Gd–Tl system

38 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 12, model 26); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 14 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (9) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental12
model26
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction21
phase transition9
formation8

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
GdTl-10Guo.tdbC. Guo, C. Li, Z. Du, J. Alloys Compd., 492, 122-27(2010). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.11.10181d605effa4ab98fd88a5676215b5b301a7226404f113f84a8d4bc2b77d2d23dviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
GdTl-10Guo.tdb1473.01GD5TL3_D88 (x(Tl) 0.39564) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.42548) + B2_BCC (x(Tl) 0.48517)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb1473.01GD5TL3_D88 (x(Tl) 0.39563) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.42548) + B2_BCC (x(Tl) 0.48518)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb1327.69LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.26664) + GD2TL_B82 (x(Tl) 0.33333) + GD5TL3_D88 (x(Tl) 0.37525)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb1322.75B2_BCC (x(Tl) 0.51158) + GD3TL5 (x(Tl) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.62526)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb1243.41GD3TL5 (x(Tl) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.70691) + GDTL3_L12 (x(Tl) 0.75)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb1243.41GD3TL5 (x(Tl) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.70695) + GDTL3_L12 (x(Tl) 0.75)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb1243.41GD3TL5 (x(Tl) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.70684) + GDTL3_L12 (x(Tl) 0.75)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb1193.13B2_BCC (x(Tl) 0.13929) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.20472) + GD2TL_B82 (x(Tl) 0.33333)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb1193.13B2_BCC (x(Tl) 0.13927) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.2047) + GD2TL_B82 (x(Tl) 0.33333)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb1193.13BCC_A2 (x(Tl) 0.13927) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.2047) + GD2TL_B82 (x(Tl) 0.33333)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb1143.02HCP_A3 (x(Tl) 0.07174) + B2_BCC (x(Tl) 0.13004) + GD2TL_B82 (x(Tl) 0.33333)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb1143.02HCP_A3 (x(Tl) 0.0717) + BCC_A2 (x(Tl) 0.12997) + GD2TL_B82 (x(Tl) 0.33333)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb1143.02HCP_A3 (x(Tl) 0.0717) + B2_BCC (x(Tl) 0.12997) + GD2TL_B82 (x(Tl) 0.33333)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb576.23GDTL3_L12 (x(Tl) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.99883) + B2_BCC (x(Tl) 0.99998)
GdTl-10Guo.tdb506.98GDTL3_L12 (x(Tl) 0.75) + HCP_A3 (x(Tl) 1) + B2_BCC (x(Tl) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Gd–Tl system (21)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1473eutectic: liq. -> Gd5Tl3 + GdTlL: Tl 0.4262; Gd5Tl3: Tl 0.3956; GdTl: Tl 0.488model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 14
report
1473eutectic: liq. -> Gd5Tl3 + GdTlL: Tl 0.4; Gd5Tl3: Tl 0.375; GdTl: Tl 0.5experimental[1] Guo 2010
cites Delfino 1983 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 15
report
1473eutectic: liq. -> Gd5Tl3 + GdTlL: Tl 0.4255; Gd5Tl3: Tl 0.3956; GdTl: Tl 0.4852model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 13
report
1328liq. + Gd5Tl3 -> Gd2TlL: Tl 0.263; Gd5Tl3: Tl 0.375; Gd2Tl: Tl 0.333333experimental[1] Guo 2010
cites Delfino 1983 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 9
report
1328liq. + Gd5Tl3 -> Gd2TlL: Tl 0.2665; Gd5Tl3: Tl 0.3752; Gd2Tl: Tl 0.333333model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 8
report
1328liq. + Gd5Tl3 -> Gd2TlL: Tl 0.2666; Gd5Tl3: Tl 0.3752; Gd2Tl: Tl 0.333333model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 7
report
1323liq. + GdTl -> Gd3Tl5L: Tl 0.5116; GdTl: Tl 0.5; Gd3Tl5: Tl 0.6253model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 19
report
1323liq. + GdTl -> Gd3Tl5L: Tl 0.515; GdTl: Tl 0.5; Gd3Tl5: Tl 0.625experimental[1] Guo 2010
cites Delfino 1983 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 21
report
1322liq. + GdTl -> Gd3Tl5L: Tl 0.5145; GdTl: Tl 0.5; Gd3Tl5: Tl 0.6265model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 20
report
1243eutectic: liq. -> Gd3Tl5 + GdTl3L: Tl 0.7069; Gd3Tl5: Tl 0.625; GdTl3: Tl 0.75model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 22
report
1243eutectic: liq. -> Gd3Tl5 + GdTl3L: Tl 0.715; Gd3Tl5: Tl 0.625; GdTl3: Tl 0.75experimental[1] Guo 2010
cites Delfino 1983 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 24
report
1243eutectic: liq. -> Gd3Tl5 + GdTl3L: Tl 0.7071; Gd3Tl5: Tl 0.625; GdTl3: Tl 0.75model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 23
report
1193eutectic: liq. -> bcc + Gd2TlL: Tl 0.23; bcc: Tl 0.145; Gd2Tl: Tl 0.333333experimental[1] Guo 2010
cites Delfino 1983 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 6
report
1193eutectic: liq. -> bcc + Gd2TlL: Tl 0.2053; bcc: Tl 0.1363; Gd2Tl: Tl 0.333333model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 5
report
1193eutectic: liq. -> bcc + Gd2TlL: Tl 0.2047; bcc: Tl 0.1393; Gd2Tl: Tl 0.333333model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 4
report
1143bcc -> hcp + Gd2Tlbcc: Tl 0.13; hcp: Tl 0.0717; Gd2Tl: Tl 0.333333model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 1
report
1143bcc -> hcp + Gd2Tlbcc: Tl 0.1281; hcp: Tl 0.0755; Gd2Tl: Tl 0.333333model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 2
report
1143bcc -> hcp + Gd2Tlbcc: Tl 0.053; hcp: Tl 0.137; Gd2Tl: Tl 0.333333experimental[1] Guo 2010
cites Delfino 1983 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 3
report
576eutectic: liq. -> GdTl3 + bccL: Tl 0.9989; GdTl3: Tl 0.9999model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 29
report
576eutectic: liq. -> GdTl3 + bccL: Tl 0.9988; GdTl3: Tl 1model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 28
report
576eutectic: liq. -> GdTl3 + bccL: Tl 0.999; GdTl3: Tl 1experimental[1] Guo 2010
cites Delfino 1983 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 30
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Gd–Tl system (8)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Gd2TlGd2Tl-54.4 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-29.904 (mp-aaabgzlk)-26.624 (oqmd-1800585)[1] Guo 2010p. 1
report
In the present work, the enthalpies of formation of compounds Gd2 Tl, Gd5 Tl3 , GdTl, Gd3 Tl5 , and GdTl3 at 298 K were predicted using revised Miedema model [13], in kJ/mol of atoms: Gd2 Tl -54.4, Gd5 Tl3 -59.2, GdTl -65.8, Gd3 Tl5 -59.05 and GdTl3 -42.06.
Gd3Tl5Gd3Tl5-59.05 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-31.319 (oqmd-2027112)[1] Guo 2010p. 1
report
In the present work, the enthalpies of formation of compounds Gd2 Tl, Gd5 Tl3 , GdTl, Gd3 Tl5 , and GdTl3 at 298 K were predicted using revised Miedema model [13], in kJ/mol of atoms: Gd2 Tl -54.4, Gd5 Tl3 -59.2, GdTl -65.8, Gd3 Tl5 -59.05 and GdTl3 -42.06.
Gd5Tl3Gd5Tl3-59.2 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-30.501 (oqmd-1796173)[1] Guo 2010p. 1
report
In the present work, the enthalpies of formation of compounds Gd2 Tl, Gd5 Tl3 , GdTl, Gd3 Tl5 , and GdTl3 at 298 K were predicted using revised Miedema model [13], in kJ/mol of atoms: Gd2 Tl -54.4, Gd5 Tl3 -59.2, GdTl -65.8, Gd3 Tl5 -59.05 and GdTl3 -42.06.
GdTlGdTl-65.8 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-36.705 (mp-aaaabdny)-35.168 (oqmd-30426)[1] Guo 2010p. 1
report
In the present work, the enthalpies of formation of compounds Gd2 Tl, Gd5 Tl3 , GdTl, Gd3 Tl5 , and GdTl3 at 298 K were predicted using revised Miedema model [13], in kJ/mol of atoms: Gd2 Tl -54.4, Gd5 Tl3 -59.2, GdTl -65.8, Gd3 Tl5 -59.05 and GdTl3 -42.06.
GdTl3GdTl3-42.06 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-24.45 (mp-aaaabeip)-23.932 (oqmd-30424)[1] Guo 2010p. 4
report
The enthalpy of formation of the compound GdTl3 at 298 K were determined by Palenzona and Cirafici [11] and Demykina et al. [12]. Because the enthalpy of formation -42.06 kJ/mol of atoms for GdTl3 predicted by the revised Miedema model is more exothermic than the experimental results -36.8 and -36.4 kJ/mol of atoms [11,12], in the present work, the experimental data determined by Palenzona and Ci…
GdTl3GdTl3-42.06 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-24.45 (mp-aaaabeip)-23.932 (oqmd-30424)[1] Guo 2010p. 1
report
In the present work, the enthalpies of formation of compounds Gd2 Tl, Gd5 Tl3 , GdTl, Gd3 Tl5 , and GdTl3 at 298 K were predicted using revised Miedema model [13], in kJ/mol of atoms: Gd2 Tl -54.4, Gd5 Tl3 -59.2, GdTl -65.8, Gd3 Tl5 -59.05 and GdTl3 -42.06.
GdTl3GdTl3-36.8 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-24.45 (mp-aaaabeip)-23.932 (oqmd-30424)[1] Guo 2010
cites Palenzona 1974 doi
p. 4
report
The enthalpy of formation of the compound GdTl3 at 298 K were determined by Palenzona and Cirafici [11] and Demykina et al. [12]. Because the enthalpy of formation -42.06 kJ/mol of atoms for GdTl3 predicted by the revised Miedema model is more exothermic than the experimental results -36.8 and -36.4 kJ/mol of atoms [11,12], in the present work, the experimental data determined by Palenzona and Ci…
GdTl3GdTl3-36.4 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-24.45 (mp-aaaabeip)-23.932 (oqmd-30424)[1] Guo 2010
cites Demykina 1980
p. 4
report
The enthalpy of formation of the compound GdTl3 at 298 K were determined by Palenzona and Cirafici [11] and Demykina et al. [12]. Because the enthalpy of formation -42.06 kJ/mol of atoms for GdTl3 predicted by the revised Miedema model is more exothermic than the experimental results -36.8 and -36.4 kJ/mol of atoms [11,12], in the present work, the experimental data determined by Palenzona and Ci…

Other properties

Phase transition (9)

Phase transition, Gd–Tl system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1263 K1263liq. -> GdTl3
GdTl3: Tl 0.75
model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 26
report
Phase transition1263 K1263liq. -> GdTl3
GdTl3: Tl 0.75
model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 25
report
Phase transition1263 K1263liq. -> GdTl3
GdTl3: Tl 0.75
experimental[1] Guo 2010
cites Delfino 1983 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 27
report
Phase transition1493 K1493liq. -> Gd5Tl3
L: Tl 0.3842; Gd5Tl3: Tl 0.3842
model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 10
report
Phase transition1493 K1493liq. -> Gd5Tl3
L: Tl 0.375; Gd5Tl3: Tl 0.375
experimental[1] Guo 2010
cites Delfino 1983 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 12
report
Phase transition1493 K1493liq. -> Gd5Tl3
L: Tl 0.3841; Gd5Tl3: Tl 0.3841
model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 11
report
Phase transition1543 K1543liq. -> GdTl
L: Tl 0.5; GdTl: Tl 0.5
experimental[1] Guo 2010
cites Delfino 1983 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 18
report
Phase transition1543 K1543liq. -> GdTl
L: Tl 0.4984; GdTl: Tl 0.4984
model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 17
report
Phase transition1543 K1543liq. -> GdTl
L: Tl 0.4977; GdTl: Tl 0.4977
model[1] Guo 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 16
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, A thermodynamic modeling of the Gd–Tl system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 492, 122-127 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.11.101