Nd–O–U system

29 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 19, model 10); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental19
model10
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
phase equilibrium10
crystal structure19

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (10)

Phase equilibrium, Nd–O–U system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase compositionFCC 1
FCC 1: Nd 0.083, O 0.667, U 0.25
model[1] Dottavio 2015Table 3, p. 4, row 9
report
Phase compositionFCC 1
FCC 1: Nd 0.01, O 0.667, U 0.323
model[1] Dottavio 2015Table 3, p. 4, row 1
report
Phase compositionFCC 1
FCC 1: Nd 0.04, O 0.667, U 0.293
model[1] Dottavio 2015Table 3, p. 4, row 7
report
Phase compositionFCC 1
FCC 1: Nd 0.02, O 0.667, U 0.313
model[1] Dottavio 2015Table 3, p. 4, row 5
report
Phase compositionFCC 1 + FCC 2
FCC 1: Nd 0.083, O 0.667, U 0.25; FCC 2: Nd 0.136, O 0.643, U 0.221
model[1] Dottavio 2015Table 3, p. 4, row 4
report
Phase compositionFCC 1 + FCC 2
FCC 1: Nd 0.04, O 0.667, U 0.293; FCC 2: Nd 0.073, O 0.654, U 0.27
model[1] Dottavio 2015Table 3, p. 4, row 3
report
Phase compositionFCC 1 + FCC 2
FCC 1: Nd 0.02, O 0.667, U 0.313; FCC 2: Nd 0.051, O 0.658, U 0.291
model[1] Dottavio 2015Table 3, p. 4, row 2
report
Phase compositionFCC 2
FCC 2: Nd 0.073, O 0.654, U 0.27
model[1] Dottavio 2015Table 3, p. 4, row 8
report
Phase compositionFCC 2
FCC 2: Nd 0.051, O 0.658, U 0.291
model[1] Dottavio 2015Table 3, p. 4, row 6
report
Phase compositionFCC 2
FCC 2: Nd 0.136, O 0.643, U 0.221
model[1] Dottavio 2015Table 3, p. 4, row 10
report

Crystal structure (19)

Crystal structure, Nd–O–U system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a5.47 not_printed298.15FCCexperimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
Lattice a5.458 not_printed298.15FCC 1experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 13
report
Lattice a5.458 not_printed298.15FCC 1experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
Lattice a5.465 not_printed298.15FCC 1experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 9
report
Lattice a5.46 not_printed298.15FCC 1experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
Lattice a5.46 not_printed298.15FCC 1experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 11
report
Lattice a5.465 not_printed298.15FCC 1experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
Lattice a5.468 not_printed298.15FCC 2experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
Lattice a5.471 not_printed298.15FCC 2experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 14
report
Lattice a5.47 not_printed298.15FCC 2experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 10
report
Lattice a5.471 not_printed298.15FCC 2experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 7
report
Lattice a5.468 not_printed298.15FCC 2experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 12
report
lattice unspecified axis5.47 not_printed298.15FCCexperimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
lattice unspecified axis5.458 not_printed298.15FCC 1experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 13
report
lattice unspecified axis5.465 not_printed298.15FCC 1experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 9
report
lattice unspecified axis5.46 not_printed298.15FCC 1experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 11
report
lattice unspecified axis5.471 not_printed298.15FCC 2experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 14
report
lattice unspecified axis5.47 not_printed298.15FCC 2experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 10
report
lattice unspecified axis5.468 not_printed298.15FCC 2experimental[1] Dottavio 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 12
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Giannina Dottavio, Yves Pontillon, Lionel Desgranges, Christine Guéneau, Renaud C. Belin, Characterising the U–Nd–O miscibility gap by an experimental and a theoretical approach, Journal of Nuclear Materials 458, 394-405 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.061