ | L: Nb 0.5087; ε: Nb 0.4065; μ: Nb 0.486 | model | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 2, p. 4, row 43 report | |
| 1796.15 | L + ε ↔ μ | L: Nb 0.5491; ε: Nb 0.3695; μ: Nb 0.475 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Srikanth 1994 | Table 2, p. 4, row 41 report | |
| 1796.15 | L + ε ↔ μ | L: Nb 0.52; ε: Nb 0.376; μ: Nb 0.465 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Vo 2011 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 39 report | |
| 1793.15 | L + ε ↔ μ | L: Nb 0.56; ε: Nb 0.37; μ: Nb 0.49 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Zelaya 1993 | Table 2, p. 4, row 40 report | |
| 1793.15 | L + ε ↔ μ | L: Nb 0.5145; ε: Nb 0.3503; μ: Nb 0.4833 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Toffolon 2000 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 42 report | |
| 1781.15 | L ↔ μ + (Nb) | L: Nb 0.586; μ: Nb 0.51; (Nb): Nb 0.91 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Vo 2011 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 44 report | |
| 1776.15 | L ↔ μ + (Nb) | L: Nb 0.5619; μ: Nb 0.5062; (Nb): Nb 0.9093 | model | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 2, p. 4, row 49 report | |
| 1773.15 | L ↔ μ + (Nb) | L: Nb 0.59; μ: Nb 0.54; (Nb): Nb 0.93 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Zelaya 1993 | Table 2, p. 4, row 45 report | |
| 1758.15 | L ↔ μ + (Nb) | L: Nb 0.6086; μ: Nb 0.525; (Nb): Nb 0.9397 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Srikanth 1994 | Table 2, p. 4, row 47 report | |
| 1757.15 | L ↔ μ + (Nb) | L: Nb 0.5926; μ: Nb 0.4937; (Nb): Nb 0.9229 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Toffolon 2000 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 48 report | |
| 1671.15 | L ↔ (δFe) + ε | L: Nb 0.0967; (δFe): Nb 0.0311; ε: Nb 0.3052 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Toffolon 2000 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 10 report | |
| 1671.15 | L ↔ μ + (Nb) | L: Nb 0.656; μ: Nb 0.4615; (Nb): Nb 0.91 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Huang 1990 | Table 2, p. 4, row 46 report | |
| 1650.15 | L ↔ (δFe) + ε | L: Nb 0.105; (δFe): Nb 0.026; ε: Nb 0.3333 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Huang 1990 | Table 2, p. 4, row 8 report | |
| 1646.15 | L ↔ (δFe) + ε | L: Nb 0.082; (δFe): Nb 0.032; ε: Nb 0.251 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Vo 2011 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 1 report | |
| 1645.15 | L ↔ (δFe) + ε | L: Nb 0.106 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Gibson 1961 | Table 2, p. 4, row 7 report | |
| 1643.15 | L ↔ (δFe) + ε | L: Nb 0.106; (δFe): Nb 0.0327; ε: Nb 0.32 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Zelaya 1993 | Table 2, p. 4, row 2 report | |
| 1643.15 | L ↔ (δFe) + ε | L: Nb 0.1199; (δFe): Nb 0.0327 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Ferrier 1964 | Table 2, p. 4, row 6 report | |
| 1638.15 | L ↔ (δFe) + ε | L: Nb 0.098 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Voronov 1937 | Table 2, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| 1635.15 | L ↔ (δFe) + ε | L: Nb 0.1017; (δFe): Nb 0.0321; ε: Nb 0.2485 | model | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 2, p. 4, row 11 report | |
| 1631.15 | L ↔ (δFe) + ε | L: Nb 0.1; (δFe): Nb 0.028; ε: Nb 0.3385 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Srikanth 1994 | Table 2, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| 1629.15 | L ↔ (δFe) + ε | (δFe): Nb 0.0758; ε: Nb 0.3386 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Eggers 1938 | Table 2, p. 4, row 3 report | |
| 1621.15 | L ↔ (δFe) + ε | L: Nb 0.1 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Goldschmidt 1960 | Table 2, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| 1508.15 | L + (δMn) ↔ (γMn) | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Savitskii 1960 | Table 2, p. 4, row 54 report | ||
| 1497.15 | L ↔ (δMn) + λ | L: Nb 0.036; (δMn): Nb 0.024 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Hellawell 1959 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 50 report | |
| 1496.15 | L ↔ (δMn) + λ | L: Nb 0.0387; (δMn): Nb 0.0216; λ: Nb 0.2952 | model | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 2, p. 4, row 52 report | |
| 1496.15 | L ↔ (δMn) + λ | L: Nb 0.0382; (δMn): Nb 0.0214; λ: Nb 0.2905 | model | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 2, p. 4, row 53 report | |
| 1493.15 | (δFe) ↔ (γFe) + ε | (δFe): Nb 0.0626; (γFe): Nb 0.0127; ε: Nb 0.3386 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Eggers 1938 | Table 2, p. 4, row 12 report | |
| 1493.15 | L ↔ (γMn) + λ | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Savitskii 1960 | Table 2, p. 4, row 55 report | ||
| 1493.15 | (δFe) ↔ (γFe) + ε | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Genders 1939 | Table 2, p. 4, row 13 report | ||
| 1481.15 | (δFe) ↔ (γFe) + ε | (δFe): Nb 0.017; (γFe): Nb 0.0099 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Ferrier 1964 | Table 2, p. 4, row 15 report | |
| 1473.15 | L ↔ (δMn) + λ | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Svechnikov 1976 | Table 2, p. 4, row 51 report | ||
| 1473.15 | (δFe) ↔ (γFe) + ε | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Gibson 1961 | Table 2, p. 4, row 14 report | ||
| 1472.15 | (δFe) ↔ (γFe) + ε | (δFe): Nb 0.0162; (γFe): Nb 0.0115; ε: Nb 0.3081 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Toffolon 2000 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 21 report | |
| 1463.15 | (δFe) ↔ (γFe) + ε | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Fischer 1970 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 16 report | ||
| 1463.15 | (δFe) ↔ (γFe) + ε | (δFe): Nb 0.0156; (γFe): Nb 0.01; ε: Nb 0.32 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Zelaya 1993 | Table 2, p. 4, row 18 report | |
| 1460.15 | (δFe) ↔ (γFe) + ε | (δFe): Nb 0.015; (γFe): Nb 0.0095; ε: Nb 0.3333 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Huang 1990 | Table 2, p. 4, row 19 report | |
| 1456.15 | (δFe) ↔ (γFe) + ε | (δFe): Nb 0.015; (γFe): Nb 0.011; ε: Nb 0.265 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Vo 2011 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 17 report | |
| 1452.15 | (δFe) ↔ (γFe) + ε | (δFe): Nb 0.0169; (γFe): Nb 0.011; ε: Nb 0.2521 | model | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 2, p. 4, row 22 report | |
| 1451.15 | (δFe) ↔ (γFe) + ε | (δFe): Nb 0.0134; (γFe): Nb 0.0099; ε: Nb 0.3378 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Srikanth 1994 | Table 2, p. 4, row 20 report | |
| 1418.15 | (δMn) + λ ↔ (βMn) | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Hellawell 1959 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 56 report | ||
| 1416.15 | (δMn) + λ ↔ (βMn) | (δMn): Nb 0.0161; λ: Nb 0.2951; (βMn): Nb 0.0233 | model | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 2, p. 4, row 58 report | |
| 1416.15 | (δMn) + λ ↔ (βMn) | (δMn): Nb 0.0151; λ: Nb 0.2914; (βMn): Nb 0.0225 | model | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 2, p. 4, row 59 report | |
| 1408.15 | (γMn) + λ ↔ (βMn) | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Savitskii 1960 | Table 2, p. 4, row 60 report | ||
| 1373.15 | (δMn) + λ ↔ (βMn) | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Svechnikov 1976 | Table 2, p. 4, row 57 report | ||
| 1262.15 | (γFe) + ε ↔ (αFe) | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Genders 1939 | Table 2, p. 4, row 24 report | ||
| 1238.15 | (γFe) + ε ↔ (αFe) | (γFe): Nb 0.0048; ε: Nb 0.3477; (αFe): Nb 0.0307 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Eggers 1938 | Table 2, p. 4, row 23 report | |
| 1233.15 | (γFe) + ε ↔ (αFe) | (γFe): Nb 0.0043; ε: Nb 0.32; (αFe): Nb 0.0073 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Zelaya 1993 | Table 2, p. 4, row 27 report | |
| 1233.15 | (γFe) + ε ↔ (αFe) | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Fischer 1970 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 25 report | ||
| 1228.15 | (γFe) + ε ↔ (αFe) | (γFe): Nb 0.0033; ε: Nb 0.337; (αFe): Nb 0.0062 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Srikanth 1994 | Table 2, p. 4, row 29 report | |
| 1222.15 | (γFe) + ε ↔ (αFe) | (γFe): Nb 0.0035; ε: Nb 0.3333; (αFe): Nb 0.0062 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Huang 1990 | Table 2, p. 4, row 28 report | |
| 1217.15 | (γFe) + ε ↔ (αFe) | (γFe): Nb 0.003; ε: Nb 0.2596; (αFe): Nb 0.0054 | model | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 2, p. 4, row 31 report | |
| 1216.15 | (γFe) + ε ↔ (αFe) | ε: Nb 0.276 | experimental | [1] Liu 2012 cites Vo 2011 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 26 report | |
| 1215.15 | (γFe) + ε ↔ (αFe) | (γFe): Nb 0.0026; ε: Nb 0.3147; (αFe): Nb 0.0047 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Toffolon 2000 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 30 report |
Other properties
Crystal structure (152)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice a | 2.832 Å | (αFe) alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | model | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 5, p. 9, row 1 report | ||
| Lattice a | 2.822 Å | (αFe) alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Wang 2004 doi | Table 5, p. 9, row 2 report | ||
| Lattice a | 4.822 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.333333 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 12 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.677 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 18 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.423 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.666667 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 15 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.766 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.333333 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 11 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.341 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.666667 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 16 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.385 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.666667 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 14 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.531 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 17 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.797 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.333333 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 13 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.56 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 19 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.743 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.307692, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 43 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.855 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 21 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.883 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 20 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.437 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 28 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.837 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 51 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.839 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 48 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.418 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 29 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.483 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.923077 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 32 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.836 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 41 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.845 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 52 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.853 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 23 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.726 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.307692, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 44 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.424 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.923077 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 33 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.844 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 25 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.875 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 46 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.367 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 49 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.458 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 50 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.452 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.846154 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 31 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.879 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 22 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.762 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.538462, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 54 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.015 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.538462 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 26 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.71 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 24 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.914 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 45 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.767 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 47 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.756 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.538462, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 53 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.97 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.538462 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 27 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.856 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 42 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.45 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.846154 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 30 report | |
| Lattice c | 7.839 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.333333 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 12 report | |
| Lattice c | 7.615 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 18 report | |
| Lattice c | 8.587 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.666667 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 15 report | |
| Lattice c | 7.811 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.333333 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 11 report | |
| Lattice c | 8.482 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.666667 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 16 report | |
| Lattice c | 8.258 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.666667 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 14 report | |
| Lattice c | 7.288 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 17 report | |
| Lattice c | 7.891 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.333333 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 13 report | |
| Lattice c | 7.471 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 19 report | |
| Lattice c | 25.968 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.307692, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 43 report | |
| Lattice c | 27 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 21 report | |
| Lattice c | 26.247 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 20 report | |
| Lattice c | 27.368 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 28 report | |
| Lattice c | 26.493 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 51 report | |
| Lattice c | 25.537 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 48 report | |
| Lattice c | 27.534 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 29 report | |
| Lattice c | 27.437 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.923077 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 32 report | |
| Lattice c | 27.199 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 41 report | |
| Lattice c | 26.671 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 52 report | |
| Lattice c | 26.657 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 23 report | |
| Lattice c | 26.1 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.307692, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 44 report | |
| Lattice c | 28.139 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.923077 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 33 report | |
| Lattice c | 25.432 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 25 report | |
| Lattice c | 26.757 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 46 report | |
| Lattice c | 27.057 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 49 report | |
| Lattice c | 26.357 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 50 report | |
| Lattice c | 28.488 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.846154 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 31 report | |
| Lattice c | 25.628 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 22 report | |
| Lattice c | 26.228 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.538462, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 54 report | |
| Lattice c | 26.103 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.538462 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 26 report | |
| Lattice c | 25.794 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 24 report | |
| Lattice c | 25.934 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 45 report | |
| Lattice c | 25.341 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 47 report | |
| Lattice c | 25.876 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.538462, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 53 report | |
| Lattice c | 27.027 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.538462 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 27 report | |
| Lattice c | 26.964 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 42 report | |
| Lattice c | 28.522 Å | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.846154 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 30 report | |
| lattice v0 | 22.7 Å3 | (αFe) alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | model | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 5, p. 9, row 1 report | ||
| lattice v0 | 22.5 Å3 | (αFe) alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | model | [1] Liu 2012 cites Wang 2004 doi | Table 5, p. 9, row 2 report | ||
| lattice v0 | 157.9 Å3 | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.333333 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 12 report | |
| lattice v0 | 157.9 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.333333 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 12 report | |
| lattice v0 | 144.3 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 18 report | |
| lattice v0 | 144.3 Å3 | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 18 report | |
| lattice v0 | 218.7 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.666667 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 15 report | |
| lattice v0 | 218.7 Å3 | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.666667 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 15 report | |
| lattice v0 | 153.6 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.333333 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 11 report | |
| lattice v0 | 153.6 Å3 | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.333333 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 11 report | |
| lattice v0 | 209.6 Å3 | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.666667 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 16 report | |
| lattice v0 | 209.6 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.666667 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 16 report | |
| lattice v0 | 207.4 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.666667 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 14 report | |
| lattice v0 | 207.4 Å3 | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.666667 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 14 report | |
| lattice v0 | 129.6 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 17 report | |
| lattice v0 | 129.6 Å3 | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 17 report | |
| lattice v0 | 157.3 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.333333 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 13 report | |
| lattice v0 | 157.3 Å3 | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.333333 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 13 report | |
| lattice v0 | 134.5 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 19 report | |
| lattice v0 | 134.5 Å3 | 0 | C14 alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 19 report | |
| lattice v0 | 505.9 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.307692, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 43 report | |
| lattice v0 | 505.9 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.307692, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 43 report | |
| lattice v0 | 551.2 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 21 report | |
| lattice v0 | 551.2 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 21 report | |
| lattice v0 | 542 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 20 report | |
| lattice v0 | 542 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 20 report | |
| lattice v0 | 700.3 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 28 report | |
| lattice v0 | 700.3 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 28 report | |
| lattice v0 | 536.9 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 51 report | |
| lattice v0 | 536.9 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 51 report | |
| lattice v0 | 517.9 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 48 report | |
| lattice v0 | 517.9 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 48 report | |
| lattice v0 | 700.8 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 29 report | |
| lattice v0 | 700.8 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 29 report | |
| lattice v0 | 714.6 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.923077 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 32 report | |
| lattice v0 | 714.6 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.923077 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 32 report | |
| lattice v0 | 550.8 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 41 report | |
| lattice v0 | 550.8 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 41 report | |
| lattice v0 | 542.3 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 52 report | |
| lattice v0 | 542.3 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 52 report | |
| lattice v0 | 543.7 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 23 report | |
| lattice v0 | 543.7 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 23 report | |
| lattice v0 | 504.9 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.307692, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 44 report | |
| lattice v0 | 504.9 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.307692, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 44 report | |
| lattice v0 | 717 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.923077 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 33 report | |
| lattice v0 | 717 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.923077 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 33 report | |
| lattice v0 | 516.9 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 25 report | |
| lattice v0 | 516.9 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 25 report | |
| lattice v0 | 550.7 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 46 report | |
| lattice v0 | 550.7 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 46 report | |
| lattice v0 | 675 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 49 report | |
| lattice v0 | 675 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 49 report | |
| lattice v0 | 686.47 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 50 report | |
| lattice v0 | 686.47 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.769231 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 50 report | |
| lattice v0 | 733.4 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.846154 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 31 report | |
| lattice v0 | 733.4 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.846154 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 31 report | |
| lattice v0 | 528.3 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 22 report | |
| lattice v0 | 528.3 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.384615 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 22 report | |
| lattice v0 | 515 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.538462, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 54 report | |
| lattice v0 | 515 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.538462, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 54 report | |
| lattice v0 | 568.5 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.538462 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 26 report | |
| lattice v0 | 568.5 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.538462 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 26 report | |
| lattice v0 | 495.6 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 24 report | |
| lattice v0 | 495.6 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 24 report | |
| lattice v0 | 542.4 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 45 report | |
| lattice v0 | 542.4 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 45 report | |
| lattice v0 | 498.8 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 47 report | |
| lattice v0 | 498.8 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.076923, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 47 report | |
| lattice v0 | 507 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.538462, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 53 report | |
| lattice v0 | 507 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.538462, Nb 0.307692 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 53 report | |
| lattice v0 | 578.3 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.538462 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 27 report | |
| lattice v0 | 578.3 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.538462 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 27 report | |
| lattice v0 | 550.7 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 42 report | |
| lattice v0 | 550.7 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0.461538, Nb 0.461538 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 42 report | |
| lattice v0 | 733.6 Å3 | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.846154 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 30 report | |
| lattice v0 | 733.6 Å3 per formula unit | 0 | μ alloy: Mn 0, Nb 0.846154 | DFT | [1] Liu 2012 | Table 4, p. 8, row 30 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- Shuhong Liu, Bengt Hallstedt, Denis Music, Yong Du, Ab initio calculations and thermodynamic modeling for the Fe–Mn–Nb system, Calphad 38, 43-58 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.03.004