Pd–Rh system

15 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 5, DFT 10); 3 calculated phase diagram(s). 5 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (4) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental5
DFT10
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
phase transition5
mixing / partial10

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
PdRh-04Kor-LB.tdbJ. Korb, unpublished, 2004.236e300bbb2d33e34d83081b8217378cb3814bb32a6b7b76d36bf51fbdc1ab39viewer · TDB · JSON
PdRh-16Gos.tdbS. Gosse, N. Dupin, C. Gueneau, J.-C. Crivello, J.-M. Joubert, J. Nucl. Mater., 474, 163-73(2016). doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.03.025e23fb73960334343652acc0668da329796ede66bec9b7930bdd609cd0c6a39b7viewer · TDB · JSON
PdRh-22Lau.tdbC. Laurin, A. Quaini, E. Regnier, A. Laplace, T. Croze, S. Gosse, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 172, 106831(2022). doi:10.1016/j.jct.2022.106831fab4e8c17fea05f7d104b916275a0f6eb6137427838d5a14987e0ca0da3bcbb8viewer · TDB · JSON

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull PdRh-04Kor-LB · CALPHAD hull PdRh-16Gos

Other properties

Phase transition (5)

Phase transition, Pd–Rh system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1827.8 K1827.8otherexperimental[1] Gossé 2016Table 4, p. 5, row 1
report
Phase transition1832.8 K1832.8other
alloy: Pd 0.9646, Rh 0.0354
experimental[1] Gossé 2016Table 4, p. 5, row 2
report
Phase transition1833.3 K1833.3other
alloy: Pd 0.9456, Rh 0.0544
experimental[1] Gossé 2016Table 4, p. 5, row 3
report
Phase transition1842.2 K1842.2other
alloy: Pd 0.8961, Rh 0.1039
experimental[1] Gossé 2016Table 4, p. 5, row 4
report
Phase transition1878.6 K1878.6other
alloy: Pd 0.7583, Rh 0.2417
experimental[1] Gossé 2016Table 4, p. 5, row 5
report

Mixing / partial (10)

Mixing / partial, Pd–Rh system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: FCC mixing enthalpy
6.44 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0FCC
alloy: Pd 0.5, Rh 0.5
DFT[1] Gossé 2016Table 2, p. 4, row 3
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: FCC mixing enthalpy
4.7264 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0FCC
alloy: Pd 0.25, Rh 0.75
DFT[1] Gossé 2016Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: FCC mixing enthalpy
1.1741 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0FCC
alloy: Pd 0.94, Rh 0.06
DFT[1] Gossé 2016Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: FCC mixing enthalpy
4.955 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0FCC
alloy: Pd 0.75, Rh 0.25
DFT[1] Gossé 2016Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: FCC mixing enthalpy
1.9837 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0FCC
alloy: Pd 0.06, Rh 0.94
DFT[1] Gossé 2016Table 2, p. 4, row 1
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: HCP mixing enthalpy
6.2174 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0HCP
alloy: Pd 0.5, Rh 0.5
DFT[1] Gossé 2016Table 2, p. 4, row 3
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: HCP mixing enthalpy
4.9894 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0HCP
alloy: Pd 0.25, Rh 0.75
DFT[1] Gossé 2016Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: HCP mixing enthalpy
1.0935 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0HCP
alloy: Pd 0.94, Rh 0.06
DFT[1] Gossé 2016Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: HCP mixing enthalpy
4.8144 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0HCP
alloy: Pd 0.75, Rh 0.25
DFT[1] Gossé 2016Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: HCP mixing enthalpy
2.4254 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0HCP
alloy: Pd 0.06, Rh 0.94
DFT[1] Gossé 2016Table 2, p. 4, row 1
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. S. Gossé, N. Dupin, C. Guéneau, J.-C. Crivello, J.-M. Joubert, Thermodynamic assessment of the Pd Rh Ru system using calphad and first-principles methods, Journal of Nuclear Materials 474, 163-173 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.03.025