Nb–Si–W system

21 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 12, model 9); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental12
model9
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction5
phase equilibrium16

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Nb–Si–W system (5)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2567.87other: L->β(Nb,W)5Si3+Bccmodel[1] Li 2013Table 6, p. 8, row 2
report
2222.25quasi-peritectic: L+β(Nb,W)5Si3->Nb(W)3Si+Bccmodel[1] Li 2013Table 6, p. 8, row 5
report
2071.25other: L->Nb(W)Si2+W(Nb)Si2model[1] Li 2013Table 6, p. 8, row 1
report
2026.38eutectic: L->β(Nb,W)5Si3+Nb(W)Si2+W(Nb)Si2model[1] Li 2013Table 6, p. 8, row 3
report
1664.57eutectic: L->W(Nb)Si2+Nb(W)Si2+Diamond–Simodel[1] Li 2013Table 6, p. 8, row 4
report

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (16)

Phase equilibrium, Nb–Si–W system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase assemblageNb(W)3Si + Bcc
alloy: Si 0, W 0
model[1] Li 2013Table 7, p. 8, row 17
report
Phase assemblageNb(W)Si2 + W(Nb)Si2 + Diamond–Si
alloy: Si 0, W 0
model[1] Li 2013Table 7, p. 8, row 14
report
Phase assemblageβ(Nb,W)5Si3 + Nb(W)Si2
alloy: Si 0, W 0
model[1] Li 2013Table 7, p. 8, row 13
report
Phase assemblageβ(Nb,W)5Si3 + Nb(W)Si2 + W(Nb)Si2
alloy: Si 0, W 0
model[1] Li 2013Table 7, p. 8, row 12
report
Phase compositionNb(W)Si2 + Liquid
Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.2319, Si 0.6678, W 0.1003
experimental[1] Li 2013
cites Li doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 4
report
Phase compositionNb(W)Si2 + W(Nb)Si2 + Liquid
Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.2018, Si 0.6652, W 0.133; W(Nb)Si2: Nb 0.0614, Si 0.6666, W 0.272
experimental[1] Li 2013
cites Li doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 7
report
Phase compositionNb(W)Si2 + W(Nb)Si2 + Liquid
Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.1995, Si 0.6662, W 0.1343; W(Nb)Si2: Nb 0.0622, Si 0.666, W 0.2718
experimental[1] Li 2013
cites Li doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 6
report
Phase compositionNb(W)Si2 + W(Nb)Si2 + β(Nb,W)5Si3
Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.2023, Si 0.6678, W 0.1299; W(Nb)Si2: Nb 0.0603, Si 0.6675, W 0.2721; β(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.1616, Si 0.3759, W 0.4625
experimental[1] Li 2013
cites Li doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 5
report
Phase compositionNb(W)Si2 + β(Nb,W)5Si3
Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.3239, Si 0.6679, W 0.0082; β(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.4667, Si 0.3866, W 0.1467
experimental[1] Li 2013
cites Li doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 1
report
Phase compositionNb(W)Si2 + β(Nb,W)5Si3
Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.2928, Si 0.6569, W 0.0503; β(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.3266, Si 0.3822, W 0.2912
experimental[1] Li 2013
cites Li doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 2
report
Phase compositionNb(W)Si2 + β(Nb,W)5Si3
Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.2931, Si 0.6682, W 0.0387; β(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.3497, Si 0.3864, W 0.2639
experimental[1] Li 2013
cites Li doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 3
report
Phase composition1973α(Nb,W)5Si3 + Bcc
α(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.606, Si 0.38, W 0.014; Bcc: Nb 0.743, Si 0.017, W 0.24
experimental[1] Li 2013
cites Ma 2002 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 10
report
Phase composition1973α(Nb,W)5Si3 + Bcc
α(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.608, Si 0.38, W 0.012; Bcc: Nb 0.895, Si 0.015, W 0.09
experimental[1] Li 2013
cites Ma 2002 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 8
report
Phase composition1973α(Nb,W)5Si3 + Bcc
α(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.6, Si 0.385, W 0.015; Bcc: Nb 0.55, Si 0.02, W 0.43
experimental[1] Li 2013
cites Ma 2002 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 11
report
Phase composition1973α(Nb,W)5Si3 + Bcc
α(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.606, Si 0.38, W 0.014; Bcc: Nb 0.824, Si 0.016, W 0.16
experimental[1] Li 2013
cites Ma 2002 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 9
report
Phase composition1973β(Nb,W)5Si3 + Bcc
β(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.5, Si 0.38, W 0.12; Bcc: Nb 0.32, Si 0.03, W 0.65
experimental[1] Li 2013
cites Ma 2002 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 12
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Yan Li, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Cuiping Guo, Thermodynamic optimization of the Nb–Si–W ternary system, Calphad 43, 112-123 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.04.004