Ho–Sb system

50 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 13, model 20, DFT 6, unspecified 11); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 23 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (11) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	13
model	20
DFT	6
unspecified	11

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	38
formation	12

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, C.P. Wang, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, Calphad, 37, 132-36(2012). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.02.004	`b58c68dedc6cca2b21588248f70ce538e6c21ca07e243298a761cb4f1133299f`	viewer · TDB · JSON
HoSb-13Wan.tdb	J. Wang, C. Li, C. Guo, Z. Du, X. Zhao, J. Shen, Thermochim. Acta, 551, 104-9(2013). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2012.10.026	`4e5c8ec99b36d5ebbc53360e8b411fcbe69b19d82edffbc22bf7e9728d38ac04`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	2152.84	HOSB_B1 (x(Sb) 0.5) + HOSB_HT (x(Sb) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.66364)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	2152.84	LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.36238) + HOSB_B1 (x(Sb) 0.5) + HOSB_HT (x(Sb) 0.5)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	2106.42	LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.35056) + HO4SB3_HT (x(Sb) 0.42857) + HOSB_B1 (x(Sb) 0.5)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	2106.42	LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.35051) + HO4SB3_HT (x(Sb) 0.42857) + HOSB_B1 (x(Sb) 0.5)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	1955.58	LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.30523) + HO5SB3_D88 (x(Sb) 0.375) + HO4SB3_HT (x(Sb) 0.42857)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	1955.58	LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.30518) + HO5SB3_D88 (x(Sb) 0.375) + HO4SB3_HT (x(Sb) 0.42857)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	1893.41	HO4SB3_D73 (x(Sb) 0.42857) + HO4SB3_HT (x(Sb) 0.42857) + HOSB_B1 (x(Sb) 0.5)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	1893.41	HO5SB3_D88 (x(Sb) 0.375) + HO4SB3_HT (x(Sb) 0.42857) + HO4SB3_D73 (x(Sb) 0.42857)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	1747	HCP_A3 (x(Sb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0) + HOSB_B1 (x(Sb) 0.5)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	1727.82	HO5SB3_D88 (x(Sb) 0.375) + HO4SB3_D73 (x(Sb) 0.42857) + HOSB_B1 (x(Sb) 0.5)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	1451.47	HCP_A3 (x(Sb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.14931) + HO5SB3_D88 (x(Sb) 0.375)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	1451.47	HCP_A3 (x(Sb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.14929) + HO5SB3_D88 (x(Sb) 0.375)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	1451.47	HCP_A3 (x(Sb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.14928) + HO5SB3_D88 (x(Sb) 0.375)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	942.97	HOSB_B1 (x(Sb) 0.5) + HOSB2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.98069)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	942.97	HOSB_B1 (x(Sb) 0.5) + HOSB2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.98064)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	897.35	HOSB2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.98703) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	897.35	HOSB2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.98706) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
HoSb-12Liu.tdb	897.35	HOSB2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.9871) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
HoSb-13Wan.tdb	2153.02	HOSB_HT (x(Sb) 0.5) + HOSB_B1 (x(Sb) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.66803)
HoSb-13Wan.tdb	2153.02	LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.35785) + HOSB_HT (x(Sb) 0.5) + HOSB_B1 (x(Sb) 0.5)
HoSb-13Wan.tdb	2144.11	LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.3554) + HO4SB3_D73 (x(Sb) 0.42857) + HOSB_HT (x(Sb) 0.5)
HoSb-13Wan.tdb	1986.5	LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.30244) + HO5SB3_D88 (x(Sb) 0.375) + HO4SB3_D73 (x(Sb) 0.42857)
HoSb-13Wan.tdb	1892.4	HO4SB3_HT (x(Sb) 0.42857) + HO4SB3_D73 (x(Sb) 0.42857) + HOSB_HT (x(Sb) 0.5)
HoSb-13Wan.tdb	1892.4	HO5SB3_D88 (x(Sb) 0.375) + HO4SB3_D73 (x(Sb) 0.42857) + HO4SB3_HT (x(Sb) 0.42857)
HoSb-13Wan.tdb	1721.1	HO5SB3_D88 (x(Sb) 0.375) + HO4SB3_HT (x(Sb) 0.42857) + HOSB_HT (x(Sb) 0.5)
HoSb-13Wan.tdb	1423.31	HCP_A3 (x(Sb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.12927) + HO5SB3_D88 (x(Sb) 0.375)
HoSb-13Wan.tdb	933.34	HOSB_HT (x(Sb) 0.5) + HOSB2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.97844)
HoSb-13Wan.tdb	933.34	HOSB_HT (x(Sb) 0.5) + HOSB2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.97844)
HoSb-13Wan.tdb	895.57	HOSB2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.98347) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
HoSb-13Wan.tdb	895.57	HOSB2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.98347) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull HoSb-12Liu

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ho–Sb system (38)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
2434	congruent melting: L -> β-HoSb	L: Sb 0.5; β-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5	model	[1] Wang 2013	Table 2, p. 2, row 8 report
2433.15	congruent melting: L ↔ βHoSb	L: Sb 0.5; βHoSb: Sb 0.5	model	[2] Liu 2012	Table 4, p. 4, row 18 report
2433.15	congruent melting: L ↔ βHoSb	L: Sb 0.5; βHoSb: Sb 0.5	experimental	[2] Liu 2012 cites Abdusaljamova 1984 doi	Table 4, p. 4, row 17 report
2433	congruent melting: L -> β-HoSb	L: Sb 0.5; β-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5	unspecified	[1] Wang 2013 cites Abdusalyamova 1984	Table 2, p. 2, row 7 report
2153.15	polymorphic: βHoSb ↔ αHoSb	βHoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5; αHoSb: Sb 0.5	unspecified	[2] Liu 2012 cites Abdusaljamova 1993	Table 4, p. 4, row 2 report
2153.15	polymorphic: βHoSb ↔ αHoSb	βHoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5; αHoSb: Sb 0.5	model	[2] Liu 2012	Table 4, p. 4, row 3 report
2153	polymorphic: β-HoSb -> α-HoSb	β-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5; α-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5	model	[1] Wang 2013	Table 2, p. 2, row 20 report
2153	polymorphic: β-HoSb -> α-HoSb	β-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5; α-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5	experimental	[1] Wang 2013 cites Abdusalyamova 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 2, row 19 report
2123.15	polymorphic: βHoSb ↔ αHoSb	βHoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5; αHoSb: Sb 0.5	experimental	[2] Liu 2012 cites Abdusaljamova 1984 doi	Table 4, p. 4, row 1 report
2123	polymorphic: β-HoSb -> α-HoSb	β-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5; α-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5	unspecified	[1] Wang 2013 cites Abdusalyamova 1984	Table 2, p. 2, row 18 report
2103.15	peritectic: L + αHoSb ↔ βHo4Sb3	L: Sb 0.353; αHoSb: Sb 0.5; βHo4Sb3: Sb 0.429	model	[2] Liu 2012	Table 4, p. 4, row 5 report
2103.15	peritectic: L + αHoSb ↔ βHo4Sb3	αHoSb: Sb 0.5; βHo4Sb3: Sb 0.429	experimental	[2] Liu 2012 cites Abdusaljamova 1984 doi	Table 4, p. 4, row 4 report
2103	peritectic: L + α-HoSb -> β-Ho4Sb3	L: Sb 0.36; α-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5; β-Ho4Sb3: Ho 0.571429, Sb 0.428571	unspecified	[1] Wang 2013 cites Abdusalyamova 1984	Table 2, p. 2, row 5 report
2103	peritectic: L + α-HoSb -> β-Ho4Sb3	L: Sb 0.35; α-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5; β-Ho4Sb3: Ho 0.571429, Sb 0.428571	model	[1] Wang 2013	Table 2, p. 2, row 6 report
1953.15	peritectic: L + βHo4Sb3 ↔ Ho5Sb3	βHo4Sb3: Sb 0.429; Ho5Sb3: Sb 0.375	experimental	[2] Liu 2012 cites Abdusaljamova 1984 doi	Table 4, p. 4, row 6 report
1953	peritectic: L + β-Ho4Sb3 -> Ho5Sb3	L: Sb 0.317; β-Ho4Sb3: Ho 0.571429, Sb 0.428571; Ho5Sb3: Ho 0.625, Sb 0.375	unspecified	[1] Wang 2013 cites Abdusalyamova 1984	Table 2, p. 2, row 3 report
1953	peritectic: L + β-Ho4Sb3 -> Ho5Sb3	L: Sb 0.31; β-Ho4Sb3: Ho 0.571429, Sb 0.428571; Ho5Sb3: Ho 0.625, Sb 0.375	model	[1] Wang 2013	Table 2, p. 2, row 4 report
1952.95	peritectic: L + βHo4Sb3 ↔ Ho5Sb3	L: Sb 0.304; βHo4Sb3: Sb 0.429; Ho5Sb3: Sb 0.375	model	[2] Liu 2012	Table 4, p. 4, row 7 report
1893	polymorphic: β-Ho4Sb3 -> α-Ho4Sb3	β-Ho4Sb3: Ho 0.571429, Sb 0.428571; α-Ho4Sb3: Ho 0.571429, Sb 0.428571	unspecified	[1] Wang 2013 cites Abdusalyamova 1984	Table 2, p. 2, row 13 report
1893	polymorphic: β-Ho4Sb3 -> α-Ho4Sb3	β-Ho4Sb3: Ho 0.571429, Sb 0.428571; α-Ho4Sb3: Ho 0.571429, Sb 0.428571	model	[1] Wang 2013	Table 2, p. 2, row 14 report
1723.65	eutectoid: αHo4Sb3 ↔ Ho5Sb3 + αHoSb	αHo4Sb3: Sb 0.429; Ho5Sb3: Sb 0.375; αHoSb: Sb 0.5	model	[2] Liu 2012	Table 4, p. 4, row 10 report
1723.15	eutectoid: αHo4Sb3 ↔ Ho5Sb3 + αHoSb	αHo4Sb3: Sb 0.429; Ho5Sb3: Sb 0.375; αHoSb: Sb 0.5	experimental	[2] Liu 2012 cites Abdusaljamova 1984 doi	Table 4, p. 4, row 8 report
1723.15	eutectoid: αHo4Sb3 ↔ Ho5Sb3 + αHoSb	αHo4Sb3: Sb 0.429; Ho5Sb3: Sb 0.375; αHoSb: Sb 0.5	unspecified	[2] Liu 2012 cites Abdusaljamova 1993	Table 4, p. 4, row 9 report
1723	eutectoid: α-Ho4Sb3 -> α-HoSb + Ho5Sb3	α-Ho4Sb3: Ho 0.571429, Sb 0.428571; α-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5; Ho5Sb3: Ho 0.625, Sb 0.375	unspecified	[1] Wang 2013 cites Abdusalyamova 1984	Table 2, p. 2, row 15 report
1723	eutectoid: α-Ho4Sb3 -> α-HoSb + Ho5Sb3	α-Ho4Sb3: Ho 0.571429, Sb 0.428571; α-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5; Ho5Sb3: Ho 0.625, Sb 0.375	experimental	[1] Wang 2013 cites Abdusalyamova 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 2, row 16 report
1722	eutectoid: α-Ho4Sb3 -> α-HoSb + Ho5Sb3	α-Ho4Sb3: Ho 0.571429, Sb 0.428571; α-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5; Ho5Sb3: Ho 0.625, Sb 0.375	model	[1] Wang 2013	Table 2, p. 2, row 17 report
1443.85	eutectic: L ↔ (Ho) + Ho5Sb3	L: Sb 0.15; (Ho): Sb 0; Ho5Sb3: Sb 0.375	model	[2] Liu 2012	Table 4, p. 4, row 12 report
1443.15	eutectic: L ↔ (Ho) + Ho5Sb3	L: Sb 0.15; (Ho): Sb 0; Ho5Sb3: Sb 0.375	experimental	[2] Liu 2012 cites Abdusaljamova 1984 doi	Table 4, p. 4, row 11 report
1443	eutectic: L -> Ho5Sb3 + Hcp_A3 (Ho)	L: Sb 0.149; Ho5Sb3: Ho 0.625, Sb 0.375	model	[1] Wang 2013	Table 2, p. 2, row 2 report
1443	eutectic: L -> Ho5Sb3 + Hcp_A3 (Ho)	L: Sb 0.15; Ho5Sb3: Ho 0.625, Sb 0.375	unspecified	[1] Wang 2013 cites Abdusalyamova 1984	Table 2, p. 2, row 1 report
943.15	peritectic: L + αHoSb ↔ HoSb2	L: Sb 0.986; αHoSb: Sb 0.5; HoSb2: Sb 0.6666	model	[2] Liu 2012	Table 4, p. 4, row 14 report
943.15	peritectic: L + αHoSb ↔ HoSb2	αHoSb: Sb 0.5; HoSb2: Sb 0.6666	experimental	[2] Liu 2012 cites Abdusaljamova 1984 doi	Table 4, p. 4, row 13 report
943	peritectic: L + α-HoSb -> HoSb2	L: Sb 0.98; α-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5; HoSb2: Ho 0.333333, Sb 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Wang 2013 cites Abdusalyamova 1984	Table 2, p. 2, row 9 report
943	peritectic: L + α-HoSb -> HoSb2	L: Sb 0.977; α-HoSb: Ho 0.5, Sb 0.5; HoSb2: Ho 0.333333, Sb 0.666667	model	[1] Wang 2013	Table 2, p. 2, row 10 report
897.25	eutectic: L ↔ (Sb) + HoSb2	L: Sb 0.99; (Sb): Sb 1; HoSb2: Sb 0.6666	model	[2] Liu 2012	Table 4, p. 4, row 16 report
897.15	eutectic: L ↔ (Sb) + HoSb2	L: Sb 0.99; (Sb): Sb 1; HoSb2: Sb 0.6666	experimental	[2] Liu 2012 cites Abdusaljamova 1984 doi	Table 4, p. 4, row 15 report
897	eutectic: L -> HoSb2 + Rhomb_A7 (Sb)	L: Sb 0.99; HoSb2: Ho 0.333333, Sb 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Wang 2013 cites Abdusalyamova 1984	Table 2, p. 2, row 11 report
895.6	eutectic: L -> HoSb2 + Rhomb_A7 (Sb)	L: Sb 0.984; HoSb2: Ho 0.333333, Sb 0.666667	model	[1] Wang 2013	Table 2, p. 2, row 12 report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Ho–Sb system (12)
Phase	Value	T (K)	Class	Source	Location
Ho5Sb3	-88.488 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0	DFT	[1] Wang 2013	Table 3, p. 3, row 9 report
Ho5Sb3	-82 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0	model	[1] Wang 2013 cites Colinet 1984 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 10 report
HoSb	-126.5 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	experimental	[1] Wang 2013 cites Goryacheva 1981	Table 3, p. 3, row 12 report
HoSb	-108.284 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0	DFT	[1] Wang 2013	Table 3, p. 3, row 11 report
HoSb	-91 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0	model	[1] Wang 2013 cites Colinet 1984 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 14 report
HoSb	-64 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	experimental	[1] Wang 2013 cites Pratt 1970	Table 3, p. 3, row 13 report
HoSb2	-84.4 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	experimental	[1] Wang 2013 cites Goryacheva 1981	Table 3, p. 3, row 19 report
HoSb2	-74 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0	model	[1] Wang 2013 cites Colinet 1984 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 20 report
HoSb2	-69.418 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0	DFT	[1] Wang 2013	Table 3, p. 3, row 18 report
HoSb2	-64.551 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0	DFT	[1] Wang 2013	Table 3, p. 3, row 17 report
HoSb2	-64.546 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0	DFT	[1] Wang 2013	Table 3, p. 3, row 16 report
HoSb2	-19.679 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0	DFT	[1] Wang 2013	Table 3, p. 3, row 15 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Jinsan Wang, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, Xushan Zhao, Jianyun Shen, Thermodynamic assessment of the La–Sb and the Ho–Sb systems using the associate model, Thermochimica Acta 551, 104-109 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2012.10.026
X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, C.P. Wang, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ho–Sb and Sb–Yb systems, Calphad 37, 132-136 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.02.004

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}