Sb–Si system

26 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 24, model 2); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 5 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (3) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	24
model	2

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	4
phase equilibrium	22

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
SbSi-11Wan.tdb	J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, J. Alloys Compd., 509, 3057-64(2011). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.11.199	`92ed80bc14bc6afe610e8234acc7d5c191e33e745b1d710826bea67e4e42d0c7`	viewer · TDB · JSON
SbSi-85Ole-LB.tdb	R.W. Olesinski, G.J. Abbaschian, Bull. Alloy Phase Diag., 6, 445-48(1985). doi:10.1007/BF02869508	`74004a1d293e3fd1f6296046415f9ffd72990022c4fcb0876a4cb0063a7fd353`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
SbSi-11Wan.tdb	902.71	RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.00316) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 0.99993)
SbSi-11Wan.tdb	902.71	RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.00316) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 0.99993)
SbSi-85Ole-LB.tdb	902.71	RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.00315) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 0.99993)
SbSi-85Ole-LB.tdb	902.71	RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.00315) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 0.99993)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull SbSi-85Ole-LB

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Sb–Si system (4)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
903	eutectic: L <-> (Sb) + (Si)	L: Sb 0.997, Si 0.003	model	[1] Wang 2011 cites Olesinski 1985 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report
903	eutectic: L <-> (Sb) + (Si)	L: Sb 0.997, Si 0.003	experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Thurmond 1960 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 2 report
903	eutectic: L <-> (Sb) + (Si)	L: Sb 0.999, Si 0.001	experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Williams 1907 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 1 report
903	eutectic: L <-> (Sb) + (Si)	L: Sb 0.997, Si 0.003	model	[1] Wang 2011	Table 1, p. 2, row 4 report

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (22)

Phase equilibrium, Sb–Si system
Property	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase composition	953.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.995, Si 0.005; L: Sb 0.995, Si 0.005	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites Girault 1977	Table 1, p. 2, row 22 report
Phase composition	1073.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.9857, Si 0.0143; L: Sb 0.9857, Si 0.0143	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 60Thu	Table 1, p. 2, row 19 report
Phase composition	1073.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.9849, Si 0.0151; L: Sb 0.9849, Si 0.0151	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 60Thu	Table 1, p. 2, row 20 report
Phase composition	1073.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.985, Si 0.015; L: Sb 0.985, Si 0.015	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites Girault 1977	Table 1, p. 2, row 21 report
Phase composition	1170.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.9761, Si 0.0239; L: Sb 0.9761, Si 0.0239	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 60Thu	Table 1, p. 2, row 18 report
Phase composition	1174.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.9757, Si 0.0243; L: Sb 0.9757, Si 0.0243	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 60Thu	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report
Phase composition	1272.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.9539, Si 0.0461; L: Sb 0.9539, Si 0.0461	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 60Thu	Table 1, p. 2, row 16 report
Phase composition	1371.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.9165, Si 0.0835; L: Sb 0.9165, Si 0.0835	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 60Thu	Table 1, p. 2, row 15 report
Phase composition	1383.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.887, Si 0.113; L: Sb 0.887, Si 0.113	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 07Wil	Table 1, p. 2, row 14 report
Phase composition	1413.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.851, Si 0.149; L: Sb 0.851, Si 0.149	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 07Wil	Table 1, p. 2, row 13 report
Phase composition	1473.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.85, Si 0.15; L: Sb 0.85, Si 0.15	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 60Thu	Table 1, p. 2, row 12 report
Phase composition	1493.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.788, Si 0.212; L: Sb 0.788, Si 0.212	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 07Wil	Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report
Phase composition	1518.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.8, Si 0.2; L: Sb 0.8, Si 0.2	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites Malmeja 1972	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
Phase composition	1521.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.681, Si 0.319; L: Sb 0.681, Si 0.319	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 07Wil	Table 1, p. 2, row 9 report
Phase composition	1549.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.487, Si 0.513; L: Sb 0.487, Si 0.513	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 07Wil	Table 1, p. 2, row 8 report
Phase composition	1573.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.355, Si 0.645; L: Sb 0.355, Si 0.645	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 07Wil	Table 1, p. 2, row 7 report
Phase composition	1583.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.5, Si 0.5; L: Sb 0.5, Si 0.5	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites Malmeja 1972	Table 1, p. 2, row 6 report
Phase composition	1603.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.262, Si 0.738; L: Sb 0.262, Si 0.738	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 07Wil	Table 1, p. 2, row 5 report
Phase composition	1621.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.191, Si 0.809; L: Sb 0.191, Si 0.809	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 07Wil	Table 1, p. 2, row 4 report
Phase composition	1658.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.092, Si 0.908; L: Sb 0.092, Si 0.908	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 07Wil	Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report
Phase composition	1669.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.056, Si 0.944; L: Sb 0.056, Si 0.944	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 07Wil	Table 1, p. 2, row 2 report
Phase composition	1685.15	liquid + L liquid: Sb 0.012, Si 0.988; L: Sb 0.012, Si 0.988	experimental	[2] Olesinski 1985 cites ref. 07Wil	Table 1, p. 2, row 1 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic modeling of the Au–Sb–Si ternary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 509, 3057-3064 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.11.199
R. W. Olesinski, G. J. Abbaschian, The Sb-Si (Antimony-Silicon) system, Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams 6, 445-448 (1985). doi:10.1007/bf02869508

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}