Mo–Ta system

25 accepted literature values from 3 paper(s) (experimental 20, DFT 2, unspecified 3); 6 calculated phase diagram(s). 4 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (5) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental20
DFT2
unspecified3
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
phase transition9
phase equilibrium11
formation3
crystal structure1
other property1

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
MoTa-04Xio.tdbW. Xiong, Y. Du, Y. Liu, B.Y. Huang, H.H. Xu, H.L. Chen, Z. Pan, Calphad, 28, 133-40(2004). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2004.07.00292183b395962707869cce8b0f5f0f52504e7ad2d3f30d4fda987dad7a563dfa5viewer · TDB · JSON
MoTa-05Tur.tdbP.E.A. Turchi, V. Drchal, J. Kudrnovsky, C. Colinet, L. Kaufman, Z.-K. Liu, Phys. Rev. B, 71, 094206(2005). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.71.09420688917f2b0afc92ac8a6a29890a28df22294c2a19f62c51bcdbd0f4d4f6986a4dviewer · TDB · JSON
MoTa-20Raj.tdbV.B. Rajkumar, Y. Du, S. Liu, K. Cheng, A.K. Srivastav, Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater., 93, 105335(2020). doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2020.105335cfa37cba21b8d3dfb2b6d542e02f6a74a8ee75aa0c9b06a8461e27a96c423fd0viewer · TDB · JSON
MoTa-22Zha.tdbE. Zhang, Y. Tang, M. Wen, A. Obaied, I. Roslyakova, L. Zhang, Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater., 103, 105780(2022). doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2022.105780a89e2ac4995bb46b2d14ffdec0a3b085451c33cf2b489d463e8c4c2f19782838viewer · TDB · JSON
MoTa-91Kau-LB.tdbL. Kaufman, Calphad, 15, 243-59(1991). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(91)90004-47885146f2baf656fcce5145b1929f9a2bc1ae7afb70b5a5a2ec48f4d84551d8cviewer · TDB · JSON
MoTa-99Cui.tdbY.W. Cui, X.G. Lu, Z.P. Jin, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 30, 2735(1999). doi:10.1007/s11661-999-0110-01ea55690b63df718cb983c3436b519a63ebbe2ed1352444dce0c9633ccd20c66viewer · TDB · JSON

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull MoTa-04Xio · CALPHAD hull MoTa-05Tur · CALPHAD hull MoTa-20Raj · CALPHAD hull MoTa-91Kau-LB · CALPHAD hull MoTa-99Cui

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Mo–Ta system (3)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Mo3Ta36.6 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Zhou 2009Table 6, p. 7, row 36
report
Ordered B2 TaMo-26.5 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0unspecified[2] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 12
report
Ta3Mo32.08 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Zhou 2009Table 6, p. 7, row 35
report

Other properties

Phase transition (9)

Phase transition, Mo–Ta system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition3022 K3022other: No. 3, Mo-20 at.% Ta
alloy: Mo 0.8, Ta 0.2
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 5
report
Phase transition3027 K3027other: No. 2, Mo-10 at.% Ta
alloy: Mo 0.9, Ta 0.1
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 3
report
Phase transition3086 K3086other: No. 5, Mo-40 at.% Ta
alloy: Mo 0.6, Ta 0.4
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 9
report
Phase transition3119 K3119other: No. 6, Mo-50 at.% Ta
alloy: Mo 0.5, Ta 0.5
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 11
report
Phase transition3142 K3142other: No. 4, Mo-30 at.% Ta
alloy: Mo 0.7, Ta 0.3
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 7
report
Phase transition3172 K3172other: No. 7, Mo-60 at.% Ta
alloy: Mo 0.4, Ta 0.6
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 13
report
Phase transition3221 K3221other: No. 8, Mo-70 at.% Ta
alloy: Mo 0.3, Ta 0.7
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 15
report
Phase transition3281 K3281other: No. 9, Mo-80 at.% Ta
alloy: Mo 0.2, Ta 0.8
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 17
report
Phase transition3317 K3317other: No. 10, Mo-90 at.% Ta
alloy: Mo 0.1, Ta 0.9
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 19
report

Phase equilibrium (11)

Phase equilibrium, Mo–Ta system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase composition2865other: No. 1, Mo-0 at.% Ta
liquid: Mo 1, Ta 0
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 1
report
Phase composition3047other: No. 2, Mo-10 at.% Ta
liquid: Mo 0.9, Ta 0.1
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 2
report
Phase composition3056other: No. 3, Mo-20 at.% Ta
liquid: Mo 0.8, Ta 0.2
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 4
report
Phase composition3092other: No. 5, Mo-40 at.% Ta
liquid: Mo 0.6, Ta 0.4
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 8
report
Phase composition3138other: No. 6, Mo-50 at.% Ta
liquid: Mo 0.5, Ta 0.5
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 10
report
Phase composition3155other: No. 4, Mo-30 at.% Ta
liquid: Mo 0.7, Ta 0.3
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 6
report
Phase composition3185other: No. 7, Mo-60 at.% Ta
liquid: Mo 0.4, Ta 0.6
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 12
report
Phase composition3235other: No. 8, Mo-70 at.% Ta
liquid: Mo 0.3, Ta 0.7
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 14
report
Phase composition3272other: No. 11, Mo-100 at.% Ta
liquid: Mo 0, Ta 1
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 20
report
Phase composition3298other: No. 9, Mo-80 at.% Ta
liquid: Mo 0.2, Ta 0.8
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 16
report
Phase composition3337other: No. 10, Mo-90 at.% Ta
liquid: Mo 0.1, Ta 0.9
experimental[3] Rajkumar 2020Table 2, p. 5, row 18
report

Crystal structure (1)

Crystal structure, Mo–Ta system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
lattice unspecified axis
printed: Lattice constant
3.2139 ÅOrdered B2 TaMo
alloy: Ta 0.5
unspecified[2] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 12
report

Other property (1)

Other property, Mo–Ta system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
bulk modulus
printed: Bulk modulus
226.7 GPaOrdered B2 TaMo
alloy: Ta 0.5
unspecified[2] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 12
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. S.H. Zhou, Y. Wang, L.-Q. Chen, Z.-K. Liu, R.E. Napolitano, Solution-based thermodynamic modeling of the Ni–Ta and Ni–Mo–Ta systems using first-principle calculations, Calphad 33, 631-641 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2009.06.006
  2. P. E. A. Turchi, V. Drchal, J. Kudrnovský, C. Colinet, Larry Kaufman, Zi-Kui Liu, Application of<i>ab initio</i>and CALPHAD thermodynamics to Mo-Ta-W alloys, Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005). doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.094206
  3. V.B. Rajkumar, Yong Du, Shuhong Liu, Kaiming Cheng, Ajeet Kumar Srivastav, Measurements of the melting points, liquidus, and solidus of the Mo, Ta, and Mo Ta binary alloys using a novel high-speed pyrometric technique, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials 93, 105335 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2020.105335