Mg–Pb system

108 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 75, model 8, DFT 25); 3 calculated phase diagram(s). 3 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (5) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental75
model8
DFT25
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction39
formation20
mixing / partial34
crystal structure15

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
MgPb-14Zha-ass.tdbF. Zhang, Y. Tang, B. Hu, S. Liu, Y. Du, Y. Zhang, J. Mining Metall. B, 50, 115-26(2014). doi:10.2298/JMMB130824017Z85fd9842fb3b047b174bb8ea0aa4180c55f330ea6ed8d382e68b70d35176eee5viewer · TDB · JSON
MgPb-14Zha-sub.tdbF. Zhang, Y. Tang, B. Hu, S. Liu, Y. Du, Y. Zhang, J. Mining Metall. B, 50, 115-26(2014). doi:10.2298/JMMB130824017Z715ddff6aaa4430b25aa0f8cdf6aaf3cedba16a959a325ee2296dd0115216f95viewer · TDB · JSON
MgPb-21Deb.tdbA. Debski, W. Gierlotka, S. Terlicka, W. Gasior, J. Alloys Compd., 861, 158396(2021). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158396c150e3ea46f0693a9b94b7525b2e9bc582d587422f87b8306031baa270a07340viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
MgPb-14Zha-ass.tdb736.95HCP_A3 (x(Pb) 0.07406) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.19307) + MG2PB_C1 (x(Pb) 0.33333)
MgPb-14Zha-ass.tdb519.12MG2PB_C1 (x(Pb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.82445) + FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0.94669)
MgPb-14Zha-sub.tdb732HCP_A3 (x(Pb) 0.0871) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.16514) + MG2PB_C1 (x(Pb) 0.33333)
MgPb-14Zha-sub.tdb732HCP_A3 (x(Pb) 0.08706) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.16507) + MG2PB_C1 (x(Pb) 0.33333)
MgPb-14Zha-sub.tdb517.29MG2PB_C1 (x(Pb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.80661) + FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0.94652)
MgPb-14Zha-sub.tdb517.29MG2PB_C1 (x(Pb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.807) + FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0.94662)
MgPb-21Deb.tdb734.48HCP_A3 (x(Pb) 0.08463) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.17679) + MG2PB_C1 (x(Pb) 0.33333)
MgPb-21Deb.tdb519.1MG2PB_C1 (x(Pb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.81728) + FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0.93764)
MgPb-21Deb.tdb519.1MG2PB_C1 (x(Pb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.81743) + FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0.93772)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull MgPb-14Zha-ass · CALPHAD hull MgPb-14Zha-sub

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Mg–Pb system (39)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
824.1congruent melting: Liquid=Mg2PbLiquid: Pb 0.3333; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333model[1] Zhang 2014Table 3, p. 6, row 6
report
823.4congruent melting: Liquid=Mg2PbLiquid: Pb 0.3333; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333model[1] Zhang 2014Table 3, p. 6, row 7
report
823.15congruent melting: Liquid=Mg2PbLiquid: Pb 0.3333; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Dobovisek 1965
Table 3, p. 6, row 3
report
823.15congruent melting: Liquid=Mg2PbLiquid: Pb 0.3333; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Kurnakow 1905
Table 3, p. 6, row 5
report
823.15congruent melting: Liquid=Mg2PbLiquid: Pb 0.3333; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Knappwost 1959
Table 3, p. 6, row 4
report
822.65congruent melting: Liquid=Mg2PbLiquid: Pb 0.3333; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Grethe 1959
Table 3, p. 6, row 1
report
822.15congruent melting: Liquid=Mg2PbLiquid: Pb 0.35; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.35experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Eldridge 1965
Table 3, p. 6, row 2
report
748.15eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Mg)Liquid: Pb 0.2; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Kurnakow 1905
Table 3, p. 6, row 13
report
748.15L = HCP_A3 (Mg)+ Mg2PbL: Pb 0.2; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Kurnakov 1933
Table 5, p. 7, row 7
report
739.35eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Mg)Liquid: Pb 0.191; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333; (Mg): Pb 0.0775experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Eldridge 1965
Table 3, p. 6, row 8
report
739.35L = HCP_A3 (Mg)+ Mg2PbL: Pb 0.191; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333; HCP_A3 (Mg): Pb 0.0775experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Eldridge 1967
Table 5, p. 7, row 2
report
739.15L = HCP_A3 (Mg)+ Mg2PbMg2Pb: Pb 0.333; HCP_A3 (Mg): Pb 0.0714experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Foote 1941
Table 5, p. 7, row 4
report
739.15eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Mg)Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333; (Mg): Pb 0.0714experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Foote 1941
Table 3, p. 6, row 10
report
739.15eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Mg)Liquid: Pb 0.191; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333; (Mg): Pb 0.091experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Vosskuhler 1939
Table 3, p. 6, row 12
report
739.15L = HCP_A3 (Mg)+ Mg2PbMg2Pb: Pb 0.333; HCP_A3 (Mg): Pb 0.078experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Dobovisek 1965
Table 5, p. 7, row 3
report
739.15L = HCP_A3 (Mg)+ Mg2PbL: Pb 0.191; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333; HCP_A3 (Mg): Pb 0.091experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Vosskuhler 1939
Table 5, p. 7, row 6
report
739.15eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Mg)Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333; (Mg): Pb 0.078experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Dobovisek 1965
Table 3, p. 6, row 9
report
739L = HCP_A3 (Mg)+ Mg2PbL: Pb 0.191; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333; HCP_A3 (Mg): Pb 0.075experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Nayeb-Hashemi 1985 doi
Table 5, p. 7, row 9
report
739L = HCP_A3 (Mg)+ Mg2PbL: Pb 0.175; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333; HCP_A3 (Mg): Pb 0.083model[2] Dębski 2021Table 5, p. 7, row 1
report
738.15L = HCP_A3 (Mg)+ Mg2PbL: Pb 0.191; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333; HCP_A3 (Mg): Pb 0.0975experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Raynor 1940
Table 5, p. 7, row 5
report
738.15eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Mg)Liquid: Pb 0.191; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333; (Mg): Pb 0.0975experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Raynor 1940
Table 3, p. 6, row 11
report
737.05eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Mg)Liquid: Pb 0.1929; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333; (Mg): Pb 0.0741model[1] Zhang 2014Table 3, p. 6, row 16
report
732.15L = HCP_A3 (Mg)+ Mg2PbL: Pb 0.192; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Grube 1905 doi
Table 5, p. 7, row 8
report
732.15eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Mg)Liquid: Pb 0.192; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Grube 1905
Table 3, p. 6, row 14
report
732eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Mg)Liquid: Pb 0.1651; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333; (Mg): Pb 0.0871model[1] Zhang 2014Table 3, p. 6, row 15
report
526.15eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Pb)Liquid: Pb 0.843; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333; (Pb): Pb 1experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Kurnakow 1905
Table 3, p. 6, row 20
report
526L = Mg2Pb + FCC_A1(Mg)L: Pb 0.84; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333; FCC_A1(Mg): Pb 1experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Kurnakov 1905
Table 5, p. 7, row 14
report
525.15eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Pb)Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333; (Pb): Pb 0.941experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Dobovisek 1965
Table 3, p. 6, row 19
report
525L = Mg2Pb + FCC_A1(Mg)Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333; FCC_A1(Mg): Pb 0.941experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Vosskuhler 1939
Table 5, p. 7, row 13
report
522L = Mg2Pb + FCC_A1(Mg)L: Pb 0.83; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333; FCC_A1(Mg): Pb 0.94experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Nayeb-Hashemi 1985 doi
Table 5, p. 7, row 16
report
521.85L = Mg2Pb + FCC_A1(Mg)L: Pb 0.83; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Raynor 1940
Table 5, p. 7, row 12
report
521.85eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Pb)Liquid: Pb 0.83; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Eldridge 1965
Table 3, p. 6, row 18
report
521.15L = Mg2Pb + FCC_A1(Mg)L: Pb 0.835; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333; FCC_A1(Mg): Pb 0.947experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Horsley 1957
Table 5, p. 7, row 11
report
521.15eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Pb)Liquid: Pb 0.835; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333; (Pb): Pb 0.947experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Graham 1971
Table 3, p. 6, row 17
report
521L = Mg2Pb + FCC_A1(Mg)L: Pb 0.82; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333; FCC_A1(Mg): Pb 0.94model[2] Dębski 2021Table 5, p. 7, row 10
report
520.22eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Pb)Liquid: Pb 0.8265; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333; (Pb): Pb 0.9463model[1] Zhang 2014Table 3, p. 6, row 23
report
520.15eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Pb)Liquid: Pb 0.7915; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333; (Pb): Pb 1experimental[1] Zhang 2014
cites Grube 1905
Table 3, p. 6, row 21
report
520L = Mg2Pb + FCC_A1(Mg)L: Pb 0.79; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.333; FCC_A1(Mg): Pb 1experimental[2] Dębski 2021
cites Grube 1905 doi
Table 5, p. 7, row 15
report
517.29eutectic: Liquid=Mg2Pb+(Pb)Liquid: Pb 0.807; Mg2Pb: Pb 0.3333; (Pb): Pb 0.9466model[1] Zhang 2014Table 3, p. 6, row 22
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Mg–Pb system (20)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Mg2Pb-11.6747 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites JARVIS
Table 3, p. 4, row 13
report
Mg2Pb-11.674 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites JARVIS
Table 3, p. 4, row 13
report
Mg2Pb-6.13647 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Automatic
Table 3, p. 4, row 15
report
Mg2Pb-6.136 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Automatic
Table 3, p. 4, row 15
report
Mg2Pb-6.07858 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites The
Table 3, p. 4, row 14
report
Mg2Pb-6.078 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites The
Table 3, p. 4, row 14
report
Mg2Pb-5.978 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Dębski 2021Table 3, p. 4, row 6
report
Mg2Pb-5.97244 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Dębski 2021Table 3, p. 4, row 6
report
Mg2PbMg2Pb-5.9 kJ/mol-atomexperimental-5.451 (mp-aaaaberc)-6.083 (oqmd-17637)[2] Dębski 2021
cites at 943 K
Table 3, p. 4, row 11
report
Mg2PbMg2Pb-5.89525 kJ/mol-atomexperimental-5.451 (mp-aaaaberc)-6.083 (oqmd-17637)[2] Dębski 2021
cites at 943 K
Table 3, p. 4, row 11
report
Mg2PbMg2Pb-5.855 kJ/mol-atomexperimental-5.451 (mp-aaaaberc)-6.083 (oqmd-17637)[2] Dębski 2021
cites Dobovisek 1965
Table 3, p. 4, row 9
report
Mg2PbMg2Pb-5.855 kJ/mol-atomexperimental-5.451 (mp-aaaaberc)-6.083 (oqmd-17637)[2] Dębski 2021
cites Seith 1937
Table 3, p. 4, row 7
report
Mg2PbMg2Pb-5.84701 kJ/mol-atomexperimental-5.451 (mp-aaaaberc)-6.083 (oqmd-17637)[2] Dębski 2021
cites Dobovisek 1965
Table 3, p. 4, row 9
report
Mg2PbMg2Pb-5.84701 kJ/mol-atomexperimental-5.451 (mp-aaaaberc)-6.083 (oqmd-17637)[2] Dębski 2021
cites Seith 1937
Table 3, p. 4, row 7
report
Mg2PbMg2Pb-5.533 kJ/mol-atomexperimental-5.451 (mp-aaaaberc)-6.083 (oqmd-17637)[2] Dębski 2021
cites Dobovisek 1965
Table 3, p. 4, row 10
report
Mg2PbMg2Pb-5.52861 kJ/mol-atomexperimental-5.451 (mp-aaaaberc)-6.083 (oqmd-17637)[2] Dębski 2021
cites Dobovisek 1965
Table 3, p. 4, row 10
report
Mg2PbMg2Pb-5.5 kJ/mol-atomexperimental-5.451 (mp-aaaaberc)-6.083 (oqmd-17637)[2] Dębski 2021
cites Grethe 1959
Table 3, p. 4, row 8
report
Mg2PbMg2Pb-5.49966 kJ/mol-atomexperimental-5.451 (mp-aaaaberc)-6.083 (oqmd-17637)[2] Dębski 2021
cites Grethe 1959
Table 3, p. 4, row 8
report
Mg2Pb-4.24535 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Materials
Table 3, p. 4, row 12
report
Mg2Pb-4.245 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Materials
Table 3, p. 4, row 12
report

Other properties

Mixing / partial (34)

Mixing / partial, Mg–Pb system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-4.267 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.1081012liquid
alloy: Mg 0.25, Pb 0.75
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 10
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-2.331 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.0571012liquid
alloy: Mg 0.139, Pb 0.861
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 9
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-7.9 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.1941012liquid
alloy: Mg 0.5, Pb 0.5
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 3
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-8.849 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.2011012liquid
alloy: Mg 0.6117, Pb 0.3883
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 1
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-7.824 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.3861012liquid
alloy: Mg 0.75, Pb 0.25
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-4.739 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.1281014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.289, Pb 0.711
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-8.776 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.1481014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.5497, Pb 0.4503
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 15
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-2.877 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.0351014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.1765, Pb 0.8235
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 11
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-6.941 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.0911014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.4066, Pb 0.5934
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 13
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-7.847 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.2741014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.5, Pb 0.5
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-5.012 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.0661014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.3047, Pb 0.6953
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 12
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-2.789 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.0661014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.1666, Pb 0.8334
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-8.991 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.1791014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.5983, Pb 0.4017
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 16
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-7.282 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.2261014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.4479, Pb 0.5521
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 7
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-9.067 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.211014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.6402, Pb 0.3598
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 17
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-6.286 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.1761014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.3782, Pb 0.6218
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: ΔmixH
-8.227 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.1181014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.4889, Pb 0.5111
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 14
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-17.354 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1012liquid
alloy: Mg 0.25, Pb 0.75
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 10
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-16.764 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1012liquid
alloy: Mg 0.139, Pb 0.861
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 9
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-15.8 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1012liquid
alloy: Mg 0.5, Pb 0.5
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 3
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-14.465 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1012liquid
alloy: Mg 0.6117, Pb 0.3883
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 1
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-5.97 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1012liquid
alloy: Mg 0.75, Pb 0.25
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-16.06 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.289, Pb 0.711
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-12.845 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.5497, Pb 0.4503
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 15
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-16.299 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.1765, Pb 0.8235
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 11
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-18.18 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.4066, Pb 0.5934
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 13
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-13.273 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.5, Pb 0.5
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-16.59 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.3047, Pb 0.6953
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 12
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-16.74 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.1666, Pb 0.8334
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-10.765 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.5983, Pb 0.4017
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 16
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-15.168 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.4479, Pb 0.5521
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 7
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-9.718 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.6402, Pb 0.3598
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 17
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-17.077 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.3782, Pb 0.6218
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
Partial enthalpy
printed: Δ¯HMg
-16.212 kJ/mol (basis unstated)1014liquid
alloy: Mg 0.4889, Pb 0.5111
experimental[2] Dębski 2021Table 2, p. 4, row 14
report

Crystal structure (15)

Crystal structure, Mg–Pb system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a
printed: Lattice constant a
3.209 unknown0HCP_A3 (Mg)
alloy: Pb 0
DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Straumanis 1949 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 4
report
Lattice a
printed: Lattice constant a
3.203 unknown0HCP_A3 (Mg)
alloy: Pb 0
DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Wyckoff 1963
Table 3, p. 4, row 5
report
Lattice a
printed: Lattice constant a
3.206 unknown0HCP_A3 (Mg)
alloy: Pb 0
DFT[2] Dębski 2021Table 3, p. 4, row 1
report
Lattice a
printed: Lattice constant a
3.203 unknown0HCP_A3 (Mg)
alloy: Pb 0
DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Materials
Table 3, p. 4, row 2
report
Lattice a
printed: Lattice constant a
3.234 unknown0HCP_A3 (Mg)
alloy: Pb 0
DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Schimmel 2005 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 3
report
Lattice a
printed: Lattice constant a
4.833 unknown0Mg2Pb
alloy: Pb 0.333333
DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Wyckoff 1963
Table 3, p. 4, row 16
report
Lattice a
printed: Lattice constant a
4.891 Å0Mg2Pb
alloy: Pb 0.333333
DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Materials
Table 3, p. 4, row 12
report
Lattice a
printed: Lattice constant a
4.818 unknown0Mg2Pb
alloy: Pb 0.333333
DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Fassler 1999
Table 3, p. 4, row 17
report
Lattice a
printed: Lattice constant a
4.881 unknown0Mg2Pb
alloy: Pb 0.333333
DFT[2] Dębski 2021Table 3, p. 4, row 6
report
Lattice a
printed: Lattice constant a
4.851 Å0Mg2Pb
alloy: Pb 0.333333
DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites JARVIS
Table 3, p. 4, row 13
report
Lattice c
printed: Lattice constant c
5.21 unknown0HCP_A3 (Mg)
alloy: Pb 0
DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Straumanis 1949 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 4
report
Lattice c
printed: Lattice constant c
5.201 unknown0HCP_A3 (Mg)
alloy: Pb 0
DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Wyckoff 1963
Table 3, p. 4, row 5
report
Lattice c
printed: Lattice constant c
5.133 unknown0HCP_A3 (Mg)
alloy: Pb 0
DFT[2] Dębski 2021Table 3, p. 4, row 1
report
Lattice c
printed: Lattice constant c
5.127 unknown0HCP_A3 (Mg)
alloy: Pb 0
DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Materials
Table 3, p. 4, row 2
report
Lattice c
printed: Lattice constant c
5.252 unknown0HCP_A3 (Mg)
alloy: Pb 0
DFT[2] Dębski 2021
cites Schimmel 2005 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 3
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. F. Zhang, Y. Tang, B. Hu, S. Liu, Y. Du, Y. Zhang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Mg-Pb and Mg-Bi systems using substitutional solution and associate models for the liquid phase, J min metall B Metall 50, 115-126 (2014). doi:10.2298/jmmb130824017z
  2. A. Dębski, W. Gierlotka, S. Terlicka, W. Gąsior, On the Mg-Pb system. Calorimetric studies and thermodynamic calculations, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 861, 158396 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158396