Ni–Pb system

31 accepted literature values from 3 paper(s) (experimental 1, model 27, unspecified 3); 4 calculated phase diagram(s). 19 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (4) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental1
model27
unspecified3
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction31

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
NiPb-00Wan-LB.tdbC.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, I. Ohnuma, R. Kainuma, K. Ishida, Calphad, 24, 149-67(2000). doi:10.1016/S0364-5916(00)00020-18aeb2c456644892c48cc69c68f1359d8270568048818245ae2a29c74ac2565f9viewer · TDB · JSON
NiPb-10Kai.tdbI. Kainulainen, P. Taskinen, J. Gisby, Calphad, 34, 441-45(2010). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.08.00172882d15b39ccedf48986f778a98cd81f9b8776c8475bc9c9dd24da0296daa89viewer · TDB · JSON
NiPb-13Vaa.tdbI. Vaajamo, P. Taskinen, J. Gisby, Calphad, 42, 66-75(2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.06.00445da44d5203a07e7cea3560423f85704130ce165b0f3de99e74c7ee9b6beeec9viewer · TDB · JSON
NiPb-99Gho.tdbG. Ghosh, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 30A, 1481-94(1999).76b83859e1d1c4ef80573bcb295d5757f3bd377c1226ba2d80086088ad849659viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
NiPb-00Wan-LB.tdb1613.31FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0.01048) + LIQUID#2 (x(Pb) 0.13639) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.60051)
NiPb-00Wan-LB.tdb599.5FCC_A1#2 (x(Pb) 0.00548) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.99741) + FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0.99918)
NiPb-10Kai.tdb1626.4FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0.00128) + LIQUID#2 (x(Pb) 0.11909) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.59666)
NiPb-10Kai.tdb598.32FCC_A1#2 (x(Pb) 2.100e-4) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.99624) + FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0.99976)
NiPb-13Vaa.tdb1618.88FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0.00154) + LIQUID#2 (x(Pb) 0.12856) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.5872)
NiPb-13Vaa.tdb598.15FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.996) + FCC_A1#2 (x(Pb) 0.99977)
NiPb-13Vaa.tdb598.15FCC_A1#2 (x(Pb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.99597) + FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0.99976)
NiPb-99Gho.tdb1614.07FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0.00768) + LIQUID#2 (x(Pb) 0.14124) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.53233)
NiPb-99Gho.tdb599.51FCC_A1#2 (x(Pb) 0.005) + LIQUID (x(Pb) 0.99712) + FCC_A1 (x(Pb) 0.99885)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull NiPb-00Wan-LB · CALPHAD hull NiPb-10Kai · CALPHAD hull NiPb-99Gho

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ni–Pb system (31)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1833.9critical point: L -> L1+L2L: Pb 0.317model[1] Wang 2000Table 3, p. 17, row 3
report
1833.9critical point: L -> L1 + L2L: Pb 0.32model[2] Kainulainen 2010
cites Wang 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
1833.9critical point: LIQUID -> LIQUID#1+LIQUID#2LIQUID: Pb 0.317model[3] Vaajamo 2013
cites Wang 2000 doi
Table 4, p. 6, row 2
report
1828.2critical point: L -> L1+L2unspecified[1] Wang 2000
cites ref. 91Nas
Table 3, p. 17, row 2
report
1828critical point: L -> L1 + L2L: Pb 0.29model[2] Kainulainen 2010
cites Nash 1987 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 1
report
1824critical point: LIQUID -> LIQUID#1+LIQUID#2LIQUID: Pb 0.294model[3] Vaajamo 2013
cites Ghosh 1999 doi
Table 4, p. 6, row 1
report
1824critical point: L -> L1 + L2L: Pb 0.29model[2] Kainulainen 2010
cites Ghosh 1999 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 3
report
1823.2critical point: L -> L1+L2experimental[1] Wang 2000
cites ref. 60Mil
Table 3, p. 17, row 1
report
1804.8critical point: LIQUID -> LIQUID#1+LIQUID#2LIQUID: Pb 0.2723model[3] Vaajamo 2013
cites Kainulainen 2010 doi
Table 4, p. 6, row 3
report
1804.76critical point: L -> L1 + L2L: Pb 0.2723model[2] Kainulainen 2010Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
1781.8critical point: LIQUID -> LIQUID#1+LIQUID#2LIQUID: Pb 0.2679model[3] Vaajamo 2013Table 4, p. 6, row 4
report
1626.5monotectic: LIQUID#1 -> LIQUID#2+FCC_A1#1LIQUID#1: Pb 0.11911; LIQUID#2: Pb 0.5965; FCC_A1#1: Pb 0.00128model[3] Vaajamo 2013
cites Kainulainen 2010 doi
Table 4, p. 6, row 7
report
1626.47monotectic: L1 -> L2 + (Ni)L1: Pb 0.1191; L2: Pb 0.5965; (Ni): Pb 0.0013model[2] Kainulainen 2010Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
1618.9monotectic: LIQUID#1 -> LIQUID#2+FCC_A1#1LIQUID#1: Pb 0.12857; LIQUID#2: Pb 0.58721; FCC_A1#1: Pb 0.00154model[3] Vaajamo 2013Table 4, p. 6, row 8
report
1614monotectic: L1 -> L2 + (Ni)L1: Pb 0.14; L2: Pb 0.53; (Ni): Pb 0.01model[2] Kainulainen 2010
cites Ghosh 1999 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 7
report
1614monotectic: LIQUID#1 -> LIQUID#2+FCC_A1#1LIQUID#1: Pb 0.1412; LIQUID#2: Pb 0.5323; FCC_A1#1: Pb 0.0077model[3] Vaajamo 2013
cites Ghosh 1999 doi
Table 4, p. 6, row 5
report
1613.3monotectic: L1 -> L2 + (Ni)L1: Pb 0.14; L2: Pb 0.6; (Ni): Pb 0.01model[2] Kainulainen 2010
cites Wang 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
1613.3monotectic: L1 -> L2+(Ni)L1: Pb 0.136; L2: Pb 0.6; (Ni): Pb 0.0105model[1] Wang 2000Table 3, p. 17, row 5
report
1613.3monotectic: LIQUID#1 -> LIQUID#2+FCC_A1#1LIQUID#1: Pb 0.136; LIQUID#2: Pb 0.6; FCC_A1#1: Pb 0.0105model[3] Vaajamo 2013
cites Wang 2000 doi
Table 4, p. 6, row 6
report
1613.2monotectic: L1 -> L2+(Ni)L1: Pb 0.116; L2: Pb 0.57; (Ni): Pb 0.01unspecified[1] Wang 2000
cites ref. 91Nas
Table 3, p. 17, row 4
report
1613.15monotectic: L1 -> L2 + (Ni)L1: Pb 0.12; L2: Pb 0.57; (Ni): Pb 0.01model[2] Kainulainen 2010
cites Nash 1987 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
599.6eutectic: L2 -> (Ni) + (Pb)L2: Pb 1; (Ni): Pb 0; (Pb): Pb 1model[2] Kainulainen 2010
cites Ghosh 1999 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 11
report
599.6eutectic: LIQUID#2 -> FCC_A1#1+FCC_A1#2LIQUID#2: Pb 0.9971; FCC_A1#1: Pb 0.0049; FCC_A1#2: Pb 0.9989model[3] Vaajamo 2013
cites Ghosh 1999 doi
Table 4, p. 6, row 9
report
599.5eutectic: L2 -> (Ni) + (Pb)L2: Pb 1; (Ni): Pb 0.55; (Pb): Pb 1model[2] Kainulainen 2010
cites Wang 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 10
report
599.5eutectic: LIQUID#2 -> FCC_A1#1+FCC_A1#2LIQUID#2: Pb 0.9974; FCC_A1#1: Pb 0.0055; FCC_A1#2: Pb 0.9992model[3] Vaajamo 2013
cites Wang 2000 doi
Table 4, p. 6, row 10
report
599.5eutectic: L2 -> (Ni)+(Pb)L2: Pb 0.9974; (Ni): Pb 0.0055; (Pb): Pb 0.9992model[1] Wang 2000Table 3, p. 17, row 7
report
598.32eutectic: L2 -> (Ni) + (Pb)L2: Pb 1; (Ni): Pb 2.000e-4; (Pb): Pb 0.99976model[2] Kainulainen 2010Table 2, p. 4, row 12
report
598.3eutectic: LIQUID#2 -> FCC_A1#1+FCC_A1#2LIQUID#2: Pb 0.99624; FCC_A1#1: Pb 2.100e-4; FCC_A1#2: Pb 0.99976model[3] Vaajamo 2013
cites Kainulainen 2010 doi
Table 4, p. 6, row 11
report
598.2eutectic: LIQUID#2 -> FCC_A1#1+FCC_A1#2LIQUID#2: Pb 0.996; FCC_A1#1: Pb 0; FCC_A1#2: Pb 0.99977model[3] Vaajamo 2013Table 4, p. 6, row 12
report
597.2eutectic: L2 -> (Ni)+(Pb)L2: Pb 0.995; (Ni): Pb 0.01; (Pb): Pb 0.998unspecified[1] Wang 2000
cites ref. 91Nas
Table 3, p. 17, row 6
report
597.15eutectic: L2 -> (Ni) + (Pb)L2: Pb 1; (Ni): Pb 0.01; (Pb): Pb 1model[2] Kainulainen 2010
cites Nash 1987 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 9
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Cui Ping Wang, Xing Jun Liu, Ikuo Ohnuma, Ryosuke Kainuma, Kiyohito Ishida, Thermodynamic assessment of the Cu-Ni-Pb system, Calphad 24, 149-167 (2000). doi:10.1016/s0364-5916(00)00020-1
  2. I. Kainulainen, P. Taskinen, J. Gisby, A thermodynamic assessment of the nickel–lead system, Calphad 34, 441-445 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.08.001
  3. I. Vaajamo, P. Taskinen, J.A. Gisby, A solubility study and thermodynamic description of the system Fe–Ni–Pb, Calphad 42, 66-75 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.06.004