In–Ir system

27 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 10, model 9, unspecified 8); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 18 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (8) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental10
model9
unspecified8
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction26
mixing / partial1

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
InIr-11Ser.tdbC. Servant, M. Idbenali, Thermochim. Acta, 517, 1-8(2011). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2010.12.01908d4e25130797918e03f7a335e97e6a40dcd96678f151c1146ed0f4f1d957cc0viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
InIr-11Ser.tdb1461.07LIQUID (x(Ir) 0.30592) + IN2IR_CB (x(Ir) 0.38395) + FCC_A1 (x(Ir) 0.96302)
InIr-11Ser.tdb1254.08LIQUID (x(Ir) 0.10124) + IN3IR_HT (x(Ir) 0.24523) + IN2IR_CB (x(Ir) 0.30808)
InIr-11Ser.tdb634IN3IR_HT (x(Ir) 0.24999) + IN3IR_D011 (x(Ir) 0.25) + IN2IR_CB (x(Ir) 0.3209)
InIr-11Ser.tdb620.57LIQUID (x(Ir) 2.000e-5) + IN3IR_HT (x(Ir) 0.23657) + IN3IR_D011 (x(Ir) 0.24001)
InIr-11Ser.tdb620.57LIQUID (x(Ir) 2.000e-5) + IN3IR_HT (x(Ir) 0.23657) + IN3IR_D011 (x(Ir) 0.24001)
InIr-11Ser.tdb429.75LIQUID (x(Ir) 0) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Ir) 0) + IN3IR_D011 (x(Ir) 0.23823)
InIr-11Ser.tdb429.75TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Ir) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ir) 0) + IN3IR_D011 (x(Ir) 0.23822)
InIr-11Ser.tdb429.75LIQUID (x(Ir) 0) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Ir) 0) + IN3IR_D011 (x(Ir) 0.23823)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the In–Ir system (26)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1463.15Liq ⇔ In2Ir + (Ir)In2Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333unspecified[1] Servant 2011
cites Anres 2000 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 12
report
1463.15eutectic: Liq -> In2 Ir + (Ir)In2 Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333experimental[1] Servant 2011
cites Anres 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 14
report
1463.15congruent melting: Liq -> In2 IrLiq: Ir 0.33; In2 Ir: Ir 0.33; In2Ir: Ir 0.33model[1] Servant 2011Table 3, p. 5, row 12
report
1461.15Liq ⇔ In2Ir + (Ir)In2Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333unspecified[1] Servant 2011
cites Flandorfer 2002 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 11
report
1461.15eutectic: Liq -> In2 Ir + (Ir)In2 Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333experimental[1] Servant 2011
cites Flandorfer 2002 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 13
report
1461.15Liq ⇔ In2Ir + (Ir)Liq: Ir 0.3057; In2Ir: Ir 0.3837; (Ir): Ir 0.9621model[1] Servant 2011Table 5, p. 6, row 13
report
1258.15Liq + In2Ir ⇔ In3Ir_HTIn2Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333; In3Ir_HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25unspecified[1] Servant 2011
cites Anres 2000 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 9
report
1258.15Liq + In2 Ir -> In3 Ir_HTIn2 Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333; In3 Ir_HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25experimental[1] Servant 2011
cites Anres 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 10
report
1254.15Liq + In2Ir ⇔ In3Ir_HTIn2Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333; In3Ir_HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25unspecified[1] Servant 2011
cites Flandorfer 2002 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 8
report
1254.15Liq + In2 Ir -> In3 Ir_HTLiq: Ir 0.0976; In2 Ir: Ir 0.2934; In3 Ir_HT: Ir 0.2442; In2Ir: Ir 0.2934; In3Ir_HT: Ir 0.2442model[1] Servant 2011Table 3, p. 5, row 11
report
1254.15Liq + In2 Ir -> In3 Ir_HTIn2 Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333; In3 Ir_HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25experimental[1] Servant 2011
cites Flandorfer 2002 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 9
report
1254.15Liq + In2Ir ⇔ In3Ir_HTLiq: Ir 0.1012; In2Ir: Ir 0.308; In3Ir_HT: Ir 0.2452model[1] Servant 2011Table 5, p. 6, row 10
report
894.25eutectic: Liq -> In2 Ir + (Ir)Liq: Ir 0.5984; In2 Ir: Ir 0.3414; (Ir): Ir 0.9752; In2Ir: Ir 0.3414model[1] Servant 2011Table 3, p. 5, row 15
report
636.15In2 Ir + In3 Ir-HT -> In3 Ir-LTIn2 Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333; In3 Ir-HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3 Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25experimental[1] Servant 2011
cites Flandorfer 2002 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 7
report
636.15In2Ir + In3Ir_HT ⇔ In3Ir_LTIn2Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333; In3Ir_HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3Ir_LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25unspecified[1] Servant 2011
cites Flandorfer 2002 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 6
report
634.85In2 Ir + In3 Ir-HT -> In3 Ir-LTIn2 Ir: Ir 0.3278; In3 Ir-HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3 Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3 Ir_HT: Ir 0.25; In3 Ir_LT: Ir 0.25; In2Ir: Ir 0.3278; In3Ir_HT: Ir 0.25; In3Ir_LT: Ir 0.25model[1] Servant 2011Table 3, p. 5, row 8
report
634.15In2Ir + In3Ir_HT ⇔ In3Ir_LTIn2Ir: Ir 0.3208; In3Ir_HT: Ir 0.25; In3Ir_LT: Ir 0.25model[1] Servant 2011Table 5, p. 6, row 7
report
625.15In3 Ir-HT -> Liq + In3 Ir-LTIn3 Ir-HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3 Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25experimental[1] Servant 2011
cites Anres 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 5
report
620.15In3 Ir-HT -> Liq + In3 Ir-LTIn3 Ir-HT: Ir 0.2386; Liq: Ir 3.700e-5; In3 Ir-LT: Ir 0.2425; In3Ir_LT: Ir 0.2425; In3Ir_HT: Ir 0.2386model[1] Servant 2011Table 3, p. 5, row 6
report
620.15In3 Ir-HT -> Liq + In3 Ir-LTIn3 Ir-HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3 Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25experimental[1] Servant 2011
cites Flandorfer 2002 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 4
report
620.15In3Ir-HT ⇔ Liq + In3Ir-LTIn3Ir-HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25unspecified[1] Servant 2011
cites Flandorfer 2002 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 4
report
429.95Liq ⇔ In + In3Ir-LTLiq: Ir 0; In: Ir 0; In3Ir-LT: Ir 0.2382; In3Ir_LT: Ir 0.2382model[1] Servant 2011Table 5, p. 6, row 3
report
429.79Liq ⇔ In + In3Ir-LTIn3Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25unspecified[1] Servant 2011
cites Anres 2000 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 2
report
429.79eutectic: Liq -> In + In3 Ir-LTIn3 Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25experimental[1] Servant 2011
cites Anres 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 2
report
429.15Liq ⇔ In + In3Ir-LTunspecified[1] Servant 2011
cites Flandorfer 2002 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 1
report
429.15eutectic: Liq -> In + In3 Ir-LTexperimental[1] Servant 2011
cites Flandorfer 2002 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 1
report

Other properties

Mixing / partial (1)

Mixing / partial, In–Ir system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Partial enthalpy
printed: partial molar enthalpy of mixing
-50 unspecified ± 21154liquidexperimental[1] Servant 2011
cites Anres 2000 doi
p. 2
report
They found that at 1154 K the limiting partial molar enthalpy of mixing of hypothetically supercooled liquid iridium in liquid indium is equal to -50 ± 2 kJ/mol.

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Colette Servant, Mohamed Idbenali, Thermodynamic assessment of the In–Ir system in the In rich part, Thermochimica Acta 517, 1-8 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2010.12.019