Ni–Zn system

103 accepted literature values from 3 paper(s) (experimental 56, model 41, unspecified 6); 4 calculated phase diagram(s). 4 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (12) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	56
model	41
unspecified	6

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	91
phase transition	12

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
NiZn-02Su.tdb	X. Su, N.-Y. Tang, J.M. Toguri, J. Phase Equilib., 23, 140-48(2002). doi:10.1361/1054971023604125	`84e7fe0c247c1dbf534a5b9cd39e34b1e87f163b53ff98e02d4eb2c53e557a86`	viewer · TDB · JSON
NiZn-03Mie.tdb	J. Miettinen, Calphad, 27, 263-74(2003). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2003.09.002	`f5ded67a69a5e8da0413cab572ce28abb29f50233cd77f0cf8700abe776c53e2`	viewer · TDB · JSON
NiZn-05Jia.tdb	M. Jiang, C.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, I. Ohnuma, R. Kainuma, G.P. Vassilev, K. Ishida, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 66, 246-50(2005). doi:10.1016/j.jpcs.2004.08.039	`fd25dd894a672e98855f5d8e4a50c250c883211baaadf5e875a84d052ac0f4ad`	viewer · TDB · JSON
NiZn-11Xio.tdb	W. Xiong, H. Xu, Y. Du, Calphad, 35, 276-83(2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.03.003	`a4a348f34af1eb963501e01c731a11cff3db79132a09dc64bddac5cf63ce9dd2`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
NiZn-02Su.tdb	1309.89	FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.38974) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.48704) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.51574)
NiZn-02Su.tdb	1309.89	FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.38974) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.48704) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.51574)
NiZn-02Su.tdb	1148.21	NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.564) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.69414) + NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.72188)
NiZn-02Su.tdb	1148.21	NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.564) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.69414) + NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.72188)
NiZn-02Su.tdb	1083.86	FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.37608) + NIZN_L10 (x(Zn) 0.45556) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.47195)
NiZn-02Su.tdb	1083.86	FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.37608) + NIZN_L10 (x(Zn) 0.45556) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.47195)
NiZn-02Su.tdb	1083.86	FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.37608) + NIZN_L10 (x(Zn) 0.45556) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.47195)
NiZn-02Su.tdb	946.02	NIZN_L10 (x(Zn) 0.52132) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.53811) + NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.72076)
NiZn-02Su.tdb	946.02	NIZN_L10 (x(Zn) 0.52132) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.53811) + NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.72076)
NiZn-02Su.tdb	946.02	NIZN_L10 (x(Zn) 0.52132) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.53811) + NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.72076)
NiZn-02Su.tdb	762.99	NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.84586) + NI2ZN15 (x(Zn) 0.88235) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.98964)
NiZn-02Su.tdb	691.11	NI2ZN15 (x(Zn) 0.88235) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.9969) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 0.99968)
NiZn-02Su.tdb	691.11	NI2ZN15 (x(Zn) 0.88235) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.99696) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 0.99968)
NiZn-03Mie.tdb	1313.13	FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.39602) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.49433) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.52212)
NiZn-03Mie.tdb	1144.24	NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.55106) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.70299) + NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.73938)
NiZn-03Mie.tdb	1082.02	FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.35423) + NIZN_B11 (x(Zn) 0.4658) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.47428)
NiZn-03Mie.tdb	936.16	NIZN_B11 (x(Zn) 0.51859) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.53581) + NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.73929)
NiZn-03Mie.tdb	761.43	NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.85559) + NIZN8 (x(Zn) 0.88889) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.97623)
NiZn-03Mie.tdb	686.33	NIZN8 (x(Zn) 0.88889) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.99067) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 1)
NiZn-03Mie.tdb	686.33	NIZN8 (x(Zn) 0.88889) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.99069) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 1)
NiZn-05Jia.tdb	1311.09	FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.39715) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.49797) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.5237)
NiZn-05Jia.tdb	1146.28	NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.55426) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.70016) + NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.73635)
NiZn-05Jia.tdb	1063.65	FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.351) + NIZN_L10 (x(Zn) 0.46732) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.48088)
NiZn-05Jia.tdb	928.25	NIZN_L10 (x(Zn) 0.51015) + NIZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5263) + NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.74078)
NiZn-05Jia.tdb	765.22	NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.86244) + NIZN8 (x(Zn) 0.88889) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.98511)
NiZn-05Jia.tdb	689.73	NIZN8 (x(Zn) 0.88889) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.99521) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 1)
NiZn-05Jia.tdb	689.73	NIZN8 (x(Zn) 0.88889) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.99521) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 1)
NiZn-11Xio.tdb	1306.86	FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.37914) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.47781) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.51569)
NiZn-11Xio.tdb	1306.86	FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.37914) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.47781) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.51569)
NiZn-11Xio.tdb	1149.26	B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.57489) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.70033) + NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.72245)
NiZn-11Xio.tdb	1149.26	B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.57489) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.70033) + NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.72245)
NiZn-11Xio.tdb	1087.66	FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.35264) + NIZN_L2A (x(Zn) 0.45345) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.46454)
NiZn-11Xio.tdb	1087.66	FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.35264) + NIZN_L2A (x(Zn) 0.45345) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.46454)
NiZn-11Xio.tdb	925.16	NIZN_L2A (x(Zn) 0.51197) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.56004) + NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.7146)
NiZn-11Xio.tdb	925.16	NIZN_L2A (x(Zn) 0.51197) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.56004) + NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.7146)
NiZn-11Xio.tdb	763.78	NI2ZN11_D82 (x(Zn) 0.85198) + NIZN8 (x(Zn) 0.88889) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.99438)
NiZn-11Xio.tdb	692.1	NIZN8 (x(Zn) 0.88889) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.99895) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 1)
NiZn-11Xio.tdb	692.1	NIZN8 (x(Zn) 0.88889) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.99896) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull NiZn-02Su · CALPHAD hull NiZn-03Mie · CALPHAD hull NiZn-05Jia

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ni–Zn system (91)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location	Quote
1318	L + (Ni) -> β	L: Zn 0.533; (Ni): Zn 0.359; β: Zn 0.493	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 2, p. 5, row 3 report
1316	peritectic: L + (Ni) = β	L: Zn 0.533; (Ni): Zn 0.359; β: Zn 0.493	experimental	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 5, p. 7, row 4 report
1316	Liq–fcc–bcc	Liq: Zn 0.533; fcc: Zn 0.359; bcc: Zn 0.493	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 4, p. 5, row 1 report
1313	Liq–fcc–bcc	Liq: Zn 0.522; fcc: Zn 0.396; bcc: Zn 0.496	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Vassilev 2000 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 3 report
1313	Liq–fcc–bcc	Liq: Zn 0.528; fcc: Zn 0.404; bcc: Zn 0.5	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Heike 1936	Table 4, p. 5, row 2 report
1313	L + (Ni) -> β	L: Zn 0.525; (Ni): Zn 0.395; β: Zn 0.485	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites ref. 1936Ham	Table 2, p. 5, row 5 report
1313	peritectic: L + (Ni) = β	L: Zn 0.522; (Ni): Zn 0.396; β: Zn 0.494	model	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Miettinen 2003 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 3 report
1313	Liq–fcc–bcc	Liq: Zn 0.522; fcc: Zn 0.396; bcc: Zn 0.494	model	[3] Miettinen 2003	Table 4, p. 5, row 5 report
1313	peritectic: L + (Ni) = β	L: Zn 0.528; (Ni): Zn 0.404; β: Zn 0.5	experimental	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Heike 1932	Table 5, p. 7, row 5 report
1313	L + (Ni) -> β	L: Zn 0.525; (Ni): Zn 0.395; β: Zn 0.485	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Heike 1932	Table 2, p. 5, row 4 report
1310	peritectic: L + (Ni) = β	L: Zn 0.516; (Ni): Zn 0.39; β: Zn 0.487	model	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Su 2002 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 2 report
1310	Liq–fcc–bcc	Liq: Zn 0.516; fcc: Zn 0.39; bcc: Zn 0.487	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Su 2002 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 4 report
1310	L + (Ni) -> β	L: Zn 0.5157; (Ni): Zn 0.3897; β: Zn 0.487	model	[1] Su 2002	Table 2, p. 5, row 1 report
1308	L + (Ni) -> β	L: Zn 0.523; (Ni): Zn 0.384; β: Zn 0.473	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tafel 1907	Table 2, p. 5, row 2 report
1307	peritectic: L + (Ni) = β	L: Zn 0.516; (Ni): Zn 0.379; β: Zn 0.478	unspecified	[2] Xiong 2011	Table 5, p. 7, row 1 report
1156	congruent melting: L -> γ	L: Zn 0.7403; γ: Ni 0.153846, Zn 0.846154	model	[1] Su 2002	Table 2, p. 5, row 20 report
1149	peritectoid: L = β + Γ	L: Zn 0.7; β: Zn 0.575; Γ: Zn 0.723	unspecified	[2] Xiong 2011	Table 5, p. 7, row 11 report
1148	eutectic		experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tamaru 1932	p. 3 report	The ␤ phase has a relatively wide homogeneity range [1932Tam, 1934Tam] with a maximum at a temperature of 1148K [1932Tam, 1933Hei] where the eutectic reaction involving the ␥ phase occurs.
1148	Liq–bcc–γ	Liq: Zn 0.688; bcc: Zn 0.584; γ: Zn 0.698	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Heike 1936	Table 4, p. 5, row 7 report
1148	eutectic: L -> β + γ	L: Zn 0.6941; β: Zn 0.564; γ: Zn 0.7219	model	[1] Su 2002	Table 2, p. 5, row 16 report
1148	peritectoid: L = β + Γ	L: Zn 0.694; β: Zn 0.564; Γ: Zn 0.722	model	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Su 2002 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 12 report
1148	peritectoid: L = β + Γ	L: Zn 0.688; β: Zn 0.584; Γ: Zn 0.698	experimental	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Heike 1933	Table 5, p. 7, row 15 report
1148	eutectic: L -> β + γ	L: Zn 0.695; β: Zn 0.585; γ: Zn 0.7	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Heike 1933	Table 2, p. 5, row 18 report
1148	Liq–bcc–γ	Liq: Zn 0.694; bcc: Zn 0.564; γ: Zn 0.722	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Su 2002 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 9 report
1148	eutectic: L -> β + γ	L: Zn 0.69; β: Zn 0.585; γ: Zn 0.7	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Hansen 1936 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 19 report
1146	Liq–bcc–γ	Liq: Zn 0.7; bcc: Zn 0.554; γ: Zn 0.723	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Vassilev 2000 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 8 report
1145	Liq–bcc–γ	Liq: Zn 0.698; bcc: Zn 0.599; γ: Zn 0.75	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 4, p. 5, row 6 report
1145	peritectoid: L = β + Γ	L: Zn 0.698; β: Zn 0.5993; Γ: Zn 0.846154	experimental	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 5, p. 7, row 14 report
1145	eutectic: L -> β + γ	L: Zn 0.7; β: Zn 0.599; γ: Zn 0.73	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 2, p. 5, row 17 report
1144	peritectoid: L = β + Γ	L: Zn 0.703; β: Zn 0.551; Γ: Zn 0.739	model	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Miettinen 2003 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 13 report
1144	Liq–bcc–γ	Liq: Zn 0.703; bcc: Zn 0.551; γ: Zn 0.739	model	[3] Miettinen 2003	Table 4, p. 5, row 10 report
1088	peritectoid: β + (Ni) = β1	β: Zn 0.465; (Ni): Zn 0.353; β1: Zn 0.454	unspecified	[2] Xiong 2011	Table 5, p. 7, row 6 report
1084	Fcc–bcc–β1	Fcc: Zn 0.376; bcc: Zn 0.472; β1: Zn 0.456	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Su 2002 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 14 report
1084	peritectoid: β + (Ni) = β1	β: Zn 0.472; (Ni): Zn 0.376; β1: Zn 0.456	model	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Su 2002 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 7 report
1084	(Ni) + β -> β1	(Ni): Zn 0.3761; β: Zn 0.472; β1: Zn 0.4555	model	[1] Su 2002	Table 2, p. 5, row 6 report
1083	(Ni) + β -> β1	(Ni): Zn 0.335; β: Zn 0.475; β1: Zn 0.455	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Hansen 1936 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 10 report
1083	(Ni) + β -> β1	(Ni): Zn 0.34; β: Zn 0.473	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Heike 1932	Table 2, p. 5, row 9 report
1083	peritectoid: β + (Ni) = β1	β: Zn 0.473; (Ni): Zn 0.338	experimental	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Heike 1932	Table 5, p. 7, row 10 report
1083	Fcc–bcc–β1	Fcc: Zn 0.338; bcc: Zn 0.473; β1: Zn 0.473	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Heike 1933	Table 4, p. 5, row 12 report
1082	Fcc–bcc–β1	Fcc: Zn 0.354; bcc: Zn 0.474; β1: Zn 0.466	model	[3] Miettinen 2003	Table 4, p. 5, row 15 report
1082	Fcc–bcc–β1	Fcc: Zn 0.353; bcc: Zn 0.48; β1: Zn 0.466	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Vassilev 2000 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 13 report
1082	peritectoid: β + (Ni) = β1	β: Zn 0.474; (Ni): Zn 0.354; β1: Zn 0.466	model	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Miettinen 2003 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 8 report
1077	peritectoid: β + (Ni) = β1	β: Zn 0.516; (Ni): Zn 0.3587; β1: Zn 0.5	experimental	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 5, p. 7, row 9 report
1077	(Ni) + β -> β1	(Ni): Zn 0.359; β: Zn 0.516; β1: Zn 0.473	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 2, p. 5, row 8 report
1077	Fcc–bcc–β1	Fcc: Zn 0.359; bcc: Zn 0.514; β1: Zn 0.5	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 4, p. 5, row 11 report
1053	(Ni) + β -> β1	(Ni): Zn 0.423; β: Zn 0.513; β1: Zn 0.473	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tafel 1907	Table 2, p. 5, row 7 report
958	β -> β1 + γ	β: Zn 0.535; β1: Zn 0.52; γ: Zn 0.74	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites ref. 36Han	Table 2, p. 5, row 15 report
948	eutectoid		experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites ref. 32Tam	p. 3 report	This phase decomposes by a eutectoid reaction at various reported temperatures of 913 K [1907Taf], 923 K [32Hei], and 948 K [32Tam].
948	β -> β1 + γ	β: Zn 0.543; β1: Zn 0.522; γ: Zn 0.736	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 2, p. 5, row 13 report
948	eutectoid: β = β1 + Γ	β: Zn 0.543; β1: Zn 0.522; Γ: Zn 0.736	experimental	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 5, p. 7, row 19 report
948	Bcc–β1–γ	Bcc: Zn 0.532; β1: Zn 0.52; γ: Zn 0.733	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Vassilev 2000 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 18 report
948	Bcc–β1–γ	Bcc: Zn 0.543; β1: Zn 0.522; γ: Zn 0.736	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 4, p. 5, row 16 report
946	eutectoid: β = β1 + Γ	β: Zn 0.538; β1: Zn 0.521; Γ: Zn 0.721	model	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Su 2002 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 17 report
946	Bcc–β1–γ	Bcc: Zn 0.538; β1: Zn 0.521; γ: Zn 0.721	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Su 2002 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 19 report
946	β -> β1 + γ	β: Zn 0.5381; β1: Zn 0.5213; γ: Zn 0.7208	model	[1] Su 2002	Table 2, p. 5, row 11 report
936	Bcc–β1–γ	Bcc: Zn 0.536; β1: Zn 0.519; γ: Zn 0.739	model	[3] Miettinen 2003	Table 4, p. 5, row 20 report
936	eutectoid: β = β1 + Γ	β: Zn 0.536; β1: Zn 0.519; Γ: Zn 0.739	model	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Miettinen 2003 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 18 report
925	eutectoid: β = β1 + Γ	β: Zn 0.56; β1: Zn 0.512; Γ: Zn 0.715	unspecified	[2] Xiong 2011	Table 5, p. 7, row 16 report
923	eutectoid		experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites ref. 32Hei	p. 3 report	This phase decomposes by a eutectoid reaction at various reported temperatures of 913 K [1907Taf], 923 K [32Hei], and 948 K [32Tam].
923	Bcc–β1–γ	Bcc: Zn 0.533; β1: Zn 0.518; γ: Zn 0.743	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Heike 1936	Table 4, p. 5, row 17 report
923	β -> β1 + γ	β: Zn 0.533; β1: Zn 0.518; γ: Zn 0.743	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Heike 1932	Table 2, p. 5, row 14 report
923	eutectoid: β = β1 + Γ	β: Zn 0.533; β1: Zn 0.518; Γ: Zn 0.743	experimental	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Heike 1932	Table 5, p. 7, row 20 report
913	eutectoid		experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tafel 1907	p. 3 report	This phase decomposes by a eutectoid reaction at various reported temperatures of 913 K [1907Taf], 923 K [32Hei], and 948 K [32Tam].
913	β -> β1 + γ	β: Zn 0.548; β1: Zn 0.473; γ: Zn 0.729	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tafel 1907	Table 2, p. 5, row 12 report
790	peritectic: L + Γ = δ	Γ: Zn 0.852; δ: Zn 0.88	experimental	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Tamaru 1935	Table 5, p. 7, row 24 report
790	Liq–γ–δ	Liq: Zn 0.994; γ: Zn 0.852; δ: Zn 0.88	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 4, p. 5, row 21 report
764	peritectic: L + Γ = δ	L: Zn 0.994; Γ: Zn 0.852; δ: Zn 0.889	unspecified	[2] Xiong 2011	Table 5, p. 7, row 21 report
764	Liq–γ–δ	Liq: Zn 0.976; γ: Zn 0.855; δ: Zn 0.889	model	[3] Miettinen 2003	Table 4, p. 5, row 25 report
764	peritectic: L + Γ = δ	L: Zn 0.976; Γ: Zn 0.855; δ: Zn 0.889	model	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Miettinen 2003 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 23 report
763	peritectic: L + Γ = δ	L: Zn 0.9; Γ: Zn 0.846; δ: Zn 0.882	model	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Su 2002 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 22 report
763	peritectic		experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Heike 1932	p. 3 report	The ␦ phase results from a peritectic reaction at 763 K [1932Hei].
763	L + γ -> δ	L: Zn 0.99; γ: Zn 0.85; δ: Zn 0.889	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Hansen 1936 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 23 report
763	L + γ -> δ	L: Zn 0.991; γ: Zn 0.851; δ: Zn 0.882	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Heike 1933	Table 2, p. 5, row 22 report
763	peritectic: L + Γ = δ	L: Zn 0.991; Γ: Zn 0.853; δ: Zn 0.882	experimental	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Heike 1933	Table 5, p. 7, row 25 report
763	Liq–γ–δ	Liq: Zn 0.99; γ: Zn 0.846; δ: Zn 0.882	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Su 2002 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 24 report
763	Liq–γ–δ	Liq: Zn 0.991; γ: Zn 0.853; δ: Zn 0.882	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Heike 1933	Table 4, p. 5, row 22 report
763	L + γ -> δ	L: Zn 0.9896; γ: Zn 0.8459; δ: Zn 0.8824	model	[1] Su 2002	Table 2, p. 5, row 21 report
762	Liq–γ–δ	Liq: Zn 0.986; γ: Zn 0.862; δ: Zn 0.889	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Vassilev 2000 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 23 report
692.1	eutectic: L -> δ + Zn(hcp)	L: Zn 0.89; δ: Zn 0.997; Zn(hcp): Zn 1	model	[1] Su 2002	Table 2, p. 5, row 26 report
692	Liq–δ–hcp(Zn)	Liq: Zn 0.997; δ: Zn 0.882; hcp(Zn): Zn 0.999	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Heike 1933	Table 4, p. 5, row 27 report
692	eutectic: L = δ + (Zn)	δ: Zn 0.88	experimental	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 5, p. 7, row 29 report
692	eutectic: L = δ + (Zn)	L: Zn 0.999; δ: Zn 0.889; (Zn): Zn 1	unspecified	[2] Xiong 2011	Table 5, p. 7, row 26 report
692	Liq–δ–hcp(Zn)	Liq: Zn 1; δ: Zn 0.88; hcp(Zn): Zn 1	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 4, p. 5, row 26 report
691.6	eutectic: L -> δ + Zn(hcp)	L: Zn 0.889; δ: Zn 0.997; Zn(hcp): Zn 1	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Hansen 1936 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 25 report
691.5	eutectic: L = δ + (Zn)	L: Zn 0.9967; δ: Zn 0.882; (Zn): Zn 0.999	experimental	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Heike 1933	Table 5, p. 7, row 30 report
691.1	eutectic: L -> δ + Zn(hcp)	L: Zn 0.889; δ: Zn 0.997; Zn(hcp): Zn 0.9997	model	[1] Su 2002	Table 2, p. 5, row 24 report
691	Liq–δ–hcp(Zn)	Liq: Zn 0.989; δ: Zn 0.882; hcp(Zn): Zn 1	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Su 2002 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 29 report
691	eutectic: L = δ + (Zn)	L: Zn 0.997; δ: Zn 0.889; (Zn): Zn 0.9997	model	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Su 2002 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 27 report
690	Liq–δ–hcp(Zn)	Liq: Zn 0.995; δ: Zn 0.889; hcp(Zn): Zn 1	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Vassilev 2000 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 28 report
686	eutectic: L = δ + (Zn)	L: Zn 0.991; δ: Zn 0.889; (Zn): Zn 1	model	[2] Xiong 2011 cites Miettinen 2003 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 28 report
686	Liq–δ–hcp(Zn)	Liq: Zn 0.991; δ: Zn 0.889; hcp(Zn): Zn 1	model	[3] Miettinen 2003	Table 4, p. 5, row 30 report

Other properties

Phase transition (12)

Phase transition, Ni–Zn system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location	Quote
Phase transition	1053 K	1053	beta1	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tafel 1907	p. 3 report	The ␤1 phase is stable at low temperatures and forms by a peritectoid reaction at 1053 K [1907Taf], 1077 K [1932Tam], or 1083 K [1932Hei].
Phase transition	1077 K	1077	beta1	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tamaru 1932	p. 3 report	The ␤1 phase is stable at low temperatures and forms by a peritectoid reaction at 1053 K [1907Taf], 1077 K [1932Tam], or 1083 K [1932Hei].
Phase transition	1083 K	1083	beta1	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Heike 1932	p. 3 report	The ␤1 phase is stable at low temperatures and forms by a peritectoid reaction at 1053 K [1907Taf], 1077 K [1932Tam], or 1083 K [1932Hei].
Phase transition	1153 K	1153	Liq–γ Liq: Zn 0.75; γ: Zn 0.75	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Tamaru 1932	Table 4, p. 5, row 31 report
Phase transition	1154 K	1154	Liq–γ Liq: Zn 0.75; γ: Zn 0.75	experimental	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Heike 1933	Table 4, p. 5, row 32 report
Phase transition	1154 K	1154	Liq–γ Liq: Zn 0.75; γ: Zn 0.75	model	[3] Miettinen 2003	Table 4, p. 5, row 35 report
Phase transition	1154 K	1154	congruent transformation	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tafel 1907	p. 3 report	The ␥ phase melts congruently at 1154 K at the composition NiZn3 [1907Taf, 1931Ekm, 1938Sch3, 1950Now].
Phase transition	1155 K	1155	Liq–γ Liq: Zn 0.747; γ: Zn 0.747	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Vassilev 2000 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 33 report
Phase transition	1156 K	1156	Liq–γ Liq: Zn 0.74; γ: Zn 0.74	model	[3] Miettinen 2003 cites Su 2002 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 34 report
Phase transition	1308 K	1308	beta	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tafel 1907	p. 3 report	The reported values are 1308 K [1907Taf], 1313 K [1932Hei], and 1316 K [1932Tam].
Phase transition	1313 K	1313	beta	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Heike 1932	p. 3 report	The reported values are 1308 K [1907Taf], 1313 K [1932Hei], and 1316 K [1932Tam].
Phase transition	1316 K	1316	beta	experimental	[1] Su 2002 cites Tamaru 1932	p. 3 report	The reported values are 1308 K [1907Taf], 1313 K [1932Hei], and 1316 K [1932Tam].

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Xuping Su, Nai-Yong Tang, Jim M. Toguri, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ni-Zn system, JPE 23, 140-148 (2002). doi:10.1361/1054971023604125
Wei Xiong, Honghui Xu, Yong Du, Thermodynamic investigation of the galvanizing systems, II: Thermodynamic evaluation of the Ni–Zn system, Calphad 35, 276-283 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.03.003
Jyrki Miettinen, Thermodynamic description of the Cu–Ni–Zn system above 600∘C, Calphad 27, 263-274 (2003). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2003.09.002

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}