Li–Si system

132 accepted literature values from 4 paper(s) (experimental 84, model 48); 3 calculated phase diagram(s). 12 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (14) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental84
model48
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction69
phase transition8
mixing / partial24
crystal structure31

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
LiSi-13Wan.tdbP. Wang, A. Kozlov, D. Thomas, F. Mertens, R. Schmid-Fetzer, Intermetallics, 42, 137-45(2013). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2013.06.003229cd983628a68f92815952bffbce6240e47a8981026a6faf0ef99eeb167fef8viewer · TDB · JSON
LiSi-14Bra.tdbM.H. Braga, A. Debski, W. Gasior, J. Alloys Compd., 616, 581-93(2014). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.06.212d53f1691e81929b40eb1b34560cc70f18df282d0b016f79c7e0dd0b7d76aacb2viewer · TDB · JSON
LiSi-17Lia.tdbS.-M. Liang, F. Taubert, A. Kozlov, J. Seidel, F. Mertens, R. Schmid-Fetzer, Intermetallics, 81, 32-46(2017). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2017.02.02447ff6e5cea85ffdd0f58850d90539f6c4547c1b382e7438eb33adaea6db1e2b3viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
LiSi-13Wan.tdb1004.94LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.2425) + LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3)
LiSi-13Wan.tdb1004.94LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.24235) + LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3)
LiSi-13Wan.tdb1004.94LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.24281) + LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3)
LiSi-13Wan.tdb956.72LIQUID (x(Si) 0.14841) + LI22SI5 (x(Si) 0.18519) + LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529)
LiSi-13Wan.tdb956.72LIQUID (x(Si) 0.14852) + LI22SI5 (x(Si) 0.18519) + LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529)
LiSi-13Wan.tdb924.75LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3) + LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.42457)
LiSi-13Wan.tdb924.75LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3) + LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.42448)
LiSi-13Wan.tdb861.48LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.48462) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 1)
LiSi-13Wan.tdb861.47LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.48471) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 1)
LiSi-13Wan.tdb861.47LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.48475) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 1)
LiSi-13Wan.tdb453.57BCC_A2 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 6.000e-5) + LI22SI5 (x(Si) 0.18519)
LiSi-13Wan.tdb453.57BCC_A2 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 6.000e-5) + LI22SI5 (x(Si) 0.18519)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb984.29LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.24162) + LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb984.29LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.24141) + LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb984.29LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.24173) + LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb909.44LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3) + LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.40247)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb909.44LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3) + LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.40233)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb902.17LIQUID (x(Si) 0.14579) + LI33SI8 (x(Si) 0.19512) + LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb902.17LIQUID (x(Si) 0.14589) + LI33SI8 (x(Si) 0.19512) + LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb889.83LIQUID (x(Si) 0.13392) + LI21SI5 (x(Si) 0.19231) + LI33SI8 (x(Si) 0.19512)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb889.82LIQUID (x(Si) 0.13364) + LI21SI5 (x(Si) 0.19231) + LI33SI8 (x(Si) 0.19512)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb857LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.45245) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 1)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb857LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.45254) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 1)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb760.91LIQUID (x(Si) 0.04281) + LI17SI4 (x(Si) 0.19048) + LI21SI5 (x(Si) 0.19231)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb760.91LIQUID (x(Si) 0.04253) + LI17SI4 (x(Si) 0.19048) + LI21SI5 (x(Si) 0.19231)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb753.82LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LISI (x(Si) 0.5) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 1)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb730.94LI17SI4 (x(Si) 0.19048) + LI21SI5 (x(Si) 0.19231) + LI33SI8 (x(Si) 0.19512)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb453.57BCC_A2 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 5.000e-5) + LI17SI4 (x(Si) 0.19048)
LiSi-14Bra.tdb453.57BCC_A2 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 5.000e-5) + LI17SI4 (x(Si) 0.19048)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb999.74LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.25759) + LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb999.74LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.25743) + LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb999.74LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.25767) + LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb911.04LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3) + LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.39511)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb911.04LI7SI3 (x(Si) 0.3) + LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.39483)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb893.07LIQUID (x(Si) 0.13089) + LI21SI5 (x(Si) 0.19589) + LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb893.07LIQUID (x(Si) 0.13103) + LI21SI5 (x(Si) 0.19589) + LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb865.1LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.44096) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 0.99992)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb865.1LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.44098) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 0.99992)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb803.64LIQUID (x(Si) 0.07484) + LI17SI4 (x(Si) 0.19048) + LI21SI5 (x(Si) 0.19589)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb803.64LIQUID (x(Si) 0.07495) + LI17SI4 (x(Si) 0.19048) + LI21SI5 (x(Si) 0.19589)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb803.64LIQUID (x(Si) 0.07473) + LI17SI4 (x(Si) 0.19048) + LI21SI5 (x(Si) 0.19589)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb773.43LI17SI4 (x(Si) 0.19048) + LI21SI5 (x(Si) 0.19589) + LI13SI4 (x(Si) 0.23529)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb757.19LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LISI (x(Si) 0.5) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 0.99999)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb757.19LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LISI (x(Si) 0.5) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 0.99999)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb757.19LI12SI7 (x(Si) 0.36842) + LISI (x(Si) 0.5) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 0.99999)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb453.55BCC_A2 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 8.000e-5) + LI17SI4 (x(Si) 0.19048)
LiSi-17Lia.tdb453.55BCC_A2 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 8.000e-5) + LI17SI4 (x(Si) 0.19048)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull LiSi-13Wan · CALPHAD hull LiSi-14Bra

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Li–Si system (69)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1033congruent melting: L ↔ Li2SiL: Li 0.666667, Si 0.333333; Li2Si: Li 0.666667, Si 0.333333experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Obinata 1965
Table 4, p. 4, row 41
report
1027congruent melting: L ↔ Li7Si3L: Li 0.7, Si 0.3; Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites C 1985
Table 4, p. 4, row 42
report
1026.6congruent melting: L -> Li7Si3L: Li 0.7, Si 0.3; Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3model[1] Liang 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 1
report
1025congruent melting: L ↔ Li2SiL: Li 0.666667, Si 0.333333; Li2Si: Li 0.666667, Si 0.333333experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Bo
Table 4, p. 4, row 40
report
1023.2congruent melting: L -> Li7Si3L: Li 0.7, Si 0.3; Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3model[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 2
report
1023.1congruent melting: L -> Li7Si3L: Li 0.7, Si 0.3; Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3model[1] Liang 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 3
report
1023congruent melting: L ↔ Li2SiL: Li 0.666667, Si 0.333333; Li2Si: Li 0.666667, Si 0.333333experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Pell 1959
Table 4, p. 4, row 39
report
1017congruent melting: L ↔ Li7Si3L: Li 0.7, Si 0.3; Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 43
report
1006congruent melting: L ↔ Li13Si4L: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294model[1] Liang 2017Table 4, p. 4, row 33
report
1005.1congruent melting: L ↔ Li13Si4L: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294model[1] Liang 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 31
report
1005eutectic: L = L13Si4 + L7Si3L: Si 0.243; L13Si4: Si 0.235294; L7Si3: Si 0.3model[2] Wang 2013Table 2, p. 6, row 4
report
1004.82L ↔ Li13Si4 + Li7Si3L: Si 0.243; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294; Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3model[1] Liang 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 36
report
999.7L ↔ Li13Si4 + Li7Si3L: Si 0.258; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294; Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3model[1] Liang 2017Table 4, p. 4, row 38
report
995congruent melting: L ↔ Li13Si4L: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites C 1985
Table 4, p. 4, row 30
report
993congruent melting: L ↔ Li4SiL: Li 0.8, Si 0.2; Li4Si: Li 0.8, Si 0.2experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Pell 1959
Table 4, p. 4, row 29
report
984.7congruent melting: L ↔ Li13Si4L: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294model[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 32
report
984.3L ↔ Li13Si4 + Li7Si3L: Si 0.242; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294; Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3model[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 37
report
982L ↔ Li13Si4 + Li7Si3L: Si 0.26; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294; Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites C 1985
Table 4, p. 4, row 35
report
976L + Li2Si ↔ Li21Si8experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Sharma 1976 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 34
report
957peritectic: L + L13Si4 = L22Si5L: Si 0.148; L13Si4: Si 0.235294; L22Si5: Si 0.185185model[2] Wang 2013Table 2, p. 6, row 2
report
956.6L + Li13Si4 ↔ Li22Si5L: Si 0.148; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294model[1] Liang 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 27
report
925peritectic: L + L7Si3 = L12Si7L: Si 0.425; L7Si3: Si 0.3; L12Si7: Si 0.368421model[2] Wang 2013Table 2, p. 6, row 6
report
924.6L + Li7Si3 -> Li12Si7L: Si 0.425; Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3; Li12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421model[1] Liang 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 9
report
923eutectic: L -> Li2Si + (Si)L: Si 0.39experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Obinata 1965
Table 4, p. 5, row 5
report
921L + Li7Si3 -> Li12Si7L: Si 0.39; Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3; Li12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites C 1985
Table 4, p. 5, row 7
report
913L + Li2Si ↔ Li4Siexperimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Obinata 1965
Table 4, p. 4, row 15
report
913L + Li7Si3 -> Li12Si7Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3; Li12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 8
report
911L + Li7Si3 -> Li12Si7L: Si 0.395; Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3; Li12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421model[1] Liang 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 11
report
909.4L + Li7Si3 -> Li12Si7L: Si 0.403; Li7Si3: Li 0.7, Si 0.3; Li12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421model[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 10
report
908eutectic: L -> Li2Si + (Si)experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Sharma 1976 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 6
report
908eutectic: L -> Li2Si + (Si)L: Si 0.394experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Bo
Table 4, p. 5, row 4
report
906L + Li2Si ↔ Li4Siexperimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Bo
Table 4, p. 4, row 14
report
902.2L + Li13Si4 ↔ Li4.13SiL: Si 0.146; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294model[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 22
report
901L + Li13Si4 ↔ Li22Si5L: Si 0.18; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites C 1985
Table 4, p. 4, row 16
report
901L + Li13Si4 ↔ Li4.11SiLi13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 19
report
900L + Li13Si4 ↔ Li4.11SiLi13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Thomas 2015 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 21
report
899L + Li13Si4 ↔ Li4.13SiLi13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 20
report
893.1L + Li13Si4 ↔ Li4.11SiL: Si 0.131; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294model[1] Liang 2017Table 4, p. 4, row 23
report
891L + Li13Si4 ↔ Li4.11SiLi13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 18
report
891L + Li15Si4 ↔ Li22Si5Li15Si4: Li 0.789474, Si 0.210526experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Sharma 1976 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 17
report
889.2L + Li4.13Si ↔ Li21Si5L: Si 0.133; Li21Si5: Li 0.804114, Si 0.195886model[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 28
report
880L + Li4.13Si ↔ Li21Si5 (?)Li21Si5 (?): Li 0.804114, Si 0.195886experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 26
report
865.1eutectic: L -> Li12Si7 + (Si)L: Si 0.441; Li12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421model[1] Liang 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 18
report
865eutectic: L -> Li12Si7 + (Si)L: Si 0.43; Li12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites C 1985
Table 4, p. 5, row 13
report
863eutectic: L -> Li12Si7 + (Si)Li12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Evers 1993 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 14
report
863eutectic: L -> LixSi + (Si)L: Si 0.42; LixSi: Li 0.5, Si 0.5experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Pell 1959
Table 4, p. 5, row 12
report
861.4eutectic: L -> Li12Si7 + (Si)L: Si 0.485; Li12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421model[1] Liang 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 16
report
861eutectic: L = L12Si7 + (Li)L: Si 0.485; L12Si7: Si 0.368421model[2] Wang 2013Table 2, p. 6, row 7
report
860eutectic: L -> Li12Si7 + (Si)Li12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 15
report
857eutectic: L -> Li12Si7 + (Si)L: Si 0.453; Li12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421model[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 17
report
804L + Li4.11Si ↔ Li17Si4Li17Si4: Li 0.809524, Si 0.190476experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Thomas 2015 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 6
report
803.6L + Li4.11Si ↔ Li17Si4L: Si 0.075; Li17Si4: Li 0.809524, Si 0.190476model[1] Liang 2017Table 4, p. 4, row 9
report
800L + Li4.11Si ↔ Li17Si4Li17Si4: Li 0.809524, Si 0.190476experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Thomas 2015 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 7
report
799L + Li4.11Si ↔ Li17Si4Li17Si4: Li 0.809524, Si 0.190476experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 5
report
783Li4.11Si ↔ Li17Si4+ Li13Si4Li17Si4: Li 0.809524, Si 0.190476; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 10
report
773.4Li4.11Si ↔ Li17Si4+ Li13Si4Li17Si4: Li 0.809524, Si 0.190476; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294model[1] Liang 2017Table 4, p. 4, row 13
report
768L + Li4.11Si ↔ Li17Si4Li17Si4: Li 0.809524, Si 0.190476experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 4
report
768Li4.11Si ↔ Li17Si4+ Li13Si4Li17Si4: Li 0.809524, Si 0.190476; Li13Si4: Li 0.764706, Si 0.235294experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 11
report
758Li12Si7 + (Si) -> LiSiLi12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421; LiSi: Li 0.5, Si 0.5experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Evers 1997
Table 4, p. 5, row 20
report
757.4L + Li21Si5 ↔ Li17Si4L: Si 0.041; Li21Si5: Li 0.804114, Si 0.195886; Li17Si4: Li 0.809524, Si 0.190476model[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 8
report
757.2Li12Si7 + (Si) -> LiSiLi12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421; LiSi: Li 0.5, Si 0.5model[1] Liang 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 23
report
757Li12Si7 + (Si) -> LiSiLi12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421; LiSi: Li 0.5, Si 0.5model[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 22
report
756Li12Si7 + (Si) -> LiSiLi12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421; LiSi: Li 0.5, Si 0.5experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Tang 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 21
report
743Li12Si7 + (Si) -> LiSiLi12Si7: Li 0.631579, Si 0.368421; LiSi: Li 0.5, Si 0.5experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Evers 1993 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 19
report
727.9Li21Si5 ↔ Li4.13Si + Li17Si4Li21Si5: Li 0.804114, Si 0.195886; Li17Si4: Li 0.809524, Si 0.190476model[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 12
report
453.6L ↔ (Li) + Li17Si4L: Si 8.000e-5; Li17Si4: Li 0.809524, Si 0.190476model[1] Liang 2017Table 4, p. 4, row 3
report
453.6L ↔ (Li) + Li17Si4L: Si 4.900e-5; Li17Si4: Li 0.809524, Si 0.190476model[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 2
report
453.6L ↔ (Li) + Li22Si5L: Si 5.600e-5model[1] Liang 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 1
report
453.6eutectic: L = (Li) + L22Si5L: Si 3.000e-4; L22Si5: Si 0.185185model[2] Wang 2013Table 2, p. 6, row 1
report

Other properties

Phase transition (8)

Phase transition, Li–Si system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition216.5 K216.5Li7Si3experimental[2] Wang 2013p. 3
report
The heat capacity measurements reveal a small phase transition of Li7Si3 at 216.5 K.
Phase transition922 K922congruent meltingmodel[1] Liang 2017p. 11
report
The Li-rich side of the present calculation labeled with all the invariant reaction temperatures is shown in Fig. 8b; superimposed as pink dash-dot lines are the metastable liquidus lines of Li15Si4, exhibiting the metastable congruent melting point at 922 K, and the metastable extension of the liquidus line of (Si).
Phase transition985 K985congruent transformationmodel[1] Liang 2017
cites Braga 2014 doi
p. 13
report
For the congruent melting point of Li13Si4 we assess 1006 K, as opposed to 985 K [5].
Phase transition1005 K1005congruent melting: L = L13Si4
L: Si 0.235294; L13Si4: Si 0.235294
model[2] Wang 2013Table 2, p. 6, row 3
report
Phase transition1005 K1005congruent transformationmodel[2] Wang 2013p. 6
report
The other more accurate value considered in our assessment is the congruent melting temperature for Li7Si3, calculated at 1027 K, and possibly that of Li13Si4 at 1005 K.
Phase transition1006 K1006congruent transformationmodel[1] Liang 2017p. 13
report
For the congruent melting point of Li13Si4 we assess 1006 K, as opposed to 985 K [5].
Phase transition1027 K1027congruent melting: L = L7Si3
L: Si 0.3; L7Si3: Si 0.3
model[2] Wang 2013Table 2, p. 6, row 5
report
Phase transition1027 K1027congruent transformationmodel[2] Wang 2013p. 6
report
The other more accurate value considered in our assessment is the congruent melting temperature for Li7Si3, calculated at 1027 K, and possibly that of Li13Si4 at 1005 K.

Mixing / partial (24)

Mixing / partial, Li–Si system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-8.4 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 11081liquid
alloy: Li 0.9393, Si 0.0607
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 2
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-13.4 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 11081liquid
alloy: Li 0.9051, Si 0.0949
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 3
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-18.5 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 11081liquid
alloy: Li 0.8711, Si 0.1289
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 4
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-3.4 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 11081liquid
alloy: Li 0.9753, Si 0.0247
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 1
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-22.8 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 11081liquid
alloy: Li 0.8438, Si 0.1562
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 5
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-21.1 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.8171, Si 0.1829
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 17
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-28.5 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.7283, Si 0.2717
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 11
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-29.4 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.5409, Si 0.4591
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 10
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-29.8 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.6548, Si 0.3452
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 24
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-26.7 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.756, Si 0.244
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 20
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-18 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.8413, Si 0.1587
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 12
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-25.6 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.7728, Si 0.2272
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 19
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-29 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.7029, Si 0.2971
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 22
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-29.7 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.6695, Si 0.3305
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 23
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-28.1 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.7281, Si 0.2719
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 21
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-18.6 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.8362, Si 0.1638
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 16
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-15.2 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.8613, Si 0.1387
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 15
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-12.1 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.8828, Si 0.1172
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 14
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-8.9 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.9038, Si 0.0962
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 13
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-24.1 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.79, Si 0.21
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 18
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-28.3 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51089liquid
alloy: Li 0.4998, Si 0.5002
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 9
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-31.9 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51092liquid
alloy: Li 0.6454, Si 0.3546
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 6
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-25.7 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51092liquid
alloy: Li 0.7968, Si 0.2032
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 7
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔHmix.
-15.2 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.51092liquid
alloy: Li 0.875, Si 0.125
experimental[3] Braga 2014Table 1, p. 4, row 8
report

Crystal structure (31)

Crystal structure, Li–Si system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a8.61 Å298.15Li12Si7
alloy: Si 0.368421
model[4] Long 2018
cites Okamoto 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice a8.6 Å298.15Li12Si7
alloy: Si 0.368421
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Nesper 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 10
report
Lattice a7.9488 Å ± 4.000e-4298.15Li13Si4
alloy: Si 0.235294
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice a7.99 Å298.15Li13Si4
alloy: Si 0.235294
model[4] Long 2018
cites Okamoto 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
Lattice a10.6322 Å ± 9.000e-4298.15Li15Si4
alloy: Si 0.210526
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
Lattice a18.7259 Å ± 1.000e-4298.15Li17Si4
alloy: Si 0.190476
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 1
report
Lattice a18.71 Å298.15Li21Si5
alloy: Si 0.192308
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Nesper 1987 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 3
report
Lattice a18.75 Å298.15Li22Si5
alloy: Si 0.185185
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Axel 1966 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 2
report
Lattice a18.751 Å298.15Li22Si5
alloy: Si 0.185185
model[4] Long 2018
cites Okamoto 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 3
report
Lattice a7.7 Å298.15Li2Si
alloy: Si 0.333333
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Axel 1965 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 9
report
Lattice a4.5246 Å ± 2.000e-4298.15Li4.11Si or Li16.42Si4experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
Lattice a7.99 Å298.15Li7Si2
alloy: Si 0.222222
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Sch 1965
Table 1, p. 2, row 7
report
Lattice a4.435 Å ± 0.001298.15Li7Si3
alloy: Si 0.3
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites H 1980
Table 1, p. 2, row 8
report
Lattice a4.435 Å298.15Li7Si3
alloy: Si 0.3
model[4] Long 2018
cites Okamoto 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
Lattice a9.3545 Å ± 5.000e-4298.15LiSi
alloy: Si 0.5
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Tang 2013 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 11
report
Lattice b19.738 Å298.15Li12Si7
alloy: Si 0.368421
model[4] Long 2018
cites Okamoto 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice b19.755 Å298.15Li12Si7
alloy: Si 0.368421
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Nesper 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 10
report
Lattice b15.1248 Å ± 8.000e-4298.15Li13Si4
alloy: Si 0.235294
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice b15.21 Å298.15Li13Si4
alloy: Si 0.235294
model[4] Long 2018
cites Okamoto 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
Lattice b4.41 Å298.15Li2Si
alloy: Si 0.333333
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Axel 1965 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 9
report
Lattice b21.944 Å ± 0.001298.15Li4.11Si or Li16.42Si4experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
Lattice b15.21 Å298.15Li7Si2
alloy: Si 0.222222
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Sch 1965
Table 1, p. 2, row 7
report
Lattice c14.341 Å298.15Li12Si7
alloy: Si 0.368421
model[4] Long 2018
cites Okamoto 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice c14.336 Å298.15Li12Si7
alloy: Si 0.368421
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Nesper 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 10
report
Lattice c4.4661 Å ± 2.000e-4298.15Li13Si4
alloy: Si 0.235294
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice c4.43 Å298.15Li13Si4
alloy: Si 0.235294
model[4] Long 2018
cites Okamoto 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
Lattice c6.56 Å298.15Li2Si
alloy: Si 0.333333
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Axel 1965 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 9
report
Lattice c13.2001 Å ± 6.000e-4298.15Li4.11Si or Li16.42Si4experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Zeilinger 2013 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
Lattice c4.43 Å298.15Li7Si2
alloy: Si 0.222222
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Sch 1965
Table 1, p. 2, row 7
report
Lattice c18.134 Å ± 0.003298.15Li7Si3
alloy: Si 0.3
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites H 1980
Table 1, p. 2, row 8
report
Lattice c5.7374 Å ± 5.000e-4298.15LiSi
alloy: Si 0.5
experimental[1] Liang 2017
cites Tang 2013 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 11
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Song-Mao Liang, Franziska Taubert, Artem Kozlov, Jürgen Seidel, Florian Mertens, Rainer Schmid-Fetzer, Thermodynamics of Li-Si and Li-Si-H phase diagrams applied to hydrogen absorption and Li-ion batteries, Intermetallics 81, 32-46 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2017.02.024
  2. Peisheng Wang, Artem Kozlov, Daniel Thomas, Florian Mertens, Rainer Schmid-Fetzer, Thermodynamic analysis of the Li–Si phase equilibria from 0 K to liquidus temperatures, Intermetallics 42, 137-145 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2013.06.003
  3. M. Helena Braga, Adam Dębski, Władysław Gąsior, Li–Si phase diagram: Enthalpy of mixing, thermodynamic stability, and coherent assessment, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 616, 581-593 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.06.212
  4. Zhaohui Long, Xiaorong Dai, Zhi Li, Fucheng Yin, Zhanpeng Jin, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic description of the Li–Si–Mn ternary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 768, 686-696 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.211