La–Mg–Nd system

21 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 21); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental21
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
phase transition21

Other properties

Phase transition (21)

Phase transition, La–Mg–Nd system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition831.15 K831.15U: L + REMg12 = RE5Mg41 + (Mg)
alloy: La 0.0298548, Mg 0.898017, Nd 0.0721279
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 19
report
Phase transition832.15 K832.15U: L + REMg12 = RE5Mg41 + (Mg)
alloy: La 0.0298548, Mg 0.898017, Nd 0.0721279
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 20
report
Phase transition835.15 K835.15L -> RE5Mg41 + (Mg) d
alloy: La 0.0475717, Mg 0.916535, Nd 0.0358937
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 11
report
Phase transition836.15 K836.15L -> RE5Mg41 + (Mg) d
alloy: La 0.0475717, Mg 0.916535, Nd 0.0358937
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 10
report
Phase transition843.15 K843.15L -> RE5Mg41 + (Mg) d
alloy: La 0.0475717, Mg 0.916535, Nd 0.0358937
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 12
report
Phase transition843.15 K843.15U: L + REMg12 = RE5Mg41 + (Mg)
alloy: La 0.0298548, Mg 0.898017, Nd 0.0721279
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 21
report
Phase transition844.15 K844.15U: L + RE2Mg17 = REMg12 + RE5Mg41
alloy: La 0.0475717, Mg 0.916535, Nd 0.0358937
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 8
report
Phase transition849.15 K849.15U: L + RE2Mg17 = REMg12 + RE5Mg41
alloy: La 0.0475717, Mg 0.916535, Nd 0.0358937
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 7
report
Phase transition858.15 K858.15U: L + RE2Mg17 = REMg12 + RE5Mg41
alloy: La 0.0298548, Mg 0.898017, Nd 0.0721279
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 18
report
Phase transition858.15 K858.15U: L + RE2Mg17 = REMg12 + RE5Mg41
alloy: La 0.0475717, Mg 0.916535, Nd 0.0358937
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 9
report
Phase transition866.15 K866.15/ L + RE2Mg17 + REMg12
alloy: La 0.0475717, Mg 0.916535, Nd 0.0358937
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 6
report
Phase transition874.15 K874.15P: L + RE2Mg17 + REMg3 = RE5Mg41
alloy: La 0.0298548, Mg 0.898017, Nd 0.0721279
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 17
report
Phase transition877.15 K877.15/ L + RE2Mg17 + REMg12
alloy: La 0.0475717, Mg 0.916535, Nd 0.0358937
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 5
report
Phase transition881.15 K881.15/ L + RE2Mg17 + REMg3
alloy: La 0.0298548, Mg 0.898017, Nd 0.0721279
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 16
report
Phase transition881.15 K881.15/ L + RE2Mg17 + REMg3
alloy: La 0.0298548, Mg 0.898017, Nd 0.0721279
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 14
report
Phase transition888.15 K888.15/ L + RE2Mg17 + REMg3
alloy: La 0.0298548, Mg 0.898017, Nd 0.0721279
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 15
report
Phase transition891.15 K891.15/ L + RE2Mg17 + REMg12
alloy: La 0.0475717, Mg 0.916535, Nd 0.0358937
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 4
report
Phase transition895.15 K895.15L / L + RE2Mg17
alloy: La 0.0298548, Mg 0.898017, Nd 0.0721279
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 13
report
Phase transition913.15 K913.15L / L + RE2Mg17
alloy: La 0.0475717, Mg 0.916535, Nd 0.0358937
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 1
report
Phase transition914.15 K914.15L / L + RE2Mg17
alloy: La 0.0475717, Mg 0.916535, Nd 0.0358937
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 2
report
Phase transition920.15 K920.15L / L + RE2Mg17
alloy: La 0.0475717, Mg 0.916535, Nd 0.0358937
experimental[1] Gröbner 2012Table 5, p. 7, row 3
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Joachim Gröbner, Milan Hampl, Rainer Schmid-Fetzer, Mark A. Easton, Suming Zhu, Mark A. Gibson et al., Phase analysis of Mg–La–Nd and Mg–La–Ce alloys, Intermetallics 28, 92-101 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2012.04.012