Sb–Tm system

26 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 6, model 13, unspecified 7); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 2 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (10) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental6
model13
unspecified7
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction16
phase transition2
formation8

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
SbTm-11Wan.tdbS.L. Wang, Z.B. Hu, F. Gao, C.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, Calphad, 35, 473-78(2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.08.0016a2d363b98bbe70b1a4c889dbeb996e3b722a9e50cdc838dadf4ad82dd59203eviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
SbTm-11Wan.tdb2053.94LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.33855) + SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + SBTM_BETA (x(Tm) 0.5)
SbTm-11Wan.tdb2053.94SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + SBTM_BETA (x(Tm) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.63587)
SbTm-11Wan.tdb1913.65SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + SB3TM5_BETA (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.67294)
SbTm-11Wan.tdb1913.65SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + SB3TM5_BETA (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.67283)
SbTm-11Wan.tdb1893.73SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + SB3TM5_ALPHA (x(Tm) 0.625) + SB3TM5_BETA (x(Tm) 0.625)
SbTm-11Wan.tdb1893.73SB3TM5_ALPHA (x(Tm) 0.625) + SB3TM5_BETA (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.68493)
SbTm-11Wan.tdb1893.73SB3TM5_BETA (x(Tm) 0.625) + SB3TM5_ALPHA (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.68508)
SbTm-11Wan.tdb1452.18SB3TM5_ALPHA (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.83743) + HCP_A3 (x(Tm) 0.98767)
SbTm-11Wan.tdb1452.18SB3TM5_ALPHA (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.8375) + HCP_A3 (x(Tm) 0.98769)
SbTm-11Wan.tdb912.24LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.01093) + SB2TM (x(Tm) 0.33333) + SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5)
SbTm-11Wan.tdb912.24LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.01094) + SB2TM (x(Tm) 0.33333) + SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5)
SbTm-11Wan.tdb900.19RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Tm) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.0096) + SB2TM (x(Tm) 0.33333)
SbTm-11Wan.tdb900.19RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Tm) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.00959) + SB2TM (x(Tm) 0.33333)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Sb–Tm system (16)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2293.15congruent melting: L ↔ βSbTmL: Tm 0.5; βSbTm: Tm 0.5model[1] Wang 2011Table 5, p. 5, row 8
report
2293.15congruent melting: L ↔ βSbTmL: Tm 0.5; βSbTm: Tm 0.5unspecified[1] Wang 2011
cites Abdusalyamova 1991
Table 5, p. 5, row 7
report
2053.55polymorphic: αSbTm ↔ βSbTmαSbTm: Tm 0.5; βSbTm: Sb 0.5, Tm 0.5model[1] Wang 2011Table 5, p. 5, row 6
report
2053.15polymorphic: αSbTm ↔ βSbTmαSbTm: Tm 0.5; βSbTm: Sb 0.5, Tm 0.5unspecified[1] Wang 2011
cites Abdusalyamova 1991
Table 5, p. 5, row 5
report
1913.65peritectic: L + αSbTm ↔ βSb3Tm5L: Tm 0.673; αSbTm: Tm 0.5; βSb3Tm5: Tm 0.625model[1] Wang 2011Table 5, p. 5, row 10
report
1913.15peritectic: L + αSbTm ↔ βSb3Tm5αSbTm: Tm 0.5; βSb3Tm5: Tm 0.625unspecified[1] Wang 2011
cites Abdusalyamova 1991
Table 5, p. 5, row 9
report
1913.15peritecticexperimental[1] Wang 2011
cites Abdusalyamova 1991
p. 2
report
Later, based on different thermal and X-ray phase and microstructural analyses, Abdusalyamova et al. [13] investigated the phase diagram in the Sb-Tm system, and reported three stoichiometric compounds: SbTm2 (peritectic formation at 640 °C), SbTm (melting point 2020 °C), and Sb5 Tm3 (peritectic formation at 1640 °C).
1893.75polymorphic: αSb3Tm5 ↔ βSb3Tm5αSb3Tm5: Tm 0.625; βSb3Tm5: Sb 0.375, Tm 0.625model[1] Wang 2011Table 5, p. 5, row 12
report
1893.15polymorphic: αSb3Tm5 ↔ βSb3Tm5αSb3Tm5: Tm 0.625; βSb3Tm5: Sb 0.375, Tm 0.625unspecified[1] Wang 2011
cites Abdusalyamova 1991
Table 5, p. 5, row 11
report
1453.15eutectic: L ↔ αSb3Tm5 + (Tm)L: Tm 0.85; αSb3Tm5: Tm 0.625unspecified[1] Wang 2011
cites Abdusalyamova 1991
Table 5, p. 5, row 13
report
1452.15eutectic: L ↔ αSb3Tm5 + (Tm)L: Tm 0.838; αSb3Tm5: Tm 0.625; (Tm): Tm 0.988model[1] Wang 2011Table 5, p. 5, row 14
report
913.15peritectic: L + αSbTm ↔ Sb2TmαSbTm: Tm 0.5; Sb2Tm: Tm 0.667unspecified[1] Wang 2011
cites Abdusalyamova 1988
Table 5, p. 5, row 3
report
913.15peritectic: L + αSbTm ↔ Sb2TmL: Tm 0.011; αSbTm: Tm 0.5; Sb2Tm: Tm 0.667model[1] Wang 2011Table 5, p. 5, row 4
report
913.15peritecticexperimental[1] Wang 2011
cites Abdusalyamova 1991
p. 2
report
Later, based on different thermal and X-ray phase and microstructural analyses, Abdusalyamova et al. [13] investigated the phase diagram in the Sb-Tm system, and reported three stoichiometric compounds: SbTm2 (peritectic formation at 640 °C), SbTm (melting point 2020 °C), and Sb5 Tm3 (peritectic formation at 1640 °C).
900.25eutectic: L ↔ (Sb) + Sb2TmL: Tm 0.0096; (Sb): Tm 0; Sb2Tm: Tm 0.333model[1] Wang 2011Table 5, p. 5, row 2
report
893.15eutectic: L ↔ (Sb) + Sb2Tm(Sb): Tm 0; Sb2Tm: Tm 0.333unspecified[1] Wang 2011
cites Abdusalyamova 1991
Table 5, p. 5, row 1
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Sb–Tm system (8)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Sb2TmSb2Tm-76.138 kJ/mol-atommodel-30.191 (mp-aaacfycm)-64.631 (oqmd-1436072)[1] Wang 2011Table 7, p. 5, row 2
report
Sb2TmSb2Tm-71 kJ/mol-atommodel-30.191 (mp-aaacfycm)-64.631 (oqmd-1436072)[1] Wang 2011
cites Colinet 1984 doi
Table 7, p. 5, row 1
report
αSb3Tm5Sb3Tm5-83.519 kJ/mol-atommodel-89.518 (mp-aaacdiol)-83 (oqmd-31049)[1] Wang 2011Table 7, p. 5, row 8
report
αSb3Tm5Sb3Tm5-80 kJ/mol-atommodel-89.518 (mp-aaacdiol)-83 (oqmd-31049)[1] Wang 2011
cites Colinet 1984 doi
Table 7, p. 5, row 7
report
αSbTmSbTm-157 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-111.529 (mp-aaaaadsy)-103.093 (oqmd-8171)[1] Wang 2011
cites Pratt 1970
Table 7, p. 5, row 4
report
αSbTmSbTm-115 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-111.529 (mp-aaaaadsy)-103.093 (oqmd-8171)[1] Wang 2011
cites Boer 1988
Table 7, p. 5, row 5
report
αSbTmSbTm-112.99 kJ/mol-atommodel-111.529 (mp-aaaaadsy)-103.093 (oqmd-8171)[1] Wang 2011Table 7, p. 5, row 6
report
αSbTmSbTm-88 kJ/mol-atommodel-111.529 (mp-aaaaadsy)-103.093 (oqmd-8171)[1] Wang 2011
cites Colinet 1984 doi
Table 7, p. 5, row 3
report

Other properties

Phase transition (2)

Phase transition, Sb–Tm system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition913.15 K913.15SbTm2experimental[1] Wang 2011
cites Abdusalyamova 1988
p. 2
report
Abdusalyamova et al. [5] were the first to report incongruent melting of the SbTm2 phase at 640 °C by means of DTA.
Phase transition2293.15 K2293.15SbTmexperimental[1] Wang 2011
cites Abdusalyamova 1991
p. 2
report
Later, based on different thermal and X-ray phase and microstructural analyses, Abdusalyamova et al. [13] investigated the phase diagram in the Sb-Tm system, and reported three stoichiometric compounds: SbTm2 (peritectic formation at 640 °C), SbTm (melting point 2020 °C), and Sb5 Tm3 (peritectic formation at 1640 °C).

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. S.L. Wang, Z.B. Hu, F. Gao, C.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessments of the Er–Sb and Sb–Tm systems, Calphad 35, 473-478 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.08.001