Se system

36 accepted literature values from 6 paper(s) (experimental 14, DFT 20, unspecified 2); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental14
DFT20
unspecified2
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
formation4
crystal structure23
other property9

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Se system (4)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
α-Se21.468 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Li 2018Table 4, p. 6, row 6
report
α-Se22.869 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Li 2018Table 4, p. 6, row 5
report
β-Se43.164 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Li 2018Table 4, p. 6, row 10
report
β-Se53.402 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Li 2018Table 4, p. 6, row 9
report

Other properties

Crystal structure (23)

Crystal structure, Se system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a4.337 Å298.15(Se)
alloy: Se 1
experimental[2] Chen 2022
cites McCann 1972 doi
Table I, p. 2, row 5
report
Lattice a0.43655 Å298.15(Se)
alloy: Se 1
unspecified[3] Zhou 2024
cites King 1981
Table 1, p. 2, row 2
report
Lattice a1.285 Å298.15(αSe)
alloy: Se 1
experimental[4] Shi 2019
cites Steigmann 1966 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
Lattice a0.905 Å298.15(βSe)
alloy: Se 1
experimental[4] Shi 2019
cites Howe 1989
Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
Lattice a4.3 Å298.15Hex(Se)
alloy: Se 1
experimental[5] Liu 2023
cites Massalski 1990
Table 1, p. 3, row 3
report
Lattice b4.337 Å298.15(Se)
alloy: Se 1
experimental[2] Chen 2022
cites McCann 1972 doi
Table I, p. 2, row 5
report
Lattice b0.807 Å298.15(αSe)
alloy: Se 1
experimental[4] Shi 2019
cites Steigmann 1966 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
Lattice b0.907 Å298.15(βSe)
alloy: Se 1
experimental[4] Shi 2019
cites Howe 1989
Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
Lattice c5.077 Å298.15(Se)
alloy: Se 1
experimental[2] Chen 2022
cites McCann 1972 doi
Table I, p. 2, row 5
report
Lattice c0.49576 Å298.15(Se)
alloy: Se 1
unspecified[3] Zhou 2024
cites King 1981
Table 1, p. 2, row 2
report
Lattice c0.931 Å298.15(αSe)
alloy: Se 1
experimental[4] Shi 2019
cites Steigmann 1966 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
Lattice c1.161 Å298.15(βSe)
alloy: Se 1
experimental[4] Shi 2019
cites Howe 1989
Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
Lattice c4.9537 Å298.15Hex(Se)
alloy: Se 1
experimental[5] Liu 2023
cites Massalski 1990
Table 1, p. 3, row 3
report
volume
printed: Volume
28.19 Å3/atom0α-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 13
report
volume
printed: Volume
32.13 Å3/atom0α-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 12
report
volume
printed: Volume
31.49 Å3/atom0α′-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 20
report
volume
printed: Volume
26.68 Å3/atom0α′-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 21
report
volume
printed: Volume
29.78 Å3/atomα′-Se
alloy: Se 1
experimental[6] Guan 2017
cites Gattow 1964 doi
Table 1, p. 5, row 19
report
volume
printed: Volume
27.74 Å3/atom0β-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 15
report
volume
printed: Volume
32.52 Å3/atom0β-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 14
report
volume
printed: Volume
23.08 Å3/atom0δ-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 18
report
volume
printed: Volume
25.99 Å3/atom0δ-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 17
report
volume
printed: Volume
26.57 Å3/atomδ-Se
alloy: Se 1
experimental[6] Guan 2017
cites Hamilton 1974 doi
Table 1, p. 5, row 16
report

Other property (9)

Other property, Se system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
bulk modulus
printed: B0
15.142 GPa0α-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 13
report
bulk modulus
printed: B0
9.058 GPa0α-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 12
report
bulk modulus
printed: B0
7.737 GPa0α′-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 20
report
bulk modulus
printed: B0
13.342 GPa0α′-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 21
report
bulk modulus
printed: B0
14.033 GPa0β-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 15
report
bulk modulus
printed: B0
8.393 GPa0β-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 14
report
bulk modulus
printed: B0
34.163 GPa0δ-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 18
report
bulk modulus
printed: B0
14.359 GPa0δ-Se
alloy: Se 1
DFT[6] Guan 2017Table 1, p. 5, row 17
report
bulk modulus
printed: B0
10.9925 GPa (range 7.085 to 14.9)δ-Se
alloy: Se 1
experimental[6] Guan 2017
cites Hamilton 1974 doi
Table 1, p. 5, row 16
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Zhi Li, Shun-Li Shang, Jianyun Shen, Po-Hsien Liao, Zi-Kui Liu, Timothy J. Anderson, Thermodynamic Assessment of the Ag-Se System Aided by First-Principles Calculations, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 39, 870-881 (2018). doi:10.1007/s11669-018-0683-7
  2. Shanxiong Chen, Jiong Wang, Shangzhao Yu, Biao Hu, Qing Wu, Yong Du, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Ge-X (X = As, Se, S, P) Systems, J. Electron. Mater. 51, 2114-2130 (2022). doi:10.1007/s11664-022-09474-1
  3. Jiaqiang Zhou, Jiong Wang, Biao Hu, Dongyu Cui, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Bi-Se and Bi-Te Binary Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 45, 89-113 (2024). doi:10.1007/s11669-024-01093-z
  4. Chenying Shi, Biaobiao Yang, Biao Hu, Yong Du, Sheng Yao, Thermodynamic Description of the Al–X (X = S, Se, Te) Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 40, 392-402 (2019). doi:10.1007/s11669-019-00733-z
  5. Runlin Liu, Jiong Wang, Dongyu Cui, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Cu-Sb-Se System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 44, 687-703 (2023). doi:10.1007/s11669-023-01074-8
  6. Pin-Wen Guan, Shun-Li Shang, Greta Lindwall, Tim Anderson, Zi-Kui Liu, First-principles calculations and thermodynamic modeling of the S-Se system and implications for chalcogenide alloys, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 694, 510-521 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.037