In–Pt system

30 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (model 30); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 9 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (15) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
model	30

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	29
phase transition	1

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
InPt-09Lia.tdb	Y. Liang, C. Guo, C. Li, Z. Du, J. Alloys Compd., 475, 220-26(2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.07.086	`15a3f542090db76bf057a054fce6245483f7a0b7db8718ba86034538b5e2a983`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1731.33	LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.7392) + L12_FCC (x(Pt) 0.7504) + FCC_A1 (x(Pt) 0.87676)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1432.01	LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.57012) + IN2PT3_B82 (x(Pt) 0.63027) + L12_FCC (x(Pt) 0.7236)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1372.53	LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.53894) + IN9PT13 (x(Pt) 0.58373) + IN2PT3_B82 (x(Pt) 0.61072)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1328.55	LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.51221) + IN5PT6 (x(Pt) 0.55835) + IN9PT13 (x(Pt) 0.57875)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1302.87	LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.49484) + INPT_HT (x(Pt) 0.5378) + IN5PT6 (x(Pt) 0.54652)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1302.87	LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.49484) + INPT_HT (x(Pt) 0.5378) + IN5PT6 (x(Pt) 0.54652)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1302.57	IN2PT_C1 (x(Pt) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.34941) + IN3PT2_D513 (x(Pt) 0.4)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1302.57	IN2PT_C1 (x(Pt) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.34958) + IN3PT2_D513 (x(Pt) 0.4)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1302.57	IN2PT_C1 (x(Pt) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.34928) + IN3PT2_D513 (x(Pt) 0.4)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1274.68	IN2PT3_B82 (x(Pt) 0.61732) + INPT2 (x(Pt) 0.66667) + L12_FCC (x(Pt) 0.72674)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1269.37	IN3PT2_D513 (x(Pt) 0.4) + LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.47234) + INPT_HT (x(Pt) 0.52162)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1269.37	IN3PT2_D513 (x(Pt) 0.4) + LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.47231) + INPT_HT (x(Pt) 0.5216)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1217.05	IN3PT2_D513 (x(Pt) 0.4) + INPT_HT (x(Pt) 0.52201) + IN5PT6 (x(Pt) 0.53278)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1217.05	IN3PT2_D513 (x(Pt) 0.4) + INPT_HT (x(Pt) 0.52201) + IN5PT6 (x(Pt) 0.53278)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1168.76	LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.22178) + IN7PT3_D8F (x(Pt) 0.3) + IN2PT_C1 (x(Pt) 0.33333)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1168.76	LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.22185) + IN7PT3_D8F (x(Pt) 0.3) + IN2PT_C1 (x(Pt) 0.33333)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1123	IN9PT13 (x(Pt) 0.58961) + IN2PT3_B82 (x(Pt) 0.60698) + INPT2 (x(Pt) 0.66667)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	1123	IN9PT13 (x(Pt) 0.58961) + IN2PT3_B82 (x(Pt) 0.60698) + INPT2 (x(Pt) 0.66667)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	823.51	IN9PT13 (x(Pt) 0.5908) + IN2PT3_ALPHA (x(Pt) 0.6) + INPT2 (x(Pt) 0.66667)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	823.51	IN9PT13 (x(Pt) 0.5908) + IN2PT3_ALPHA (x(Pt) 0.6) + INPT2 (x(Pt) 0.66667)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	426.81	TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Pt) 0) + LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.00537) + IN7PT3_D8F (x(Pt) 0.3)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	426.81	TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Pt) 0) + LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.00535) + IN7PT3_D8F (x(Pt) 0.3)
InPt-09Lia.tdb	426.81	TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Pt) 0) + LIQUID (x(Pt) 0.00534) + IN7PT3_D8F (x(Pt) 0.3)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the In–Pt system (29)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1731	liq. + fcc(Pt) -> InPt3	liq.: Pt 0.739; fcc(Pt): Pt 0.8765; InPt3: Pt 0.7505	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 28 report
1731	liq. + fcc(Pt) -> InPt3	liq.: Pt 0.73; fcc(Pt): Pt 0.89; InPt3: Pt 0.75	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 29 report
1433	liq. + InPt3 -> βIn2Pt3	liq.: Pt 0.56; InPt3: Pt 0.71; βIn2Pt3: Pt 0.6	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 21 report
1433	liq. + InPt3 -> βIn2Pt3	liq.: Pt 0.5704; InPt3: Pt 0.7238; βIn2Pt3: Pt 0.6305	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 20 report
1373	liq. + βIn2Pt3 -> In9Pt13	liq.: Pt 0.55; βIn2Pt3: Pt 0.58; In9Pt13: Pt 0.575	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 19 report
1373	liq. + βIn2Pt3 -> In9Pt13	liq.: Pt 0.5389; βIn2Pt3: Pt 0.6107; In9Pt13: Pt 0.5837	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 18 report
1337	congruent melting: liq. -> In3Pt2	liq.: Pt 0.4; In3Pt2: In 0.6, Pt 0.4	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 9 report
1337	congruent melting: liq. -> In3Pt2	liq.: Pt 0.4; In3Pt2: In 0.6, Pt 0.4	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 8 report
1329	liq. + In9Pt13 -> In5Pt6	liq.: Pt 0.51; In9Pt13: Pt 0.55; In5Pt6: Pt 0.545	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 17 report
1329	liq. + In9Pt13 -> In5Pt6	liq.: Pt 0.5122; In9Pt13: Pt 0.5788; In5Pt6: Pt 0.5584	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 16 report
1305	congruent melting: liq. -> In2Pt	liq.: Pt 0.3333; In2Pt: In 0.666667, Pt 0.333333	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 5 report
1303	liq. + In5Pt6 -> InPt	liq.: Pt 0.4948; In5Pt6: Pt 0.5465; InPt: Pt 0.5378	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 12 report
1303	liq. + In5Pt6 -> InPt	liq.: Pt 0.495; In5Pt6: Pt 0.53; InPt: Pt 0.51	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 13 report
1303	eutectic: liq. -> In2Pt + In3Pt2	In2Pt: In 0.666667, Pt 0.333333; In3Pt2: In 0.6, Pt 0.4	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 7 report
1303	eutectic: liq. -> In2Pt + In3Pt2	liq.: Pt 0.3494; In2Pt: In 0.666667, Pt 0.333333; In3Pt2: In 0.6, Pt 0.4	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 6 report
1278	βIn2Pt3 + InPt3 -> InPt2	βIn2Pt3: Pt 0.61; InPt3: Pt 0.73; InPt2: In 0.333333, Pt 0.666667	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 27 report
1278	βIn2Pt3 + InPt3 -> InPt2	βIn2Pt3: Pt 0.6177; InPt3: Pt 0.7268; InPt2: In 0.333333, Pt 0.666667	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 26 report
1269	eutectic: liq. -> In3Pt2 + InPt	liq.: Pt 0.4723; In3Pt2: In 0.6, Pt 0.4; InPt: Pt 0.5216	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 10 report
1266	eutectic: liq. -> In3Pt2 + InPt	liq.: Pt 0.47; In3Pt2: In 0.6, Pt 0.4; InPt: Pt 0.48	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 11 report
1217	InPt -> In3Pt2 + In5Pt6	InPt: Pt 0.5; In3Pt2: In 0.6, Pt 0.4; In5Pt6: Pt 0.51	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 15 report
1217	InPt -> In3Pt2 + In5Pt6	InPt: Pt 0.522; In3Pt2: In 0.6, Pt 0.4; In5Pt6: Pt 0.5328	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 14 report
1169	liq. + In2Pt -> In7Pt3	liq.: Pt 0.18; In2Pt: In 0.666667, Pt 0.333333; In7Pt3: In 0.7, Pt 0.3	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 4 report
1169	liq. + In2Pt -> In7Pt3	liq.: Pt 0.2218; In2Pt: In 0.666667, Pt 0.333333; In7Pt3: In 0.7, Pt 0.3	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 3 report
1123	βIn2Pt3 -> In9Pt13 + InPt2	βIn2Pt3: Pt 0.605; In9Pt13: Pt 0.59; InPt2: In 0.333333, Pt 0.666667	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 25 report
1123	βIn2Pt3 -> In9Pt13 + InPt2	βIn2Pt3: Pt 0.607; In9Pt13: Pt 0.5896; InPt2: In 0.333333, Pt 0.666667	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 24 report
823	In9Pt13 + InPt2 -> αIn2Pt3	In9Pt13: Pt 0.5908; InPt2: In 0.333333, Pt 0.666667; αIn2Pt3: In 0.4, Pt 0.6	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 22 report
823	In9Pt13 + InPt2 -> αIn2Pt3	In9Pt13: Pt 0.585; InPt2: In 0.333333, Pt 0.666667; αIn2Pt3: In 0.4, Pt 0.6	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 23 report
427	eutectic: liq. -> tetra(In) + In7Pt3	liq.: Pt 0.001; tetra(In): Pt 0; In7Pt3: In 0.7, Pt 0.3	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 2 report
427	eutectic: liq. -> tetra(In) + In7Pt3	liq.: Pt 0.0053; tetra(In): Pt 0; In7Pt3: In 0.7, Pt 0.3	model	[1] Liang 2009	Table 2, p. 4, row 1 report

Other properties

Phase transition (1)

Phase transition, In–Pt system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location	Quote
Phase transition	1312 K	1312	liq + In3Pt2 + In2Pt	model	[1] Liang 2009 cites Okamoto 2005 doi	p. 4 report	The invariant reaction liq. + In3 Pt2 → In2 Pt at 1312 K was reviewed by Okamoto [6].

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Yu Liang, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic modeling of the In–Pt system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 475, 220-226 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.07.086

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}