Nb–Ni–Ti system

30 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (model 30); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 25 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
model30
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction30

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Nb–Ni–Ti system (30)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1745.15quasi-peritectic: L + NbNi3 -> χ1 + χ4L: Ni 0.839, Ti 0.081; NbNi3: Nb 0.196, Ni 0.75, Ti 0.054; χ1: Nb 0.13, Ni 0.75, Ti 0.12; χ4: Nb 0.15, Ni 0.8model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 1
report
1705.15quasi-peritectic: L + Ni3Ti -> χ1 + χ2L: Nb 0.013, Ni 0.748, Ti 0.239; Ni3Ti: Nb 0.023, Ni 0.756, Ti 0.222; χ1: Nb 0.13, Ni 0.75, Ti 0.12; χ2: Ni 0.75, Ti 0.2model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 2
report
1679.15quasi-peritectic: L + NbNi3 -> χ1 + χ3L: Nb 0.095, Ni 0.607, Ti 0.297; NbNi3: Nb 0.198, Ni 0.749, Ti 0.053; χ1: Nb 0.13, Ni 0.75, Ti 0.12; χ3: Nb 0.15, Ni 0.56, Ti 0.29model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 3
report
1595.15quasi-peritectic: L + χ4 -> (γ-Ni) + χ1L: Nb 0.016, Ni 0.859, Ti 0.125; χ4: Nb 0.15, Ni 0.8; (γ-Ni): Nb 0.085, Ni 0.629, Ti 0.286; χ1: Nb 0.13, Ni 0.75, Ti 0.12model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 4
report
1589.15eutectic: L -> (γ-Ni) + Ni3Ti + χ1L: Nb 0.012, Ni 0.852, Ti 0.136; (γ-Ni): Nb 0.066, Ni 0.613, Ti 0.321; Ni3Ti: Nb 0.022, Ni 0.779, Ti 0.199; χ1: Nb 0.13, Ni 0.75, Ti 0.12model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 5
report
1587.15quasi-peritectic: L + χ4 -> NbNi3 + (γ-Ni)L: Nb 0.125, Ni 0.875; χ4: Nb 0.15, Ni 0.8; NbNi3: Nb 0.216, Ni 0.752, Ti 0.032; (γ-Ni): Nb 0.15, Ni 0.56, Ti 0.29model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 6
report
1583.25quasi-peritectic: L+Nb15Ni80Ti5 -> NbNi3+Nb13Ni75Ti12L: Ni 0.71, Ti 0.072model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 13
report
1567.85other: Ni3Ti+Nb13Ni75Ti12 -> L+Nb5Ni75Ti20L: Ni 0.7306, Ti 0.2156model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 15
report
1553.65eutectic: L -> γ+NbNi3+Nb15Ni80Ti5L: Ni 0.8514, Ti 0.0018model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 6
report
1524.15quasi-peritectic: L + χ3 -> χ1 + NiTiL: Nb 0.018, Ni 0.585, Ti 0.396; χ3: Nb 0.15, Ni 0.56, Ti 0.29; χ1: Nb 0.13, Ni 0.75, Ti 0.12; NiTi: Ni 0.539, Ti 0.432model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 7
report
1514.85quasi-peritectic: L+Nb15Ni80Ti5 -> γ+Nb13Ni75Ti12L: Ni 0.8223, Ti 0.1417model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 14
report
1514.65eutectic: L -> γ+Ni3Ti+Nb13Ni75Ti12L: Ni 0.8217, Ti 0.1427model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 5
report
1495.15quasi-peritectic: L + χ1 -> χ2 + NiTiL: Nb 0.009, Ni 0.597, Ti 0.394; χ1: Nb 0.13, Ni 0.75, Ti 0.12; χ2: Ni 0.75, Ti 0.2; NiTi: Nb 0.022, Ni 0.545, Ti 0.432model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 8
report
1457.15quasi-peritectic: L + χ2 -> NiTi + Ni3TiL: Nb 0.002, Ni 0.604, Ti 0.394; χ2: Ni 0.75, Ti 0.2; NiTi: Nb 0.008, Ni 0.544, Ti 0.449; Ni3Ti: Nb 0.028, Ni 0.749, Ti 0.223model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 9
report
1422.15eutectic: L -> χ5 + Nb7Ni6 + (β-Nb,Ti)L: Nb 0.44, Ni 0.442, Ti 0.118; χ5: Nb 0.4, Ni 0.45, Ti 0.15; Nb7Ni6: Nb 0.558, Ni 0.442; (β-Nb,Ti): Nb 0.884, Ni 0.062, Ti 0.054model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 10
report
1413.15quasi-peritectic: L + χ3 -> NbNi3 + χ5L: Nb 0.396, Ni 0.497, Ti 0.106; χ3: Nb 0.15, Ni 0.56, Ti 0.29; NbNi3: Nb 0.251, Ni 0.707, Ti 0.042; χ5: Nb 0.4, Ni 0.45, Ti 0.15model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 11
report
1412.15eutectic: L -> NbNi3 + χ5 + Nb7Ni6L: Nb 0.401, Ni 0.497, Ti 0.102; NbNi3: Nb 0.252, Ni 0.706, Ti 0.042; χ5: Nb 0.4, Ni 0.45, Ti 0.15; Nb7Ni6: Nb 0.535, Ni 0.465model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 12
report
1407.45quasi-peritectic: L+α -> Nb6Ni7+Nb8Ni9Ti3L: Ni 0.4923, Ti 0.0979model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 9
report
1407.15eutectic: L -> χ5 + (β-Nb,Ti) + χ3L: Nb 0.364, Ni 0.403, Ti 0.233; χ5: Nb 0.4, Ni 0.45, Ti 0.15; (β-Nb,Ti): Nb 0.798, Ni 0.068, Ti 0.134; χ3: Nb 0.15, Ni 0.56, Ti 0.29model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 13
report
1367.15quasi-peritectic: L + χ3 -> (β-Nb,Ti) + NiTiL: Nb 0.25, Ni 0.362, Ti 0.387; χ3: Nb 0.15, Ni 0.56, Ti 0.29; (β-Nb,Ti): Nb 0.688, Ni 0.066, Ti 0.246; NiTi: Nb 0.085, Ni 0.496, Ti 0.419model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 14
report
1365.65quasi-peritectic: L+Nb13Ni75Ti12 -> Nb15Ni56Ti29+Nb5Ni75Ti20L: Ni 0.617, Ti 0.311model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 12
report
1349.45quasi-peritectic: L+Ni3Ti -> NiTi+Nb5Ni75Ti20L: Ni 0.6136, Ti 0.3531model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 11
report
1336.85eutectic: L -> NiTi+Nb15Ni56Ti29+Nb5Ni75Ti20L: Ni 0.6078, Ti 0.3438model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 2
report
1317.55quasi-peritectic: L+Nb6Ni7 -> NbNi3+Nb8Ni9Ti3L: Ni 0.5654, Ti 0.0888model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 10
report
1300.35eutectic: L -> NbNi3+Nb8Ni9Ti3+Nb13Ni75Ti12L: Ni 0.5785, Ti 0.1277model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 4
report
1298.45eutectic: L -> Nb15Ni56Ti29+Nb8Ni9Ti3+Nb13Ni75Ti12L: Ni 0.574, Ti 0.1563model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 3
report
1213.15eutectic: L -> (β-Nb,Ti) + NiTi + NiTi2L: Nb 0.045, Ni 0.295, Ti 0.659; (β-Nb,Ti): Nb 0.325, Ni 0.038, Ti 0.636; NiTi: Nb 0.048, Ni 0.486, Ti 0.466; NiTi2: Ni 0.333, Ti 0.667model[1] Santhy 2015Table 10, p. 11, row 15
report
1205.05quasi-peritectic: L+Nb15Ni56Ti29 -> NiTi+Nb8Ni9Ti3L: Ni 0.3962, Ti 0.423model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 8
report
1187.25quasi-peritectic: L+Nb8Ni9Ti3 -> α+NiTiL: Ni 0.3802, Ti 0.4434model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 7
report
1174.75eutectic: L -> α+NiTi+NiTi2L: Ni 0.3425, Ti 0.5505model[2] Matsumoto 2005Table 4, p. 10, row 1
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. K. Santhy, K.C. Hari Kumar, Thermodynamic reassessment of Nb-Ni-Ti system with order–disorder model, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 619, 733-747 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.200
  2. Satoshi Matsumoto, Tatsuya Tokunaga, Hiroshi Ohtani, Mitsuhiro Hasebe, Thermodynamic Analysis of the Phase Equilibria of the Nb–Ni–Ti System, Mater. Trans. 46, 2920-2930 (2005). doi:10.2320/matertrans.46.2920