Fe–Ti system

505 accepted literature values from 10 paper(s) (experimental 107, model 308, DFT 40, unspecified 50); 15 calculated phase diagram(s). 3 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (10) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental107
model308
DFT40
unspecified50
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction188
phase transition19
formation126
mixing / partial96
activity / EMF / Gibbs energy72
crystal structure4

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
FeTi-09Key.tdbJ. De Keyzer, G. Cacciamani, N. Dupin, P. Wollants, Calphad, 33, 109-23(2009).1ea2428706857b8b4d87849f9ffe38eb45d7b77f0040ea46692d66f154c74b79viewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-11Wan.tdbC.P. Wang, J.P. Zheng, Y. Yu, H.F. Hu, X.J. Liu, Mater. Chem. Phys., 130, 806-14(2011). doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.07.07129487a21dbf9915b717d867e283437bed8dac95583c55b8372ebbdccb9f40ddfviewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-12Bo.tdbH. Bo, J. Wang, L. Duarte, C. Leinenbach, L. Liu, H. Liu, Z. Jin, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 22, 2204-11(2012). doi:10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61450-7183add95bfc32e462504a28e1e6328b1d8c009f30f99607bc69641a7f14f6dcdviewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-12Guo.tdbC. Guo, C. Li, X. Zheng, Z. Du, Calphad, 38, 155-60(2012). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.06.01047ca15461ab905b4aeae6cd7d3bb7da0dfae666fef68df0ee66ddee1db708e35viewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-19Wit.tdbV.T. Witusiewicz, A.A. Bondar, U. Hecht, A. Theofilatos, N.I. Tsyganenko, S.V. Utkin, I.B. Tikhonova, J. Alloys Compd., 800, 419-49(2019). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.34120ca15b772842baaa34683f953d0447b8ea5ea5357470c837e7608aeeead7f66viewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-21San.tdbK. Santhy, K.C. Hari Kumar, Intermetallics, 128, 106978(2021). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2020.10697834a1c0676e8eed2a1bffe5586aa61e5ee7d8057553d49b6486bbd670d2113056viewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-21Zha.tdbG. Zhang, W. Zheng, Z. Zhao, Y. He, Z. Zheng, D. Tang, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 42, 363-72(2021). doi:10.1007/s11669-021-00889-7de527885390e9a9d0de02a8ae9d9df0dd2604c8ca7ad0a6c980e240ad34864e7viewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-22Kri.tdbM.J. Kriegel, M.H. Wetzel, O. Fabrichnaya, D. Rafaja, Calphad, 76, 102383(2022). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2021.1023837d978f1075f96b7faaf3b5c2076e6f57e9115cf369cc489eef6e1ddab648ed49viewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-24Lia.tdbZ. Liang, U. Kattner, K. Choudharry, F. Tavazza, C. Campbell, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 45, 732-56(2024). doi:10.1007/s11669-024-01124-90a498e0d238a414e0a15d505bd317dc0289ca7132b2b93b178ad416991462d95viewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-89Bal.tdbK. Balasubramanian, unpublished work, KTH, Stockholm, 1989.960a05a577d637ea7f60486e68aa7b8a55d865e09d889b710579c55daefa15ceviewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-94Har.tdbK.C. Hari Kumar, P. Wollants, L. Delaey, Calphad, 18, 223-34(1994). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(94)90028-089d365c4c3215e59dd9c737f1d7f7c288f25f30a88ad8dadc828d910cb7464deviewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-98Dum.tdbL.F.S. Dumitrescu, M. Hillert, N. Saunders, J. Phase Equilib., 19, 441-48(1998). doi:10.1361/10549719877034192316241d492de1e8a29f93eea7fd6438180dfdbf4a2f22a49d5f6e129e3b83cafcviewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-98Har-LB.tdbK.C. Hari Kumar, unpublished, 1998.8b57368794e5504f3c115a02c8734d9109150614b2493e1e14214e4245c95990viewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-98Jon.tdbS. Jonsson, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 29B, 361-70(1998). doi:10.1007/s11663-998-0113-zd6efa66564a03f46cc102c8f207f0b820cd8f12a91a0f8d748e43b1aaab1bfaaviewer · TDB · JSON
FeTi-98Ran.tdbM.H. Rand, COST 507, Final report round 2, 1998.72430ad2c2591dead916039a4b447b24d5a0db7b10d58c8aa10b132cee4ba054viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
FeTi-09Key.tdb1578.38C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.35995) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50022) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50433)
FeTi-09Key.tdb1578.38C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.35995) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50022) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50433)
FeTi-09Key.tdb1565.15B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.09821) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.15707) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.27486)
FeTi-09Key.tdb1354.58B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.51916) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71855) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.76715)
FeTi-09Key.tdb1354.58B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51916) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71855) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.76715)
FeTi-09Key.tdb1354.58B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51916) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71855) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.76715)
FeTi-09Key.tdb1354.58B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51916) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71855) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.76715)
FeTi-09Key.tdb1154.99HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 1) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 1) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 1)
FeTi-09Key.tdb861.46B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50786) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.86926) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99944)
FeTi-09Key.tdb861.46B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50786) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.86926) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99944)
FeTi-09Key.tdb861.46B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50786) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.86926) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99944)
FeTi-09Key.tdb861.46B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50786) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.86926) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99944)
FeTi-11Wan.tdb1590.53C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.36149) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.50356) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50469)
FeTi-11Wan.tdb1590.53C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.36149) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.50356) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50469)
FeTi-11Wan.tdb1564.47BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.10142) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.15543) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.28116)
FeTi-11Wan.tdb1363.24FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.51452) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71862) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.78038)
FeTi-11Wan.tdb1363.24FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.51452) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71862) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.78038)
FeTi-11Wan.tdb867.59FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.51487) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.88846) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99946)
FeTi-11Wan.tdb867.59FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.51487) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.88846) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99946)
FeTi-12Bo.tdb1667.47FCC_A1 (x(Ti) 0) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0)
FeTi-12Bo.tdb1592.21C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.37439) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.49222) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.49846)
FeTi-12Bo.tdb1579.82LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.1648) + FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.26832) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.2848)
FeTi-12Bo.tdb1557.92B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.09036) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.15172) + FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.26028)
FeTi-12Bo.tdb1352.33B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.52109) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.72458) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.76957)
FeTi-12Bo.tdb1302.1B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.04731) + FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.26627) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.28506)
FeTi-12Bo.tdb856.11B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51064) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.86477) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99953)
FeTi-12Guo.tdb1667.47FCC_A1 (x(Ti) 0) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0)
FeTi-12Guo.tdb1576.72C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.37001) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50031) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50445)
FeTi-12Guo.tdb1576.72C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.37001) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50031) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50445)
FeTi-12Guo.tdb1567.04B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.09695) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.15598) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.26386)
FeTi-12Guo.tdb1353.51B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.51934) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71945) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.76885)
FeTi-12Guo.tdb1353.51B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51934) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71945) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.76885)
FeTi-12Guo.tdb1184.81FCC_A1 (x(Ti) 0) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0)
FeTi-12Guo.tdb857.22B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50948) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.85794) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.9993)
FeTi-12Guo.tdb857.22B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.50948) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.85794) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.9993)
FeTi-19Wit.tdb1588.43C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.37405) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.49725) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.49743)
FeTi-19Wit.tdb1588.43C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.37405) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.49725) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.49743)
FeTi-19Wit.tdb1556.73B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.09473) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.15795) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.27326)
FeTi-19Wit.tdb1353.28B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.5272) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.72529) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.77059)
FeTi-19Wit.tdb1353.28B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.5272) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.72529) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.77059)
FeTi-19Wit.tdb857.01B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51498) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.86515) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99953)
FeTi-19Wit.tdb857.01B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.51498) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.86515) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99953)
FeTi-21San.tdb1667.47FCC_A1 (x(Ti) 0) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0)
FeTi-21San.tdb1574.46C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.35981) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50014) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50317)
FeTi-21San.tdb1574.46C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.35981) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50014) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50317)
FeTi-21San.tdb1562.2B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.09858) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.15788) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.2762)
FeTi-21San.tdb1395.76C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.34547) + FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.47774) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.49964)
FeTi-21San.tdb1395.76C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.34547) + FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.47774) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.49964)
FeTi-21San.tdb1352.03B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.51911) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71781) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.7665)
FeTi-21San.tdb1352.03B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.51911) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71781) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.7665)
FeTi-21San.tdb1352.03B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51911) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71781) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.7665)
FeTi-21San.tdb1184.81FCC_A1 (x(Ti) 0) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0)
FeTi-21San.tdb1154.99HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 1) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 1) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 1)
FeTi-21San.tdb1113.51FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.49983) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51513) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.81651)
FeTi-21San.tdb1113.51FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.49983) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51513) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.81651)
FeTi-21San.tdb1113.51FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.49983) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51513) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.81651)
FeTi-21San.tdb1044.99FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.49991) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51333) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.83023)
FeTi-21San.tdb1044.99FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.49991) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51333) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.83023)
FeTi-21San.tdb1044.99FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.49991) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51333) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.83023)
FeTi-21San.tdb860.21B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50786) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.86879) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99958)
FeTi-21San.tdb860.21B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.50786) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.86879) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99958)
FeTi-21San.tdb860.21B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50786) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.86879) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99958)
FeTi-21San.tdb778.14C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.33338) + FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.45486) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.49998)
FeTi-21San.tdb778.14C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.33338) + FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.45486) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.49998)
FeTi-21Zha.tdb1667.47FCC_A1 (x(Ti) 0) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0)
FeTi-21Zha.tdb1596.49C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.36865) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.47879) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50175)
FeTi-21Zha.tdb1596.49C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.36865) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.47879) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50175)
FeTi-21Zha.tdb1551.4B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.08144) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.15035) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.2589)
FeTi-21Zha.tdb1349.2B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.52253) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.72073) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.78625)
FeTi-21Zha.tdb1349.2B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.52253) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.72073) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.78625)
FeTi-21Zha.tdb1349.2B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.52253) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.72073) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.78625)
FeTi-21Zha.tdb1184.81FCC_A1 (x(Ti) 0) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0)
FeTi-21Zha.tdb860.73B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50709) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.86471) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99945)
FeTi-21Zha.tdb860.73B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50709) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.86471) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99945)
FeTi-21Zha.tdb860.73B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50709) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.86471) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99945)
FeTi-22Kri.tdb1588.35C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.35631) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.49594) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50736)
FeTi-22Kri.tdb1588.35C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.35631) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.49594) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50736)
FeTi-22Kri.tdb1564.24BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.08639) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.14806) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.27718)
FeTi-22Kri.tdb1356.4FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.52103) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71788) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.77392)
FeTi-22Kri.tdb1356.4FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.52103) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71788) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.77392)
FeTi-22Kri.tdb864.86FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.50692) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.87079) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99957)
FeTi-22Kri.tdb864.86FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.50692) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.87079) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99957)
FeTi-24Lia.tdb1655.43C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.37021) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.47042) + BCC_4SL (x(Ti) 0.49666)
FeTi-24Lia.tdb1655.43C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.37021) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.47042) + BCC_4SL (x(Ti) 0.49666)
FeTi-24Lia.tdb1580.79BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.08001) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.1461) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.26419)
FeTi-24Lia.tdb1398.21BCC_4SL (x(Ti) 0.50252) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.75188) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.81961)
FeTi-24Lia.tdb1398.21BCC_4SL (x(Ti) 0.50252) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.75188) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.81961)
FeTi-24Lia.tdb999.34BCC_4SL (x(Ti) 0.50046) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.93246) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99998)
FeTi-24Lia.tdb999.34BCC_4SL (x(Ti) 0.50046) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.93246) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99998)
FeTi-24Lia.tdb999.34BCC_4SL (x(Ti) 0.50046) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.93246) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99998)
FeTi-24Lia.tdb367.09BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.33328) + BCC_4SL (x(Ti) 0.43339)
FeTi-24Lia.tdb367.09BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.33328) + BCC_4SL (x(Ti) 0.43339)
FeTi-89Bal.tdb1560.22BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.10082) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.15704) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.33333)
FeTi-89Bal.tdb1560.22BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.10073) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.15695) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.33333)
FeTi-89Bal.tdb1559.83C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.33333) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.53243)
FeTi-89Bal.tdb1559.83C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.33333) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.53253)
FeTi-89Bal.tdb1335.77FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71949) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.78234)
FeTi-89Bal.tdb1335.77FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71977) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.78275)
FeTi-89Bal.tdb850.1FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.87056) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99957)
FeTi-89Bal.tdb850.1FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.87056) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99957)
FeTi-89Bal.tdb451.83C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.33333) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 1)
FeTi-94Har.tdb1589.47FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.35689) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.51148)
FeTi-94Har.tdb1589.47FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.35687) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.51124)
FeTi-94Har.tdb1565.35BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.10091) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.15488) + FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.26662)
FeTi-94Har.tdb1351.19FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71097) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.77031)
FeTi-94Har.tdb1351.19FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71108) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.77046)
FeTi-94Har.tdb840.65FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.87848) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99967)
FeTi-94Har.tdb840.65FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.87848) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99967)
FeTi-94Har.tdb359.85FE2TI_C14 (x(Ti) 0.39957) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 1)
FeTi-98Dum.tdb1608.53C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.4127) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.49119) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5)
FeTi-98Dum.tdb1608.53C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.4128) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.49133) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5)
FeTi-98Dum.tdb1560.18BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.09657) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.17193) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.3081)
FeTi-98Dum.tdb1345.41FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.70542) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.75788)
FeTi-98Dum.tdb1345.41FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.70559) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.75811)
FeTi-98Dum.tdb856.41FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.87367) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.9995)
FeTi-98Dum.tdb856.41FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.87375) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.9995)
FeTi-98Har-LB.tdb1578.35C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.36327) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50025) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50491)
FeTi-98Har-LB.tdb1578.35C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.36327) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50025) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50491)
FeTi-98Har-LB.tdb1564.97B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.0983) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.15717) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.27505)
FeTi-98Har-LB.tdb1354.58B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.51916) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71855) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.76715)
FeTi-98Har-LB.tdb1354.58B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.51916) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71855) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.76715)
FeTi-98Har-LB.tdb861.36B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.50785) + B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.86928) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99958)
FeTi-98Har-LB.tdb861.36B2_BCC#2 (x(Ti) 0.50785) + B2_BCC (x(Ti) 0.86928) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99958)
FeTi-98Jon.tdb1589.68C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.3907) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.5141)
FeTi-98Jon.tdb1589.68C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.39071) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.51412)
FeTi-98Jon.tdb1563BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.11373) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.16431) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.30575)
FeTi-98Jon.tdb1344.44FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71724) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.75986)
FeTi-98Jon.tdb1344.44FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71744) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.76011)
FeTi-98Jon.tdb858.08FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.88866) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99952)
FeTi-98Jon.tdb858.08FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.88876) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99952)
FeTi-98Ran.tdb1593.42C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.37403) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50633)
FeTi-98Ran.tdb1593.42C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.37403) + FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.50634)
FeTi-98Ran.tdb1564.41BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.09892) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.1522) + C14_LAVES (x(Ti) 0.26711)
FeTi-98Ran.tdb1349.28FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71159) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.77229)
FeTi-98Ran.tdb1349.28FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.71166) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.77238)
FeTi-98Ran.tdb849.41FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.87713) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99936)
FeTi-98Ran.tdb849.41FETI_B2 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.87726) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.99936)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull FeTi-09Key · CALPHAD hull FeTi-11Wan · CALPHAD hull FeTi-12Bo · CALPHAD hull FeTi-12Guo · CALPHAD hull FeTi-19Wit · CALPHAD hull FeTi-21San · CALPHAD hull FeTi-21Zha · CALPHAD hull FeTi-22Kri · CALPHAD hull FeTi-89Bal · CALPHAD hull FeTi-94Har · CALPHAD hull FeTi-98Dum · CALPHAD hull FeTi-98Har-LB · CALPHAD hull FeTi-98Jon · CALPHAD hull FeTi-98Ran

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Fe–Ti system (188)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1803congruent melting: Liquid->λLiquid: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; λ: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 54Nis		Table 5, p. 8, row 2
report
1753congruent melting: Liquid->λLiquid: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; λ: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 56Kor		Table 5, p. 8, row 3
report
1710congruent melting: Liquid↔Fe2TiFe2Ti: Ti 0.33; L: Ti 0.33model[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 7		Table 2, p. 5, row 7
report
1710congruent melting: L -> C14L: Fe 0.67; C14: Fe 0.67unspecified[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Hari 1999		Table 4, p. 17, row 4
report
1707congruent melting: L -> C14L: Fe 0.672; C14: Fe 0.672model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Guo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 8
report
1706congruent melting: L -> C14L: Fe 0.671; C14: Fe 0.671model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Bo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 9
report
1706congruent melting: Liquid↔Fe2TiFe2Ti: Ti 0.329; L: Ti 0.329model[2] BO 2012Table 2, p. 5, row 8
report
1704congruent melting: Congruent melting of Fe2TiFe2Ti: Ti 0.342model[4] Jonsson 1998Table IV, p. 5, row 6
report
1704congruent melting: L -> C14L: Fe 0.658; C14: Fe 0.658model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 6
report
1703congruent melting: L -> C14L: Fe 0.664; C14: Fe 0.664unspecified[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Wang 2011 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 7
report
1700congruent melting: L -> C14L: Fe 0.666; C14: Fe 0.666model[3] Witusiewicz 2019Table 4, p. 17, row 10
report
1700congruent melting: L -> C14L: Fe 0.667; C14: Fe 0.667unspecified[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Hari 1994 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 2
report
1700congruent melting: L -> C14experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Hellawell 1957 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 1
report
1700congruent melting: Liquid->λLiquid: Ti 0.329; λ: Ti 0.329unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 57Hel		Table 5, p. 8, row 4
report
1700congruent melting: Liquid->λLiquid: Ti 0.333; λ: Ti 0.333model[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 87Mur		Table 5, p. 8, row 6
report
1700congruent melting: Liquid->λLiquid: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; λ: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333model[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 82Kub		Table 5, p. 8, row 5
report
1700congruent melting: Liquid->λLiquid: Ti 0.336; λ: Ti 0.336model[1] Kumar 1994Table 5, p. 8, row 1
report
1700congruent melting: Congruent melting of Fe2TiFe2Ti: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Hellawell 1957 doi		Table IV, p. 5, row 4
report
1700congruent melting: Liquid↔Fe2TiLiquid: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; Fe2Ti: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333unspecified[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 26		Table 2, p. 5, row 5
report
1696congruent melting: Liquid↔Fe2TiLiquid: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; Fe2Ti: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333unspecified[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 22		Table 2, p. 5, row 6
report
1696congruent melting: Congruent melting of Fe2TiFe2Ti: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Booker 1979		Table IV, p. 5, row 5
report
1696congruent melting: L -> C14experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Booker 1979		Table 4, p. 17, row 3
report
1692.5congruent melting: L -> C14model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Dumitrescu 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 5
report
1613eutectic: Liquid->α+λλ: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 54Nis		Table 5, p. 8, row 16
report
1612Fe2Ti + FeTi + LFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 4, p. 4, row 24
report
1612peritectic: L + C14 -> B2model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Dumitrescu 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 15
report
1599eutectic: L -> A2 + C14L: Fe 0.83; A2: Fe 0.897; C14: Fe 0.75experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Booker 1979		Table 4, p. 17, row 24
report
1599bcc(Fe) + L + Fe2TiFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Booker 1979		Table 4, p. 4, row 2
report
1599Bcc(Fe) + L + Fe2TiBcc(Fe): Ti 0.103; L: Ti 0.17; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.25experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Booker 1979		Table IV, p. 5, row 2
report
1599Liquid↔BCC_Fe+Fe2TiLiquid: Ti 0.17; BCC_Fe: Ti 0.103; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.25unspecified[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 22		Table 2, p. 5, row 2
report
1598eutectic: Liquid->α+λλ: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 65Bor		Table 5, p. 8, row 19
report
1593.4peritectic: Liquid + Laves-C14 -> FeTi*Liquid: Ti 0.506; Laves-C14: Ti 0.334; FeTi*: Ti 0.5model[6] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 223, row 3
report
1593.4Fe2Ti + FeTi + LFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 4, p. 4, row 21
report
1593.15peritectic: L + Fe2Ti -> FeTiL: Ti 0.391; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.514; FeTi: Ti 0.5experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 2
report
1593peritectic: L + C14 -> B2L: Fe 0.486; C14: Fe 0.609; B2: Fe 0.5model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 16
report
1593Fe2Ti + FeTi + LFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 4, row 23
report
1593Fe2Ti + FeTi + LFe2Ti: Ti 0.391; FeTi: Ti 0.5; L: Ti 0.514model[4] Jonsson 1998Table IV, p. 5, row 9
report
1592Liquid+Fe2Ti↔FeTiLiquid: Ti 0.497; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.373; FeTi: Ti 0.492model[2] BO 2012Table 2, p. 5, row 12
report
1592peritectic: L + C14 -> B2L: Fe 0.503; C14: Fe 0.627; B2: Fe 0.508model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Bo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 20
report
1591.6Fe2Ti + FeTi + LFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 4, p. 4, row 19
report
1590.15peritectic: L + Fe2Ti -> FeTiL: Ti 0.505; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.352; FeTi: Ti 0.497experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Murray 1981 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 3
report
1590peritectic: λ+Liquid->FeTiλ: Ti 0.352; Liquid: Ti 0.505; FeTi: Ti 0.497model[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 87Mur		Table 5, p. 8, row 14
report
1590Liquid+Fe2Ti↔FeTiFe2Ti: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5unspecified[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 26		Table 2, p. 5, row 9
report
1590peritectic: λ+Liquid->FeTiλ: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 54Nis		Table 5, p. 8, row 8
report
1590Fe2Ti + L <=> FeTiFe2Ti: Ti 0.352; L: Ti 0.505; FeTi: Ti 0.497unspecified[8] Santhy 2021
cites Murray 1987		Table 7, p. 6, row 5
report
1590Fe2Ti + FeTi + LFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Ti 0.5experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites ref. 57Hel		Table 4, p. 4, row 17
report
1590peritectic: λ+Liquid->FeTiλ: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5model[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 82Kub		Table 5, p. 8, row 13
report
1590Fe2Ti + FeTi + LFe2Ti: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Hellawell 1957 doi		Table IV, p. 5, row 7
report
1589.5Fe2Ti + FeTi + LFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 4, p. 4, row 22
report
1589.15peritectic: L + Fe2Ti -> FeTiL: Ti 0.511; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.357; FeTi: Ti 0.5experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Hari 1994 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 1
report
1589Liquid+Fe2Ti↔FeTiLiquid: Ti 0.515; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.37; FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5unspecified[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 22		Table 2, p. 5, row 10
report
1589peritectic: L + C14 -> B2experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Hellawell 1957 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 11
report
1589peritectic: L + C14 -> B2L: Fe 0.49; C14: Fe 0.645; B2: Fe 0.5experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Murray 1981 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 12
report
1589peritectic: λ+Liquid->FeTiλ: Ti 0.357; Liquid: Ti 0.511; FeTi: Ti 0.5model[1] Kumar 1994Table 5, p. 8, row 7
report
1589peritectic: L + C14 -> B2L: Fe 0.485; C14: Fe 0.63experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Booker 1979		Table 4, p. 17, row 13
report
1589peritectic: L + C14 -> B2L: Fe 0.499; C14: Fe 0.643; B2: Fe 0.5model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Hari 1994 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 14
report
1589peritectic: L + C14 -> B2L: Fe 0.495; C14: Fe 0.639; B2: Fe 0.5unspecified[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Wang 2011 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 18
report
1589Fe2Ti + FeTi + LFe2Ti: Ti 0.37; FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5; L: Ti 0.515experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Booker 1979		Table IV, p. 5, row 8
report
1589peritectic: λ+Liquid->FeTiλ: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 57Hel		Table 5, p. 8, row 11
report
1589Fe2Ti + FeTi + LFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Ti 0.5experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Booker 1979		Table 4, p. 4, row 18
report
1588peritectic: λ+Liquid->FeTiλ: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 65Bor		Table 5, p. 8, row 12
report
1588peritectic: L + C14 -> B2L: Fe 0.5026; C14: Fe 0.626; B2: Fe 0.5027model[3] Witusiewicz 2019Table 4, p. 17, row 21
report
1587.15peritectic: L + Fe2Ti -> FeTiL: Ti 0.505; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.361; FeTi: Ti 0.5model[7] Wang 2011Table 3, p. 6, row 4
report
1583peritectic: λ+Liquid->FeTiλ: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 59Mur		Table 5, p. 8, row 10
report
1579.95eutectic: L -> β-Fe + C14L: Ti 0.1465; β-Fe: Ti 0.0803; C14: Ti 0.2643model[9] Liang 2024Table 5, p. 10, row 5
report
1579.8L + C14 -> TiFe_B2L: Ti 0.516; C14: Ti 0.3766; TiFe_B2: Ti 0.4971model[9] Liang 2024Table 5, p. 10, row 3
report
1578Liquid+Fe2Ti↔FeTiLiquid: Ti 0.507; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.364; FeTi: Ti 0.5model[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 7		Table 2, p. 5, row 11
report
1578peritectic: L + C14 -> B2L: Fe 0.493; C14: Fe 0.636; B2: Fe 0.5unspecified[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Hari 1999		Table 4, p. 17, row 17
report
1576peritectic: L + C14 -> B2L: Fe 0.495; C14: Fe 0.63; B2: Fe 0.499model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Guo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 19
report
1574Fe2Ti + L <=> FeTiFe2Ti: Ti 0.36; L: Ti 0.505; FeTi: Ti 0.5model[8] Santhy 2021Table 7, p. 6, row 3
report
1574Fe2Ti + L <=> FeTiFe2Ti: Ti 0.374; L: Ti 0.505; FeTi: Ti 0.5model[8] Santhy 2021Table 7, p. 6, row 4
report
1571eutectic: Liquid->α+λλ: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 56Kor		Table 5, p. 8, row 17
report
1571peritectic: λ+Liquid->FeTiλ: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 56Kor		Table 5, p. 8, row 9
report
1567eutectic: L -> A2 + C14L: Fe 0.844; A2: Fe 0.902; C14: Fe 0.736model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Guo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 29
report
1566.15eutectic: L -> αFe + Fe2TiL: Ti 0.155; αFe: Ti 0.1; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.265experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Hari 1994 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 5
report
1566eutectic: L -> A2 + C14L: Fe 0.845; A2: Fe 0.9; C14: Fe 0.735model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Hari 1994 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 25
report
1566Liquid↔BCC_Fe+Fe2TiLiquid: Ti 0.156; BCC_Fe: Ti 0.098; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.275model[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 7		Table 2, p. 5, row 3
report
1566eutectic: L -> A2 + C14L: Fe 0.844; A2: Fe 0.902; C14: Fe 0.725unspecified[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Hari 1999		Table 4, p. 17, row 27
report
1566eutectic: Liquid->α+λLiquid: Ti 0.155; α: Ti 0.1; λ: Ti 0.265model[1] Kumar 1994Table 5, p. 8, row 15
report
1565.4bcc(Fe) + L + Fe2TiFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 4, p. 4, row 6
report
1564.4eutectic: Liquid -> bcc-A2 + Laves-C14Liquid: Ti 0.152; bcc-A2: Ti 0.099; Laves-C14: Ti 0.267model[6] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 223, row 5
report
1564.4bcc(Fe) + L + Fe2TiFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 4, p. 4, row 5
report
1564.15eutectic: L -> αFe + Fe2TiL: Ti 0.164; αFe: Ti 0.113; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.306experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 6
report
1564Bcc(Fe) + L + Fe2TiBcc(Fe): Ti 0.113; L: Ti 0.164; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.306model[4] Jonsson 1998Table IV, p. 5, row 3
report
1564bcc(Fe) + L + Fe2TiFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 4, row 7
report
1564eutectic: L -> A2 + C14L: Fe 0.836; A2: Fe 0.887; C14: Fe 0.694model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 26
report
1563L <=> α-Fe + Fe2TiL: Ti 0.157; α-Fe: Ti 0.098; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.276model[8] Santhy 2021Table 7, p. 6, row 6
report
1563eutectic: Liquid->α+λLiquid: Ti 0.16; α: Ti 0.098; λ: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333model[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 82Kub		Table 5, p. 8, row 20
report
1562.8bcc(Fe) + L + Fe2TiFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 4, p. 4, row 3
report
1562.15eutectic: L -> αFe + Fe2TiL: Ti 0.16; αFe: Ti 0.1; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.276experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Murray 1981 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 7
report
1562.15eutectic: L -> αFe + Fe2TiL: Ti 0.156; αFe: Ti 0.101; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.281model[7] Wang 2011Table 3, p. 6, row 8
report
1562Bcc(Fe) + L + Fe2TiL: Ti 0.16; Fe2Ti: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Hellawell 1957 doi		Table IV, p. 5, row 1
report
1562eutectic: L -> A2 + C14unspecified[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Hellawell 1957 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 22
report
1562bcc(Fe) + L + Fe2TiFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites ref. 57Hel		Table 4, p. 4, row 1
report
1562Liquid↔BCC_Fe+Fe2TiLiquid: Ti 0.16; Fe2Ti: Fe 0.666667, Ti 0.333333unspecified[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 26		Table 2, p. 5, row 1
report
1562eutectic: Liquid->α+λLiquid: Ti 0.16; α: Ti 0.1; λ: Ti 0.276model[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 87Mur		Table 5, p. 8, row 21
report
1562bcc(Fe) + L + Fe2TiFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 4, p. 4, row 8
report
1562eutectic: L -> A2 + C14L: Fe 0.84; A2: Fe 0.9; C14: Fe 0.724experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Murray 1981 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 23
report
1562L <=> α-Fe + Fe2TiL: Ti 0.16; α-Fe: Ti 0.1; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.276unspecified[8] Santhy 2021
cites Murray 1987		Table 7, p. 6, row 8
report
1562eutectic: Liquid->α+λLiquid: Ti 0.16; α: Ti 0.098; λ: Ti 0.333unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 57Hel		Table 5, p. 8, row 18
report
1562eutectic: L -> A2 + C14L: Fe 0.844; A2: Fe 0.899; C14: Fe 0.719unspecified[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Wang 2011 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 28
report
1560L <=> α-Fe + Fe2TiL: Ti 0.159; α-Fe: Ti 0.1; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.277model[8] Santhy 2021Table 7, p. 6, row 7
report
1560bcc(Fe) + L + Fe2TiFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 4, p. 4, row 4
report
1559.9Fe2Ti + FeTi + LFe2Ti: Ti 0.333333; FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 4, p. 4, row 20
report
1559eutectic: L -> A2 + C14L: Fe 0.849; A2: Fe 0.91; C14: Fe 0.74model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Bo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 30
report
1559Liquid↔BCC_Fe+Fe2TiLiquid: Ti 0.151; BCC_Fe: Ti 0.09; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.26model[2] BO 2012Table 2, p. 5, row 4
report
1558eutectic: L -> A2 + C14experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019Table 4, p. 17, row 31
report
1557eutectic: L -> A2 + C14L: Fe 0.842; A2: Fe 0.905; C14: Fe 0.727model[3] Witusiewicz 2019Table 4, p. 17, row 32
report
1363eutectic: Liquid->FeTi+αFeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 65Bor		Table 5, p. 8, row 25
report
1359FeTi + L + bcc(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Booker 1979		Table 4, p. 4, row 25
report
1359Liquid↔FeTi+BCC_TiLiquid: Ti 0.71; FeTi: Ti 0.52; BCC_Ti: Ti 0.77unspecified[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 22		Table 2, p. 5, row 14
report
1359FeTi + L + Bcc(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.52; L: Ti 0.71; Bcc(Ti): Ti 0.77experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Booker 1979		Table IV, p. 5, row 11
report
1358.15eutectic: L -> FeTi + βTiL: Ti 0.705; FeTi: Ti 0.525; βTi: Ti 0.79experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Murray 1981 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 11
report
1358.15eutectic: L -> FeTi + βTiL: Ti 0.719; FeTi: Ti 0.515; βTi: Ti 0.782model[7] Wang 2011Table 3, p. 6, row 12
report
1358eutectic: Liquid->FeTi+αLiquid: Ti 0.71; FeTi: Ti 0.518model[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 82Kub		Table 5, p. 8, row 26
report
1358eutectic: Liquid->FeTi+αLiquid: Ti 0.705; FeTi: Ti 0.525; α: Ti 0.79model[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 87Mur		Table 5, p. 8, row 27
report
1358eutectic: L -> A2 + B2L: Fe 0.281; A2: Fe 0.228; B2: Fe 0.485unspecified[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Wang 2011 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 40
report
1358L <=> FeTi+β-TiL: Ti 0.705; FeTi: Ti 0.525; β-Ti: Ti 0.79unspecified[8] Santhy 2021
cites Murray 1987		Table 7, p. 6, row 10
report
1358eutectic: L -> A2 + B2L: Fe 0.295; A2: Fe 0.21; B2: Fe 0.475experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Murray 1981 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 34
report
1357eutectic: L -> A2 + B2L: Fe 0.29; A2: Fe 0.23; B2: Fe 0.48experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Booker 1979		Table 4, p. 17, row 35
report
1357eutectic: L -> A2 + B2experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019Table 4, p. 17, row 43
report
1355FeTi + L + bcc(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 4, p. 4, row 32
report
1355eutectic: L -> A2 + B2model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Dumitrescu 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 37
report
1355Liquid↔FeTi+BCC_TiLiquid: Ti 0.719; FeTi: Ti 0.519; BCC_Ti: Ti 0.767model[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 7		Table 2, p. 5, row 15
report
1355eutectic: L -> A2 + B2L: Fe 0.281; A2: Fe 0.233; B2: Fe 0.481unspecified[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Hari 1999		Table 4, p. 17, row 39
report
1354.7FeTi + L + bcc(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 4, p. 4, row 27
report
1353eutectic: L -> A2 + B2L: Fe 0.28; A2: Fe 0.232; B2: Fe 0.48model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Guo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 41
report
1353FeTi + L + bcc(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites R 1952		Table 4, p. 4, row 26
report
1353eutectic: L -> A2 + B2L: Fe 0.29; A2: Fe 0.22experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites R 1952		Table 4, p. 17, row 33
report
1353eutectic: Liquid->FeTi+αLiquid: Ti 0.712; FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 52Thy		Table 5, p. 8, row 23
report
1353eutectic: L -> A2 + B2L: Fe 0.275; A2: Fe 0.229; B2: Fe 0.473model[3] Witusiewicz 2019Table 4, p. 17, row 44
report
1353FeTi + L + Bcc(Ti)FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5; L: Ti 0.71; Bcc(Ti): Ti 0.78experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites R 1952		Table IV, p. 5, row 10
report
1353Liquid↔FeTi+BCC_TiLiquid: Ti 0.71; FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5; BCC_Ti: Ti 0.78unspecified[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 12		Table 2, p. 5, row 13
report
1353eutectic: Liquid->FeTi+αFeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 54Nis		Table 5, p. 8, row 24
report
1352L <=> FeTi+β-TiL: Ti 0.718; FeTi: Ti 0.519; β-Ti: Ti 0.766model[8] Santhy 2021Table 7, p. 6, row 9
report
1352eutectic: L -> A2 + B2L: Fe 0.275; A2: Fe 0.23; B2: Fe 0.479model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Bo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 42
report
1352Liquid↔FeTi+BCC_TiLiquid: Ti 0.725; FeTi: Ti 0.521; BCC_Ti: Ti 0.77model[2] BO 2012Table 2, p. 5, row 16
report
1351.15eutectic: L -> FeTi + βTiL: Ti 0.711; FeTi: Ti 0.5; βTi: Ti 0.77experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Hari 1994 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 9
report
1351eutectic: L -> A2 + B2L: Fe 0.289; A2: Fe 0.23; B2: Fe 0.5model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Hari 1994 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 36
report
1351FeTi + L + bcc(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 4, p. 4, row 30
report
1351eutectic: Liquid->FeTi+αLiquid: Ti 0.711; FeTi: Ti 0.5; α: Ti 0.77model[1] Kumar 1994Table 5, p. 8, row 22
report
1349.3FeTi + L + bcc(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 4, p. 4, row 29
report
1349.3eutectic: Liquid -> FeTi* + bcc-A2Liquid: Ti 0.712; FeTi*: Ti 0.5; bcc-A2: Ti 0.772model[6] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 223, row 1
report
1346.15eutectic: L -> FeTi + βTiL: Ti 0.718; FeTi: Ti 0.5; βTi: Ti 0.761experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 10
report
1346FeTi + L + bcc(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 4, row 31
report
1346FeTi + L + Bcc(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5; L: Ti 0.718; Bcc(Ti): Ti 0.761model[4] Jonsson 1998Table IV, p. 5, row 12
report
1346eutectic: L -> A2 + B2L: Fe 0.282; A2: Fe 0.239; B2: Fe 0.5model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 38
report
1339.4eutectic: L -> β-Ti + TiFe_B2L: Ti 0.7166; β-Ti: Ti 0.7711; TiFe_B2: Ti 0.5209model[9] Liang 2024Table 5, p. 10, row 1
report
1335.8FeTi + L + bcc(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 4, p. 4, row 28
report
1052peritectic: A2+C14 -> A2^fexperimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019Table 4, p. 17, row 56
report
1050.5peritectic: A2+C14 -> A2^fA2: Fe 0.98experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Arrott 1959 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 55
report
1050peritectic: A2+C14 -> A2^fA2: Fe 0.974; C14: Fe 0.723model[3] Witusiewicz 2019Table 4, p. 17, row 59
report
1034peritectic: A2+C14 -> A2^fA2: Fe 0.979; C14: Fe 0.7model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Guo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 57
report
1022peritectic: A2+C14 -> A2^fA2: Fe 0.993; C14: Fe 0.709model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Bo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 58
report
873eutectoid: α->FeTi+εFeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 79Mat		Table 5, p. 8, row 30
report
868.15eutectoid: βTi -> FeTi + αTiβTi: Ti 0.889; FeTi: Ti 0.515; αTi: Ti 0.9995model[7] Wang 2011Table 3, p. 6, row 16
report
868.15eutectoid: βTi -> FeTi + αTiβTi: Ti 0.85; FeTi: Ti 0.51; αTi: Ti 0.9996experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Murray 1981 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 15
report
868eutectoid: α->FeTi+εα: Ti 0.85; FeTi: Ti 0.51; ε: Ti 0.9996model[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 87Mur		Table 5, p. 8, row 32
report
868eutectoid: A2 -> A3 + B2A2: Fe 0.122; A3: Fe 4.000e-4; B2: Fe 0.5unspecified[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Wang 2011 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 51
report
868eutectoid: α->FeTi+εFeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5unspecified[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 67Rau		Table 5, p. 8, row 29
report
863eutectoid: α->FeTi+εα: Ti 0.87; FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5model[1] Kumar 1994
cites ref. 82Kub		Table 5, p. 8, row 31
report
863eutectoid: A2 -> A3 + B2A2: Fe 0.14; A3: Fe 4.000e-5; B2: Fe 0.48experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Murray 1981 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 46
report
861BCC_Ti↔FeTi+HCP_TiBCC_Ti: Ti 0.869; FeTi: Ti 0.508; HCP_Ti: Ti 0.9996model[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 7		Table 2, p. 5, row 18
report
861eutectoid: A2 -> A3 + B2A2: Fe 0.131; A3: Fe 4.000e-4; B2: Fe 0.492unspecified[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Hari 1999		Table 4, p. 17, row 50
report
859.15eutectoid: βTi -> FeTi + αTiβTi: Ti 0.889; FeTi: Ti 0.5; αTi: Ti 0.9995experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 14
report
859FeTi + bcc(Ti) + cph(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 4, row 37
report
859FeTi + Bcc(Ti) + Hcp(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5; Bcc(Ti): Ti 0.889; Hcp(Ti): Ti 0.9995model[4] Jonsson 1998Table IV, p. 5, row 14
report
859eutectoid: A2 -> A3 + B2A2: Fe 0.111; A3: Fe 5.000e-4; B2: Fe 0.5model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 48
report
857eutectoid: A2 -> A3 + B2A2: Fe 0.135; A3: Fe 4.700e-4; B2: Fe 0.485model[3] Witusiewicz 2019Table 4, p. 17, row 54
report
856.4eutectoid: A2 -> A3 + B2model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Dumitrescu 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 47
report
856.4FeTi + bcc(Ti) + cph(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 4, p. 4, row 38
report
856eutectoid: A2 -> A3 + B2A2: Fe 0.135; A3: Fe 5.000e-4; B2: Fe 0.489model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Bo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 53
report
856BCC_Ti↔FeTi+HCP_TiBCC_Ti: Ti 0.865; FeTi: Ti 0.511; HCP_Ti: Ti 0.9995model[2] BO 2012Table 2, p. 5, row 19
report
853eutectoid: A2 -> A3 + B2A2: Fe 0.141; A3: Fe 7.000e-4; B2: Fe 0.488model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Guo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 52
report
850FeTi + bcc(Ti) + cph(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 4, p. 4, row 34
report
849.4eutectoid: bcc-A2 -> FeTi* + hcp-A3bcc-A2: Ti 0.877; FeTi*: Ti 0.5; hcp-A3: Ti 0.999model[6] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 223, row 2
report
849.4FeTi + bcc(Ti) + cph(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 4, p. 4, row 35
report
848BCC_Ti↔FeTi+HCP_TiFeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5unspecified[2] BO 2012
cites ref. 12		Table 2, p. 5, row 17
report
848eutectoid: A2 -> A3 + B2experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites R 1952		Table 4, p. 17, row 45
report
848FeTi + Bcc(Ti) + Hcp(Ti)FeTi: Fe 0.5, Ti 0.5experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites R 1952		Table IV, p. 5, row 13
report
848FeTi + bcc(Ti) + cph(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites R 1952		Table 4, p. 4, row 33
report
841.15eutectoid: βTi -> FeTi + αTiβTi: Ti 0.878; FeTi: Ti 0.5; αTi: Ti 0.9996experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Hari 1994 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 13
report
841eutectoid: A2 -> A3 + B2A2: Fe 0.122; A3: Fe 4.000e-4; B2: Fe 0.5model[3] Witusiewicz 2019
cites Hari 1994 doi		Table 4, p. 17, row 49
report
841eutectoid: α->FeTi+εα: Ti 0.878; FeTi: Ti 0.5; ε: Ti 0.99967model[1] Kumar 1994Table 5, p. 8, row 28
report
840.65FeTi + bcc(Ti) + cph(Ti)FeTi: Ti 0.5model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 4, p. 4, row 36
report
839.01β-Ti -> α-Ti + TiFe_B2β-Ti: Ti 1; α-Ti: Ti 0.8608; TiFe_B2: Ti 0.5096model[9] Liang 2024Table 5, p. 10, row 2
report
595β-Ti <=> FeTi+α-Tiβ-Ti: Ti 0.85; FeTi: Ti 0.51; α-Ti: Ti 0.9996unspecified[8] Santhy 2021
cites Murray 1987		Table 7, p. 6, row 12
report
587β-Ti <=> FeTi+α-Tiβ-Ti: Ti 0.869; FeTi: Ti 0.508; α-Ti: Ti 0.99958model[8] Santhy 2021Table 7, p. 6, row 11
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Fe–Ti system (126)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
AlTi-41.5863 kJ/mol (basis unstated)DFT[9] Liang 2024
cites Kirklin 1995		Table 4, p. 9, row 38
report
AlTi-41.5863 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 39
report
AlTi3-7.04361 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 37
report
AlTi3-7.04361 kJ/mol (basis unstated)DFT[9] Liang 2024
cites Kirklin 1995		Table 4, p. 9, row 36
report
AlTi3-2.12273 kJ/mol (basis unstated)DFT[9] Liang 2024
cites Kirklin 1995		Table 4, p. 9, row 34
report
AlTi32.12273 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 35
report
BCC_4SL-40.3128 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 3
report
BCC_4SL-40.3111 kJ/mol (basis unstated)DFT[9] Liang 2024
cites Curtarolo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 9, row 1
report
BCC_4SL-24.5885 kJ/mol (basis unstated)model[9] Liang 2024
cites De 2009 doi		Table 4, p. 9, row 2
report
BCC_4SL-19.0696 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 9
report
BCC_4SL-18.9944 kJ/mol (basis unstated)DFT[9] Liang 2024
cites Curtarolo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 9, row 8
report
BCC_4SL-12.9161 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 5
report
BCC_4SL-12.7355 kJ/mol (basis unstated)DFT[9] Liang 2024
cites Curtarolo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 9, row 4
report
BCC_4SL-4.53706 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 7
report
BCC_4SL-4.35467 kJ/mol (basis unstated)DFT[9] Liang 2024
cites Curtarolo 2012 doi		Table 4, p. 9, row 6
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-34.52 kJ/mol-atom1413model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 3, p. 4, row 31
report
Fe2Ti-34.3 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1413.15unspecified[7] Wang 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 13
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-34.168 kJ/mol-atom1413model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 3, p. 4, row 29
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-33.93 kJ/mol-atom1413model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 3, p. 4, row 32
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-33.9 kJ/mol-atom1413model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-29.56 (oqmd-1590944)[4] Jonsson 1998Table I, p. 2, row 10
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-31.84 kJ/mol-atom1413model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 3, p. 4, row 30
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-31.815 kJ/mol-atom1514model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 3, p. 4, row 24
report
Fe2Ti-31.6 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1514.15unspecified[7] Wang 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 9
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-31.513 kJ/mol-atom1514model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 3, p. 4, row 25
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-31.5 kJ/mol-atom1514model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[4] Jonsson 1998Table I, p. 2, row 8
report
Fe2Ti-30.8 kJ/mol (basis unstated)973.15unspecified[7] Wang 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 11
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-30.13 kJ/mol-atom0model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-29.56 (oqmd-1590944)[8] Santhy 2021Table 8, p. 8, row 10
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-29.752 kJ/mol-atom1514model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 3, p. 4, row 23
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-29.273 kJ/mol-atom1413model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 3, p. 4, row 33
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-29.11 kJ/mol-atom1514model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-29.56 (oqmd-1590944)[8] Santhy 2021Table 8, p. 8, row 7
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-28.42 kJ/mol-atom1413model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-29.56 (oqmd-1590944)[8] Santhy 2021Table 8, p. 8, row 4
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-27.6 kJ/mol-atom1514experimental-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-29.56 (oqmd-1590944)[8] Santhy 2021
cites Gachon 1983		Table 8, p. 8, row 9
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-27.6 kJ/mol-atom ± 11514experimental-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Gachon 1981 doi		Table I, p. 2, row 7
report
Fe2Ti-27.6 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1514.15experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Gachon 1983 doi		Table 4, p. 6, row 10
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-27.6 kJ/mol-atom ± 11514experimental-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Gachon 1981 doi		Table 3, p. 4, row 22
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-26.863 kJ/mol-atom1514model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 3, p. 4, row 26
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-26.13 kJ/mol-atom1514model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-29.56 (oqmd-1590944)[8] Santhy 2021Table 8, p. 8, row 8
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-26.01 kJ/mol-atom1413model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-29.56 (oqmd-1590944)[8] Santhy 2021Table 8, p. 8, row 5
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-25.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 21413experimental-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-29.56 (oqmd-1590944)[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Dinsdale 1981		Table I, p. 2, row 9
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-25.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 21413experimental-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Dinsdale 1985		Table 3, p. 4, row 27
report
Fe2Ti-25.394 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1413.15experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Dinsdale 1985		Table 4, p. 6, row 14
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-25.39 kJ/mol-atom1413experimental-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-29.56 (oqmd-1590944)[8] Santhy 2021
cites Dinsdale 1985		Table 8, p. 8, row 6
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-25 kJ/mol-atom0model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-29.56 (oqmd-1590944)[8] Santhy 2021
cites Miedema 1981		Table 8, p. 8, row 11
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-22.4 kJ/mol-atom973model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-29.56 (oqmd-1590944)[8] Santhy 2021Table 8, p. 8, row 1
report
Fe2Ti-21.294 kJ/mol (basis unstated)973.15experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Dinsdale 1985		Table 4, p. 6, row 12
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-21.29 kJ/mol-atom973experimental-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-29.56 (oqmd-1590944)[8] Santhy 2021
cites Dinsdale 1985		Table 8, p. 8, row 3
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti-21.26 kJ/mol-atom973model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-29.56 (oqmd-1590944)[8] Santhy 2021Table 8, p. 8, row 2
report
Fe2TiFe2Ti7.179 kJ/mol-atom1413model-27.342 (mp-aaaaadqk)-28.736 (oqmd-18688)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 3, p. 4, row 28
report
FeTiFeTi-50.17 kJ/mol-atom0model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[8] Santhy 2021
cites Watson 1998 doi		Table 8, p. 8, row 23
report
FeTi-46.5 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[8] Santhy 2021
cites Ohtani 2004 doi		Table 8, p. 8, row 22
report
FeTiFeTi-44.58 kJ/mol-atom0model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[8] Santhy 2021Table 8, p. 8, row 20
report
FeTi-44.58 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[8] Santhy 2021Table 5, p. 3, row 16
report
FeTiFeTi-32.19 kJ/mol-atom1440model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[8] Santhy 2021Table 8, p. 8, row 16
report
FeTiFeTi-32.1 kJ/mol-atom1513model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[8] Santhy 2021Table 8, p. 8, row 18
report
FeTiFeTi-31.7 kJ/mol-atom1450model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[4] Jonsson 1998Table I, p. 2, row 4
report
FeTiFeTi-31.691 kJ/mol-atom1450model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 3, p. 4, row 13
report
FeTiFeTi-31.639 kJ/mol-atom1513model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 3, p. 4, row 20
report
FeTiFeTi-31.6 kJ/mol-atom1513model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[4] Jonsson 1998Table I, p. 2, row 6
report
FeTiFeTi-31.1 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.31450experimental-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Gachon 1981 doi		Table I, p. 2, row 3
report
FeTiFeTi-31.1 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.31450experimental-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Gachon 1981 doi		Table 3, p. 4, row 8
report
FeTiFeTi-31 kJ/mol-atom1440experimental-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[8] Santhy 2021
cites Gachon 1983		Table 8, p. 8, row 17
report
FeTi-31 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1450.15experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Gachon 1983 doi		Table 4, p. 6, row 4
report
FeTiFeTi-29.868 kJ/mol-atom1450model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 3, p. 4, row 14
report
FeTiFeTi-29.816 kJ/mol-atom1513model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 3, p. 4, row 21
report
FeTiFeTi-29.59 kJ/mol-atom973experimental-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[8] Santhy 2021
cites Dinsdale 1985		Table 8, p. 8, row 15
report
FeTi-29.588 kJ/mol (basis unstated)973.15experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Dinsdale 1985		Table 4, p. 6, row 6
report
FeTi-28.4 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1450.15unspecified[7] Wang 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 3
report
FeTi-28.3 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1513.15unspecified[7] Wang 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 7
report
FeTiFeTi-28 kJ/mol-atom0model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[8] Santhy 2021
cites Miedema 1981		Table 8, p. 8, row 21
report
FeTiFeTi-27.81 kJ/mol-atom1513experimental-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[8] Santhy 2021
cites Dinsdale 1985		Table 8, p. 8, row 19
report
FeTi-27.807 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1513.15experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Dinsdale 1985		Table 4, p. 6, row 8
report
FeTiFeTi-27.8 kJ/mol-atom ± 41513experimental-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Dinsdale 1981		Table I, p. 2, row 5
report
FeTiFeTi-27.8 kJ/mol-atom ± 41513experimental-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Dinsdale 1985		Table 3, p. 4, row 15
report
FeTiFeTi-27.67 kJ/mol-atom973model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[8] Santhy 2021Table 8, p. 8, row 14
report
FeTiFeTi-27.51 kJ/mol-atom1450model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 3, p. 4, row 12
report
FeTiFeTi-27.297 kJ/mol-atom1513model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 3, p. 4, row 19
report
FeTiFeTi-25.692 kJ/mol-atom1450model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 3, p. 4, row 11
report
FeTiFeTi-25.639 kJ/mol-atom1513model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 3, p. 4, row 18
report
FeTi-25.6 kJ/mol (basis unstated)973.15unspecified[7] Wang 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 5
report
FeTiFeTi-24.58 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[8] Santhy 2021Table 8, p. 8, row 12
report
FeTiFeTi-24.486 kJ/mol-atom1450model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 3, p. 4, row 10
report
FeTiFeTi-24.4 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[4] Jonsson 1998Table I, p. 2, row 2
report
FeTiFeTi-24.399 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 3, p. 4, row 6
report
FeTiFeTi-24.272 kJ/mol-atom1513model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 3, p. 4, row 17
report
FeTi-23.6 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15unspecified[7] Wang 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 1
report
FeTiFeTi-22.576 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 3, p. 4, row 7
report
FeTiFeTi-22.25 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 3, p. 4, row 5
report
FeTiFeTi-20.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.6298.15experimental-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Kubaschewski 1955 doi		Table I, p. 2, row 1
report
FeTiFeTi-20.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.6298.15experimental-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Kubaschewski 1957		Table 3, p. 4, row 1
report
FeTi-20.292 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Kubaschewski 1955 doi		Table 4, p. 6, row 2
report
FeTiFeTi-20.29 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[8] Santhy 2021
cites Dench 1955		Table 8, p. 8, row 13
report
FeTiFeTi-19.225 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 3, p. 4, row 3
report
FeTiFeTi-18.39 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 3, p. 4, row 4
report
FeTiFeTi-16.824 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 3, p. 4, row 2
report
FeTiFeTi12.055 kJ/mol-atom1450model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 3, p. 4, row 9
report
FeTiFeTi16.375 kJ/mol-atom1513model-40.604 (mp-aaaaaalt)-43.34 (oqmd-19423)[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 3, p. 4, row 16
report
FeTi74.45 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[8] Santhy 2021Table 5, p. 3, row 18
report
FeTi95 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[8] Santhy 2021Table 5, p. 3, row 17
report
Fe₂Ti-30.131 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[8] Santhy 2021Table 5, p. 3, row 10
report
Fe₂Ti-29.817 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[8] Santhy 2021Table 5, p. 3, row 11
report
Fe₂Ti-27.134 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[8] Santhy 2021Table 5, p. 3, row 12
report
Fe₂Ti-23.678 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[8] Santhy 2021Table 5, p. 3, row 15
report
Fe₂Ti26.931 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[8] Santhy 2021Table 5, p. 3, row 13
report
Fe₂Ti37.039 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[8] Santhy 2021Table 5, p. 3, row 14
report
Laves C14-32.6129 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 12
report
Laves C14-32.6129 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 10
report
Laves C14-26.4801 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 28
report
Laves C14-26.4801 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 30
report
Laves C14-24.4396 kJ/mol (basis unstated)model[9] Liang 2024
cites De 2009 doi		Table 4, p. 9, row 11
report
Laves C14-9.57942 kJ/mol (basis unstated)model[9] Liang 2024
cites De 2009 doi		Table 4, p. 9, row 14
report
Laves C14-8.68391 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 25
report
Laves C14-8.68391 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 27
report
Laves C145 kJ/mol (basis unstated)model[9] Liang 2024
cites De 2009 doi		Table 4, p. 9, row 29
report
Laves C145 kJ/mol (basis unstated)model[9] Liang 2024
cites De 2009 doi		Table 4, p. 9, row 23
report
Laves C145 kJ/mol (basis unstated)model[9] Liang 2024
cites De 2009 doi		Table 4, p. 9, row 26
report
Laves C145 kJ/mol (basis unstated)model[9] Liang 2024
cites De 2009 doi		Table 4, p. 9, row 20
report
Laves C1419.3941 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 33
report
Laves C1419.3941 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 31
report
Laves C1420.9002 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 24
report
Laves C1420.9002 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 22
report
Laves C1428.3674 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 21
report
Laves C1428.3674 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 19
report
Laves C1444.5977 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 15
report
Laves C1444.5977 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 13
report
τ3-10.0347 kJ/mol (basis unstated)DFT[9] Liang 2024
cites Kirklin 1995		Table 4, p. 9, row 40
report
τ3-10.0347 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[9] Liang 2024Table 4, p. 9, row 41
report

Other properties

Phase transition (19)

Phase transition, Fe–Ti system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1043 K1043magneticmodel[1] Kumar 1994p. 11
report		The computed phase diagram shows that the ferromagnetic transition of the Fe-rich a phase at about 1043 K (770 "c) significantly intluences the disposition of (a+X]/n phase boundary in this temperature region.
Phase transition1063.3 K1063.3congruent transformation: hcp-A3 -> bcc-A2
hcp-A3: Ti 0.224; bcc-A2: Ti 0.224		model[6] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 225, row 1
report
Phase transition1296 K1296congruent melting: bcc-A2 -> Liquid
bcc-A2: Ti 0.12; L: Ti 0.12		model[6] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 225, row 2
report
Phase transition1692.5 K1692.5congruent transformation: Cong. melting of Fe2Ti
Fe2Ti: Ti 0.333333		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 4, p. 4, row 16
report
Phase transition1696 K1696congruent transformation: Cong. melting of Fe2Ti
Fe2Ti: Ti 0.333333		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Booker 1979		Table 4, p. 4, row 10
report
Phase transition1698 K1698L <=> Fe2Ti
L: Ti 0.331; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.331		model[8] Santhy 2021Table 7, p. 6, row 1
report
Phase transition1699.5 K1699.5congruent transformation: Cong. melting of Fe2Ti
Fe2Ti: Ti 0.333333		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 4, p. 4, row 14
report
Phase transition1700 K1700L <=> Fe2Ti
L: Ti 0.333; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.333		unspecified[8] Santhy 2021
cites Murray 1987		Table 7, p. 6, row 2
report
Phase transition1700 K1700congruent transformationmodel[1] Kumar 1994p. 6
report		Congruent melting of h occurs at 1700 K (1427 "C) corresponding to 0.336 XTi.
Phase transition1700 K1700congruent transformation: Cong. melting of Fe2Ti
Fe2Ti: Ti 0.333333		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 4, p. 4, row 11
report
Phase transition1700 K1700congruent transformation: Cong. melting of Fe2Ti
Fe2Ti: Ti 0.333333		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites ref. 57Hel		Table 4, p. 4, row 9
report
Phase transition1700.15 K1700.15congruent melting: L -> Fe2Ti
Fe2Ti: Ti 0.333		experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Murray 1981 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 19
report
Phase transition1700.15 K1700.15congruent melting: L -> Fe2Ti
Fe2Ti: Ti 0.336		experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Hari 1994 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 17
report
Phase transition1704 K1704congruent transformation: Cong. melting of Fe2Ti
Fe2Ti: Ti 0.333333		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 4, p. 4, row 15
report
Phase transition1704.15 K1704.15congruent melting: L -> Fe2Ti
L: Ti 0.342; Fe2Ti: Ti 0.333333		experimental[7] Wang 2011
cites Jonsson 1998 doi		Table 3, p. 6, row 18
report
Phase transition1706.3 K1706.3congruent transformation: Cong. melting of Fe2Ti
Fe2Ti: Ti 0.333333		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 4, p. 4, row 13
report
Phase transition1707 K1707congruent transformation: Laves-C14 -> bcc-A2
Laves-C14: Ti 0.333; bcc-A2: Ti 0.333		model[6] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 223, row 4
report
Phase transition1712.2 K1712.2congruent transformation: Cong. melting of Fe2Ti
Fe2Ti: Ti 0.333333		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 4, p. 4, row 12
report
Phase transition1733.96 K1733.96L -> C14
L: Ti 0.3445; C14: Ti 0.3445		model[9] Liang 2024Table 5, p. 10, row 4
report

Mixing / partial (96)

Mixing / partial, Fe–Ti system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_M^Me		-8.6 kJ/mol-atom ± 5.41600Bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table II, p. 2, row 11
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_M^Me		-55.5 kJ/mol-atom1600Bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table II, p. 2, row 12
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_M^Me		-61 kJ/mol-atom1600Bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table II, p. 2, row 10
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_M^Me		-24.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 6.71600Bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table II, p. 2, row 9
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-24.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 6.71600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table 1, p. 3, row 29
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-24.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 6.71600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table 1, p. 3, row 29
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-55.5 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 41
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-55.5 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 41
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-47.6 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 1, p. 3, row 42
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-47.6 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 1, p. 3, row 42
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-61 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 34
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-61 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 34
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-47.4 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 39
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-47.4 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 39
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-56 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 1, p. 3, row 33
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-56 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 1, p. 3, row 33
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-52.1 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 1, p. 3, row 40
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-52.1 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 1, p. 3, row 40
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-50.9 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 32
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-50.9 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 32
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-65.5 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 1, p. 3, row 30
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-65.5 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 1, p. 3, row 30
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-59.7 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 1, p. 3, row 37
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-59.7 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 1, p. 3, row 37
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-49.6 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 1, p. 3, row 35
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-49.6 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 1, p. 3, row 35
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-53.5 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 1, p. 3, row 38
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-53.5 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 1, p. 3, row 38
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-57.6 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 1, p. 3, row 31
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-57.6 kJ/mol-atom1600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 1, p. 3, row 31
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-8.6 kJ/mol-atom ± 5.41600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table 1, p. 3, row 36
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-8.6 kJ/mol-atom ± 5.41600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table 1, p. 3, row 36
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_M^Me		-52 kJ/mol-atom ± 31823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Dyubanov 1975		Table II, p. 2, row 1
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-96.5 kJ/mol-atom1823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 1, p. 3, row 2
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-96.5 kJ/mol-atom1823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 1, p. 3, row 2
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-67.8 kJ/mol-atom1823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 4
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-67.8 kJ/mol-atom1823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 4
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_M^Me		-64.5 kJ/mol-atom1823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table II, p. 2, row 2
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-64.5 kJ/mol-atom1823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 6
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-64.5 kJ/mol-atom1823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 6
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-52 kJ/mol-atom ± 31823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Dyubanov 1975		Table 1, p. 3, row 1
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-52 kJ/mol-atom ± 31823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Dyubanov 1975		Table 1, p. 3, row 1
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-51.8 kJ/mol-atom1823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 1, p. 3, row 7
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-51.8 kJ/mol-atom1823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 1, p. 3, row 7
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-56.5 kJ/mol-atom1823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 1, p. 3, row 3
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-56.5 kJ/mol-atom1823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 1, p. 3, row 3
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-72.3 kJ/mol-atom1823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 1, p. 3, row 5
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-72.3 kJ/mol-atom1823L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 1, p. 3, row 5
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-56.5 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 1, p. 3, row 10
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-56.5 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 1, p. 3, row 10
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-62.9 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 1, p. 3, row 26
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Fe)		-62.9 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 1, p. 3, row 26
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-96.5 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 1, p. 3, row 9
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-96.5 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 1, p. 3, row 9
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-72.3 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 1, p. 3, row 12
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-72.3 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 1, p. 3, row 12
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-64.5 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 13
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-64.5 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 13
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-67.8 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 11
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-67.8 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 11
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-67.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 131873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Furukawa 1976		Table 1, p. 3, row 22
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Fe)		-67.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 131873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Furukawa 1976		Table 1, p. 3, row 22
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Fe)		-64.5 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 27
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-64.5 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 27
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Fe)		-64.3 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 1, p. 3, row 23
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-64.3 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 1, p. 3, row 23
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-45.5 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 1, p. 3, row 24
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Fe)		-45.5 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 1, p. 3, row 24
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_M^Me		-65.7 kJ/mol-atom ± 41873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Furukawa 1976		Table II, p. 2, row 3
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_M^Me		-67.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 131873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Furukawa 1976		Table II, p. 2, row 7
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_M^Me		-64.5 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table II, p. 2, row 8
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_M^Me		-64.5 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table II, p. 2, row 4
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Fe)		-66.6 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 1, p. 3, row 28
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-66.6 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 1, p. 3, row 28
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Fe)		-56.7 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 25
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-56.7 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 0, Ti 1		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 25
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-51.8 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 1, p. 3, row 14
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-51.8 kJ/mol-atom1873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 1, p. 3, row 14
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-65.7 kJ/mol-atom ± 41873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Furukawa 1976		Table 1, p. 3, row 8
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-65.7 kJ/mol-atom ± 41873L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Furukawa 1976		Table 1, p. 3, row 8
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-56.5 kJ/mol-atom2000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 1, p. 3, row 17
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-56.5 kJ/mol-atom2000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 1, p. 3, row 17
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_M^Me		-64.5 kJ/mol-atom2000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table II, p. 2, row 6
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-63.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.62000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Y 1981		Table 1, p. 3, row 15
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-63.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.62000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Y 1981		Table 1, p. 3, row 15
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-96.5 kJ/mol-atom2000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 1, p. 3, row 16
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-96.5 kJ/mol-atom2000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 1, p. 3, row 16
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-72.3 kJ/mol-atom2000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 1, p. 3, row 19
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-72.3 kJ/mol-atom2000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 1, p. 3, row 19
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-64.5 kJ/mol-atom2000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 20
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-64.5 kJ/mol-atom2000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 20
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_M^Me		-63.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.62000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Esin 1981		Table II, p. 2, row 5
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-51.8 kJ/mol-atom2000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 1, p. 3, row 21
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-51.8 kJ/mol-atom2000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 1, p. 3, row 21
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: H_Me - ^0H_Me (T)		-67.8 kJ/mol-atom2000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 18
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: HMe - 0HMe(T) (Me = Ti)		-67.8 kJ/mol-atom2000L
alloy: Fe 1, Ti 0		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 1, p. 3, row 18
report

Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy (72)

Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy, Fe–Ti system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Activity Ti
printed: aTi · 10^3		0.0016 11550Bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table III, p. 2, row 10
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi · 10^3		0.0042 11550Bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table III, p. 2, row 11
report
Activity Ti
printed: a_Ti·10^3		0.0021 11550Bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table III, p. 2, row 9
report
Activity Ti
printed: a_Ti·10^3		0.0031 11550Bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table III, p. 2, row 12
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0031 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 41
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0027 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 32
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00299 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 2, p. 4, row 33
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0033 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 2, p. 4, row 37
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0032 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 2, p. 4, row 31
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0042 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table 2, p. 4, row 36
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0016 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 34
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0044 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 2, p. 4, row 35
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0054 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 39
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0021 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table 2, p. 4, row 29
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0071 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 2, p. 4, row 42
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0063 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 2, p. 4, row 38
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0059 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 2, p. 4, row 40
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0014 11550bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 2, p. 4, row 30
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi · 10^3		0.0035 11600Bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table III, p. 2, row 16
report
Activity Ti
printed: a_Ti·10^3		0.0043 11600Bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table III, p. 2, row 15
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0038 11600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 2, p. 4, row 51
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0079 11600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 2, p. 4, row 56
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.006 11600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 53
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0043 11600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table 2, p. 4, row 50
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0072 11600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 2, p. 4, row 52
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0066 11600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 2, p. 4, row 54
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0035 11600bcc
alloy: Fe 0.9238, Ti 0.0762		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 55
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi · 10^3		0.0023 11650Bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table III, p. 2, row 13
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi · 10^3		0.0021 11650Bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table III, p. 2, row 14
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0035 11650bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 46
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0023 11650bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Robinson 1976		Table 2, p. 4, row 43
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0042 11650bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 2, p. 4, row 45
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00196 11650bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 2, p. 4, row 44
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0021 11650bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 48
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0039 11650bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 2, p. 4, row 47
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0056 11650bcc
alloy: Fe 0.952, Ti 0.048		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 2, p. 4, row 49
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.01134 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.857, Ti 0.143		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 2, p. 4, row 23
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00296 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.911, Ti 0.089		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 13
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.01243 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.857, Ti 0.143		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 2, p. 4, row 24
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00706 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.857, Ti 0.143		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 27
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00184 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.934, Ti 0.066		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00316 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.934, Ti 0.066		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Fruehan 1970 doi		Table 2, p. 4, row 1
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00486 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.911, Ti 0.089		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 11
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00933 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.874, Ti 0.126		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 2, p. 4, row 17
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00567 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.911, Ti 0.089		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 2, p. 4, row 12
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00356 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.934, Ti 0.066		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00503 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.911, Ti 0.089		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 2, p. 4, row 10
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.0066 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.874, Ti 0.126		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Fruehan 1970 doi		Table 2, p. 4, row 15
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi · 10^3		0.00551 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.874, Ti 0.126		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table III, p. 2, row 6
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00924 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.874, Ti 0.126		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 2, p. 4, row 21
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00905 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.874, Ti 0.126		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 18
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.01316 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.857, Ti 0.143		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 2, p. 4, row 26
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00551 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.874, Ti 0.126		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Jonsson 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 20
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00845 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.874, Ti 0.126		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 2, p. 4, row 16
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00589 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.911, Ti 0.089		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 2, p. 4, row 14
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00312 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.934, Ti 0.066		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Balasubramanian 1989		Table 2, p. 4, row 3
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.01158 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.857, Ti 0.143		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 25
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00417 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.934, Ti 0.066		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 2, p. 4, row 7
report
Activity Ti
printed: a_Ti·10^3		0.00316 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.934, Ti 0.066		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Fruehan 1970 doi		Table III, p. 2, row 1
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00437 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.911, Ti 0.089		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Fruehan 1970 doi		Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00245 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.934, Ti 0.066		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.01036 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.874, Ti 0.126		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Haft 1994		Table 2, p. 4, row 19
report
Activity Ti
printed: a_Ti·10^3		0.00813 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.857, Ti 0.143		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Fruehan 1970 doi		Table III, p. 2, row 7
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi · 10^3		0.0066 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.874, Ti 0.126		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Fruehan 1970 doi		Table III, p. 2, row 5
report
Activity Ti
printed: a_Ti·10^3		0.00296 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.911, Ti 0.089		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table III, p. 2, row 4
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.01109 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.857, Ti 0.143		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998Table 2, p. 4, row 28
report
Activity Ti
printed: a_Ti·10^3		0.00706 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.857, Ti 0.143		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table III, p. 2, row 8
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00813 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.857, Ti 0.143		experimental[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Fruehan 1970 doi		Table 2, p. 4, row 22
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00302 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.934, Ti 0.066		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Rand 1998		Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi · 10^3		0.00437 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.911, Ti 0.089		experimental[4] Jonsson 1998
cites Fruehan 1970 doi		Table III, p. 2, row 3
report
Activity Ti
printed: aTi x 10^3		0.00419 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.911, Ti 0.089		model[5] Dumitrescu 1998
cites Murray 1987		Table 2, p. 4, row 9
report
Activity Ti
printed: a_Ti·10^3		0.00184 11873L
alloy: Fe 0.934, Ti 0.066		model[4] Jonsson 1998Table III, p. 2, row 2
report

Crystal structure (4)

Crystal structure, Fe–Ti system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a4.956 Å1700.15 (<)Fe2Ti
alloy: Ti 0.333333		model[10] Keyzer 2009Table 1, p. 3, row 8
report
Lattice a4.785 Å1700.15 (<)Fe2Ti
alloy: Ti 0.333333		model[10] Keyzer 2009Table 1, p. 3, row 8
report
Lattice c8.032 Å1700.15 (<)Fe2Ti
alloy: Ti 0.333333		model[10] Keyzer 2009Table 1, p. 3, row 8
report
Lattice c7.799 Å1700.15 (<)Fe2Ti
alloy: Ti 0.333333		model[10] Keyzer 2009Table 1, p. 3, row 8
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. K.C.Hari Kumar, P. Wollaiits, L. Delaey, Thermodynamic reassessment and calculation of FeTi phase diagram, Calphad 18, 223-234 (1994). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(94)90028-0
  2. Hong BO, Jiang WANG, Liliana DUARTE, Christian LEINENBACH, Li-bin LIU, Hua-shan LIU et al., Thermodynamic re-assessment of Fe–Ti binary system, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 22, 2204-2211 (2012). doi:10.1016/s1003-6326(11)61450-7
  3. V.T. Witusiewicz, A.A. Bondar, U. Hecht, A. Theofilatos, N.I. Tsyganenko, S.V. Utkin et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic re-modelling of the constituent binaries and ternary B–Fe–Ti system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 800, 419-449 (2019). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.341
  4. Stefan Jonsson, Assessment of the Fe-Ti system, Metall Mater Trans B 29, 361-370 (1998). doi:10.1007/s11663-998-0113-z
  5. L. F. S. Dumitrescu, M. Hillert, N. Sounders, Comparison of Fe-Ti assessments, JPE 19, 441-448 (1998). doi:10.1361/105497198770341923
  6. I. Ansara, A. T. Dinsdale, M. H. Rand (eds.), COST 507: Thermochemical database for light metal alloys, Volume 2, EUR 18499 EN, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (1998), ISBN 92-828-3902-8.
  7. C.P. Wang, J.P. Zheng, Y. Yu, H.F. Hu, X.J. Liu, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic calculation of the phase equilibria in the Fe–Nb–Ti ternary system, Materials Chemistry and Physics 130, 806-814 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.07.071
  8. K. Santhy, K.C. Hari Kumar, Thermodynamic modelling of magnetic laves phase in Fe–Ti system using first principle method, Intermetallics 128, 106978 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2020.106978
  9. Zhi Liang, Ursula Kattner, Kamal Choudharry, Francesca Tavazza, Carelyn Campbell, Thermodynamic Assessments of Ti-Al, Ti-Fe, and Ti-Al-Fe Systems with Four-Sublattice Description of Ordered Body-Centered Cubic Phase and Density Functional Theory Data, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 45, 732-756 (2024). doi:10.1007/s11669-024-01124-9
  10. Jozefien De Keyzer, Gabriele Cacciamani, Nathalie Dupin, Patrick Wollants, Thermodynamic modeling and optimization of the Fe–Ni–Ti system, Calphad 33, 109-123 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2008.10.003