P–Zn system

85 accepted literature values from 3 paper(s) (experimental 37, model 35, unspecified 13); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 7 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · phases (13) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	37
model	35
unspecified	13

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	18
phase transition	25
formation	34
crystal structure	8

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull ZnP-09Tu · CALPHAD hull ZnP-16Liu

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the P–Zn system (18)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1269.15	eutectic: L -> ZnP2 + Zn3P2	L: P 0.0059; ZnP2: P 0.666667; Zn3P2: P 0.4	unspecified	[1] Liu 2016 cites Tu 2009 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 9 report
1267.15	eutectic: L -> ZnP2 + Zn3P2	L: P 0.00594; ZnP2: P 0.666667; Zn3P2: P 0.4	unspecified	[1] Liu 2016	Table 5, p. 6, row 8 report
1258.15	eutectic: L -> βZn3P2 + αZnP2	L: P 0.57; βZn3P2: P 0.4; αZnP2: P 0.666	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 22 report
1256.15	eutectic: L -> βZn3P2 + αZnP2	L: P 0.56; βZn3P2: P 0.4; αZnP2: P 0.666	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 21 report
1255.15	eutectic: L -> βZn3P2 + αZnP2	L: P 0.56; βZn3P2: P 0.4; αZnP2: P 0.666	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 23 report
1253.15	eutectic: L -> βZn3P2 + αZnP2	L: P 0.55; βZn3P2: P 0.4; αZnP2: P 0.666	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Berak 1969	Table 4, p. 6, row 19 report
1253.15	eutectic: L -> ZnP2 + Zn3P2	L: P 0.0055; ZnP2: P 0.666667; Zn3P2: P 0.4	experimental	[1] Liu 2016 cites Dutkiewlcz 1991 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 10 report
1223.15	eutectic: L -> βZn3P2 + αZnP2	βZn3P2: P 0.4; αZnP2: P 0.666667	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Schneider 1973	Table 4, p. 6, row 20 report
692.3	eutectic: L -> (Zn) + αZn3P2	L: P 7.000e-4; (Zn): P 0; αZn3P2: P 0.4	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 5 report
692.15	eutectic: L -> (Zn) + αZn3P2	L: P 0.0066; (Zn): P 0; αZn3P2: P 0.4	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Berak 1969	Table 4, p. 6, row 2 report
690.9	eutectic: L -> (Zn) + αZn3P2	L: P 0.0034; (Zn): P 0; αZn3P2: P 0.4	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 4 report
690.8	eutectic: L -> (Zn) + αZn3P2	L: P 0.0036; (Zn): P 0; αZn3P2: P 0.4	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 6 report
689.15	eutectic: L -> (Zn) + Zn3P2	L: P 6.400e-4; (Zn): P 0; Zn3P2: P 0.4	unspecified	[1] Liu 2016 cites Tu 2009 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 3 report
689.15	eutectic: L -> (Zn) + Zn3P2	L: P 6.600e-4; (Zn): P 0; Zn3P2: P 0.4	experimental	[1] Liu 2016 cites Dutkiewlcz 1991 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 4 report
689.15	eutectic: L -> (Zn) + αZn3P2	L: P 0.0066; (Zn): P 0; αZn3P2: P 0.4	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Schneider 1973	Table 4, p. 6, row 1 report
686.15	eutectic: L -> (Zn) + Zn3P2	L: P 0.025; (Zn): P 0; Zn3P2: P 0.4	experimental	[1] Liu 2016 cites Ugay 1968	Table 5, p. 6, row 2 report
685.35	eutectic: L -> (Zn) + Zn3P2	L: P 0.00907; (Zn): P 0; Zn3P2: P 0.4	unspecified	[1] Liu 2016	Table 5, p. 6, row 1 report
674.15	eutectic: L -> (Zn) + αZn3P2	L: P 0.025; (Zn): P 0; αZn3P2: P 0.4	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Ugai 1968	Table 4, p. 6, row 3 report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, P–Zn system (20)
Phase	Compound	Value	T (K)	Class	MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	Source	Location
Zn3P2		-181.78 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	model			[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Tu 2009 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report
Zn3P2		-151.839 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	model			[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Liu 2016 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report
Zn3P2	Zn3P2	-46.06 kJ/mol-atom ± 6300	298.15	experimental	-18.169 (mp-aaaaadbr)	-27.768 (oqmd-14030)	[1] Liu 2016 cites Karvelis 1959	Table 4, p. 6, row 4 report
Zn3P2	Zn3P2	-46.06 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.26	298.15	experimental	-18.169 (mp-aaaaadbr)	-27.768 (oqmd-14030)	[3] Tu 2009 cites Karvelis 1959	Table 3, p. 4, row 8 report
Zn3P2	Zn3P2	-44.66 kJ/mol-atom ± 1500	298.15	unspecified	-18.169 (mp-aaaaadbr)	-27.768 (oqmd-14030)	[1] Liu 2016 cites Karvelis 1959	Table 4, p. 6, row 5 report
Zn3P2	Zn3P2	-44.66 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.3	298.15	experimental	-18.169 (mp-aaaaadbr)	-27.768 (oqmd-14030)	[3] Tu 2009 cites Karvelis 1959	Table 3, p. 4, row 9 report
Zn3P2	Zn3P2	-36.356 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-18.169 (mp-aaaaadbr)	-27.768 (oqmd-14030)	[3] Tu 2009	Table 3, p. 4, row 10 report
Zn3P2	Zn3P2	-36.356 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-18.169 (mp-aaaaadbr)	-27.768 (oqmd-14030)	[1] Liu 2016 cites Tu 2009 doi	Table 4, p. 6, row 6 report
Zn3P2	Zn3P2	-34.64 kJ/mol-atom ± 10400	298.15	unspecified	-18.169 (mp-aaaaadbr)	-27.768 (oqmd-14030)	[1] Liu 2016 cites Sirota 2016	Table 4, p. 6, row 2 report
Zn3P2	Zn3P2	-34.64 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.08	298.15	experimental	-18.169 (mp-aaaaadbr)	-27.768 (oqmd-14030)	[3] Tu 2009 cites Sirota 1975	Table 3, p. 4, row 6 report
Zn3P2	Zn3P2	-33.06 kJ/mol-atom ± 4.18	298.15	experimental	-18.169 (mp-aaaaadbr)	-27.768 (oqmd-14030)	[3] Tu 2009 cites Schoonmaker 1967 doi	Table 3, p. 4, row 7 report
Zn3P2	Zn3P2	-33.06 kJ/mol-atom ± 20900	298.15	experimental	-18.169 (mp-aaaaadbr)	-27.768 (oqmd-14030)	[1] Liu 2016 cites Schoonmaker 1967 doi	Table 4, p. 6, row 3 report
Zn3P2	Zn3P2	-30.3678 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-18.169 (mp-aaaaadbr)	-27.768 (oqmd-14030)	[1] Liu 2016	Table 4, p. 6, row 1 report
ZnP2		-127.4 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 7.5	298.15	unspecified			[1] Liu 2016 cites Sirota 2016	Table 4, p. 6, row 8 report
ZnP2		-126.85 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	model			[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Tu 2009 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 12 report
ZnP2		-126.85 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	model			[1] Liu 2016 cites Tu 2009 doi	Table 4, p. 6, row 9 report
ZnP2		-92.9282 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	model			[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Liu 2016 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 11 report
ZnP2		-92.9282 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	model			[1] Liu 2016	Table 4, p. 6, row 7 report
ZnP2	ZnP2	-42.4667 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.5	298.15	experimental	-23.975 (mp-aaaaaqib)	-40.016 (oqmd-31359)	[3] Tu 2009 cites Sirota 1975	Table 3, p. 4, row 11 report
ZnP2	ZnP2	-42.2833 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-23.975 (mp-aaaaaqib)	-40.016 (oqmd-31359)	[3] Tu 2009	Table 3, p. 4, row 12 report

Other properties

Phase transition (25)

Phase transition, P–Zn system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location	Quote
Phase transition	1113.15 K	1113.15	congruent melting: L -> βZn3P2 L: P 0.4; βZn3P2: P 0.4	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Ugai 1968	Table 4, p. 6, row 15 report
Phase transition	1118.15 K	1118.15	polymorphic: αZn3P2 -> βZn3P2 αZn3P2: P 0.4; βZn3P2: P 0.4	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Pistorius 1977	Table 4, p. 6, row 8 report
Phase transition	1123.15 K	1123.15	polymorphic: αZn3P2 -> βZn3P2 αZn3P2: P 0.4; βZn3P2: P 0.4	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Schneider 1973	Table 4, p. 6, row 7 report
Phase transition	1123.15 K	1123.15	polymorphic: αZn3P2 -> βZn3P2 αZn3P2: P 0.4; βZn3P2: P 0.4	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 11 report
Phase transition	1153.15 K	1153.15	polymorphic: αZn3P2 -> βZn3P2 αZn3P2: P 0.4; βZn3P2: P 0.4	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Berak 1969	Table 4, p. 6, row 9 report
Phase transition	1261.15 K	1261.15	polymorphic: αZnP2 -> βZnP2 αZnP2: P 0.666667; βZnP2: P 0.666667	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 26 report
Phase transition	1263.15 K	1263.15	polymorphic: αZnP2 -> βZnP2 αZnP2: P 0.666; βZnP2: P 0.666667	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Berak 1969	Table 4, p. 6, row 24 report
Phase transition	1263.15 K	1263.15	polymorphic: αZnP2 -> βZnP2 αZnP2: P 0.666667; βZnP2: P 0.666667	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 25 report
Phase transition	1307.15 K	1307.15	congruent melting: L -> ZnP2 L: P 0.00667; ZnP2: P 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Liu 2016 cites Tu 2009 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 12 report
Phase transition	1311.15 K	1311.15	congruent melting: L -> βZnP2 L: P 0.666667; βZnP2: P 0.666667	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 30 report
Phase transition	1311.55 K	1311.55	congruent melting: L -> ZnP2 L: P 0.00667; ZnP2: P 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Liu 2016	Table 5, p. 6, row 11 report
Phase transition	1312.15 K	1312.15	congruent melting: L -> βZnP2 L: P 0.666667; βZnP2: P 0.666667	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 29 report
Phase transition	1313.15 K	1313.15	congruent melting: L -> ZnP2 L: P 0.00667; ZnP2: P 0.666667	experimental	[1] Liu 2016 cites Dutkiewlcz 1991 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 13 report
Phase transition	1313.15 K	1313.15	congruent melting: L -> βZnP2 L: P 0.666; βZnP2: P 0.666	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Berak 1969	Table 4, p. 6, row 28 report
Phase transition	1313.15 K	1313.15	congruent melting: L -> βZnP2 L: P 0.666667; βZnP2: P 0.666667	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 31 report
Phase transition	1313.15 K	1313.15	βZnP2 + liquid	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Berak 1969	p. 3 report	Furthermore, βZnP2 melts at 1040 ∘ C and undergoes the α → β transformation at 990 ∘ C as reported by Berak and Pruchnik [35].
Phase transition	1433.15 K	1433.15	congruent melting: L -> βZn3P2 L: P 0.4; βZn3P2: P 0.4	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Schneider 1973	Table 4, p. 6, row 13 report
Phase transition	1433.15 K	1433.15	βZn3P2 + liquid	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Schneider 1973	p. 2 report	The α → β transformation of this phase occurs at 850 ∘ C, while the melting of βZn3 P2 occurs at 1160 ∘ C and according to Schneider and Krumnacker [36].
Phase transition	1436.15 K	1436.15	congruent melting: L -> βZn3P2 L: P 0.4; βZn3P2: P 0.4	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 18 report
Phase transition	1437.15 K	1437.15	congruent melting: L -> βZn3P2 L: P 0.4; βZn3P2: P 0.4	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 16 report
Phase transition	1438.15 K	1438.15	congruent melting: L -> βZn3P2 L: P 0.4; βZn3P2: P 0.4	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019	Table 4, p. 6, row 17 report
Phase transition	1443.15 K	1443.15	congruent melting: L -> Zn3P2 L: P 0.004; Zn3P2: P 0.4	unspecified	[1] Liu 2016 cites Tu 2009 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 6 report
Phase transition	1446.15 K	1446.15	congruent melting: L -> Zn3P2 L: P 0.004; Zn3P2: P 0.4	experimental	[1] Liu 2016 cites Dutkiewlcz 1991 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 7 report
Phase transition	1448.15 K	1448.15	congruent melting: L -> Zn3P2 L: P 0.004; Zn3P2: P 0.4	unspecified	[1] Liu 2016	Table 5, p. 6, row 5 report
Phase transition	1466.15 K	1466.15	congruent melting: L -> βZn3P2 L: P 0.4; βZn3P2: P 0.4	experimental	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Berak 1969	Table 4, p. 6, row 14 report

Formation (14)

Formation, P–Zn system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG298	-31.7414 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	Zn3P2 alloy: Zn 0.6	model	[1] Liu 2016	Table 4, p. 6, row 1 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG298	-33.762 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	Zn3P2 alloy: P 0.4, Zn 0.6	model	[3] Tu 2009	Table 3, p. 4, row 10 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG°298	-168.81 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	Zn3P2 alloy: Zn 0.6	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Tu 2009 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG298	-36.02 kJ/mol-atom ± 13000	298.15	Zn3P2 alloy: Zn 0.6	unspecified	[1] Liu 2016 cites Sirota 2016	Table 4, p. 6, row 2 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG298	-36.02 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.6	298.15	Zn3P2 alloy: P 0.4, Zn 0.6	experimental	[3] Tu 2009 cites Sirota 1975	Table 3, p. 4, row 6 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG298	-33.762 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	Zn3P2 alloy: Zn 0.6	model	[1] Liu 2016 cites Tu 2009 doi	Table 4, p. 6, row 6 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG°298	-158.707 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	Zn3P2 alloy: Zn 0.6	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Liu 2016 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG298	-40.9667 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.83333	298.15	ZnP2 alloy: P 0.666667, Zn 0.333333	experimental	[3] Tu 2009 cites Sirota 1975	Table 3, p. 4, row 11 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG°298	-118.032 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	ZnP2 alloy: Zn 0.333333	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Liu 2016 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 11 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG°298	-126.2 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	ZnP2 alloy: Zn 0.333333	model	[2] Ghasemi 2019 cites Tu 2009 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 12 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG298	-122.9 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 5.5	298.15	ZnP2 alloy: Zn 0.333333	unspecified	[1] Liu 2016 cites Sirota 2016	Table 4, p. 6, row 8 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG298	-126.2 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	ZnP2 alloy: Zn 0.333333	model	[1] Liu 2016 cites Tu 2009 doi	Table 4, p. 6, row 9 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG298	-42.0667 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	ZnP2 alloy: P 0.666667, Zn 0.333333	model	[3] Tu 2009	Table 3, p. 4, row 12 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG298	-118.032 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	298.15	ZnP2 alloy: Zn 0.333333	model	[1] Liu 2016	Table 4, p. 6, row 7 report

Crystal structure (8)

Crystal structure, P–Zn system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Lattice a	5.08 Å		β-Zn3P2 alloy: Zn 0.6	experimental	[1] Liu 2016 cites Berak 1969	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
Lattice a	8.85 Å		β-ZnP2 alloy: Zn 0.333333	experimental	[1] Liu 2016 cites Hegyi 1963 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report
Lattice a	8.089 Å	298.15	α-Zn3P2 alloy: Zn 0.6	experimental	[1] Liu 2016 cites Pistorius 1977	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
Lattice a	5.08 Å	298.15	α-ZnP2 alloy: Zn 0.333333	experimental	[1] Liu 2016 cites Hegyi 1963 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
Lattice b	7.29 Å		β-ZnP2 alloy: Zn 0.333333	experimental	[1] Liu 2016 cites Hegyi 1963 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report
Lattice c	7.56 Å		β-ZnP2 alloy: Zn 0.333333	experimental	[1] Liu 2016 cites Hegyi 1963 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report
Lattice c	11.407 Å	298.15	α-Zn3P2 alloy: Zn 0.6	experimental	[1] Liu 2016 cites Pistorius 1977	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
Lattice c	18.59 Å	298.15	α-ZnP2 alloy: Zn 0.333333	experimental	[1] Liu 2016 cites Hegyi 1963 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Ya Liu, Bin Zhou, Wei Lv, Changjun Wu, Xuping Su, Jianhua Wang, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic assessment of the Zn–Si–P system, Surface and Coatings Technology 306, 370-377 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.01.016
Masoomeh Ghasemi, E. Stutz, S. Escobar Steinvall, M. Zamani, A. Fontcuberta i Morral, Thermodynamic re-assessment of the Zn–P binary system, Materialia 6, 100301 (2019). doi:10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100301
Hao Tu, Fucheng Yin, Xuping Su, Ya Liu, Xinming Wang, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic modeling of the Al–P–Zn ternary system, Calphad 33, 755-760 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2009.10.003

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file. Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}