In–Yb system

19 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 7, model 12); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 16 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (10) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental7
model12
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction17
phase transition2

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
InYb-11Gao.tdbF. Gao, S.L. Wang, C.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, Calphad, 35, 1-5(2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.0039f2bb0e5d29f5ab13c424d89058296792d4255701b7093846da2e2e973eb44daviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
InYb-11Gao.tdb1153.12IN2YB (x(Yb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.35713) + INYB_B2 (x(Yb) 0.50001)
InYb-11Gao.tdb1153.12IN2YB (x(Yb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.35707) + INYB_B2 (x(Yb) 0.50001)
InYb-11Gao.tdb1092.87INYB_B2 (x(Yb) 0.52354) + INYB2_C37 (x(Yb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.69879)
InYb-11Gao.tdb1082.87INYB2_C37 (x(Yb) 0.66667) + IN2YB5 (x(Yb) 0.71429) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.72409)
InYb-11Gao.tdb1082.87INYB2_C37 (x(Yb) 0.66667) + IN2YB5 (x(Yb) 0.71429) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.72467)
InYb-11Gao.tdb1082.86INYB2_C37 (x(Yb) 0.66667) + IN2YB5 (x(Yb) 0.71429) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.72453)
InYb-11Gao.tdb1023LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.94034) + BCC_A2 (x(Yb) 0.99031) + FCC_A1 (x(Yb) 0.99202)
InYb-11Gao.tdb963.1IN2YB5 (x(Yb) 0.71429) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.9005) + FCC_A1 (x(Yb) 0.98608)
InYb-11Gao.tdb963.1IN2YB5 (x(Yb) 0.71429) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.90041) + FCC_A1 (x(Yb) 0.98607)
InYb-11Gao.tdb903.18LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.15865) + IN3YB_L12 (x(Yb) 0.25) + IN2YB (x(Yb) 0.33333)
InYb-11Gao.tdb903.18LIQUID (x(Yb) 0.15869) + IN3YB_L12 (x(Yb) 0.25) + IN2YB (x(Yb) 0.33333)
InYb-11Gao.tdb429.65TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Yb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 2.000e-4) + IN3YB_L12 (x(Yb) 0.25)
InYb-11Gao.tdb429.65TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Yb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Yb) 2.000e-4) + IN3YB_L12 (x(Yb) 0.25)

Convex hulls: OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the In–Yb system (17)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1153.15eutectic: L -> InYb + In2YbL: In 0.633; InYb: In 0.5; In2Yb: In 0.667model[1] Gao 2011Table 2, p. 2, row 9
report
1148.15eutectic: L -> InYb + In2YbL: In 0.63; InYb: In 0.5; In2Yb: In 0.667experimental[1] Gao 2011
cites McMasters 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 10
report
1093.15L + InYb -> InYb2L: In 0.28; InYb: In 0.47; InYb2: In 0.333experimental[1] Gao 2011
cites McMasters 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 8
report
1093.15L + InYb -> InYb2L: In 0.301; InYb: In 0.477; InYb2: In 0.333model[1] Gao 2011Table 2, p. 2, row 7
report
1093.15peritecticmodel[1] Gao 2011p. 4
report
The calculated peritectic melting temperatures of the In2 Yb5 , InYb2 , and In3 Yb phases are 810 °C, 820 °C, and 630 °C, respectively, and the calculated congruent melting temperatures of the InYb and In2 Yb phases are 1066 °C and 885 °C, respectively.
1083.15L + InYb2 -> In2Yb5L: In 0.25; InYb2: In 0.333; In2Yb5: In 0.286experimental[1] Gao 2011
cites McMasters 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 6
report
1083.15peritecticmodel[1] Gao 2011p. 4
report
The calculated peritectic melting temperatures of the In2 Yb5 , InYb2 , and In3 Yb phases are 810 °C, 820 °C, and 630 °C, respectively, and the calculated congruent melting temperatures of the InYb and In2 Yb phases are 1066 °C and 885 °C, respectively.
1083.15L + InYb2 -> In2Yb5L: In 0.283; InYb2: In 0.333; In2Yb5: In 0.286model[1] Gao 2011Table 2, p. 2, row 5
report
1023.15(γYb) -> L + (βYb)(γYb): In 0.01; L: In 0.06model[1] Gao 2011Table 2, p. 2, row 1
report
1023.15(γYb) -> L + (βYb)(γYb): In 0.02; L: In 0.05; (βYb): In 0.015experimental[1] Gao 2011
cites McMasters 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 2
report
963.15eutectic: L -> (βYb)+In2Yb5L: In 0.1; (βYb): In 0.014; In2Yb5: In 0.286model[1] Gao 2011Table 2, p. 2, row 3
report
963.15eutectic: L -> (βYb)+In2Yb5L: In 0.115; (βYb): In 0.01; In2Yb5: In 0.286experimental[1] Gao 2011
cites McMasters 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 4
report
903.15L + In2Yb -> In3YbL: In 0.833; In2Yb: In 0.667; In3Yb: In 0.75model[1] Gao 2011Table 2, p. 2, row 11
report
903.15L + In2Yb -> In3YbL: In 0.865; In2Yb: In 0.667; In3Yb: In 0.75experimental[1] Gao 2011
cites McMasters 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 12
report
903.15peritecticmodel[1] Gao 2011p. 4
report
The calculated peritectic melting temperatures of the In2 Yb5 , InYb2 , and In3 Yb phases are 810 °C, 820 °C, and 630 °C, respectively, and the calculated congruent melting temperatures of the InYb and In2 Yb phases are 1066 °C and 885 °C, respectively.
429.15eutectic: L -> (In) + In3YbL: In 0.9997; (In): In 1; In3Yb: In 0.75model[1] Gao 2011Table 2, p. 2, row 13
report
427.15eutectic: L -> (In) + In3Yb(In): In 1; In3Yb: In 0.75experimental[1] Gao 2011
cites McMasters 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 14
report

Other properties

Phase transition (2)

Phase transition, In–Yb system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1158.15 K1158.15congruent transformationmodel[1] Gao 2011p. 4
report
The calculated peritectic melting temperatures of the In2 Yb5 , InYb2 , and In3 Yb phases are 810 °C, 820 °C, and 630 °C, respectively, and the calculated congruent melting temperatures of the InYb and In2 Yb phases are 1066 °C and 885 °C, respectively.
Phase transition1339.15 K1339.15congruent transformationmodel[1] Gao 2011p. 4
report
The calculated peritectic melting temperatures of the In2 Yb5 , InYb2 , and In3 Yb phases are 810 °C, 820 °C, and 630 °C, respectively, and the calculated congruent melting temperatures of the InYb and In2 Yb phases are 1066 °C and 885 °C, respectively.

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. F. Gao, S.L. Wang, C.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessments of the In–Eu and In–Yb systems, Calphad 35, 1-5 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.003