Nb–Si–W system
21 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 12, model 9); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 12 |
| model | 9 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 5 |
| phase equilibrium | 16 |
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2567.87 | other: L->β(Nb,W)5Si3+Bcc | model | [1] Li 2013 | Table 6, p. 8, row 2 report | ||
| 2222.25 | quasi-peritectic: L+β(Nb,W)5Si3->Nb(W)3Si+Bcc | model | [1] Li 2013 | Table 6, p. 8, row 5 report | ||
| 2071.25 | other: L->Nb(W)Si2+W(Nb)Si2 | model | [1] Li 2013 | Table 6, p. 8, row 1 report | ||
| 2026.38 | eutectic: L->β(Nb,W)5Si3+Nb(W)Si2+W(Nb)Si2 | model | [1] Li 2013 | Table 6, p. 8, row 3 report | ||
| 1664.57 | eutectic: L->W(Nb)Si2+Nb(W)Si2+Diamond–Si | model | [1] Li 2013 | Table 6, p. 8, row 4 report |
Other properties
Phase equilibrium (16)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase assemblage | Nb(W)3Si + Bcc alloy: Si 0, W 0 | model | [1] Li 2013 | Table 7, p. 8, row 17 report | |||
| Phase assemblage | Nb(W)Si2 + W(Nb)Si2 + Diamond–Si alloy: Si 0, W 0 | model | [1] Li 2013 | Table 7, p. 8, row 14 report | |||
| Phase assemblage | β(Nb,W)5Si3 + Nb(W)Si2 alloy: Si 0, W 0 | model | [1] Li 2013 | Table 7, p. 8, row 13 report | |||
| Phase assemblage | β(Nb,W)5Si3 + Nb(W)Si2 + W(Nb)Si2 alloy: Si 0, W 0 | model | [1] Li 2013 | Table 7, p. 8, row 12 report | |||
| Phase composition | Nb(W)Si2 + Liquid Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.2319, Si 0.6678, W 0.1003 | experimental | [1] Li 2013 cites Li doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 4 report | |||
| Phase composition | Nb(W)Si2 + W(Nb)Si2 + Liquid Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.2018, Si 0.6652, W 0.133; W(Nb)Si2: Nb 0.0614, Si 0.6666, W 0.272 | experimental | [1] Li 2013 cites Li doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 7 report | |||
| Phase composition | Nb(W)Si2 + W(Nb)Si2 + Liquid Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.1995, Si 0.6662, W 0.1343; W(Nb)Si2: Nb 0.0622, Si 0.666, W 0.2718 | experimental | [1] Li 2013 cites Li doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 6 report | |||
| Phase composition | Nb(W)Si2 + W(Nb)Si2 + β(Nb,W)5Si3 Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.2023, Si 0.6678, W 0.1299; W(Nb)Si2: Nb 0.0603, Si 0.6675, W 0.2721; β(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.1616, Si 0.3759, W 0.4625 | experimental | [1] Li 2013 cites Li doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 5 report | |||
| Phase composition | Nb(W)Si2 + β(Nb,W)5Si3 Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.3239, Si 0.6679, W 0.0082; β(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.4667, Si 0.3866, W 0.1467 | experimental | [1] Li 2013 cites Li doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 1 report | |||
| Phase composition | Nb(W)Si2 + β(Nb,W)5Si3 Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.2928, Si 0.6569, W 0.0503; β(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.3266, Si 0.3822, W 0.2912 | experimental | [1] Li 2013 cites Li doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 2 report | |||
| Phase composition | Nb(W)Si2 + β(Nb,W)5Si3 Nb(W)Si2: Nb 0.2931, Si 0.6682, W 0.0387; β(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.3497, Si 0.3864, W 0.2639 | experimental | [1] Li 2013 cites Li doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 3 report | |||
| Phase composition | 1973 | α(Nb,W)5Si3 + Bcc α(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.606, Si 0.38, W 0.014; Bcc: Nb 0.743, Si 0.017, W 0.24 | experimental | [1] Li 2013 cites Ma 2002 doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 10 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1973 | α(Nb,W)5Si3 + Bcc α(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.608, Si 0.38, W 0.012; Bcc: Nb 0.895, Si 0.015, W 0.09 | experimental | [1] Li 2013 cites Ma 2002 doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 8 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1973 | α(Nb,W)5Si3 + Bcc α(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.6, Si 0.385, W 0.015; Bcc: Nb 0.55, Si 0.02, W 0.43 | experimental | [1] Li 2013 cites Ma 2002 doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 11 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1973 | α(Nb,W)5Si3 + Bcc α(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.606, Si 0.38, W 0.014; Bcc: Nb 0.824, Si 0.016, W 0.16 | experimental | [1] Li 2013 cites Ma 2002 doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 9 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1973 | β(Nb,W)5Si3 + Bcc β(Nb,W)5Si3: Nb 0.5, Si 0.38, W 0.12; Bcc: Nb 0.32, Si 0.03, W 0.65 | experimental | [1] Li 2013 cites Ma 2002 doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 12 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- Yan Li, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Cuiping Guo, Thermodynamic optimization of the Nb–Si–W ternary system, Calphad 43, 112-123 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.04.004