Ho–V system

4 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 2, model 2); 2 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (4) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental2
model2
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction4

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
HoV-09Wan-newHo.tdbC.P. Wang, S.H. Guo, X.J. Liu, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, J. Alloys Compd., 487, 173-78(2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.08.042930e37db75afc59b9f3b7011321414660b4bfb50c7503dde2466611216abdce1viewer · TDB · JSON
HoV-09Wan.tdbC.P. Wang, S.H. Guo, X.J. Liu, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, J. Alloys Compd., 487, 173-78(2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.08.042fc4a88833a46ac6a171ac2a841622a3af0587abb1d4b63ffd80b9f9561279ee7viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
HoV-09Wan-newHo.tdb2149.78LIQUID (x(V) 0.08803) + LIQUID#2 (x(V) 0.97574) + BCC_A2 (x(V) 0.9966)
HoV-09Wan-newHo.tdb1714.23HCP_A3 (x(V) 0.00571) + LIQUID (x(V) 0.02786) + BCC_A2 (x(V) 0.99902)
HoV-09Wan.tdb2149.67LIQUID (x(V) 0.08801) + LIQUID#2 (x(V) 0.97574) + BCC_A2 (x(V) 0.99668)
HoV-09Wan.tdb1716.84BCC_A2 (x(V) 5.300e-4) + HCP_A3 (x(V) 0.00298) + LIQUID (x(V) 0.01417)
HoV-09Wan.tdb1702.55HCP_A3 (x(V) 0.00551) + LIQUID (x(V) 0.02687) + BCC_A2 (x(V) 0.99905)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull HoV-09Wan-newHo

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ho–V system (4)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2150.15monotectic: L2 -> L1 +(V)L2: V 0.976; L1: V 0.088; (V): V 0.997model[1] Wang 2009Table 5, p. 5, row 2
report
2150.15monotectic: L2 -> L1 +(V)L2: V 0.979; L1: V 0.106; (V): V 0.999experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Smith 1989
Table 5, p. 5, row 1
report
1703.15eutectic: L -> (V) +(Ho)L: V 0.035; (V): V 1; (Ho): V 0.004experimental[1] Wang 2009
cites Smith 1989
Table 5, p. 5, row 3
report
1703.15eutectic: L -> (V) +(Ho)L: V 0.027; (V): V 1; (Ho): V 0.005model[1] Wang 2009Table 5, p. 5, row 4
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. C.P. Wang, S.H. Guo, X.J. Liu, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, Thermodynamic assessments of the Ho–X (X: Cu, Mo, V) systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 487, 173-178 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.08.042