Pb–Te system

41 accepted literature values from 4 paper(s) (experimental 17, model 12, DFT 12); 5 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (7) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental17
model12
DFT12
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction12
phase transition7
formation22

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
PbTe-09Gie.tdbW. Gierlotka, J. Lapsa, D. Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, J. Alloys Compd., 479, 152-56(2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.12.0831d05106b6376c8f0518d08cd839cb130cbe42eee8d0581a278be2e06a8caaebeviewer · TDB · JSON
PbTe-09Liu.tdbY. Liu, L. Zhang, D. Yu, J. Electron. Mater., 38, 2033-45(2009). doi:10.1007/s11664-009-0875-3edccadcbcc684b2ccf2987be877f25a86d8a589b6baadd46eb6cc09603d971d7viewer · TDB · JSON
PbTe-10Gie.tdbW. Gierlotka, J. Lapsa, K. Fitzner, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 31, 509-17(2010). doi:10.1007/s11669-010-9791-8ffb7d7dfb04a30b6275e887df22917c9ee4304354d89528bb8f39555904a5ef7viewer · TDB · JSON
PbTe-15Baj.tdbS. Bajaj, G.S. Pomrehn, J.W. Doak, W. Gierlotka, H.-J. Wu, S.-W. Chen, C. Wolverton, W.A. Goddard, G.J. Snyder, Acta Mater., 92, 72-80(2015). doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.03.034e1bad0890740970fccdf61400eb9f401868fe63e11aaf03b51fafb6ba4fd9675viewer · TDB · JSON
PbTe-86Kat.tdbU. Kattner, H.L. Lukas, G. Petzow, Calphad, 10, 103-16(1986). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(86)90015-5c309772d299befd6ebe5c7ec98f85ee6598d06cbe6d33b578b1772d0c2e4dfb1viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
PbTe-09Gie.tdb689.29PBTE_B1 (x(Te) 0.5001) + ION (x(Te) 0.89736) + HEXAGONAL_A8 (x(Te) 1)
PbTe-09Gie.tdb600.06FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + ION (x(Te) 8.700e-4) + PBTE_B1 (x(Te) 0.5)
PbTe-09Liu.tdb686.83PBTE_B1 (x(Te) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.88898) + HEXAGONAL_A8 (x(Te) 1)
PbTe-09Liu.tdb599.8FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.00131) + PBTE_B1 (x(Te) 0.5)
PbTe-10Gie.tdb702.56PBTE_B1 (x(Te) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.93064) + HEXAGONAL_A8 (x(Te) 1)
PbTe-10Gie.tdb600.2FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + LIQUID (x(Te) 6.600e-4) + PBTE_B1 (x(Te) 0.5)
PbTe-15Baj.tdb690.98PBTE_B1 (x(Te) 0.50007) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.90978) + HEXAGONAL_A8 (x(Te) 1)
PbTe-15Baj.tdb600.36FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + LIQUID (x(Te) 4.000e-4) + PBTE_B1 (x(Te) 0.5)
PbTe-86Kat.tdb689.06PBTE_B1 (x(Te) 0.50004) + LIQUID (x(Te) 0.89278) + HEXAGONAL_A8 (x(Te) 1)
PbTe-86Kat.tdb600.02FCC_A1 (x(Te) 0) + LIQUID (x(Te) 9.500e-4) + PBTE_B1 (x(Te) 0.5)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull PbTe-09Gie · CALPHAD hull PbTe-09Liu · CALPHAD hull PbTe-10Gie · CALPHAD hull PbTe-86Kat

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Pb–Te system (12)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
689.3eutectic: L -> PbTe + HEXAGONAL_A8L: Te 0.8974; PbTe: Te 0.5; HEXAGONAL_A8: Te 1model[1] Gierlotka 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 3
report
689.29eutectic: Te-rich eutecticL: Te 0.8926; PbTe: Te 0.5; (Te): Te 1model[2] Kattner 1986Table 5, p. 11, row 3
report
686.6liq <-> hex + PbTeL: Te 0.89; hex: Te 1; PbTe: Te 0.5model[3] Liu 2009Table V, p. 9, row 8
report
686liq <-> hex + PbTeL: Te 0.893; hex: Te 1; PbTe: Te 0.5experimental[3] Liu 2009
cites Moniri 1978
Table V, p. 9, row 11
report
685liq <-> hex + PbTeL: Te 0.837; hex: Te 1; PbTe: Te 0.5experimental[3] Liu 2009
cites Kimura 1915
Table V, p. 9, row 9
report
684liq <-> hex + PbTeL: Te 0.8913; hex: Te 1; PbTe: Te 0.5experimental[3] Liu 2009
cites Ngai 1987 doi
Table V, p. 9, row 12
report
673liq <-> hex + PbTeL: Te 0.852; hex: Te 1; PbTe: Te 0.5experimental[3] Liu 2009
cites Fay 1902
Table V, p. 9, row 13
report
651liq <-> hex + PbTeL: Te 0.82; hex: Te 1; PbTe: Te 0.5experimental[3] Liu 2009
cites Lugscheider 1965 doi
Table V, p. 9, row 10
report
600.1eutectic: L -> PbTe + FCC_A1L: Te 8.735e-4; PbTe: Te 0.5; FCC_A1: Te 0model[1] Gierlotka 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 1
report
600.06eutectic: Pb-rich eutecticL: Te 0.001; (Pb): Te 1.000e-4; PbTe: Te 0.5model[2] Kattner 1986Table 5, p. 11, row 2
report
599.8liq <-> Pb + PbTeL: Te 0.04; Pb: Te 0; PbTe: Te 0.5experimental[3] Liu 2009
cites Greenwood 1939
Table V, p. 9, row 2
report
599.8liq <-> Pb + PbTeL: Te 0.00132; Pb: Te 0; PbTe: Te 0.5model[3] Liu 2009Table V, p. 9, row 1
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Pb–Te system (10)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
PbTe-47.2 kJ/mol (basis unstated)737experimental[1] Gierlotka 2009
cites Castanet 1972
Table 4, p. 5, row 5
report
PbTePbTe-36.05 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-39.148 (mp-aaaabdej)-39.511 (oqmd-1856648)[3] Liu 2009
cites Castanet 1972
Table IV, p. 9, row 3
report
PbTePbTe-35.15 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-39.148 (mp-aaaabdej)-39.511 (oqmd-1856648)[3] Liu 2009
cites McAteer 1936 doi
Table IV, p. 9, row 1
report
PbTe-35.146 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15experimental[1] Gierlotka 2009
cites Hirayama 1964 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 2
report
PbTePbTe-34.4 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-39.148 (mp-aaaabdej)-39.511 (oqmd-1856648)[3] Liu 2009Table IV, p. 9, row 4
report
PbTePbTe-34.3 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-39.148 (mp-aaaabdej)-39.511 (oqmd-1856648)[3] Liu 2009
cites Robinson 1966
Table IV, p. 9, row 2
report
PbTe-34.267 kJ/mol (basis unstated)273experimental[1] Gierlotka 2009
cites Robinson 1966
Table 4, p. 5, row 4
report
PbTe-32.532 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[1] Gierlotka 2009Table 4, p. 5, row 1
report
PbTe-32.532 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[1] Gierlotka 2009p. 5
report
Calculated enthalpy of formation of PbTe intermetallic compound at 298 K is equal -32532 J/mol which shows very good agreement with the values reported in the literature.
PbTe-23.809 kJ/mol (basis unstated)295experimental[1] Gierlotka 2009
cites Fabre 1887
Table 4, p. 5, row 3
report

Other properties

Phase transition (7)

Phase transition, Pb–Te system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1177 K1177liq <-> PbTe
L: Te 0.5; PbTe: Te 0.5
experimental[3] Liu 2009
cites Kimura 1915
Table V, p. 9, row 4
report
Phase transition1187 K1187liq <-> PbTe
L: Te 0.5; PbTe: Te 0.5
experimental[3] Liu 2009
cites Lugscheider 1965 doi
Table V, p. 9, row 5
report
Phase transition1190 K1190liq <-> PbTe
L: Te 0.5; PbTe: Te 0.5
experimental[3] Liu 2009
cites Fay 1902
Table V, p. 9, row 7
report
Phase transition1192 K1192liq <-> PbTe
L: Te 0.5; PbTe: Te 0.5
model[3] Liu 2009Table V, p. 9, row 3
report
Phase transition1195 K1195L -> PbTe
L: Te 0.5; PbTe: Te 0.5
model[1] Gierlotka 2009Table 3, p. 4, row 2
report
Phase transition1195.89 K1195.89congruent melting: Congruent melting point of PbTe
PbTe: Te 0.5001
model[2] Kattner 1986Table 5, p. 11, row 1
report
Phase transition1197 K1197liq <-> PbTe
L: Te 0.5; PbTe: Te 0.5
experimental[3] Liu 2009
cites Miller 1966
Table V, p. 9, row 6
report

Formation (12)

Formation, Pb–Te system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
defect formation energy
printed: ΔHd,q
2.71 eV/defect300PbTe
alloy: Te 1
DFT[4] Bajaj 2015Table 1, p. 6, row 5
report
defect formation energy
printed: ΔHd,q
0.35 eV/defect300PbTe
alloy: Te 0.5
DFT[4] Bajaj 2015Table 1, p. 6, row 7
report
defect formation energy
printed: ΔHd,q
0.72 eV/defect300PbTe
alloy: Te 0.5
DFT[4] Bajaj 2015Table 1, p. 6, row 1
report
defect formation energy
printed: ΔHd,q
1.32 eV/defect300PbTe
alloy: Te 0.5
DFT[4] Bajaj 2015Table 1, p. 6, row 9
report
defect formation energy
printed: ΔHd,q
1.49 eV/defect300PbTe
alloy: Te 0
DFT[4] Bajaj 2015Table 1, p. 6, row 4
report
defect formation energy
printed: ΔHd,q
2.04 eV/defect300PbTe
alloy: Te 0
DFT[4] Bajaj 2015Table 1, p. 6, row 10
report
defect formation energy
printed: ΔHd,q
3.29 eV/defect300PbTe
alloy: Te 0
DFT[4] Bajaj 2015Table 1, p. 6, row 12
report
defect formation energy
printed: ΔHd,q
0.95 eV/defect300PbTe
alloy: Te 0.5
DFT[4] Bajaj 2015Table 1, p. 6, row 2
report
defect formation energy
printed: ΔHd,q
3.73 eV/defect300PbTe
alloy: Te 1
DFT[4] Bajaj 2015Table 1, p. 6, row 6
report
defect formation energy
printed: ΔHd,q
0.87 eV/defect300PbTe
alloy: Te 1
DFT[4] Bajaj 2015Table 1, p. 6, row 8
report
defect formation energy
printed: ΔHd,q
1.44 eV/defect300PbTe
alloy: Te 0
DFT[4] Bajaj 2015Table 1, p. 6, row 3
report
defect formation energy
printed: ΔHd,q
2.78 eV/defect300PbTe
alloy: Te 1
DFT[4] Bajaj 2015Table 1, p. 6, row 11
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Wojciech Gierlotka, Joanna Łapsa, Dominika Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, Thermodynamic description of the Pb–Te system using ionic liquid model, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 479, 152-156 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.12.083
  2. U. Kattner, H.L. Lukas, G. Petzow, Optimization and calculation of the PB — TE system, Calphad 10, 103-116 (1986). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(86)90015-5
  3. Yajun Liu, Lijun Zhang, Di Yu, Thermodynamic Descriptions for the Cd-Te, Pb-Te, Cd-Pb and Cd-Pb-Te Systems, Journal of Elec Materi 38, 2033-2045 (2009). doi:10.1007/s11664-009-0875-3
  4. Saurabh Bajaj, Gregory S. Pomrehn, Jeff W. Doak, Wojciech Gierlotka, Hsin-jay Wu, Sinn-Wen Chen et al., Ab initio study of intrinsic point defects in PbTe: an insight into phase stability, Acta Materialia 92, 72-80 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.03.034