Pt–V system

20 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 10, model 10); 1 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (8) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental10
model10
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction20

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
PtV-08Wan.tdbC.P. Wang, A.Q. Zheng, X.J. Liu, Intermetallics, 16, 544-49(2008). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2008.01.0028cbc6690005d46d1d9a885ecb6c08eac7f85944ffbfe21acd9566c8b1dcd275fviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
PtV-08Wan.tdb2079.92LIQUID (x(V) 0.78927) + PTV3_A15 (x(V) 0.80658) + BCC_A2 (x(V) 0.89535)
PtV-08Wan.tdb1993.05FCC_A1 (x(V) 0.56405) + LIQUID (x(V) 0.60109) + PTV3_A15 (x(V) 0.67354)
PtV-08Wan.tdb1692.74PTV_B19 (x(V) 0.51893) + FCC_A1 (x(V) 0.55897) + PTV3_A15 (x(V) 0.67567)
PtV-08Wan.tdb1251.86PT2V (x(V) 0.33579) + FCC_A1 (x(V) 0.39006) + PTV_B19 (x(V) 0.49965)
PtV-08Wan.tdb1245.14PT3V_D022 (x(V) 0.25538) + FCC_A1 (x(V) 0.27328) + PT2V (x(V) 0.31971)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Pt–V system (20)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2183.15congruent melting: L -> (V)L: Pt 0; (V): Pt 0model[1] Wang 2008Table 5, p. 5, row 2
report
2183.15congruent melting: L -> (V)L: Pt 0; (V): Pt 0experimental[1] Wang 2008
cites Smith 1989
Table 5, p. 5, row 1
report
2078.15other: L -> (Pt)L: Pt 0.73; (Pt): Pt 0.73experimental[1] Wang 2008
cites Smith 1989
Table 5, p. 5, row 19
report
2077.15other: L -> (Pt)L: Pt 0.738; (Pt): Pt 0.738model[1] Wang 2008Table 5, p. 5, row 20
report
2076.15peritectic: L + (V) -> PtV3L: Pt 0.214; (V): Pt 0.106; PtV3: Pt 0.194model[1] Wang 2008Table 5, p. 5, row 4
report
2073.15peritectic: L + (V) -> PtV3L: Pt 0.31; (V): Pt 0.12; PtV3: Pt 0.18experimental[1] Wang 2008
cites Smith 1989
Table 5, p. 5, row 3
report
1993.15eutectic: L -> (Pt) + PtV3L: Pt 0.397; (Pt): Pt 0.435; PtV3: Pt 0.327model[1] Wang 2008Table 5, p. 5, row 6
report
1993.15eutectic: L -> (Pt) + PtV3L: Pt 0.37; (Pt): Pt 0.43; PtV3: Pt 0.34experimental[1] Wang 2008
cites Smith 1989
Table 5, p. 5, row 5
report
1774.15congruent melting: (Pt) -> PtV(Pt): Pt 0.494; PtV: Pt 0.494model[1] Wang 2008Table 5, p. 5, row 10
report
1773.15congruent melting: (Pt) -> PtV(Pt): Pt 0.5; PtV: Pt 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2008
cites Smith 1989
Table 5, p. 5, row 9
report
1689.15eutectoid: (Pt) -> PtV + PtV3(Pt): Pt 0.441; PtV: Pt 0.481; PtV3: Pt 0.325model[1] Wang 2008Table 5, p. 5, row 8
report
1683.15eutectoid: (Pt) -> PtV + PtV3(Pt): Pt 0.45; PtV: Pt 0.48; PtV3: Pt 0.33experimental[1] Wang 2008
cites Smith 1989
Table 5, p. 5, row 7
report
1373.15congruent melting: (Pt) -> Pt2V(Pt): Pt 0.667; Pt2V: Pt 0.667experimental[1] Wang 2008
cites Smith 1989
Table 5, p. 5, row 13
report
1373.15congruent melting: (Pt) -> Pt2V(Pt): Pt 0.673; Pt2V: Pt 0.673model[1] Wang 2008Table 5, p. 5, row 14
report
1288.15congruent melting: (Pt) -> Pt3V(Pt): Pt 0.75; Pt3V: Pt 0.75experimental[1] Wang 2008
cites Smith 1989
Table 5, p. 5, row 17
report
1285.15congruent melting: (Pt) -> Pt3V(Pt): Pt 0.75; Pt3V: Pt 0.75model[1] Wang 2008Table 5, p. 5, row 18
report
1253.15eutectoid: (Pt) -> Pt2V + PtV(Pt): Pt 0.61; Pt2V: Pt 0.655; PtV: Pt 0.515experimental[1] Wang 2008
cites Smith 1989
Table 5, p. 5, row 11
report
1251.15eutectoid: (Pt) -> Pt2V + PtV(Pt): Pt 0.61; Pt2V: Pt 0.665; PtV: Pt 0.5model[1] Wang 2008Table 5, p. 5, row 12
report
1245.15eutectoid: (Pt) -> Pt3V + Pt2V(Pt): Pt 0.727; Pt3V: Pt 0.745; Pt2V: Pt 0.682model[1] Wang 2008Table 5, p. 5, row 16
report
1243.15eutectoid: (Pt) -> Pt3V + Pt2V(Pt): Pt 0.715; Pt3V: Pt 0.74; Pt2V: Pt 0.68experimental[1] Wang 2008
cites Smith 1989
Table 5, p. 5, row 15
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. C.P. Wang, A.Q. Zheng, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessments of the V–Ge and V–Pt systems, Intermetallics 16, 544-549 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2008.01.002