In–Na system

20 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 14, model 6); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (8) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental14
model6
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction18
phase transition2

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
InNa-13Wan.tdbL. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Liu, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 34, 447-52(2013). doi:10.1007/s11669-013-0258-66ddab60c74e5461a61b382c78f26d0df48e5b77d2f06cee84b1769ce5c52e087viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
InNa-13Wan.tdb618.58IN8NA5 (x(Na) 0.38462) + INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.606)
InNa-13Wan.tdb618.58IN8NA5 (x(Na) 0.38462) + INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.60624)
InNa-13Wan.tdb618.58IN8NA5 (x(Na) 0.38462) + INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.60589)
InNa-13Wan.tdb618.58IN8NA5 (x(Na) 0.38462) + INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.60586)
InNa-13Wan.tdb559INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + INNA3 (x(Na) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.75272)
InNa-13Wan.tdb559INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + INNA3 (x(Na) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.75273)
InNa-13Wan.tdb559INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + INNA3 (x(Na) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.75261)
InNa-13Wan.tdb559INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + INNA3 (x(Na) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.75219)
InNa-13Wan.tdb434.99INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + INNA3 (x(Na) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.98357)
InNa-13Wan.tdb434.99INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + INNA3 (x(Na) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.98366)
InNa-13Wan.tdb434.99INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + INNA3 (x(Na) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.98369)
InNa-13Wan.tdb434.99INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + INNA3 (x(Na) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.98369)
InNa-13Wan.tdb433TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Na) 0.04843) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.0498) + IN8NA5 (x(Na) 0.38462)
InNa-13Wan.tdb433TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Na) 0.04843) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.0498) + IN8NA5 (x(Na) 0.38462)
InNa-13Wan.tdb369.01INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.9954) + BCC_A2 (x(Na) 0.99989)
InNa-13Wan.tdb369.01INNA_B32 (x(Na) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Na) 0.99544) + BCC_A2 (x(Na) 0.99989)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the In–Na system (18)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
720.8congruent melting: liq -> In8Na5L: Na 0.384; In8Na5: In 0.615385, Na 0.384615model[1] Wang 2013Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
715congruent melting: liq -> In8Na5L: Na 0.385; In8Na5: In 0.615385, Na 0.384615experimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Thummel 1970 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 7
report
713congruent melting: liq -> In8Na5L: Na 0.4; In8Na5: In 0.615385, Na 0.384615experimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Lamprecht 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
626liq + In8Na5 -> InNaIn8Na5: In 0.615385, Na 0.384615; InNa: In 0.5, Na 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Schneidner 2013
Table 2, p. 4, row 10
report
621.1liq + In8Na5 -> InNaL: Na 0.587; In8Na5: Na 0.384; InNa: In 0.5, Na 0.5model[1] Wang 2013Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
618liq + In8Na5 -> InNaIn8Na5: In 0.615385, Na 0.384615; InNa: In 0.5, Na 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Thummel 1970 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 9
report
559.3liq + InNa -> InNa3L: Na 0.75; InNa: Na 0.5; InNa3: In 0.25, Na 0.75model[1] Wang 2013Table 2, p. 4, row 11
report
442.3liq + InNa -> InNa3L: Na 0.97; InNa: Na 0.5; InNa3: In 0.25, Na 0.75model[1] Wang 2013Table 2, p. 4, row 12
report
433eutectic: liq -> (In) + In8Na5In8Na5: In 0.615385, Na 0.384615experimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Heberlein 1952
Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
433eutectic: liq -> (In) + In8Na5L: Na 0.065; In8Na5: In 0.615385, Na 0.384615experimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Neething 1974
Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
430.7eutectic: liq -> (In) + In8Na5L: Na 0.04; In8Na5: Na 0.384model[1] Wang 2013Table 2, p. 4, row 1
report
428eutectic: liq -> (In) + In8Na5In8Na5: In 0.615385, Na 0.384615experimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Lamprecht 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 3
report
369eutectic: liq -> InNa + βNa(bcc)L: Na 0.9996; InNa: In 0.5, Na 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Lamprecht 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 15
report
369eutectic: liq -> InNa + βNa(bcc)InNa: In 0.5, Na 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Neething 1974
Table 2, p. 4, row 17
report
369eutectic: liq -> InNa + βNa(bcc)InNa: In 0.5, Na 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Heycock 1899
Table 2, p. 4, row 18
report
368.8eutectic: liq -> InNa + βNa(bcc)L: Na 1; InNa: Na 0.5model[1] Wang 2013Table 2, p. 4, row 13
report
368eutectic: liq -> InNa + βNa(bcc)InNa: In 0.5, Na 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Thummel 1970 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 16
report
367.9eutectic: liq -> InNa + βNa(bcc)InNa: In 0.5, Na 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Davies 1967
Table 2, p. 4, row 14
report

Other properties

Phase transition (2)

Phase transition, In–Na system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition713 K713congruent transformationexperimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Lamprecht 1969 doi
p. 1
report
Lamprecht and Crowther[4] gave the composition of the congruent melting point as 40 at.% Na(In3Na2) at 713 K and Thümmel and Klemm[5] gave as 38.5 at.% Na (In8Na5) at 715 K.
Phase transition715 K715congruent transformationexperimental[1] Wang 2013
cites Thummel 1970 doi
p. 1
report
Lamprecht and Crowther[4] gave the composition of the congruent melting point as 40 at.% Na(In3Na2) at 713 K and Thümmel and Klemm[5] gave as 38.5 at.% Na (In8Na5) at 715 K.

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Lei Wang, Yajun Liu, Jing Liu, Thermodynamic Basis and Related Phase Equilibria for In-Na and In-Ca Binary Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 34, 447-452 (2013). doi:10.1007/s11669-013-0258-6