Sb–Tm system
26 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 6, model 13, unspecified 7); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 2 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (10) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 6 |
| model | 13 |
| unspecified | 7 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 16 |
| phase transition | 2 |
| formation | 8 |
Calculated phase diagrams
Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.
| TDB file | Assessment | SHA-256 | Links |
|---|---|---|---|
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | S.L. Wang, Z.B. Hu, F. Gao, C.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, Calphad, 35, 473-78(2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.08.001 | 6a2d363b98bbe70b1a4c889dbeb996e3b722a9e50cdc838dadf4ad82dd59203e | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| TDB file | T (K) | Phases at the invariant |
|---|---|---|
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | 2053.94 | LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.33855) + SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + SBTM_BETA (x(Tm) 0.5) |
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | 2053.94 | SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + SBTM_BETA (x(Tm) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.63587) |
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | 1913.65 | SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + SB3TM5_BETA (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.67294) |
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | 1913.65 | SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + SB3TM5_BETA (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.67283) |
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | 1893.73 | SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + SB3TM5_ALPHA (x(Tm) 0.625) + SB3TM5_BETA (x(Tm) 0.625) |
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | 1893.73 | SB3TM5_ALPHA (x(Tm) 0.625) + SB3TM5_BETA (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.68493) |
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | 1893.73 | SB3TM5_BETA (x(Tm) 0.625) + SB3TM5_ALPHA (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.68508) |
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | 1452.18 | SB3TM5_ALPHA (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.83743) + HCP_A3 (x(Tm) 0.98767) |
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | 1452.18 | SB3TM5_ALPHA (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.8375) + HCP_A3 (x(Tm) 0.98769) |
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | 912.24 | LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.01093) + SB2TM (x(Tm) 0.33333) + SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) |
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | 912.24 | LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.01094) + SB2TM (x(Tm) 0.33333) + SBTM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) |
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | 900.19 | RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Tm) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.0096) + SB2TM (x(Tm) 0.33333) |
| SbTm-11Wan.tdb | 900.19 | RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Tm) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.00959) + SB2TM (x(Tm) 0.33333) |
Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2293.15 | congruent melting: L ↔ βSbTm | L: Tm 0.5; βSbTm: Tm 0.5 | model | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 5, p. 5, row 8 report | |
| 2293.15 | congruent melting: L ↔ βSbTm | L: Tm 0.5; βSbTm: Tm 0.5 | unspecified | [1] Wang 2011 cites Abdusalyamova 1991 | Table 5, p. 5, row 7 report | |
| 2053.55 | polymorphic: αSbTm ↔ βSbTm | αSbTm: Tm 0.5; βSbTm: Sb 0.5, Tm 0.5 | model | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 5, p. 5, row 6 report | |
| 2053.15 | polymorphic: αSbTm ↔ βSbTm | αSbTm: Tm 0.5; βSbTm: Sb 0.5, Tm 0.5 | unspecified | [1] Wang 2011 cites Abdusalyamova 1991 | Table 5, p. 5, row 5 report | |
| 1913.65 | peritectic: L + αSbTm ↔ βSb3Tm5 | L: Tm 0.673; αSbTm: Tm 0.5; βSb3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | model | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 5, p. 5, row 10 report | |
| 1913.15 | peritectic: L + αSbTm ↔ βSb3Tm5 | αSbTm: Tm 0.5; βSb3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | unspecified | [1] Wang 2011 cites Abdusalyamova 1991 | Table 5, p. 5, row 9 report | |
| 1913.15 | peritectic | experimental | [1] Wang 2011 cites Abdusalyamova 1991 | p. 2 report | Later, based on different thermal and X-ray phase and microstructural analyses, Abdusalyamova et al. [13] investigated the phase diagram in the Sb-Tm system, and reported three stoichiometric compounds: SbTm2 (peritectic formation at 640 °C), SbTm (melting point 2020 °C), and Sb5 Tm3 (peritectic formation at 1640 °C). | |
| 1893.75 | polymorphic: αSb3Tm5 ↔ βSb3Tm5 | αSb3Tm5: Tm 0.625; βSb3Tm5: Sb 0.375, Tm 0.625 | model | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 5, p. 5, row 12 report | |
| 1893.15 | polymorphic: αSb3Tm5 ↔ βSb3Tm5 | αSb3Tm5: Tm 0.625; βSb3Tm5: Sb 0.375, Tm 0.625 | unspecified | [1] Wang 2011 cites Abdusalyamova 1991 | Table 5, p. 5, row 11 report | |
| 1453.15 | eutectic: L ↔ αSb3Tm5 + (Tm) | L: Tm 0.85; αSb3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | unspecified | [1] Wang 2011 cites Abdusalyamova 1991 | Table 5, p. 5, row 13 report | |
| 1452.15 | eutectic: L ↔ αSb3Tm5 + (Tm) | L: Tm 0.838; αSb3Tm5: Tm 0.625; (Tm): Tm 0.988 | model | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 5, p. 5, row 14 report | |
| 913.15 | peritectic: L + αSbTm ↔ Sb2Tm | αSbTm: Tm 0.5; Sb2Tm: Tm 0.667 | unspecified | [1] Wang 2011 cites Abdusalyamova 1988 | Table 5, p. 5, row 3 report | |
| 913.15 | peritectic: L + αSbTm ↔ Sb2Tm | L: Tm 0.011; αSbTm: Tm 0.5; Sb2Tm: Tm 0.667 | model | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 5, p. 5, row 4 report | |
| 913.15 | peritectic | experimental | [1] Wang 2011 cites Abdusalyamova 1991 | p. 2 report | Later, based on different thermal and X-ray phase and microstructural analyses, Abdusalyamova et al. [13] investigated the phase diagram in the Sb-Tm system, and reported three stoichiometric compounds: SbTm2 (peritectic formation at 640 °C), SbTm (melting point 2020 °C), and Sb5 Tm3 (peritectic formation at 1640 °C). | |
| 900.25 | eutectic: L ↔ (Sb) + Sb2Tm | L: Tm 0.0096; (Sb): Tm 0; Sb2Tm: Tm 0.333 | model | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 5, p. 5, row 2 report | |
| 893.15 | eutectic: L ↔ (Sb) + Sb2Tm | (Sb): Tm 0; Sb2Tm: Tm 0.333 | unspecified | [1] Wang 2011 cites Abdusalyamova 1991 | Table 5, p. 5, row 1 report |
Formation enthalpies
Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.
| Phase | Compound | Value | T (K) | Class | MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sb2Tm | Sb2Tm | -76.138 kJ/mol-atom | model | -30.191 (mp-aaacfycm) | -64.631 (oqmd-1436072) | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 7, p. 5, row 2 report | ||
| Sb2Tm | Sb2Tm | -71 kJ/mol-atom | model | -30.191 (mp-aaacfycm) | -64.631 (oqmd-1436072) | [1] Wang 2011 cites Colinet 1984 doi | Table 7, p. 5, row 1 report | ||
| αSb3Tm5 | Sb3Tm5 | -83.519 kJ/mol-atom | model | -89.518 (mp-aaacdiol) | -83 (oqmd-31049) | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 7, p. 5, row 8 report | ||
| αSb3Tm5 | Sb3Tm5 | -80 kJ/mol-atom | model | -89.518 (mp-aaacdiol) | -83 (oqmd-31049) | [1] Wang 2011 cites Colinet 1984 doi | Table 7, p. 5, row 7 report | ||
| αSbTm | SbTm | -157 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | experimental | -111.529 (mp-aaaaadsy) | -103.093 (oqmd-8171) | [1] Wang 2011 cites Pratt 1970 | Table 7, p. 5, row 4 report | |
| αSbTm | SbTm | -115 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | experimental | -111.529 (mp-aaaaadsy) | -103.093 (oqmd-8171) | [1] Wang 2011 cites Boer 1988 | Table 7, p. 5, row 5 report | |
| αSbTm | SbTm | -112.99 kJ/mol-atom | model | -111.529 (mp-aaaaadsy) | -103.093 (oqmd-8171) | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 7, p. 5, row 6 report | ||
| αSbTm | SbTm | -88 kJ/mol-atom | model | -111.529 (mp-aaaaadsy) | -103.093 (oqmd-8171) | [1] Wang 2011 cites Colinet 1984 doi | Table 7, p. 5, row 3 report |
Other properties
Phase transition (2)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase transition | 913.15 K | 913.15 | SbTm2 | experimental | [1] Wang 2011 cites Abdusalyamova 1988 | p. 2 report | Abdusalyamova et al. [5] were the first to report incongruent melting of the SbTm2 phase at 640 °C by means of DTA. |
| Phase transition | 2293.15 K | 2293.15 | SbTm | experimental | [1] Wang 2011 cites Abdusalyamova 1991 | p. 2 report | Later, based on different thermal and X-ray phase and microstructural analyses, Abdusalyamova et al. [13] investigated the phase diagram in the Sb-Tm system, and reported three stoichiometric compounds: SbTm2 (peritectic formation at 640 °C), SbTm (melting point 2020 °C), and Sb5 Tm3 (peritectic formation at 1640 °C). |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- S.L. Wang, Z.B. Hu, F. Gao, C.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessments of the Er–Sb and Sb–Tm systems, Calphad 35, 473-478 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.08.001