Ge–Mg system

4 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 3, model 1); 3 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (6) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental3
model1
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
formation4

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
GeMg-06Isl.tdbF. Islam, A.K. Thykadavil, M. Medraj, J. Alloys Compd., 425, 129-39(2006). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.01.0508081df690d59d0288fa48a0f6fcdd1eb86496be933061db1ef32b8b5bbd63859viewer · TDB · JSON
GeMg-10Yan-1.tdbH. Yan, Y. Du, L. Zhou, H. Xu, L. Zhang, S. Liu, Int. J. Mater. Res., 101, 1489-96(2010). doi:10.3139/146.11043622c07581734a575745402dc6ff241911e9de0e5c7b44a331337ea0314a36723fviewer · TDB · JSON
GeMg-10Yan-2.tdbH. Yan, Y. Du, L. Zhou, H. Xu, L. Zhang, S. Liu, Int. J. Mater. Res., 101, 1489-96(2010). doi:10.3139/146.11043612570a7d080460a42c613fdeebe0a3a915ed74f13e4b346d4dff43f852263d90viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
GeMg-06Isl.tdb969.29DIAMOND_A4 (x(Mg) 0) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.34925) + GEMG2_C1 (x(Mg) 0.66667)
GeMg-06Isl.tdb969.29DIAMOND_A4 (x(Mg) 0) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.34923) + GEMG2_C1 (x(Mg) 0.66667)
GeMg-06Isl.tdb969.29DIAMOND_A4 (x(Mg) 0) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.3492) + GEMG2_C1 (x(Mg) 0.66667)
GeMg-06Isl.tdb923GEMG2_C1 (x(Mg) 0.66667) + HCP_A3 (x(Mg) 1) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 1)
GeMg-06Isl.tdb903.9GEMG2_C1 (x(Mg) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.974) + HCP_A3 (x(Mg) 1)
GeMg-06Isl.tdb903.9GEMG2_C1 (x(Mg) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.97424) + HCP_A3 (x(Mg) 1)
GeMg-10Yan-1.tdb971.08DIAMOND_A4 (x(Mg) 0) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.36727) + GEMG2_C1 (x(Mg) 0.66667)
GeMg-10Yan-1.tdb971.08DIAMOND_A4 (x(Mg) 0) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.36723) + GEMG2_C1 (x(Mg) 0.66667)
GeMg-10Yan-1.tdb971.08DIAMOND_A4 (x(Mg) 0) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.36721) + GEMG2_C1 (x(Mg) 0.66667)
GeMg-10Yan-1.tdb907.39GEMG2_C1 (x(Mg) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.97817) + HCP_A3 (x(Mg) 1)
GeMg-10Yan-1.tdb907.39GEMG2_C1 (x(Mg) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.97832) + HCP_A3 (x(Mg) 1)
GeMg-10Yan-2.tdb972.29DIAMOND_A4 (x(Mg) 0) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.37066) + GEMG2_C1 (x(Mg) 0.66667)
GeMg-10Yan-2.tdb903.71GEMG2_C1 (x(Mg) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.9778) + HCP_A3 (x(Mg) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull GeMg-06Isl · CALPHAD hull GeMg-10Yan-2

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Ge–Mg system (4)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Mg2Ge-115.37 unspecified ± 0.25298.15experimental[1] Islam 2006
cites Beardmore 1966
p. 5
report
They found that the heat of formation of Mg2 Ge at 298 K from the solid elements is -104.23 ± 1.26 kJ, whereas Beardmore et al. [30] reported the same as -115.37 ± 0.25 kJ, showing a disagreement between the two values.
Mg2Ge-104.23 unspecified ± 1.26298.15experimental[1] Islam 2006p. 5
report
They found that the heat of formation of Mg2 Ge at 298 K from the solid elements is -104.23 ± 1.26 kJ, whereas Beardmore et al. [30] reported the same as -115.37 ± 0.25 kJ, showing a disagreement between the two values.
Mg2GeGeMg2-39.3728 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-25.946 (mp-aaaaaaps)-26.833 (oqmd-646873)[1] Islam 2006Table 3, p. 5, row 6
report
Mg2GeGeMg2-38.409 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.0837273experimental-25.946 (mp-aaaaaaps)-26.833 (oqmd-646873)[1] Islam 2006
cites Bever 1964
Table 3, p. 5, row 4
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. F. Islam, A.K. Thykadavil, M. Medraj, A computational thermodynamic model of the Mg–Al–Ge system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 425, 129-139 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.01.050