Hg–Mg system

34 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 15, model 19); 1 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (11) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental15
model19
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction34

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
HgMg-09Fen.tdbY. Feng, R.C. Wang, C.Q. Peng, H.S. Liu, J. Cent. South Univ. Technol., 16, 32-37(2009). doi:10.1007/s11771-009-0005-7ddfcb316b5d22cbe0e8b20b9011d76839b690b3dd89aa94776c37796d273f926viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
HgMg-09Fen.tdb833.84HG3MG5_D88 (x(Mg) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.63028) + HGMG2_C37 (x(Mg) 0.66667)
HgMg-09Fen.tdb833.84HG3MG5_D88 (x(Mg) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.63034) + HGMG2_C37 (x(Mg) 0.66667)
HgMg-09Fen.tdb833.84HG3MG5_D88 (x(Mg) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.63016) + HGMG2_C37 (x(Mg) 0.66667)
HgMg-09Fen.tdb830.89HGMG_B2 (x(Mg) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.60213) + HG3MG5_D88 (x(Mg) 0.625)
HgMg-09Fen.tdb830.88HGMG_B2 (x(Mg) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.60205) + HG3MG5_D88 (x(Mg) 0.625)
HgMg-09Fen.tdb794.16HGMG2_C37 (x(Mg) 0.66667) + HG2MG5 (x(Mg) 0.71429) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.75895)
HgMg-09Fen.tdb794.16HGMG2_C37 (x(Mg) 0.66667) + HG2MG5 (x(Mg) 0.71429) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.75887)
HgMg-09Fen.tdb780.47HG2MG5 (x(Mg) 0.71429) + HGMG3 (x(Mg) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.7807)
HgMg-09Fen.tdb780.47HG2MG5 (x(Mg) 0.71429) + HGMG3 (x(Mg) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.78053)
HgMg-09Fen.tdb780.47HG2MG5 (x(Mg) 0.71429) + HGMG3 (x(Mg) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.78075)
HgMg-09Fen.tdb718.95HGMG3 (x(Mg) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.85482) + HCP_A3 (x(Mg) 0.98164)
HgMg-09Fen.tdb718.95HGMG3 (x(Mg) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.85484) + HCP_A3 (x(Mg) 0.98165)
HgMg-09Fen.tdb441.1LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.18681) + HG2MG_C11B (x(Mg) 0.33333) + HGMG_B2 (x(Mg) 0.5)
HgMg-09Fen.tdb441.1LIQUID (x(Mg) 0.18696) + HG2MG_C11B (x(Mg) 0.33333) + HGMG_B2 (x(Mg) 0.5)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Hg–Mg system (34)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
903congruent melting: L↔MgHgMgHg: Hg 0.5experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 25
Table 6, p. 5, row 24
report
900congruent melting: L↔MgHgMgHg: Hg 0.5experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 26
Table 6, p. 5, row 25
report
899congruent melting: L↔MgHgMgHg: Hg 0.5model[1] Feng 2009Table 6, p. 5, row 27
report
889congruent melting: L↔MgHgMgHg: Hg 0.5model[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 27
Table 6, p. 5, row 26
report
853congruent melting: L↔Mg2HgMg2Hg: Hg 0.3333experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 25
Table 6, p. 5, row 11
report
847congruent melting: L↔Mg2HgMg2Hg: Hg 0.333model[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 27
Table 6, p. 5, row 13
report
843congruent melting: L↔Mg2HgMg2Hg: Hg 0.3333experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 26
Table 6, p. 5, row 12
report
842congruent melting: L↔Mg2HgMg2Hg: Hg 0.333model[1] Feng 2009Table 6, p. 5, row 14
report
835congruent melting: L↔Mg5Hg3Mg5Hg3: Hg 0.375experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 25
Table 6, p. 5, row 18
report
835congruent melting: L↔Mg5Hg3L: Hg 0.375, Mg 0.625; Mg5Hg3: Hg 0.375, Mg 0.625model[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 27
Table 6, p. 5, row 19
report
834congruent melting: L↔Mg5Hg3Mg5Hg3: Hg 0.375model[1] Feng 2009Table 6, p. 5, row 20
report
833.5eutectic: L↔Mg2Hg+Mg5Hg3L: Hg 0.371; Mg2Hg: Hg 0.333; Mg5Hg3: Hg 0.375model[1] Feng 2009Table 6, p. 5, row 17
report
833eutectic: L↔MgHg+Mg5Hg3L: Hg 0.4; MgHg: Hg 0.5; Mg5Hg3: Hg 0.375experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 25
Table 6, p. 5, row 21
report
832eutectic: L↔MgHg+Mg5Hg3MgHg: Hg 0.5, Mg 0.5; Mg5Hg3: Hg 0.375, Mg 0.625model[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 27
Table 6, p. 5, row 22
report
831eutectic: L↔Mg2Hg+Mg5Hg3L: Hg 0.362; Mg2Hg: Hg 0.3333; Mg5Hg3: Hg 0.375experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 25
Table 6, p. 5, row 15
report
831eutectic: L↔Mg2Hg+Mg5Hg3Mg2Hg: Hg 0.333333, Mg 0.666667; Mg5Hg3: Hg 0.375, Mg 0.625experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 28
Table 6, p. 5, row 16
report
831eutectic: L↔MgHg+Mg5Hg3L: Hg 0.398; MgHg: Hg 0.5; Mg5Hg3: Hg 0.375model[1] Feng 2009Table 6, p. 5, row 23
report
791peritectic: L+Mg2Hg↔Mg5Hg2L: Hg 0.237; Mg2Hg: Hg 0.333; Mg5Hg2: Hg 0.286model[1] Feng 2009Table 6, p. 5, row 10
report
790peritectic: L+Mg2Hg↔Mg5Hg2Mg2Hg: Hg 0.333333, Mg 0.666667; Mg5Hg2: Hg 0.285714, Mg 0.714286model[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 27
Table 6, p. 5, row 9
report
788peritectic: L+Mg2Hg↔Mg5Hg2L: Hg 0.25; Mg2Hg: Hg 0.3333; Mg5Hg2: Hg 0.2857experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 25
Table 6, p. 5, row 8
report
781.7peritectic: L+Mg5Hg2↔Mg3HgL: Hg 0.223; Mg5Hg2: Hg 0.286; Mg3Hg: Hg 0.25model[1] Feng 2009Table 6, p. 5, row 7
report
781peritectic: L+Mg5Hg2↔Mg3HgL: Hg 0.24; Mg5Hg2: Hg 0.2857; Mg3Hg: Hg 0.25experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 26
Table 6, p. 5, row 5
report
771peritectic: L+Mg5Hg2↔Mg3HgMg5Hg2: Hg 0.285714, Mg 0.714286; Mg3Hg: Hg 0.25, Mg 0.75model[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 27
Table 6, p. 5, row 6
report
731eutectic: L↔(Mg)+Mg3HgL: Hg 0.17; (Mg): Hg 0.0045; Mg3Hg: Hg 0.25experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 25
Table 6, p. 5, row 1
report
727eutectic: L↔(Mg)+Mg3HgMg3Hg: Hg 0.25, Mg 0.75model[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 27
Table 6, p. 5, row 3
report
721eutectic: L↔(Mg)+Mg3HgL: Hg 0.175; (Mg): Hg 0.012; Mg3Hg: Hg 0.25experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 26
Table 6, p. 5, row 2
report
719.6eutectic: L↔(Mg)+Mg3HgL: Hg 0.146; (Mg): Hg 0.02; Mg3Hg: Hg 0.25model[1] Feng 2009Table 6, p. 5, row 4
report
444peritectic: L+MgHg↔MgHg2MgHg: Hg 0.5, Mg 0.5; MgHg2: Hg 0.666667, Mg 0.333333model[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 27
Table 6, p. 5, row 30
report
443.1peritectic: L+MgHg↔MgHg2L: Hg 0.812; MgHg: Hg 0.5; MgHg2: Hg 0.667model[1] Feng 2009Table 6, p. 5, row 31
report
443peritectic: L+MgHg↔MgHg2L: Hg 0.8066; MgHg: Hg 0.5; MgHg2: Hg 0.6667experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 26
Table 6, p. 5, row 29
report
442peritectic: L+MgHg↔MgHg2L: Hg 0.806; MgHg: Hg 0.5; MgHg2: Hg 0.6667experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 24
Table 6, p. 5, row 28
report
234eutectic: L↔Hg+MgHg2L: Hg 0.999; Hg: Hg 1; MgHg2: Hg 0.667model[1] Feng 2009Table 6, p. 5, row 34
report
232eutectic: L↔Hg+MgHg2Hg: Hg 1; MgHg2: Hg 0.6667experimental[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 24
Table 6, p. 5, row 32
report
232eutectic: L↔Hg+MgHg2MgHg2: Hg 0.666667, Mg 0.333333model[1] Feng 2009
cites ref. 27
Table 6, p. 5, row 33
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Yan Feng, Ri-chu Wang, Chao-qun Peng, Hua-shan Liu, Thermodynamic reassessment of Ga-Hg and Mg-Hg systems, J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 16, 32-37 (2009). doi:10.1007/s11771-009-0005-7