In–Mn system

60 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 54, model 6); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 16 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (8) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	54
model	6

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	17
phase transition	28
phase equilibrium	14
formation	1

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
InMn-15Wan.tdb	L.Y. Wang, J. Wang, C.F. Zhu, G. Cheng, C.Y. Tang, G.H. Rao, H.Y. Zhou, Thermochim. Acta, 607, 74-81(2015). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2015.03.022	`213bd22e68c918e1d82b67797f37b7f51e43957bb8eeb8ab117064c191d6fdcf`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
InMn-15Wan.tdb	1466.33	LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.95099) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.98292) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.98942)
InMn-15Wan.tdb	1293.26	LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.69897) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.92218) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 0.93401)
InMn-15Wan.tdb	1181.8	LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.51841) + INMN3_D83 (x(Mn) 0.75) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 0.91042)
InMn-15Wan.tdb	1181.8	LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.51859) + INMN3_D83 (x(Mn) 0.75) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 0.91043)
InMn-15Wan.tdb	908	INMN3_D83 (x(Mn) 0.75) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 0.96292) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.98687)
InMn-15Wan.tdb	908	INMN3_D83 (x(Mn) 0.75) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 0.96297) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 0.98688)
InMn-15Wan.tdb	429.6	TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Mn) 0) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 3.200e-4) + INMN3_D83 (x(Mn) 0.75)
InMn-15Wan.tdb	429.6	TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Mn) 0) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 3.200e-4) + INMN3_D83 (x(Mn) 0.75)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the In–Mn system (17)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1485	peritectic: L+δ-Mn ↔ γ-Mn		experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Kopp 1968	Table 3, p. 5, row 2 report
1466.3	peritectic: L+δ-Mn ↔ γ-Mn	L: Mn 0.951; δ-Mn: Mn 0.9894; γ-Mn: Mn 0.9829	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 3, p. 5, row 3 report
1445	peritectic: L+δ-Mn ↔ γ-Mn	L: Mn 0.95	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Zwicker 1950	Table 3, p. 5, row 1 report
1293.2	metatectic/catatectic: γ-Mn ↔ L+β-Mn	γ-Mn: Mn 0.9222; L: Mn 0.699; β-Mn: Mn 0.934	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 3, p. 5, row 7 report
1293	metatectic/catatectic: γ-Mn ↔ L+β-Mn	L: Mn 0.72	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Kopp 1968	Table 3, p. 5, row 5 report
1292.7	metatectic/catatectic: γ-Mn ↔ L+β-Mn		experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 3, p. 5, row 6 report
1248	metatectic/catatectic: γ-Mn ↔ L+β-Mn	L: Mn 0.79	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Zwicker 1950	Table 3, p. 5, row 4 report
1183	peritectic: L+β-Mn ↔ InMn3	L: Mn 0.52; InMn3: Mn 0.75	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Kopp 1968	Table 3, p. 5, row 9 report
1181.8	peritectic: L+β-Mn ↔ InMn3	L: Mn 0.5186; β-Mn: Mn 0.9104; InMn3: Mn 0.75	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 3, p. 5, row 11 report
1181.5	peritectic: L+β-Mn ↔ InMn3	InMn3: Mn 0.75	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 3, p. 5, row 10 report
1145	peritectic: L+β-Mn ↔ InMn3	L: Mn 0.54; β-Mn: Mn 0.86; InMn3: Mn 0.75	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Zwicker 1950	Table 3, p. 5, row 8 report
908	eutectoid: β-Mn ↔ InMn3+α-Mn	β-Mn: Mn 0.963; InMn3: Mn 0.75; α-Mn: Mn 0.9873	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 3, p. 5, row 14 report
908	eutectoid: β-Mn ↔ InMn3+α-Mn	InMn3: Mn 0.75	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Kopp 1968	Table 3, p. 5, row 13 report
863	eutectoid: β-Mn ↔ InMn3+α-Mn	InMn3: Mn 0.75	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Zwicker 1950	Table 3, p. 5, row 12 report
429.6	eutectic: L ↔ InMn3+(In)	L: Mn 3.000e-4; InMn3: Mn 0.75; (In): Mn 1.000e-4	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 3, p. 5, row 17 report
429	eutectic: L ↔ InMn3+(In)	InMn3: Mn 0.75	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Zwicker 1950	Table 3, p. 5, row 15 report
429	eutectic: L ↔ InMn3+(In)	InMn3: Mn 0.75	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 3, p. 5, row 16 report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, In–Mn system (1)
Phase	Compound	Value	T (K)	Class	MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	Source	Location	Quote
InMn3		0.67 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	model			[1] Wang 2015	p. 6 report	The enthalpy of formation of InMn3 at 298 K was calculated to be 670 J/mol and compared with the experimental data [31] as shown in Fig. 10.

Other properties

Phase transition (28)

Phase transition, In–Mn system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase transition	428.1 K	428.1	Mn7In93 alloy: In 0.93, Mn 0.07	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 1 report
Phase transition	428.5 K	428.5	Mn50In50 alloy: In 0.5, Mn 0.5	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 11 report
Phase transition	428.6 K	428.6	Mn35In65 alloy: In 0.65, Mn 0.35	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report
Phase transition	428.7 K	428.7	Mn55In45 alloy: In 0.45, Mn 0.55	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 13 report
Phase transition	428.8 K	428.8	Mn70In30 alloy: In 0.3, Mn 0.7	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 22 report
Phase transition	428.9 K	428.9	Mn60In40 alloy: In 0.4, Mn 0.6	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 16 report
Phase transition	428.9 K	428.9	Mn73In27 alloy: In 0.27, Mn 0.73	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 25 report
Phase transition	429.2 K	429.2	Mn45In55 alloy: In 0.55, Mn 0.45	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report
Phase transition	429.3 K	429.3	Mn15In85 alloy: In 0.85, Mn 0.15	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
Phase transition	429.3 K	429.3	Mn25In75 alloy: In 0.75, Mn 0.25	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report
Phase transition	429.6 K	429.6	Mn75In25 alloy: In 0.25, Mn 0.75	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 28 report
Phase transition	429.7 K	429.7	Mn77In23 alloy: In 0.23, Mn 0.77	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 31 report
Phase transition	429.8 K	429.8	Mn65In35 alloy: In 0.35, Mn 0.65	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 19 report
Phase transition	1179.7 K	1179.7	Mn55In45 alloy: In 0.45, Mn 0.55	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 14 report
Phase transition	1180.5 K	1180.5	Mn60In40 alloy: In 0.4, Mn 0.6	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 17 report
Phase transition	1180.6 K	1180.6	Mn85In15 (1123 K, 360 h) alloy: In 0.15, Mn 0.85	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 38 report
Phase transition	1180.9 K	1180.9	Mn70In30 alloy: In 0.3, Mn 0.7	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 23 report
Phase transition	1181 K	1181	Mn80In20 (873 K,720 h) alloy: In 0.2, Mn 0.8	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 35 report
Phase transition	1181.6 K	1181.6	Mn77In23 alloy: In 0.23, Mn 0.77	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 32 report
Phase transition	1182.1 K	1182.1	Mn75In25 alloy: In 0.25, Mn 0.75	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 29 report
Phase transition	1183 K	1183	Mn65In35 alloy: In 0.35, Mn 0.65	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 20 report
Phase transition	1183.6 K	1183.6	Mn73In27 alloy: In 0.27, Mn 0.73	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 26 report
Phase transition	1289.2 K	1289.2	Mn73In27 alloy: In 0.27, Mn 0.73	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 27 report
Phase transition	1291.5 K	1291.5	Mn85In15 (1123 K, 360 h) alloy: In 0.15, Mn 0.85	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 39 report
Phase transition	1293.2 K	1293.2	Mn90In10 (1123 K, 360 h) alloy: In 0.1, Mn 0.9	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 41 report
Phase transition	1293.4 K	1293.4	Mn80In20 (873 K,720 h) alloy: In 0.2, Mn 0.8	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 36 report
Phase transition	1294.2 K	1294.2	Mn75In25 alloy: In 0.25, Mn 0.75	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 30 report
Phase transition	1294.4 K	1294.4	Mn77In23 alloy: In 0.23, Mn 0.77	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 33 report

Phase equilibrium (14)

Phase equilibrium, In–Mn system
Property	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase composition	928.6	other: Mn7In93 liquid: In 0.93, Mn 0.07	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 2 report
Phase composition	1005.5	other: Mn15In85 liquid: In 0.85, Mn 0.15	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
Phase composition	1070.5	other: Mn25In75 liquid: In 0.75, Mn 0.25	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
Phase composition	1111.2	other: Mn35In65 liquid: In 0.65, Mn 0.35	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report
Phase composition	1155.8	other: Mn45In55 liquid: In 0.55, Mn 0.45	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report
Phase composition	1161.4	other: Mn50In50 liquid: In 0.5, Mn 0.5	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 12 report
Phase composition	1210.1	other: Mn60In40 liquid: In 0.4, Mn 0.6	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 18 report
Phase composition	1211.3	other: Mn55In45 liquid: In 0.45, Mn 0.55	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 15 report
Phase composition	1245.8	other: Mn65In35 liquid: In 0.35, Mn 0.65	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 21 report
Phase composition	1261.1	other: Mn70In30 liquid: In 0.3, Mn 0.7	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 24 report
Phase composition	1321.5	other: Mn77In23 liquid: In 0.23, Mn 0.77	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 34 report
Phase composition	1369.8	other: Mn80In20 (873 K,720 h) liquid: In 0.2, Mn 0.8	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 37 report
Phase composition	1389.7	other: Mn85In15 (1123 K, 360 h) liquid: In 0.15, Mn 0.85	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 40 report
Phase composition	1429.3	other: Mn90In10 (1123 K, 360 h) liquid: In 0.1, Mn 0.9	experimental	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 42 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

L.Y. Wang, J. Wang, C.F. Zhu, G. Cheng, C.Y. Tang, G.H. Rao et al., Experimental investigation and thermodynamic assessment of the Mn–In binary system, Thermochimica Acta 607, 74-81 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2015.03.022

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}