Fe–Mn system

31 accepted literature values from 6 paper(s) (experimental 8, model 20, DFT 3); 7 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (9) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental8
model20
DFT3
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction22
formation6
mixing / partial3

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
FeMn-04Wit.tdbV.T. Witusiewicz, F. Sommer, E.J. Mittemeijer, J. Phase Equilib., 25, 346-54(2004). doi:10.1361/15477030420115df83d83606098227a3c4ec8e0ae81239ccda189f63af5f7ee1886a8a2b90d8c7viewer · TDB · JSON
FeMn-19Big-3g.tdbS. Bigdeli, M. Selleby, Calphad, 64, 185-95(2019). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2018.11.011fc3b68475c2b54fbc268506a1e29b384351815b42b161004caaab01be6dc5c1cviewer · TDB · JSON
FeMn-23Jac.tdbA. Jacob, E. Povoden-Karadeniz, P. Retzl, E. Kozeschnik, Calphad, 81, 102531(2023). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2023.102531b1d4b760eabbecaed228481258d9ed0e492ec87a500710a4da07f623450ad371viewer · TDB · JSON
FeMn-87Hua.tdbW. Huang, Calphad, 11, 183-86(1987). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(87)90013-73c63e147d2ae5b365173e4eccd8453ec996a1703a13442fe2ac6eb4b563f7d23viewer · TDB · JSON
FeMn-89Hua-LB.tdbW. Huang, Calphad, 13, 243-52(1989). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(89)90004-7e2d34b9be367a6592d55ec938ccbdd03ee8ff5fe60c738aef370802237c719fbviewer · TDB · JSON
FeMn-89Hua-modified.tdbW. Huang, Calphad, 13, 243-52(1989). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(89)90004-78767948ee291af1ef9b059b2c7afcc03d248c90512e1b6d2fb52f40903dd06e4viewer · TDB · JSON
FeMn-89Lee.tdbB.-J. Lee, D.N. Lee, Calphad, 13, 345-54(1989). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(89)90024-28d5883ffc9634f3577d0b3ded68da5f3f96c501faa7893d2fbba9bbe29c1d1bdviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
FeMn-04Wit.tdb1748.34BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.10043) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.10242) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.13053)
FeMn-04Wit.tdb1509.55FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.86827) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.87749) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.87831)
FeMn-04Wit.tdb973.48FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.59179) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 0.66955) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.67909)
FeMn-04Wit.tdb524.1BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.02136) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.43384) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.65111)
FeMn-19Big-3g.tdb1746.24BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.10142) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.10325) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.13087)
FeMn-19Big-3g.tdb1507.39FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.86578) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.87523) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.8763)
FeMn-19Big-3g.tdb982.12FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.57756) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 0.68536) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.69367)
FeMn-19Big-3g.tdb490.15BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.03884) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.41059) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.72904)
FeMn-23Jac.tdb1659.51FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.44002) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.45628) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.49864)
FeMn-23Jac.tdb1571.77FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.69284) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.70911) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.73751)
FeMn-23Jac.tdb1317.45BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 1) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 1) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 1)
FeMn-23Jac.tdb986.84FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.63627) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 0.69926) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.70559)
FeMn-23Jac.tdb507.68BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.0247) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.44288) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.64358)
FeMn-87Hua.tdb1746.89BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.09287) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.09394) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.1207)
FeMn-87Hua.tdb1509.65FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.89545) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.90225) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.90476)
FeMn-87Hua.tdb969.62FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.56748) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 0.69236) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.69419)
FeMn-87Hua.tdb568.67BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.01038) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.40295) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.683)
FeMn-89Hua-LB.tdb1746.75BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.10035) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.10141) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.1291)
FeMn-89Hua-LB.tdb1507.22FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.86744) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.87529) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.8765)
FeMn-89Hua-LB.tdb973.23FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.60613) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 0.68092) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.68965)
FeMn-89Hua-LB.tdb521.29BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.03324) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.43577) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.65932)
FeMn-89Hua-modified.tdb1746.75BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.10036) + FCC_4SL (x(Mn) 0.10142) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.1291)
FeMn-89Hua-modified.tdb1746.75BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.10036) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.10142) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.1291)
FeMn-89Hua-modified.tdb1667.47BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0) + FCC_4SL (x(Mn) 0) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0)
FeMn-89Hua-modified.tdb1507.22FCC_4SL (x(Mn) 0.86739) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.87524) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.87645)
FeMn-89Hua-modified.tdb1507.22FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.86739) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.87524) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.87645)
FeMn-89Hua-modified.tdb1411.01BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 1) + FCC_4SL (x(Mn) 1) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 1)
FeMn-89Hua-modified.tdb973.16FCC_4SL (x(Mn) 0.60592) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 0.68076) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.68951)
FeMn-89Hua-modified.tdb522.54BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.03346) + FCC_4SL (x(Mn) 0.43448) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.6585)
FeMn-89Lee.tdb1748.48BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.09057) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.09231) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.11934)
FeMn-89Lee.tdb1508.23FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.86234) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.87076) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.87137)
FeMn-89Lee.tdb967.25FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.58401) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 0.66381) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.66961)
FeMn-89Lee.tdb306.61BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 3.300e-4) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.57049) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.77161)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull FeMn-04Wit · CALPHAD hull FeMn-19Big-3g · CALPHAD hull FeMn-87Hua · CALPHAD hull FeMn-89Hua-LB · CALPHAD hull FeMn-89Hua-modified · CALPHAD hull FeMn-89Lee

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Fe–Mn system (22)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1748.5peritectic: liquid + bcc-A2 -> fcc-A1bcc-A2: Mn 0.1; fcc-A1: Mn 0.102; liquid: Mn 0.139model[1] Witusiewicz 2004Table 2, p. 3, row 10
report
1747peritectic: liquid + bcc-A2 -> fcc-A1bcc-A2: Mn 0.1; fcc-A1: Mn 0.101; liquid: Mn 0.129model[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites ref. 1989Hua
Table 2, p. 3, row 9
report
1747peritectic: liquid + bcc-A2 -> fcc-A1bcc-A2: Mn 0.096; fcc-A1: Mn 0.102; liquid: Mn 0.13experimental[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites Hellawell 1956
Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
1746.8peritectic: Liquid + bcc-A2 -> fcc-A1L: Mn 0.1; bcc-A2: Mn 0.129; fcc-A1: Mn 0.129model[2] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 215, row 3
report
1746peritectic: liquid + bcc-A2 -> fcc-A1bcc-A2: Mn 0.101; fcc-A1: Mn 0.102; liquid: Mn 0.13model[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites Huang 1987
Table 2, p. 3, row 8
report
1509.6peritectic: liquid + bcc-A2 -> fcc-A1bcc-A2: Mn 0.878; fcc-A1: Mn 0.868; liquid: Mn 0.877model[1] Witusiewicz 2004Table 2, p. 3, row 14
report
1508peritectic: liquid + bcc-A2 -> fcc-A1bcc-A2: Mn 0.912; fcc-A1: Mn 0.903; liquid: Mn 0.909model[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites Huang 1987
Table 2, p. 3, row 12
report
1507.2peritectic: Liquid + bcc-A2 -> fcc-A1L: Mn 0.867; bcc-A2: Mn 0.877; fcc-A1: Mn 0.875model[2] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 215, row 4
report
1507peritectic: liquid + bcc-A2 -> fcc-A1bcc-A2: Mn 0.87; fcc-A1: Mn 0.864; liquid: Mn 0.867experimental[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites Hellawell 1956
Table 2, p. 3, row 11
report
1507peritectic: liquid + bcc-A2 -> fcc-A1bcc-A2: Mn 0.877; fcc-A1: Mn 0.875; liquid: Mn 0.867model[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites ref. 1989Hua
Table 2, p. 3, row 13
report
1433.2congruent transformation: fcc-A1 -> cub-A13fcc-A1: Mn 0.854; cub-A13: Mn 0.854model[1] Witusiewicz 2004Table 2, p. 3, row 18
report
1429congruent transformation: fcc-A1 -> cub-A13fcc-A1: Mn 0.87; cub-A13: Mn 0.87experimental[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites Hellawell 1956
Table 2, p. 3, row 15
report
1429congruent transformation: fcc-A1 -> cub-A13fcc-A1: Mn 0.864; cub-A13: Mn 0.864model[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites ref. 1989Hua
Table 2, p. 3, row 17
report
1429congruent transformation: fcc-A1 -> cub-A13fcc-A1: Mn 0.863; cub-A13: Mn 0.863model[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites Huang 1987
Table 2, p. 3, row 16
report
973.5eutectoid: cub-A13 -> fcc-A1 + bcc-A12cub-A13: Mn 0.67; fcc-A1: Mn 0.592; bcc-A12: Mn 0.679model[1] Witusiewicz 2004Table 2, p. 3, row 4
report
973.2eutectoid: cub-A13 -> fcc-A1 + cbcc-A12cub-A13: Mn 0.681; fcc-A1: Mn 0.606; cbcc-A12: Mn 0.69model[2] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 215, row 1
report
973eutectoid: cub-A13 -> fcc-A1 + bcc-A12cub-A13: Mn 0.701; fcc-A1: Mn 0.59; bcc-A12: Mn 0.703model[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites Huang 1987
Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report
973eutectoid: cub-A13 -> fcc-A1 + bcc-A12cub-A13: Mn 0.681; fcc-A1: Mn 0.606; bcc-A12: Mn 0.69model[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites ref. 1989Hua
Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
973eutectoid: cub-A13 -> fcc-A1 + bcc-A12cub-A13: Mn 0.66; fcc-A1: Mn 0.62; bcc-A12: Mn 0.68experimental[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites Hellawell 1956
Table 2, p. 3, row 1
report
528eutectoid: fcc-A1 -> bcc-A2 + bcc-A12fcc-A1: Mn 0.431; bcc-A2: Mn 0.022; bcc-A12: Mn 0.647model[1] Witusiewicz 2004Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
521.3eutectoid: fcc-A1 -> bcc-A2 + cbcc-A12fcc-A1: Mn 0.436; bcc-A2: Mn 0.033; cbcc-A12: Mn 0.659model[2] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 215, row 2
report
521eutectoid: fcc-A1 -> bcc-A2 + bcc-A12fcc-A1: Mn 0.436; bcc-A2: Mn 0.033; bcc-A12: Mn 0.659model[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites ref. 1989Hua
Table 2, p. 3, row 5
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Fe–Mn system (6)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
C14 Laves FeMn218.636 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[3] Zheng 2022Table 4, p. 6, row 11
report
C14 Laves FeMn2FeMn218.653 kJ/mol-atom298.15model14.765 (oqmd-1449617)[3] Zheng 2022Table 4, p. 6, row 12
report
C14 Laves MnFe221.311 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[3] Zheng 2022Table 4, p. 6, row 13
report
C14 Laves MnFe2Fe2Mn25.409 kJ/mol-atom298.15model16.64 (oqmd-1449732)[3] Zheng 2022Table 4, p. 6, row 14
report
fee-2 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1443experimental[4] Huang 1991
cites ref. 1
p. 4
report
For a SO-50 alloy and with the same structure of pure elements as reference give the following enthalpy of formation of the Fe-Mn states, the experiments alloy (1): -1 kJ/mol for liquid at 1873 K, -2 kJ/mol for fee at 1443 K; of the Fe-V alloy (2): -8.6 kJ/mol for liquid at 1873 K, -5.3 kJ/mol for bee at 1623 K.
liquid-1 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1873experimental[4] Huang 1991
cites ref. 1
p. 4
report
For a SO-50 alloy and with the same structure of pure elements as reference give the following enthalpy of formation of the Fe-Mn states, the experiments alloy (1): -1 kJ/mol for liquid at 1873 K, -2 kJ/mol for fee at 1443 K; of the Fe-V alloy (2): -8.6 kJ/mol for liquid at 1873 K, -5.3 kJ/mol for bee at 1623 K.

Other properties

Mixing / partial (3)

Mixing / partial, Fe–Mn system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH^SQS
-3.952 kJ/mol-atomfcc
alloy: Fe 0.5, Mn 0.5
DFT[5] Bracq 2021Table 1, p. 4, row 8
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: heat of mixing
-4900 J/m011400experimental[6] Huang 1989
cites ref. 24
p. 2
report
In the 7 phase, a negative heat of mixing at 1400 K with a minimum of -4900 J/m01 was reported by Kendall et al. (24).
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: heat of mixing
-3 kJ/mol-atom1443experimental[6] Huang 1989
cites ref. 4
p. 2
report
Recently, Kubitx et al. (4) determined the heat of mixing at 1443. 1073 and 873 K with a minimum of -3000 J/m01 at 1443 K.

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. V.T. Witusiewicz, F. Sommer, E.J. Mittemeijer, Reevaluation of the Fe-Mn Phase Diagram, Journal of Phase Equilibria & Diffusion 25, 346-354 (2004). doi:10.1361/15477030420115
  2. I. Ansara, A. T. Dinsdale, M. H. Rand (eds.), COST 507: Thermochemical database for light metal alloys, Volume 2, EUR 18499 EN, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (1998), ISBN 92-828-3902-8.
  3. Weisen Zheng, Wei Song, Tong Wu, Jingya Wang, Yanlin He, Xiao-Gang Lu, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic modeling of the ternary Ti–Fe–Mn system for hydrogen storage applications, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 891, 161957 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161957
  4. Weiming Huang, A Thermodynamic Analysis of the Mn-V And Fe-Mn-V Systems, Calphad 15, 195-208 (1991). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(91)90018-f
  5. Guillaume Bracq, Jean-Claude Crivello, Mathilde Laurent-Brocq, Jean-Marc Joubert, Ivan Guillot, What is the Enthalpy Contribution to the Stabilization of the Co–Cr–Fe–Mn–Ni Faced-centered Cubic Solid Solution?, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 42, 561-570 (2021). doi:10.1007/s11669-021-00922-9
  6. Weiming Huang, An assessment of the Fe-Mn system, Calphad 13, 243-252 (1989). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(89)90004-7