Fe–Pd system

25 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 13, model 12); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 2 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (6) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental13
model12
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction21
formation4

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
FePd-99Gho-LB.tdbG. Ghosh, C. Kantner, G.B. Olson, J. Phase Equilib., 20, 295-308(1999). doi:10.1361/10549719977033581144714d50700b1a28a8ad1b6936558770de176bbf6f8c72c21311a0c71ec9cd02viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
FePd-99Gho-LB.tdb1753.43BCC_A2 (x(Pd) 0.03877) + FCC_A1 (x(Pd) 0.04336) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.07577)
FePd-99Gho-LB.tdb1087.42BCC_A2 (x(Pd) 0.02566) + FCC_A1#2 (x(Pd) 0.05963) + FCC_A1 (x(Pd) 0.24012)
FePd-99Gho-LB.tdb1037.12FEPD_L10 (x(Pd) 0.62224) + FCC_A1 (x(Pd) 0.64422) + FEPD3_L12 (x(Pd) 0.6833)
FePd-99Gho-LB.tdb898.04BCC_A2 (x(Pd) 0.00603) + FCC_A1 (x(Pd) 0.39972) + FEPD_L10 (x(Pd) 0.48925)
FePd-99Gho-LB.tdb322.8FEPD3_L12 (x(Pd) 0.84322) + FEPD3_L12#2 (x(Pd) 0.88493) + FCC_A1 (x(Pd) 0.9472)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Fe–Pd system (21)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1753L + (δFe) -> (γFe)L: Pd 0.0757; (δFe): Pd 0.0387; (γFe): Pd 0.0433model[1] Ghosh 1999Table 1, p. 5, row 2
report
1751L + (δFe) -> (γFe)L: Pd 0.065; (δFe): Pd 0.033; (γFe): Pd 0.037experimental[1] Ghosh 1999
cites Gibson 1958
Table 1, p. 5, row 1
report
1583congruent melting: L -> γL: Pd 0.5; γ: Pd 0.5experimental[1] Ghosh 1999
cites Kubaschewski 1982
Table 1, p. 5, row 11
report
1582congruent melting: L -> γL: Pd 0.4971; γ: Pd 0.4971model[1] Ghosh 1999Table 1, p. 5, row 12
report
1173γ -> γ1 + γ2experimental[1] Ghosh 1999
cites Raub 1963
Table 1, p. 5, row 13
report
1147γ -> γ1 + γ2γ: Pd 0.1406model[1] Ghosh 1999Table 1, p. 5, row 14
report
1094polymorphic: γ -> FePd3γ: Pd 0.7305; FePd3: Fe 0.25, Pd 0.75model[1] Ghosh 1999Table 1, p. 5, row 21
report
1093polymorphic: γ -> FePd3γ: Fe 0.25, Pd 0.75; FePd3: Fe 0.25, Pd 0.75experimental[1] Ghosh 1999
cites Raub 1963
Table 1, p. 5, row 19
report
1088γ1 -> (αFe) + γ2γ1: Pd 0.07; (αFe): Pd 0.0348; γ2: Pd 0.2348experimental[1] Ghosh 1999
cites Raub 1963
Table 1, p. 5, row 4
report
1087γ1 -> (αFe) + γ2γ1: Pd 0.0597; (αFe): Pd 0.0257; γ2: Pd 0.2401model[1] Ghosh 1999Table 1, p. 5, row 5
report
1083polymorphic: γ -> FePd3γ: Pd 0.6596; FePd3: Fe 0.25, Pd 0.75experimental[1] Ghosh 1999
cites Takezawa 1987 doi
Table 1, p. 5, row 20
report
1073γ1 -> (αFe) + γ2experimental[1] Ghosh 1999
cites Kussman 1963
Table 1, p. 5, row 3
report
1073polymorphic: γ -> FePd3γ: Pd 0.65; FePd3: Fe 0.25, Pd 0.75experimental[1] Ghosh 1999
cites Kussman 1963
Table 1, p. 5, row 18
report
1063polymorphic: γ -> FePdγ: Fe 0.5, Pd 0.5; FePd: Fe 0.5, Pd 0.5experimental[1] Ghosh 1999
cites Raub 1963
Table 1, p. 5, row 15
report
1060polymorphic: γ -> FePdγ: Pd 0.5808; FePd: Fe 0.5, Pd 0.5model[1] Ghosh 1999Table 1, p. 5, row 17
report
1056polymorphic: γ -> FePdγ: Pd 0.5792; FePd: Fe 0.5, Pd 0.5experimental[1] Ghosh 1999
cites Takezawa 1987 doi
Table 1, p. 5, row 16
report
1037γ -> FePd + FePd3γ: Pd 0.6443; FePd: Pd 0.6222; FePd3: Pd 0.6833model[1] Ghosh 1999Table 1, p. 5, row 10
report
1033γ -> FePd + FePd3γ: Pd 0.615; FePd: Fe 0.5, Pd 0.5; FePd3: Fe 0.25, Pd 0.75experimental[1] Ghosh 1999
cites Raub 1963
Table 1, p. 5, row 9
report
898γ -> (αFe) + FePdγ: Pd 0.3998; (αFe): Pd 0.0061; FePd: Pd 0.4893model[1] Ghosh 1999Table 1, p. 5, row 8
report
878γ -> (αFe) + FePdγ: Pd 0.46; FePd: Pd 0.4833experimental[1] Ghosh 1999
cites Kussman 1963
Table 1, p. 5, row 6
report
873γ -> (αFe) + FePdγ: Pd 0.43; (αFe): Pd 0.0087; FePd: Pd 0.4696experimental[1] Ghosh 1999
cites Raub 1963
Table 1, p. 5, row 7
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Fe–Pd system (4)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
FePdFePd-13.735 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-6.145 (mp-aaaaaeex)-6.376 (oqmd-116604)[1] Ghosh 1999Table 2, p. 7, row 1
report
FePdFePd-6 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-6.145 (mp-aaaaaeex)-6.376 (oqmd-116604)[1] Ghosh 1999
cites F 1988
Table 2, p. 7, row 2
report
FePd3FePd3-22.01 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-10.445 (mp-aaaabgif)-10.407 (oqmd-30235)[1] Ghosh 1999Table 2, p. 7, row 3
report
FePd3FePd3-4 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-10.445 (mp-aaaabgif)-10.407 (oqmd-30235)[1] Ghosh 1999
cites F 1988
Table 2, p. 7, row 4
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. G. Ghosh, C. Kantner, G. B. Olson, Thermodynamic modeling of the Pd-X (X=Ag, Co, Fe, Ni) systems, JPE 20, 295-308 (1999). doi:10.1361/105497199770335811