In–Ir system
27 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 10, model 9, unspecified 8); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 18 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (8) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 10 |
| model | 9 |
| unspecified | 8 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 26 |
| mixing / partial | 1 |
Calculated phase diagrams
Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.
| TDB file | Assessment | SHA-256 | Links |
|---|---|---|---|
| InIr-11Ser.tdb | C. Servant, M. Idbenali, Thermochim. Acta, 517, 1-8(2011). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2010.12.019 | 08d4e25130797918e03f7a335e97e6a40dcd96678f151c1146ed0f4f1d957cc0 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| TDB file | T (K) | Phases at the invariant |
|---|---|---|
| InIr-11Ser.tdb | 1461.07 | LIQUID (x(Ir) 0.30592) + IN2IR_CB (x(Ir) 0.38395) + FCC_A1 (x(Ir) 0.96302) |
| InIr-11Ser.tdb | 1254.08 | LIQUID (x(Ir) 0.10124) + IN3IR_HT (x(Ir) 0.24523) + IN2IR_CB (x(Ir) 0.30808) |
| InIr-11Ser.tdb | 634 | IN3IR_HT (x(Ir) 0.24999) + IN3IR_D011 (x(Ir) 0.25) + IN2IR_CB (x(Ir) 0.3209) |
| InIr-11Ser.tdb | 620.57 | LIQUID (x(Ir) 2.000e-5) + IN3IR_HT (x(Ir) 0.23657) + IN3IR_D011 (x(Ir) 0.24001) |
| InIr-11Ser.tdb | 620.57 | LIQUID (x(Ir) 2.000e-5) + IN3IR_HT (x(Ir) 0.23657) + IN3IR_D011 (x(Ir) 0.24001) |
| InIr-11Ser.tdb | 429.75 | LIQUID (x(Ir) 0) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Ir) 0) + IN3IR_D011 (x(Ir) 0.23823) |
| InIr-11Ser.tdb | 429.75 | TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Ir) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ir) 0) + IN3IR_D011 (x(Ir) 0.23822) |
| InIr-11Ser.tdb | 429.75 | LIQUID (x(Ir) 0) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Ir) 0) + IN3IR_D011 (x(Ir) 0.23823) |
Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1463.15 | Liq ⇔ In2Ir + (Ir) | In2Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333 | unspecified | [1] Servant 2011 cites Anres 2000 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 12 report | |
| 1463.15 | eutectic: Liq -> In2 Ir + (Ir) | In2 Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Servant 2011 cites Anres 2000 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 14 report | |
| 1463.15 | congruent melting: Liq -> In2 Ir | Liq: Ir 0.33; In2 Ir: Ir 0.33; In2Ir: Ir 0.33 | model | [1] Servant 2011 | Table 3, p. 5, row 12 report | |
| 1461.15 | Liq ⇔ In2Ir + (Ir) | In2Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333 | unspecified | [1] Servant 2011 cites Flandorfer 2002 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 11 report | |
| 1461.15 | eutectic: Liq -> In2 Ir + (Ir) | In2 Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Servant 2011 cites Flandorfer 2002 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 13 report | |
| 1461.15 | Liq ⇔ In2Ir + (Ir) | Liq: Ir 0.3057; In2Ir: Ir 0.3837; (Ir): Ir 0.9621 | model | [1] Servant 2011 | Table 5, p. 6, row 13 report | |
| 1258.15 | Liq + In2Ir ⇔ In3Ir_HT | In2Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333; In3Ir_HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25 | unspecified | [1] Servant 2011 cites Anres 2000 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 9 report | |
| 1258.15 | Liq + In2 Ir -> In3 Ir_HT | In2 Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333; In3 Ir_HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25 | experimental | [1] Servant 2011 cites Anres 2000 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 10 report | |
| 1254.15 | Liq + In2Ir ⇔ In3Ir_HT | In2Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333; In3Ir_HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25 | unspecified | [1] Servant 2011 cites Flandorfer 2002 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 8 report | |
| 1254.15 | Liq + In2 Ir -> In3 Ir_HT | Liq: Ir 0.0976; In2 Ir: Ir 0.2934; In3 Ir_HT: Ir 0.2442; In2Ir: Ir 0.2934; In3Ir_HT: Ir 0.2442 | model | [1] Servant 2011 | Table 3, p. 5, row 11 report | |
| 1254.15 | Liq + In2 Ir -> In3 Ir_HT | In2 Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333; In3 Ir_HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25 | experimental | [1] Servant 2011 cites Flandorfer 2002 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 9 report | |
| 1254.15 | Liq + In2Ir ⇔ In3Ir_HT | Liq: Ir 0.1012; In2Ir: Ir 0.308; In3Ir_HT: Ir 0.2452 | model | [1] Servant 2011 | Table 5, p. 6, row 10 report | |
| 894.25 | eutectic: Liq -> In2 Ir + (Ir) | Liq: Ir 0.5984; In2 Ir: Ir 0.3414; (Ir): Ir 0.9752; In2Ir: Ir 0.3414 | model | [1] Servant 2011 | Table 3, p. 5, row 15 report | |
| 636.15 | In2 Ir + In3 Ir-HT -> In3 Ir-LT | In2 Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333; In3 Ir-HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3 Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25 | experimental | [1] Servant 2011 cites Flandorfer 2002 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 7 report | |
| 636.15 | In2Ir + In3Ir_HT ⇔ In3Ir_LT | In2Ir: In 0.666667, Ir 0.333333; In3Ir_HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3Ir_LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25 | unspecified | [1] Servant 2011 cites Flandorfer 2002 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 6 report | |
| 634.85 | In2 Ir + In3 Ir-HT -> In3 Ir-LT | In2 Ir: Ir 0.3278; In3 Ir-HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3 Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3 Ir_HT: Ir 0.25; In3 Ir_LT: Ir 0.25; In2Ir: Ir 0.3278; In3Ir_HT: Ir 0.25; In3Ir_LT: Ir 0.25 | model | [1] Servant 2011 | Table 3, p. 5, row 8 report | |
| 634.15 | In2Ir + In3Ir_HT ⇔ In3Ir_LT | In2Ir: Ir 0.3208; In3Ir_HT: Ir 0.25; In3Ir_LT: Ir 0.25 | model | [1] Servant 2011 | Table 5, p. 6, row 7 report | |
| 625.15 | In3 Ir-HT -> Liq + In3 Ir-LT | In3 Ir-HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3 Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25 | experimental | [1] Servant 2011 cites Anres 2000 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 5 report | |
| 620.15 | In3 Ir-HT -> Liq + In3 Ir-LT | In3 Ir-HT: Ir 0.2386; Liq: Ir 3.700e-5; In3 Ir-LT: Ir 0.2425; In3Ir_LT: Ir 0.2425; In3Ir_HT: Ir 0.2386 | model | [1] Servant 2011 | Table 3, p. 5, row 6 report | |
| 620.15 | In3 Ir-HT -> Liq + In3 Ir-LT | In3 Ir-HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3 Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25 | experimental | [1] Servant 2011 cites Flandorfer 2002 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 4 report | |
| 620.15 | In3Ir-HT ⇔ Liq + In3Ir-LT | In3Ir-HT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25; In3Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25 | unspecified | [1] Servant 2011 cites Flandorfer 2002 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 4 report | |
| 429.95 | Liq ⇔ In + In3Ir-LT | Liq: Ir 0; In: Ir 0; In3Ir-LT: Ir 0.2382; In3Ir_LT: Ir 0.2382 | model | [1] Servant 2011 | Table 5, p. 6, row 3 report | |
| 429.79 | Liq ⇔ In + In3Ir-LT | In3Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25 | unspecified | [1] Servant 2011 cites Anres 2000 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 2 report | |
| 429.79 | eutectic: Liq -> In + In3 Ir-LT | In3 Ir-LT: In 0.75, Ir 0.25 | experimental | [1] Servant 2011 cites Anres 2000 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 2 report | |
| 429.15 | Liq ⇔ In + In3Ir-LT | unspecified | [1] Servant 2011 cites Flandorfer 2002 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 1 report | ||
| 429.15 | eutectic: Liq -> In + In3 Ir-LT | experimental | [1] Servant 2011 cites Flandorfer 2002 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 1 report |
Other properties
Mixing / partial (1)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partial enthalpy printed: partial molar enthalpy of mixing | -50 unspecified ± 2 | 1154 | liquid | experimental | [1] Servant 2011 cites Anres 2000 doi | p. 2 report | They found that at 1154 K the limiting partial molar enthalpy of mixing of hypothetically supercooled liquid iridium in liquid indium is equal to -50 ± 2 kJ/mol. |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- Colette Servant, Mohamed Idbenali, Thermodynamic assessment of the In–Ir system in the In rich part, Thermochimica Acta 517, 1-8 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2010.12.019